Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
426. (Kalmia angustifolia) ,huckleberry (0 lussacia baccata), low bush blueberry (Vaccinium vacillans.), Japanese honeysuckle Lonicera japonica) J and mapleleafed viburnum (Viburnum acerifolium).· Those most commonly encountered yhich grow ovar 4' high are high bush blueberry (Vaccinium cory:rr;,bosumand V. atrococcum), bayberry (Myrica pensylvanica) J winterberry (~ verticillata), sweet pepperbush (Clethra alnifolia), mountain laurel (Kalmia latifolia), Virburnums (Viburnum spp.) '. alder (Alnus ~), flowering aogwooa (Cornus florida), swamp azalia (Rhododendroii viscosum), pinkster flower (Rhododendron nudifloriumr, spiabush (Lindera benzoin), barberry (Berberis vulgaris), witchbazel (Hamamelis virginiana). These species are most desirable and permissible along the edge of the right-of-way. However, some utilities will also permit these species to persist directly under the lines if scattered in occurrence. The abundance of greenbrier and its tendency to crowd out other more desirable species and form impenetrable thickets is a local problem in this part of Connecticut and requires some modification in the management procedures as will be pointed out later. In 1954the tree growth was cut and allowed to resurge for subsequent treatments. Evaluation of Spray Techniques Since 1953 over 40 plots 50' x 50' or larger have been established under or along the lines. Here various techniques have been employed using knapsack sprayers as well as commercial power equipment. In order to achieve the management objectives outlined, the spraying has been done selectively except for special plots where the aim was to determine the effect of indiscriminate applications. The various techniques employed include the basal, root-collar, dormant stem, ste~foliageJ notching, frilling, and stump treatments. Some of the formulations and seasons of applications along with comments on effectiveness are given in Table I. Although the basal technique gave effective root-kill in all seasons, root-collar applications were even more effective, as has been reported by other investigators (12,13). Trees up to 3" in diameter were root-killed using the root-collar technique which involved thoroughly wetting the soil around the root-collar. One very definite advantage of this method over the basal technique is that the chemical is specifically directed to the rootcoilar area. Therefore, the problem of accumulated leaf-litter around the stems preventing run-down totPe root-collar is eliminated. For root-suckering species mid to late sunmerapplications were most effective. When concentrations were reduced to 1: 30, whiteoak showed some resistance with only 35%% root-kill. Both of these techniques have been extensively used on the demonstration area and are highly recommended for right-of -way maintenance. Along with obtaining effective root-kill they can be applied very selectively, thus enabling one to preserve desirable shrubs and maintain a tight. ground cover wherever it exists. Similar findings have been reported on the Penelec rightof-way in central Pennsylvania (14).· . The dormant stem technique was employed on greenbrier as well as tree sprouts. Although formulations in oil are known to be effective,little work has been done with Oil-water and water carriers. Data indicate that effective root;.kill resUlts when relatively high concentrations (1:20) are applied in water (TabJe I). By eliminating oil less damage results to desirable species. It has been found that this technique is especially adaptable to situations
TABLEI :Basal I I I !Root ,collar Formulation Season Nature of vee:etation and effectiveness D&T, Jan. 1.5.5 .Ex:ce?.lent root-kill on most tree spe T:oil -lHi-l:20, 1: 30 Mar. '.56 white oak 53%). Summerapplications July 15.5 most effective on root-suckering spec Dec. '.54 ies such as aspen and sumac. Tloil 1:20 I 1-----I----- ...... Feb. t 54 eies (black oak 99%,black birch 98%" Most effective technique employed. Excellent root-kill on oak" ,cherry" maple, birch and hickor,y any season; aspen in summer. Growth 61 to 3"DBH t----......,..--------------------1 mT,+oil. Greenbrier (continuous 3-.5 1 ) . Over 95% 1.:20 root-kill. iDormant Stem 'I'Jt oil ,,'.f water .1:20 Dec. '55 Excellent root-kill of black oak, gray birch, hickory, tulip, black birch • T+water 1:20 Mar. '60 Excellent control of red maple, black birch, hickory, yellow birch, black oak, 4-10 1 • Presumed root-killed. D&T-water Good root-kill of black oak, black birch 1:100 Sept. '54 and aspen, averaging 87%root-kill. i Commercial White oak very resistant; only 13%rootiS t em _ kill. !Foliar I I D&T 1 gal. oil Over 95%root-kill of greenbrier. Most effective stem-foliar treatment. 3 gal. water July 155 1:20 I ..L- -'- --a. ~ · .... 7H\-1:20 equivalent to 5 gallons or 20 p01ll"tde aci.d equ:i."\Te.~eil+' of chemical per 100 gallons all.
