Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
350. PROGRESSREPORTON A STUDYOF THEGERMINATION ANDGROVITH OF YELIDWFOXTAIL(SETARIAGLAUCA(,1.) !m@!.)l Robert A. Peters and Harlan C. Yotrom 2 Introduction Yellow foxtail is one of the most prevalent annual grasses in the Eastern United States. This species listed by Fernald3 as Setaria gla.u£ii (L.) Bgauv. is listed more commonly in older references as Setaria lutescens. An ubiquitous warm season grass, foxtail is most frequently associated with annual crops or ,'lith the first year of growth in perennial crops such as forages where the soil has been recently disturbed. While it has long presented a weed ryroblem, relatively little is mown as to the germination and growth characteristics of yellow foxtail. More soecific information on the biological characteristics of this species is needed as a basis for an . intelligent approach to both cultural and che~cal control. The foxtail investigation discussed in this paper was made at the Agronomy Research Farm of the University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut. The following is a progress report of long term study of the growth characteristics of yellow foxtail being carried out as T)art of the Regional NE-42 Cooperative Weed Control Project4. Procedure ... Seed for the germination study was collected in the field in the fa.ll of 1958 and ·1959 at the time that shattering nOI'!,Jally occurs. Periodic attempts were made following harvest to induce -germination thru alterinl7 the enviromnent or thru treatment of the seed bv chemical or non-chemical means. Germination '>illS measured in triplicate' for each treatment by placing 50 seeds per petri dish in a germinator at SOOF•. The gemination experiments were carried out primarily in the la1x>ratory. The progressive developnent of foxtail plants was followed both in the greenhouse and in the field from the time of germination until seed heads were produced. The density of volunteer stands of vellow foxtail varies widely depending "both on the abundance of seedlings and on the degree of control if attempted. Starting with a high density volunteer stand, periodic measurements . 1 Contribution"from the Storrs (Conn.) Agricultural Experiment Station, Storrs, Conn. .. 2 Associate AgrOnomist and Research Assistant, respectively. 3 Fernald; M. L. Gray's Nnual g,t Botany. Eighth Edition.. American Boek" Company, New York. 1950. . 4 Weed Life Cycles, Soil Microorganisms and Light as Factors in the Control of Weeds in the· Northeast. •
351. were made during 1958 both of naturally' c:ro'\i'Jdedplants and of plants widely spaced by hand weeding of adjacent plants. Results Germination Studies Post-h$l.rvest DQrmancv as Related to Time: No germination' of newly' harvested foxtail seed occurred following collection of 1958, 1959, or 1960 seed. Seed oollected in 1954 stored under warm dry conditions still retained post-harvest dormancy in 1960 tests. After sufficient time lapse, most stored seed gradually lost dormancy. Five percent gemination of the 1958 seed was obtained by '!)ecember 1, 1958, and by mdd-Nevember-for 1960 seed but not until the follo~.n.ng Februarv 1 for the 1959 seed. Effect of Environment: Realizing did not approximat,e the conditions that storage of seed in warm, dry con1itions to which seed is exposed in the field, an . attempt to find an environment in which germination would be induced was rrade f Seed stored dry in a refrigerator for 10 weeks did not germinate. Alternate subjection of drv seed to freezing and room temperatures did not significantly increase gerrilination. In a further test foxtail seeds were soaked in water for 12 hours. Germination of seed immediately following soaking was no greater than for non-soaked seed, namely 3 percent. The soaked seed was held in a refrigerator and sampfes removed daily for test. The germination gradually increased to 45 percent after.8 days, but decreased in the 'following four days being down to 25 percent on the last day of the experiment. Soaked seed held in a freezer and withdra,.m daily for 12 days gave no gemination. Seed soaked and then held at room temperature after drying displayed less lag in the onset of increased germination with 25 percent germination occurring after 4 days storage as compared to 8 percent germination from seed held in the cold. In summary, the treatment increasing germination the most "las soaking the seed follo\'red by storage for several days'prior to placing in a germinator •. Soaked seed stored in a freezer, however, failed to geminate upon removal. Seed collected in the fall of 1959 "2S placed in seven environments with samples being ~dthdra"n at 12 intervals from September 28, 1959 to February 26, 1960 for germination tests. All samples in a moist condition were in moist soil • . 1. Constant cold - drv storage 2. Constant cold - wet 3. Constant warm (80°) - dry storage 4. Constant warm (80 0 ) - wet soil 5 . Constant warm (80 0 ) but fluctuating drv and wet storage 6. Fluctuating warm and cold with wet storage condition (Seed placed in a screen and. buried in the field.)
