Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
566. PROGRESS-R!PORT·ON CONTltOLOF EURASIANWATERMILFOILIN CHESAPEAKEBAY .' , John H. Steenis Patuxent Wildlife Research Center U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Laurel, Maryland and Vernon D. Stotts Maryland Game and Inland Fish Commission . Pittman-Robertson Project W-3Q-R Annapolis, Maryland INTRODUCTION .. . Eurasian watermilfoil Q!.yriophyllum spicatum) is widely . distributed in Europe and Asia and now is spreading rapidly in this country.' Present in New Jersey since the turn of the century, and in the Potomac River ~yland and Virginia) since 1933, it has been repOrted recently in the upper part of Chesapeake Bay and in North Carolina, New York,' and Tennessee. Eurasian watermilfoil is closely related to the native watermilfoil, Myriophyllum exalbescens, found mainly in glaciated areas. It is very versatile, growing in both fresh and brackish waters. Beaven (1960) reported that it thrives in waters which are fresh or have a salinity up to 10 parts per thousand but grows much more slowly at a salinity of 15 parts per thousand. Since it is absent in more acid waters, it appears that the alkalinity of brackish water favors growth in tidal areas. This plant readily withstands 3-foot tides and is found in water up to 9 feet deep. The manner in which Eurasian watermilfoil completely dominates most areas in which it grows has resulted in a severe weed problem. In many embayments of the Potomac River and elsewhere on Chesapeake Bay, it often completely replaces native submergent vegetation including valuable duckfood plants such as widgeongrass (Ruppia maritima), sago pondweed Potamo eton pectinatus), redhead grass or claspingleaf pondweed PoUmo eton perfoliatus), and wildcelery (ValUsneria americana). The native vegetation, however, can withstand more wind and wave action. A dense but loosely woven blanket of watermilfoil often extends from the bottom to the surface, restricting water movement. This impedes the flow of food to oysters and reduces the oxygen supply under the blanket, which may cause oyster mortality at times. Harvest of oysters, clams, crabs and fish is hampered severely by extensive growths of Eurasian watermilfoil. In addition, dense stands curtail-recreational activities
567. (such as, boating and water skiing) and lower sboreline real estate values. In dense mats, conditions for mosquito breeding may occur (SPfin&er 1959). , . Considerable work already has been done 'on the control of various species of watermilfoil in ponds and lakes by Younger (1959), Boschetti (1959) t Hall (1960), Huckins (1960), aawlCol:titll (1HO). Since tbese studies indicated that both si1'WlS and· 2)4-& can kill these' plants in inland areas, our'main objective as to detend..' hcnr toapply these procedures effectively in tidal sltuatSMIII 80 'that t1aey ~ld prO'91de satisfactory control of Eurasian wateria1lfoll without being d.etriBJentai to native waterfowl food plants or cOlllDercial and sPort fishery interests. Studies on control of this plant have been a cooperative effort. Personnel ~~ the Pa.tuxent Wildlife Research center furnished pertinent data on identification, distribution, and eeolo&y of. Eurasian water" milfoU. ' Gerald H. Townsend, student assistant at Patuxent, and Richard N. Smith, formerly with the Maryland Game and Inland Fish COIIIIl1ssion, participated actively in applying and evaluating treatments, making surveys, and tabulating data. Charles r. Noble and Houston C. Phillips of the Pea Island National Wildlife Refuge in North Carolina assisted in control teats conducted 1n that area. Francis Beaven of the Maryland' Department of Research and Education and Dexter S. Haven of the Virginia Fisheries Laboratory participated in field studiea and conducted pre 11m1uary investigations on the toxicological effects of control procedures on fish, crabs, and oysters. Edgar H. Holli8 of the Maryland Department of Tidewater Fisheries and Royston Medford of the Bureau of Coumereial Fisheries sUpplied information on distribution of the plant in MarY1.and. ChelUcal companies, including Allied Chemical Corporation; Amcbem Products, Incorporated; Chipman Chemical COIDp4ny, Incorporated; Diamond Alkalt Co.qtpany; Dow Chemical Company; Pennsalt Chem1c~ls Corporation; . and. B.euor-Hill Corporation furnished materials and technical assistance. STUDYPltOCEDUR.E ~tudies were ~onducted in Dundee and salq.eter Creeks and on the SUsquehAnna Flats in the upper part of Chesapeake Bay and on Lower Machodoc, Nailj81l1OYand Piccowaxen Creeks off the Potamac River. tidal fluctuation b. these areas varied from 2 - 2 1/2 feet. Other tests were made in a fre8hwater impoundment at the Pea Is land. Refuge. "" MOst of the tests consisted in the app1ication'~f granUles of attaclay !mpl'.'egnated with herbicide because liquid carried materials are more apt to be traDspot:'ted' away by the tide. Also" unPUblished work has 8hown ~ that certaln liquid cmiers sometimes are harmful to aquatic animal life. Not only can they increase the tosicity· of' the compound,· but they can cause. an unpleasant flavor,' as in"oysters subjected to oil at concentrations aa law &8 I a.lIon to anacre.'
