08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 15—1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 15—1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 15—1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

With the ra~id constru~tion of new lines it was reali~ed that other methods<br />

were ne~esa~~ to keep pace with the rapid gro~~h of the transmission system,<br />

and extensive research was conducted in the stump-treatment method. This<br />

mctihod, which is one of our most effective, was perfected and adopted as a<br />

part of our program in 19~after 3 years of experimental work. It is used<br />

after the initial clearing of new rights-of-way.<br />

We have also tried stump treatment on recleared rights-of-way, but the results<br />

have not been too satisfactory. One of the major problems is that the brush<br />

is not burned, and moving the brush tc get to the stumps is an expenSive<br />

operation. Also, the crew workers are unable to find many of the small stumps<br />

to spray themj therefore, considerable growth appears on these rebrushed<br />

rights-of-way the season following the treatment. Vines and briars make it<br />

difficult to remove the brush and to locate the small stumps.<br />

At the present time a mixture of 3 percent of 2,4,5-T esters in diesel oil is<br />

used for the basal and the stump treatment methods. The number of gallons an<br />

acre is determined by the stem count. The root crown of the brush or the<br />

stump, including all the exposed roots, is thoroughly wet with the mixture.<br />

When conifers occur in the course of basal treatment, it is best to spray the<br />

entire plant.<br />

In 1960 a portable mist blower was used en an experimental basis for applying<br />

concentrated mixtures of various chemicals, but we have not had sufficient<br />

time to evaluate the effectiveness of this method of application. This work<br />

will be continued, with evaluations of this method.<br />

Extensive experimental work has been done with numerous 60il sterilants to<br />

determine their possibilities in pole degrassing, which is done in fire hazard<br />

areas to eliminate grass and weeds and prevent poles from burning as a result<br />

of grass fires. Chemicals are applied in a 6-foot radius around the base of<br />

a pole, resulting in an area treated of apprOXimately 100 square feet. Some<br />

of the chemicals have been very effective and appear to be more economical<br />

than the "scalping" method.<br />

The control of danger trees outside the cleared rights-of-way presents an<br />

additional and expensive maintenance problem, which is also accomplished by<br />

both chemical and mechanical methods. Sometimes danger trees are cleared by<br />

mechanical methodsj however, we have found that it is USUally more economical<br />

to control them by the application of a 3-percent mixture of 2,4,5-T esters<br />

indiesel oil to an overlapping axe frill encircling the tree at a height not<br />

more than 12 inches above the ground line.<br />

We have done research work with almost all chemicals for weed and brush<br />

control that have come to our attention, and many of them have been included<br />

in our program. The chemicals have been in liqUid) powder, granular, and<br />

pellet form. We have used them in storage areas, transfurmer yards, riprap,<br />

and drainage ditches and along railroads to keep these area.s cle"ll' (,.f'v""gotation,<br />

in addition to transmission line rights-of-way.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!