08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 15—1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 15—1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 15—1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

457.<br />

1:1ETHODSOF APPLYINGMALEICHYDRAZIDE<br />

David G. Grinnn 1<br />

In the fall of 1959, the first test plots. using<br />

maleic hydrazide to inhibit the growth of grass wer'e.begun in<br />

the northern sections of the New Jersey Turnpike. : The purpose<br />

of these trials was to familiarize ourselves with the problems<br />

that might confront us if a large. scale operation.were to be<br />

initiated. The results of these initial tests will. be discussed<br />

in detail by Mr. Paul Bohne, Naugatuck Chemical Division, U.S.<br />

Rubber Company.<br />

However, in the late fall before dormancy, in the<br />

area around Hightstown, we treated approximate~y five acres.<br />

Because of this particular test and inconsistent results<br />

observed the following spring of 1960, we realized we had to<br />

search for a more practical method of applying maleic hydrazide.<br />

It would be to our advantage to discuss the Hightstown<br />

experiments. A 200 gallon spray tank, trailer mounted,<br />

ri[ged with a Hudson all-purpose spray boom, was used. The·<br />

boom had 13 nOZZles, and was set at 17 inches above grade.<br />

The amounts of material used are relatively unimportant at this<br />

time. This entire unit was conveyed by a jeep. At no time<br />

during the application did the operator change the height of<br />

the boom or regulate the controls. The entire bowl area was<br />

treated with no regard for overlapping. The results showed<br />

evidence that maleic hydrazide definitely inhibited the growth<br />

of grasses 8 The degree of inhibition varied with the rates<br />

of maleic hydraZide applied. The limiting factor in this test<br />

was the method of application. Severe browning out occurred<br />

on all turns. It was obvious that three or four turns were<br />

made at the same location. As the unit moved along the terrain,<br />

the height of the boom varied tremendously. At times the boom<br />

wa~ within six inches of the grade, accounting formany skips<br />

in the spray pattern. Every dip, every roll in the grade added<br />

to the irregularities of the spray apttern. It was necessary<br />

to mow this lawn area in order to maintain the turf at an even<br />

height. A general observation that may be of interest was the<br />

reduction of broadleaf weeds. The fall application prevented<br />

1. Horticulturist, New Jersey Turnpike Authority,<br />

New Brunswick, New Jersey

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!