Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Table I. Effect. of Pre-emergence Treat.ment.s on Oat.s and Forage Legume Yields Treat.ment. No. Chemical RaW/A. Ibs. A.E. Yield of Oats Yield of Forage Yield of Forage Bu/A. 1~ T.ons/A. at. Moist.ure 1~ Moist.ure 1958 1st. Cut.. 1959 T.ons/A. at. 1~ Moist.ure 2nd Cut.. 1959 T.ot.al Forage Yield - 2 cute TonfijA. 1959 1 2 ,; 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 '17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Sinox Sinox P.E. P.E. 4(2, 4-DB)Amine 4(2,4-DB)Amine ACP M-1l9 ACP M-1l9 Bptam Ept.am Ept.am I£P Amine (D:>w) MCPAmine (Dow) 2,4,5-T.P (AmChem) 2,4,5-T.P (AmCbem) ACP L-688 ACPL-688 ACP L-685 ACP L-685 Fenuron Fenuron Fenuron Neburon Neburon Neburon Check 2.0 4.0 1·5 3·0 2.0 4.0 1.5 3·0 4.0 0·5 1.0 0·75 1.5 0·75 1.5 0·75 1.5 2.0 4.0 6.0 1.5 3·0 6.0 0.0 80.8 77·1 80.1 75·1 71.0 71.0 74·9 67.0 68.6 76.3 76.6 80.7 77·2 8,;.4 71.1 77·3 80.5 00.0 00.0 00.0 79.2 81.2 75.2 73·2 1.87 1.41 1.66 1.91 1.2'; 0·95 1.72 2.18 2·07 1.18 0.76 0.69 0.40 1.33 0·76 1.01 0.85 0.1t6 0.31 0.,;6 1.93 1.96 1.87 1.79 1.65 1.43 1.60 1·55 1.17 1.78 1.lt6 1.86 1.67 1·09 0.57 0.47 0.33 1.35 0.56 0.85 0.61 0.29 0.48 0·51 1.81 1.74 1.53 1.55 3·52 2.84 3.26 ,.146 2.40 ·1.73 3.18 4.04 3·74 2·27 1·33 1.13 ·0·73 2.68 1·32 1.86 1.1t6 0·75 0·79 0.81 3·74 3·70 ,.40 3·34 • o \D ("f\
361. The most e.ffective chemicals in reduc1llg the weed pOpulation were Neburon and Eptam. These were followed by 2,4-D amine, Sinox P.E"AC~ L-685, ACPL-688, MoPamine, 4(2~4-DB) and ACPL-119· Except for the Fenuronand 2, 4-D plots, there was no evidence of aI:\Y effect on the emergence and ~stablishme~t of the alfalfa seeding. .. . . : The best stands of seedling alfalfa were obtained on the Neburon,Eptam and Sinox P.E. plots, with Neburon being exceptional. Throusllout the growing season, there was no weed growth, oats or legume 4evelopment on the Fenuron plots. Observations during the growing season did not show any injury to the oats" pap.1cle development or maturd:ty. The yield of oats and the ir test weight were affected. SUMMARY: Pre-emergence treatments show promise for the control of early germinating weeds in oats and the associated legume seeding. The only species not controlled was ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), and the perennials such as: Ground Cherry (Physalis subglabrata), Flower ..of-the-Hour (Hibiscus trionum) Horse Nettle (Solanum ~arOl1nens~), andquackgrass. (AsroPyron repeDS). Effeotive weed controlan
- Page 309 and 310: -' Table II (can't) 309. Stand of S
- Page 312 and 313: 312. THEEFFECTIVENESSOF COMBINATION
- Page 314 and 315: 314. Table 2. Stand Counts and Sile
- Page 316 and 317: 316. planted control before these h
- Page 318 and 319: Table II. The control of quackgrass
- Page 320 and 321: 320. growing season in the 1957-59
- Page 322 and 323: 322. Table I Main Effects of Cultur
- Page 324 and 325: 324. Atrazine by September 10 when
- Page 326 and 327: 326. Another effect of Atrazine tha
- Page 328 and 329: 32S. Amitrol-T was intermediate in
- Page 330 and 331: Qolumn Separation: Cellulose. A 24
- Page 332 and 333: 332, Figure -I. Chromatogram of qua
- Page 334 and 335: 334. PRELIMINARYRESULTSONTHE USE OF
- Page 336 and 337: 336. DATEOF BERRYHARVESTAS IT AFFEC
- Page 338 and 339: within three inches of the soIl sur
- Page 340 and 341: 340 .. The growth ra.te of Horse ne
- Page 342 and 343: 342. dish containing ten seeds bet\
- Page 344 and 345: 344. is not a factor in in It is
- Page 346 and 347: 346 • .Absornt:j.Qn Qn Exchange R
- Page 348 and 349: 348. The' chrona tog ram."WaS first
- Page 350 and 351: 350. PROGRESSREPORTON A STUDYOF THE
- Page 352 and 353: 352. 7. Fluctuating warm and cold w
- Page 354 and 355: 354. A clos.e correlation was found