- Page 299 and 300: 299, Diphenatrile Results During th
- Page 301 and 302: 301. tentative generic name triflur
- Page 303 and 304: - 1 PRE-ENERGENCE CRABGRASS CONTROL
- Page 305 and 306: Discussion 30; • a) Pre-emergence
- Page 307 and 308: 307. TABLEI -- Comparison of Produc
- Page 309 and 310: -' Table II (can't) 309. Stand of S
- Page 312 and 313: 312. THEEFFECTIVENESSOF COMBINATION
- Page 314 and 315: 314. Table 2. Stand Counts and Sile
- Page 316 and 317: 316. planted control before these h
- Page 318 and 319: Table II. The control of quackgrass
- Page 320 and 321: 320. growing season in the 1957-59
- Page 322 and 323: 322. Table I Main Effects of Cultur
- Page 324 and 325: 324. Atrazine by September 10 when
- Page 326 and 327: 326. Another effect of Atrazine tha
- Page 328 and 329: 32S. Amitrol-T was intermediate in
- Page 330 and 331: Qolumn Separation: Cellulose. A 24
- Page 332 and 333: 332, Figure -I. Chromatogram of qua
- Page 334 and 335: 334. PRELIMINARYRESULTSONTHE USE OF
- Page 336 and 337: 336. DATEOF BERRYHARVESTAS IT AFFEC
- Page 338 and 339: within three inches of the soIl sur
- Page 340 and 341: 340 .. The growth ra.te of Horse ne
- Page 342 and 343: 342. dish containing ten seeds bet\
- Page 344 and 345: 344. is not a factor in in It is
- Page 346 and 347: 346 • .Absornt:j.Qn Qn Exchange R
- Page 348 and 349: 348. The' chrona tog ram."WaS first
- Page 352 and 353: 352. 7. Fluctuating warm and cold w
- Page 354 and 355: 354. A clos.e correlation was found
- Page 356 and 357: 356. 1 THE ANATOMICAL NATUREO:BTHE
- Page 358 and 359: 358. The 2,4,5-TP was most effectiv
- Page 360 and 361: Table I. Effect. of Pre-emergence T
- Page 362 and 363: INTRODUCIIOB: THEEFFECTOF WEEDCOMPE
- Page 364 and 365: 1";. 1958 JFab1e I (cont ' d) Treat
- Page 366 and 367: 366. fiE USE OF FENACFOR QUACKGRASS
- Page 368 and 369: 36$. SUMMARY: Based on a I).umber o
- Page 370 and 371: - Table 1. Chemicals and Rates Used
- Page 372 and 373: 372. On spring plowed plots I where
- Page 374 and 375: Table 1. Treat.ments Used and Stand
- Page 376 and 377: 37t. PRELIMINARYRESULTSONTHE CONTRO
- Page 378 and 379: 378. CHEMICAL TREATMENTS FORTHECONT
- Page 380 and 381: Table ;. Visual RatiDgs and Stand C
- Page 382 and 383: ANN11AL WEEDCONTROL IN SILAGECORN1
- Page 384 and 385: TABLEI. field Corn tiead Control an
- Page 386 and 387: Sunderiand,' Mass..Experiment: In t
- Page 388 and 389: ) ) BBLB I. QuackgT88S Control in F
- Page 390 and 391: TABLEIII. Quackgr888 Control in Fie
- Page 392 and 393: 392. herbicides. In senerel."we.had
- Page 394 and 395: 394. RESULTS§e PISCUSSION In Augus
- Page 396 and 397: 396. WHATHAPPENS TO PHENOXYHERBICID
- Page 398 and 399: D. TASTEAND ODORSTUDIES Taste and o
350.<br />
PROGRESSREPORTON A STUDYOF THEGERMINATION ANDGROVITH<br />
OF YELIDWFOXTAIL(SETARIAGLAUCA(,1.) !m@!.)l<br />
Robert A. Peters<br />
and Harlan C. Yotrom<br />
2<br />
Introduction<br />
Yellow foxtail is one of the most prevalent annual grasses in the<br />
Eastern United States. This species listed by Fernald3 as Setaria gla.u£ii<br />
(L.) Bgauv. is listed more commonly in older references as Setaria lutescens.<br />
An ubiquitous warm season grass, foxtail is most frequently associated with<br />
annual crops or ,'lith the first year of growth in perennial crops such as<br />
forages where the soil has been recently disturbed. While it has long<br />
presented a weed ryroblem, relatively little is mown as to the germination<br />
and growth characteristics of yellow foxtail. More soecific information on<br />
the biological characteristics of this species is needed as a basis for an .<br />
intelligent approach to both cultural and che~cal control.<br />
The foxtail investigation discussed in this paper was made at the<br />
Agronomy Research Farm of the University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut.<br />
The following is a progress report of long term study of the growth characteristics<br />
of yellow foxtail being carried out as T)art of the Regional NE-42<br />
Cooperative <strong>Weed</strong> Control Project4.<br />
Procedure<br />
...<br />
Seed for the germination study was collected in the field in the<br />
fa.ll of 1958 and ·1959 at the time that shattering nOI'!,Jally occurs. Periodic<br />
attempts were made following harvest to induce -germination thru alterinl7 the<br />
enviromnent or thru treatment of the seed bv chemical or non-chemical means.<br />
Germination '>illS measured in triplicate' for each treatment by placing 50 seeds<br />
per petri dish in a germinator at SOOF•.<br />
The gemination experiments were carried out primarily in the la1x>ratory.<br />
The progressive developnent of foxtail plants was followed both in the greenhouse<br />
and in the field from the time of germination until seed heads were<br />
produced.<br />
The density of volunteer stands of vellow foxtail varies widely<br />
depending "both on the abundance of seedlings and on the degree of control if<br />
attempted. Starting with a high density volunteer stand, periodic measurements<br />
.<br />
1 Contribution"from the Storrs (Conn.) Agricultural Experiment Station,<br />
Storrs, Conn. ..<br />
2 Associate AgrOnomist and Research Assistant, respectively.<br />
3 Fernald; M. L. Gray's Nnual g,t Botany. Eighth Edition.. American Boek"<br />
Company, New York. 1950. .<br />
4 <strong>Weed</strong> Life Cycles, Soil Microorganisms and Light as Factors in the Control<br />
of <strong>Weed</strong>s in the· Northeast.<br />
•