08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 15—1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 15—1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 15—1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

changes in populations of various species of aquatic worms, clams, and<br />

various aquatic insects, either shortly after treatment (one week) or six<br />

weeks after treatment. This would certainly indicate that Aquathol would<br />

not adversely affect the fish population by effecting certain aquatic<br />

species either directly effecting the fish or their food chain~ Therefore,<br />

in areas where fish management is a major consideration, this point should<br />

be taken into account.<br />

Considera~:ipn number- four, with respect to chronic toxicity:<br />

'" 1. A two-year chronic study in rats, indicated that at 100,<br />

300, 1000 ppm of disodium endothal in the diet, there was no<br />

significant difference in the survival of the rats or any<br />

indications of intoxication at the above dosages.<br />

2. There was no statistically significant difference in the<br />

weights; however, rats feeding on 1000 ppm of disodium endothal<br />

in the diet showed a lower weight.<br />

Here, I feel that it would be well to go back and review the normal use<br />

dosage which is normally required for control,on an overall aquatic treatment.<br />

This would be 1 to 2 ppm in the water. This foregoing, coupled<br />

with the short residue picture of 48 to 16 hours at 1 to 2 ppm in water,<br />

and even at the maximum dosage of 5 ppm a complete residue disappearance<br />

in four days, would indicate a good safety factor.<br />

The next consideration is with respect to the toxicity to the user and<br />

handler. Aquathol is certainly safer to use than some of the other materials<br />

currently used for aquatic weed control, and other herbicidal and<br />

insecticidal uses. In toxicity tests on rats the oral LD50 for Aquathol<br />

(19.2% solution of disodium endothal) was found to be approximately<br />

200 mg/kg. of body weight. The granular 5% formulation, previously referred<br />

to as Aquathol G, would be correspondingly less.<br />

A 1% solution of disodium endothal (10,000 ppm) was irritating to the<br />

skin without evidence of sensitization. Higher concentrations increased<br />

the degree of skin absorption and toxicity. Under normal recommended<br />

precautions for handling Aquathol this product can be used safely. Once<br />

the material has been applied, there should be no danger of acute toxicity<br />

to either humans or animals. Reasonable precautions considered are as<br />

follows for Aquathol, as well as all other pesticides:<br />

1. Read label warning.<br />

2. Avoid contact with eye and skin with both concentrate<br />

and diluted material as much as possible.<br />

3. Avoid inhaling or breathing dust, granules, or spray.<br />

4. Wash off en)' material spilled, or oth~rwtse applied on<br />

your person, as soon as possible.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!