- Page 356 and 357: 356. 1 THE ANATOMICAL NATUREO:BTHE
- Page 358 and 359: 358. The 2,4,5-TP was most effectiv
- Page 362 and 363: INTRODUCIIOB: THEEFFECTOF WEEDCOMPE
- Page 364 and 365: 1";. 1958 JFab1e I (cont ' d) Treat
- Page 366 and 367: 366. fiE USE OF FENACFOR QUACKGRASS
- Page 368 and 369: 36$. SUMMARY: Based on a I).umber o
- Page 370 and 371: - Table 1. Chemicals and Rates Used
- Page 372 and 373: 372. On spring plowed plots I where
- Page 374 and 375: Table 1. Treat.ments Used and Stand
- Page 376 and 377: 37t. PRELIMINARYRESULTSONTHE CONTRO
- Page 378 and 379: 378. CHEMICAL TREATMENTS FORTHECONT
- Page 380 and 381: Table ;. Visual RatiDgs and Stand C
- Page 382 and 383: ANN11AL WEEDCONTROL IN SILAGECORN1
- Page 384 and 385: TABLEI. field Corn tiead Control an
- Page 386 and 387: Sunderiand,' Mass..Experiment: In t
- Page 388 and 389: ) ) BBLB I. QuackgT88S Control in F
- Page 390 and 391: TABLEIII. Quackgr888 Control in Fie
- Page 392 and 393: 392. herbicides. In senerel."we.had
- Page 394 and 395: 394. RESULTS§e PISCUSSION In Augus
- Page 396 and 397: 396. WHATHAPPENS TO PHENOXYHERBICID
- Page 398 and 399: D. TASTEAND ODORSTUDIES Taste and o
- Page 400 and 401: herbicides produces aquantit.at.ive
- Page 402 and 403: 4('2. • A DECADEOF BRUSHCONl'ROL
- Page 404 and 405: areas, fre1.uently the crews l'UIrL
- Page 406 and 407: 406. During June and July 1959 a pr
- Page 408 and 409: 408. Numerous chemicals have been u
Table I. Effect. of Pre-emergence Treat.ment.s on Oat.s and Forage Legume Yields<br />
Treat.ment.<br />
No.<br />
Chemical<br />
RaW/A.<br />
Ibs. A.E.<br />
Yield of Oats Yield of Forage Yield of Forage<br />
Bu/A. 1~ T.ons/A. at.<br />
Moist.ure<br />
1~ Moist.ure<br />
1958 1st. Cut.. 1959<br />
T.ons/A. at.<br />
1~ Moist.ure<br />
2nd Cut.. 1959<br />
T.ot.al Forage<br />
Yield - 2 cute<br />
TonfijA. 1959<br />
1<br />
2<br />
,;<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
'17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
21<br />
22<br />
23<br />
24<br />
Sinox<br />
Sinox<br />
P.E.<br />
P.E.<br />
4(2, 4-DB)Amine<br />
4(2,4-DB)Amine<br />
ACP M-1l9<br />
ACP M-1l9<br />
Bptam<br />
Ept.am<br />
Ept.am<br />
I£P Amine (D:>w)<br />
MCPAmine (Dow)<br />
2,4,5-T.P (AmChem)<br />
2,4,5-T.P (AmCbem)<br />
ACP L-688<br />
ACPL-688<br />
ACP L-685<br />
ACP L-685<br />
Fenuron<br />
Fenuron<br />
Fenuron<br />
Neburon<br />
Neburon<br />
Neburon<br />
Check<br />
2.0<br />
4.0<br />
1·5<br />
3·0<br />
2.0<br />
4.0<br />
1.5<br />
3·0<br />
4.0<br />
0·5<br />
1.0<br />
0·75<br />
1.5<br />
0·75<br />
1.5<br />
0·75<br />
1.5<br />
2.0<br />
4.0<br />
6.0<br />
1.5<br />
3·0<br />
6.0<br />
0.0<br />
80.8<br />
77·1<br />
80.1<br />
75·1<br />
71.0<br />
71.0<br />
74·9<br />
67.0<br />
68.6<br />
76.3<br />
76.6<br />
80.7<br />
77·2<br />
8,;.4<br />
71.1<br />
77·3<br />
80.5<br />
00.0<br />
00.0<br />
00.0<br />
79.2<br />
81.2<br />
75.2<br />
73·2<br />
1.87<br />
1.41<br />
1.66<br />
1.91<br />
1.2';<br />
0·95<br />
1.72<br />
2.18<br />
2·07<br />
1.18<br />
0.76<br />
0.69<br />
0.40<br />
1.33<br />
0·76<br />
1.01<br />
0.85<br />
0.1t6<br />
0.31<br />
0.,;6<br />
1.93<br />
1.96<br />
1.87<br />
1.79<br />
1.65<br />
1.43<br />
1.60<br />
1·55<br />
1.17<br />
1.78<br />
1.lt6<br />
1.86<br />
1.67<br />
1·09<br />
0.57<br />
0.47<br />
0.33<br />
1.35<br />
0.56<br />
0.85<br />
0.61<br />
0.29<br />
0.48<br />
0·51<br />
1.81<br />
1.74<br />
1.53<br />
1.55<br />
3·52<br />
2.84<br />
3.26<br />
,.146<br />
2.40<br />
·1.73<br />
3.18<br />
4.04<br />
3·74<br />
2·27<br />
1·33<br />
1.13<br />
·0·73<br />
2.68<br />
1·32<br />
1.86<br />
1.1t6<br />
0·75<br />
0·79<br />
0.81<br />
3·74<br />
3·70<br />
,.40<br />
3·34<br />
•<br />
o<br />
\D<br />
("f\
Change language