Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

More documents

Recommendations

Info

310. TABLEIII - Location: Comparison of Products and Experimental Materials for Tolerance to Seedling Grasses. AmchemResearch Farm, Ambler, Pas Grasses were seeded on May5. Treatments were app~j;ed on May26 and JU:1e15. Bands of cn€T.'l,ieal18 inches wide wei'e applied to the seedlings with a 6 inch check strip left bet~Ben the treated bands. Grasses were mowedfirst intervals thereafter. on June 2 and at approximately weekly Seedlings treated lYT..v.y 26 liere evaluated June 6 and July 8. Seedlings treated June 15 were evaluated June 22 and July 8. 10 • normal stand 0 • eompleteki11 freated I1ay 26 Turf Injury - Average of Ratings Jw.P, 6 & Jul:r 8 Chemical Rate rent 'Blue ~~~8C'~~ RJ~ Clo'Vsṛ Crib XF.... 832 3/4 1b/lOOO 9.5 10 9.5 10 8 5.5 XF...832 I} lb/lOOO 9 10 7 10 5 . ~ 0 XF-834 3/4 Ib/lOOO' 10 10 8.5 10 5 0 XF...834 I} lb/l000 10 10 8 9,,5 1 0 XF-833 3/4 Ib/l000 ~ 10 10 10 10 7..5 .4 XF-833 Ii 1b/l000 9.5 10 9.5 10 6.5 0.5 Zytron 1328 1$ Ib/A 5.5 5.5 3.5 7 5.5 ' :1 ZYtron 1481 1%"lb/A ,', 7,,5 9.5 9 10 10 10 Chlordane (product) @ ree. 10 10 9.5 10 10 10 '. 1_, Daethol (produe t.) 10:'lb!A 9.5 10 9 9.5 10 9.5 -. Triealeium @ ree,) 6 3 8.5 9.5 1.5 3.5 arsenate + 2,4-n/ 2,4,5-TP (product)
Page 1 and 2:
THE USE OF VEGETATIVECHARACTERISTIC
Page 3 and 4:
In a few grasses with smooth sheath
Page 5 and 6:
5. FACTORSINFLUEUCINGTHE PERFORFANC
Page 7 and 8:
7. The introduction of synthetic or
Page 9 and 10:
The com;onents the distribution of
Page 11 and 12:
grains. We early found that the oat
Page 13 and 14:
13. Atrazine Days following cpm/O.
Page 15 and 16:
15. not find an abundant production
Page 17 and 18:
Weed Control In Suburbia 1 Howard H
Page 19 and 20:
For establishing new lawns, I would
Page 21 and 22:
Any improvement that you can make i
Page 23 and 24:
PROMISINGNEWCHEMICALSFORWEEDCONTROL
Page 25 and 26:
25. Promis ins results have also be
Page 27 and 28:
27. (Lycbnis alba), cinquefoil (Pot
Page 29 and 30:
THE EFFECTS OF ADDED PENETRANT AIDS
Page 31 and 32:
... Surfactant Produced bz: . 31
Page 33 and 34:
33. 33. of scintillation solution,
Page 35 and 36:
Table 3. The Net Counts Per Minute
Page 37 and 38:
The comparisons for lower leaves, s
Page 39 and 40:
39. SUMMARY Tests using 2-C 14-1abe
Page 41 and 42:
41. RECENTDEVELOPMENTS IN THEUSE OF
Page 43 and 44:
second application be made not late
Page 45 and 46:
45. Combinations of vegadex-Randox
Page 47 and 48:
11/ Persistence of Soil-Incorporate
Page 49 and 50:
Plot size varied from 9 sq. ft. to
Page 51 and 52:
Lower rates of R-1856 were tested o
Page 53 and 54:
greenhouse tests are listed below.
Page 55 and 56:
PROGRESSREPORTON LAY-BYUEEDCONTROLI
Page 57 and 58:
57. Table 1. Effect of sodium silic
Page 59 and 60:
Sheets (1959) studied, under labora
Page 61 and 62:
M, ',. • • •• • " ' Treat
Page 63 and 64:
Figure 1. Relative performance trea
Page 65 and 66:
A duplicate test was started August
Page 67 and 68:
67. "he two tests which dealt with
Page 69 and 70:
69. CONTROLOF WEEDSIN VEGETABLECROP
Page 71 and 72:
71.' TABLE 3. RESPONSE OF VEGETABLE
Page 73 and 74:
73. COHBIltit.TloNS' OF cnu:'PITH C
Page 75 and 76:
75. Results The delay in applicatio
Page 77 and 78:
77. Summary Logarithmic, tank-mixed
Page 79 and 80:
(' ( ( Table 1 Rates and Dates of H
Page 81 and 82:
( ( ( Table 3 Effect of Post-Tran~l
Page 83 and 84:
( ( ( Table 5 Effect of Lay-By Herb
Page 85 and 86:
Chemical Weed Control Charles J. No
Page 87 and 88:
Table I. Weed control, plant stand,
Page 89 and 90:
Table 1 - Table Beets Pre-plant; Pr
Page 91 and 92:
91. Chemical Weed Control in Onions
Page 93 and 94:
93. Table I. l;ced control, plant s
Page 95 and 96:
95. Results Survey Table I of Hando
Page 97 and 98:
97. Weed counts were made 3 weeks a
Page 99 and 100:
99. Third applications were made on
Page 101 and 102:
