Vol. 15—1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 15—1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 15—1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

08.06.2015 Views

areas, fre1.uently the crews l'UIrLl'ei the aprQ.Ymixture .through a 1/2-i.nch highpressure, agricultural spre.y hose for a distance cf as much as 1 mile. Beeauae of this, the next units purchased were 35-gpm pumps used with 500­ gallon tanks. The 35-gpm pumps permitted the use of several spray guns with each unit while still maintaining the desired nozzle pressure. The 200­ gallon units were skid-mounted on 4-wheel drive vehicles and were very satisfactory. The 5OO-gallon units we7e pe7manently mounted on Army- surplus 6x6 vehicles, and have given excellent service. Normally a crew used 2 spray trucks, 1 water truck, and a personnel carrier. We found that while spraying in remote areas where a considerable amount cf hose pulling was reqUired only one 35-gpm pump Ir.ounted on ,a 5OO-g.a.llon tank was adequate and, of course, more economical. About 5 years ago we purchased an orchard blower with fans producing a wind velocity up to 90 miles an hour and mounted this on one of our 35-gpm spray units with a 500-gallon tank. Numerous test plots were established with this unit, and some of the results were very satisfactory. However, the timber burned outside the rights-of-way; and the potential hazard to susceptible agricultural and garden crops, particularly on Windy days, was so great that we have discontinued the use of this machine. By 1958 the cost of chemical control'had become so great that we were forced to reevaluate our entire program to keep costs down. This reevaluation revealed that we had increased our volume of material per acre in an effort to obtain a higher percentage of brushkill and also that the cost of labor and transportation had skyrocketed. In recent years the trend of control has become centered around individual species to determine their habits, characteristics, and life cycles. From observation it appeared that we were using excessi ve amounts of chemicals on some species and were overl"ading the translocation capacity of these plants. Webegan looking for new methods to apply controlled amounts of chemicals to brush on rights-of-way. As a result the automatic spray nozzle was developed in 1958 for applying a semiconcentrated mixture of esters and wRter to transmission line rights-ofway. Available literature was reviewet'l; and Boomjet, or automatic spray, nozzles were purchased. These were single, compact nozzles made in different capaci ties for mounting at the rear of. a truck for spraying a swath 38 to 66 feet wide, depending on the pressure and gpm. The nozzle assembly produces a uniform flat spray pattern. A telescoping attachment was designed for mounting the nozzle at a vertical angle of 45 0 to the rear of the truck tank, permitting the nozzle to give a vertical spray pattern at the desired height, which is governed by the height of brush being sprayed. Atomization of each jet is as fine as possible in relation to the distance the spray mixture must travel to complete the spray pattern. The nozzle is brass, with 5 fixed-position tips. It has a lj4-inch plug in the top, which is an ideal location for a pressure gauge. We have apprOXimately 20 autcmatic spray nozzles mounted on military-type 6x6 trucks equipped With no-~pin differentials, mud-grip tires, and 800-, 1,000-, and 1,200-gallon tanks. Wehave been using this type of truck for right-of-way maintenance for several years, and an experienced driver can cover a high

percentage of o~r trAnsmission line rights-of-way s~rayed by gr~un4 crews with very few acres of brush skipped.. A pump with 6 full floating nylon rollers to force the spray mixture through the pump is mounted on the truck frame under the tank and is operated by a power takeoff. The normal operating speed is 500 rpm, and at 20 psi the pump delivers 30 gallons a minute. A pressure gauge, strainer, And adjustable bypass valve are installed. Since no agitator is installed in the tank, the bypass connecti~n is used t~ keep the water and chemicals mixed. On a lOO-foot right-of-way the truck is driven down one side with the spray directed to the outside edge of the cl4l')a,redright-of-way. At a pressure of 20 psi ;the effeetive swath is 50 feet wide. We normally enter the right-ofway and drive until about one-half of the mixture in the tQDk is used or until some obstacle, such as a fence, crops, or a creek, has reen encountered. The truck is then turned around, and the other side of the right-of-way is sprayed. ~he truck speed is 2 miles an hour, resulting in the spraying of 6 acres of brush an hour and the application of 50 gallons of mixture an acre. Numerous test ~lots were established with the automatic spray nozzle using different chemicals at various rates. The best mixture for our region appears to be 2,4,5-T esters and water, applied at the ra~e of 50 gallons an acre, using 1-1/2 gallons, or 6 pounds, of acid. --- In an effort to reduce right-of-way maintenance cost further and in order to keep pace with the growth of TVA's transmissi~n system, a contract was negotiated with a helic~pter contractor in July 1958 to spray 382 acres. A mixture of 1 gallon of 2,4,5-T esters, conta.ining 4 pounds of acid, in 4 gallons of oil was applied at the rate of 5 gallons of mixture an acre. Wewere concerned about the volatility and drift of the oil; and, since all of this work was on an experimental basis, about 1/2 of this acreage was sprayed using only water as a carrier. One gallon of 2,4,5-T esters, containing 4 pounds of acid, was applied in 4 gallons ~f water an acre. This spraying was done on rights-of-way in remote mountainous areas, where spraying by ground crews was almost impossible and the cost was prohibitive. The mixed species present were dense and ranged from 6 to 20 feet in height, with the majority averaging between 10 to 20 feet. ~e spraying was done late in the season; however, we felt that. adequate moisture was in the scil for continued plant growth to aid in the chemical translocation. In the late summer, 2 months after application, the susceptible .~pecies were defoliated, or the leaves had turned brown. Chemical translocation was evident in the stems ~f tulip poplar, sweet gum, black gum, sumac, .pe~6immon, and sassafras. We could see very little difference at this time between the reeults of the spraying with oil as a carrier and those in which ~te~ had been used. In 1959, after one growing season, it was observed that geod control was obtained on sweet gum, black gum, tulip poplar,. black locust, wild cherry, sassafras, sumac, persimmon, and the majority of the eaks; that fair control '- was obtained -m red. oak, chestnut oak, red;bud, and hickory; and that poor control was obtained on maple, elm, ash, sou:rwood, pine, and cedar. This inspection showed that the oil spray had a slight advantage over the water spray in controlling a few of the more resistant species.