- Page 376 and 377: 37t. PRELIMINARYRESULTSONTHE CONTRO
- Page 378 and 379: 378. CHEMICAL TREATMENTS FORTHECONT
- Page 380 and 381: Table ;. Visual RatiDgs and Stand C
- Page 382 and 383: ANN11AL WEEDCONTROL IN SILAGECORN1
- Page 384 and 385: TABLEI. field Corn tiead Control an
- Page 386 and 387: Sunderiand,' Mass..Experiment: In t
- Page 388 and 389: ) ) BBLB I. QuackgT88S Control in F
- Page 390 and 391: TABLEIII. Quackgr888 Control in Fie
- Page 392 and 393: 392. herbicides. In senerel."we.had
- Page 394 and 395: 394. RESULTS§e PISCUSSION In Augus
- Page 396 and 397: 396. WHATHAPPENS TO PHENOXYHERBICID
- Page 398 and 399: D. TASTEAND ODORSTUDIES Taste and o
- Page 400 and 401: herbicides produces aquantit.at.ive
- Page 402 and 403: 4('2. • A DECADEOF BRUSHCONl'ROL
- Page 404 and 405: areas, fre1.uently the crews l'UIrL
- Page 406 and 407: 406. During June and July 1959 a pr
- Page 408 and 409: 408. Numerous chemicals have been u
- Page 410 and 411: " A Progress Report on Urab * Brush
- Page 412 and 413: 412.
- Page 414 and 415: 414. Urab is an effective chemical
- Page 416 and 417: 416. application. Atrazine has a wa
- Page 418 and 419: 418. COMPARISONOF TECHNIQUESANDSPEC
- Page 420 and 421: Table I - Results of chemicals appl
- Page 422 and 423: 422. Results and Discussion Data fr
- Page 424 and 425: 424. THE CONNECTICUT ARBORETUM RIGH
- Page 428 and 429: 42$. TABLEI (cont'd.) Technique For
- Page 430 and 431: 43". by Leonard and Crafts (15) mos
- Page 432 and 433: 432. awareness of the need for good
- Page 434 and 435: 434. RECOMMENDAT:I"'NS FOR THE USE
- Page 436 and 437: 436. The recommended materials for
- Page 438 and 439: 438. NATURALANDSCAJ:'ING WITHHERBIC
- Page 440 and 441: 440. STATEHIGHWAYHERBICIDE POLICIES
- Page 442 and 443: 442. There is a matter of judgment
- Page 444 and 445: 444. DATAON STATEHIGHWAYHERBICIDE P
- Page 446 and 447: 446. ROADSIDEBRUSHCONTROLWIM PHENOX
- Page 448 and 449: 446. Spraying begins in Connecticut
- Page 450 and 451: Basal applications can be applied e
- Page 452 and 453: 452. UMASSACHUSETTS PROGRESSREPORTO
- Page 454 and 455: 45,4. Again, since the solution is
- Page 456 and 457: 456. Statistics In 1959, the low bi
- Page 458 and 459: 458. formation of seed heads. It wa
- Page 460 and 461: 460. In our northern division, we c
- Page 462 and 463: 462. '. 1. A. 200 ga'l Lons of' wat
- Page 464 and 465: METHODSOF SMIJPLING RAG.hfEED POLLS
- Page 466 and 467: counted. ThJ grqins m~y ba st~inad
- Page 468 and 469: 468. slide moved across the orifi~e
- Page 470 and 471: 470. INTERIMREPORTONAQUATICWEEDCONT
- Page 472 and 473: ,.' f'inal retJuJ.t was that the us
- Page 474 and 475: 474. taste and odor problems. The a
TABLEI<br />
:Basal<br />
I<br />
I<br />
I<br />
!Root<br />
,collar<br />
Formulation Season Nature of vee:etation and effectiveness<br />
D&T, Jan. 1.5.5 .Ex:ce?.lent root-kill on most tree spe<br />
T:oil<br />
-lHi-l:20, 1: 30 Mar. '.56 white oak 53%). Summerapplications<br />
July 15.5 most effective on root-suckering spec<br />
Dec. '.54 ies such as aspen and sumac.<br />
Tloil<br />
1:20<br />
I<br />
1-----I----- ......<br />
Feb. t 54 eies (black oak 99%,black birch 98%"<br />
Most effective technique employed.<br />
Excellent root-kill on oak" ,cherry"<br />
maple, birch and hickor,y any season;<br />
aspen in summer. Growth 61 to 3"DBH<br />
t----......,..--------------------1<br />
mT,+oil. Greenbrier (continuous 3-.5 1 ) . Over 95%<br />
1.:20 root-kill.<br />
iDormant<br />
Stem<br />
'I'Jt oil<br />
,,'.f water<br />
.1:20<br />
Dec. '55<br />
Excellent root-kill of black oak, gray<br />
birch, hickory, tulip, black birch •<br />
T+water<br />
1:20<br />
Mar. '60<br />
Excellent control of red maple, black<br />
birch, hickory, yellow birch, black<br />
oak, 4-10 1 • Presumed root-killed.<br />
D&T-water<br />
Good root-kill of black oak, black birch<br />
1:100 Sept. '54 and aspen, averaging 87%root-kill.<br />
i<br />
Commercial<br />
White oak very resistant; only 13%rootiS<br />
t em<br />
_ kill.<br />
!Foliar<br />
I<br />
I<br />
D&T<br />
1 gal. oil<br />
Over 95%root-kill of greenbrier. Most<br />
effective stem-foliar treatment.<br />
3 gal. water July 155<br />
1:20<br />
I ..L- -'- --a. ~<br />
· ....<br />
7H\-1:20 equivalent to 5 gallons or 20 p01ll"tde aci.d equ:i."\Te.~eil+' of<br />
chemical per 100 gallons all.