08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 15—1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 15—1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 15—1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

348.<br />

The' chrona tog ram."WaS first di~through a.,dried, dipped through<br />

solution h, and again dried. Area 2 showed a very" strong sugar cencencra­<br />

'bion, with area 7 exhibiting less concentration. Area 2 appeared to<br />

contain numerous sugars , whereas area 7 appeared to be a single sugar •<br />

.<br />

A section of the paper was developed with sulphanillc reagent, a test<br />

for "Ohenols. No phenoks were present in the areas of inhibition.<br />

Discussion<br />

Extracts of yellow foxtail plants, botn green and dry, inhibited seed<br />

germination and gro,'1th of several crop species. The inhibitory activit:; of<br />

the tops and roots were not significantly different •.<br />

~ressure.<br />

. The inhibition appears to be due to factors other than pH or oemotd.c<br />

The fact that the inhibitor is heat stable \t:luld in:iicate that :it is not<br />

proteinaceous in char~cter nor easily volatilized. Thus proteins and Vi:>latile<br />

compounds are eliminated.<br />

Loss of inhibition by as 11ing would eliminate such possibilities as<br />

potassium or other mineral ions.<br />

Sim e the molecule can be dialyzed a rel~tivelV' small molecular<br />

weight is indicated.<br />

, Its insolubility in the organic solvents suggests a polar comocurd ,<br />

'Further, it is not easily ionized due to its free 'Ol ssage through mediumactivity<br />

exchange resins.<br />

Also eliminated is ammonia, as distill'ltion of a basic extract does<br />

not cause loss of its inhibitory action.<br />

Since the chloroform did not extract any inhibitor, the chloroform<br />

soluble group known as alkaloids is probably disqualified.<br />

The activated carbon failed to re~ve toe inhibitor, suggesting that<br />

pigments are not resoonsible for the inhibition.<br />

Paper l)!'l.rtition chromatozraphy suggests that carbohydrates are :involved<br />

in the inhibition.<br />

The above results indicate that inhibition is probably due to 'sugar<br />

compounds,<br />

Summary<br />

Aqueous extracts of yelloW' foxtail were found to be inhibitory to the<br />

gerrrlination and gro"lth 'of seeds of several crop plants. The genninatiol:1<br />

and grovrth inhibitor produced by yello\-' foxtail ,-ras found to be T)resent in<br />

equal amounts in both tops and roots of the foxtail plant. Further, no<br />

significant difference in inhibitory activity of dry vs , green plant material

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!