percentage of o~r trAnsmission line rights-of-way s~rayed by gr~un4 crews with<br />

very few acres of brush skipped.. A pump with 6 full floating nylon rollers to<br />

force the spray mixture through the pump is mounted on the truck frame under<br />

the tank and is operated by a power takeoff. The normal operating speed is<br />

500 rpm, and at 20 psi the pump delivers 30 gallons a minute. A pressure<br />

gauge, strainer, And adjustable bypass valve are installed. Since no agitator<br />

is installed in the tank, the bypass connecti~n is used t~ keep the water and<br />

chemicals mixed.<br />

On a lOO-foot right-of-way the truck is driven down one side with the spray<br />

directed to the outside edge of the cl4l')a,redright-of-way. At a pressure of<br />

20 psi ;the effeetive swath is 50 feet wide. We normally enter the right-ofway<br />

and drive until about one-half of the mixture in the tQDk is used or until<br />

some obstacle, such as a fence, crops, or a creek, has reen encountered. The<br />

truck is then turned around, and the other side of the right-of-way is sprayed.<br />

~he truck speed is 2 miles an hour, resulting in the spraying of 6 acres of<br />

brush an hour and the application of 50 gallons of mixture an acre.<br />

Numerous test ~lots were established with the automatic spray nozzle using<br />

different chemicals at various rates. The best mixture for our region appears<br />

to be 2,4,5-T esters and water, applied at the ra~e of 50 gallons an acre,<br />

using 1-1/2 gallons, or 6 pounds, of acid.<br />

--- In an effort to reduce right-of-way maintenance cost further and in order to<br />

keep pace with the growth of TVA's transmissi~n system, a contract was negotiated<br />

with a helic~pter contractor in July 1958 to spray 382 acres. A mixture<br />

of 1 gallon of 2,4,5-T esters, conta.ining 4 pounds of acid, in 4 gallons of<br />

oil was applied at the rate of 5 gallons of mixture an acre. Wewere concerned<br />

about the volatility and drift of the oil; and, since all of this work<br />

was on an experimental basis, about 1/2 of this acreage was sprayed using only<br />

water as a carrier. One gallon of 2,4,5-T esters, containing 4 pounds of<br />

acid, was applied in 4 gallons ~f water an acre.<br />

This spraying was done on rights-of-way in remote mountainous areas, where<br />

spraying by ground crews was almost impossible and the cost was prohibitive.<br />

The mixed species present were dense and ranged from 6 to 20 feet in height,<br />

with the majority averaging between 10 to 20 feet. ~e spraying was done<br />

late in the season; however, we felt that. adequate moisture was in the scil<br />

for continued plant growth to aid in the chemical translocation. In the late<br />

summer, 2 months after application, the susceptible .~pecies were defoliated,<br />

or the leaves had turned brown. Chemical translocation was evident in the<br />

stems ~f tulip poplar, sweet gum, black gum, sumac, .pe~6immon, and sassafras.<br />

We could see very little difference at this time between the reeults of the<br />

spraying with oil as a carrier and those in which ~te~ had been used.<br />

In 1959, after one growing season, it was observed that geod control was<br />

obtained on sweet gum, black gum, tulip poplar,. black locust, wild cherry,<br />

sassafras, sumac, persimmon, and the majority of the eaks; that fair control<br />

'- was obtained -m red. oak, chestnut oak, red;bud, and hickory; and that poor<br />

control was obtained on maple, elm, ash, sou:rwood, pine, and cedar. This<br />

inspection showed that the oil spray had a slight advantage over the water<br />

spray in controlling a few of the more resistant species.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!