- Page 516 and 517: 516. HERBICIDf;TECHNIQUE.:> ,FORTn-
- Page 518 and 519: 518. The possibility o:rusing contr
- Page 520 and 521: 520 • . However, the capacity of
- Page 522 and 523: 522. This is followed by planting i
- Page 524 and 525: 524. AQJJATICWEEDCONTROLANDRELATEDP
- Page 526 and 527: 526. findings we increased the amou
- Page 528 and 529: 52e. There is a constant reinfectio
- Page 530 and 531: 530. in 1960 the Potamogeton re-app
- Page 532 and 533: 532. PROGRESSREPORT ON THE FIELD TE
- Page 534 and 535: 534. It· was tht.;n necessary to d
- Page 536 and 537: 536. l.qunlin Hcrbici(.l(; pr-ove-d
- Page 538 and 539: ;538. P.EFEP..ENCES 1. ijOSCIlETTI,
- Page 540 and 541: 540. The oontrol plot was ohosen so
- Page 542 and 543: 542. The dissolved oxygen content r
- Page 544 and 545: 544. Summary 1. Six experimental pl
- Page 546 and 547: 546. A PRELIMINARYREPORTON THE EFFE
- Page 548 and 549: that either slow chemical hydrolysi
- Page 550 and 551: 550. In July of 1959 funds were mad
- Page 552 and 553: 552. The barge was run at ~ speed o
- Page 554 and 555: 554. areas successfully treated in
- Page 556 and 557: 556. pick~rel spawning suacess but
- Page 558 and 559: Control of the Pondweed. Potamogeto
- Page 560 and 561: 560. THE ABSORPTIONANDMETABOLISMOF
- Page 562 and 563: 562. in controlling weeds in ponds
- Page 564 and 565: CommonName WEEDSCONTROLLED ANDAQUAT
- Page 568 and 569: 568. Herbicides used for these stud
- Page 570 and 571: 570. StHtARy Invasion of Eurasian v
- Page 572 and 573: AUTHORINDEX(continued) ~ King, -Ken
- Page 574 and 575: S/I/pg.2 Dinitro (DNOSBP) •• 11
- Page 576: S/I/4 SUBJECTINDEX{corrt Lnued ) S/
566.<br />
PROGRESS-R!PORT·ON CONTltOLOF EURASIANWATERMILFOILIN CHESAPEAKEBAY<br />
.' ,<br />
John H. Steenis<br />
Patuxent Wildlife Research Center<br />
U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service<br />
Laurel, Maryland<br />
and<br />
Vernon D. Stotts<br />
Maryland Game and Inland Fish Commission<br />
. Pittman-Robertson Project W-3Q-R<br />
Annapolis, Maryland<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
.. . Eurasian watermilfoil Q!.yriophyllum spicatum) is widely<br />
. distributed in Europe and Asia and now is spreading rapidly in this<br />
country.' Present in New Jersey since the turn of the century, and in<br />
the Potomac River ~yland and Virginia) since 1933, it has been<br />
repOrted recently in the upper part of Chesapeake Bay and in North<br />
Carolina, New York,' and Tennessee.<br />
Eurasian watermilfoil is closely related to the native<br />
watermilfoil, Myriophyllum exalbescens, found mainly in glaciated areas.<br />
It is very versatile, growing in both fresh and brackish waters. Beaven<br />
(1960) reported that it thrives in waters which are fresh or have a<br />
salinity up to 10 parts per thousand but grows much more slowly at a<br />
salinity of 15 parts per thousand. Since it is absent in more acid<br />
waters, it appears that the alkalinity of brackish water favors growth<br />
in tidal areas. This plant readily withstands 3-foot tides and is found<br />
in water up to 9 feet deep.<br />
The manner in which Eurasian watermilfoil completely dominates<br />
most areas in which it grows has resulted in a severe weed problem. In<br />
many embayments of the Potomac River and elsewhere on Chesapeake Bay, it<br />
often completely replaces native submergent vegetation including valuable<br />
duckfood plants such as widgeongrass (Ruppia maritima), sago pondweed<br />
Potamo eton pectinatus), redhead grass or claspingleaf pondweed<br />
PoUmo eton perfoliatus), and wildcelery (ValUsneria americana). The<br />
native vegetation, however, can withstand more wind and wave action.<br />
A dense but loosely woven blanket of watermilfoil often extends from the<br />
bottom to the surface, restricting water movement. This impedes the<br />
flow of food to oysters and reduces the oxygen supply under the blanket,<br />
which may cause oyster mortality at times. Harvest of oysters, clams,<br />
crabs and fish is hampered severely by extensive growths of Eurasian<br />
watermilfoil. In addition, dense stands curtail-recreational activities