1t1. ~ata - Onion stand counts, wee
Page 103 and 104:
The data in table 2 gives the signi
Page 105 and 106:
The following effects were noted. 1
Page 107 and 108:
PRE-fREATINGSOILS, APOSSIBLE.TECfiN
Page 109 and 110:
· 109. Table 2. The influence of d
Page 111 and 112:
..... 11 ... - Progress Report on W
Page 113 and 114:
113. fndothal as a pre-planting inc
Page 115 and 116:
115~ Table 3. Mean markebab l.e 9£
Page 117 and 118:
1170 Chemical Weed Control Charles
Page 119 and 120:
119. Table I .. Weed contrOl! plant
Page 121 and 122:
121. '- The stand of plants of bo
Page 123 and 124:
123. Table II. Weed control stand a
Page 125 and 126:
EFFECTOF SEVERALHERBICIDESONEARLYYI
Page 127 and 128:
Table 2. Calcula.ted ecre yields of
Page 129 and 130:
129. - Treatment Average weight per
Page 131 and 132:
-- The herbicides were applied on J
Page 133 and 134:
133. Table 2. Effect of pre-plant h
Page 135 and 136:
- 135. Dim tro for Weed Control in
Page 137 and 138:
PJ,OORESSREPORT:ON.:WEEJhCGNTROL IN
Page 139 and 140:
- Simazine 2 and 2 1/2 lb./A and at
Page 141 and 142:
141. Results - .l2.22 Table 2 shows
Page 143 and 144:
- !!!! Applications 143. The plots
Page 145 and 146:
145. Conclusions ADexperiment carri
Page 147 and 148:
147. Residual herbicide activity wa
Page 149 and 150:
- Table 1. Herbicides and Rates Use
Page 151 and 152:
~ __ ( ( ( Table 3. WeedControl on
Page 153 and 154:
153. TreatiD§ Established Hemlock
Page 155 and 156:
155. flowering and growth in the sp
Page 157 and 158:
157. Table 2. Pansy Weed Control (P
Page 159 and 160:
1590 Table 3. Herbicides Used on Tu
Page 161 and 162:
------- -------------_._------ ..
Page 163 and 164:
'. 163. In .Table 3 Co.mpariS01'U$
Page 165 and 166:
1.65. "'-" Ia.!!l.! ! __!ind_a!!,d_
Page 167 and 168:
167. Maleic Hydrazide for Weed Cont
Page 169 and 170:
169. 1. Dana, M. N. Sensitive Fern
Page 171 and 172:
171. -' Table 1. Amino triazole res
Page 173 and 174:
1730 Additiona! apple .,samples wer
Page 175 and 176:
more consistently effective than 5
Page 177 and 178:
177. HUBICIDES roll YOUNGAPPLE TUES
Page 179 and 180:
--. Table I. Treatments No. Materia
Page 181 and 182:
Table 1 -Effect of Granular Formula
Page 183 and 184:
iss. BVAWATIONor rIVE HEIBICIDES 10
Page 185 and 186:
PROGRESSREPORT'ON WEEDCONTROL IN CA
Page 187 and 188:
"'- Table' 1. Herbicide,s Used inCa
Page 189 and 190:
189. Tabl\7 5. Rating ot BroodIest
Page 191 and 192:
WEEDGONTROLIN SWBE:rCORNWITHDACTHAL
Page 193 and 194:
D. FlantinB A!Plication of Thiolcar
Page 195 and 196:
Table 2. Rainfall, Monmouth, Maine
Page 197 and 198:
197. Table 4. rercent> Broadlear We
Page 199 and 200:
1-. . " Table 6. Percent Broad1eaf
Page 201 and 202:
'\) 0' ,.... • ( ( ( Table 9. Y
Page 203 and 204:
ANNUALWEEDCONTROLIN POTATOESWITHDNB
Page 205 and 206:
·205. Percen t Woad Can trol ·196
Page 207 and 208:
, r t"
Page 209 and 210:
Table 5. Annual Broadleaf Weed Cont
Page 211 and 212:
211. Table 9. Effect of fast-Emerge
Page 213 and 214:
2130 Conclusion There are quite a n
Page 215 and 216:
SOMERESEARCHANDWEEDCONTROL METHODS
Page 217 and 218:
-- ,,"I. ,'~; "... TABLEII. EFFECTO
Page 219 and 220:
( ( ( - -~. , ~ ._w ~~ "PlOOl:tB21.
Page 221 and 222:
'-~ With respect to asparagus. howe
Page 223 and 224:
, 1 ,WEEDCONTROLIN ClaTAIN VlGBTABL
Page 225 and 226:
225 • r '.,':' .TABU: ~~ ... ,WEE
Page 227 and 228:
227 • . TABLEIV' -' WEED CONTROJ.
Page 229 and 230:
2290 'of.' .'J • ~ : ~. ... :.' "
Page 231 and 232:
231. Conclusions The results publis
Page 233 and 234:
possibility of too severe thinning
Page 235 and 236:
PRE-EMERGENCEWEEDCONTROLTN ceRN s,
Page 237 and 238:
INCORPORATED ANDUNINCORPORATED·LIQ
Page 239 and 240:
( ( ( Table 1. Weed Control Ratings
Page 241 and 242:
at both weed rating dates at Newark
Page 243 and 244:
DNBP - Zytron Mixture for Weed Cont
Page 245 and 246:
~ •• 245. ·Res~1~8 fr.o.George
Page 247 and 248:
247. Weed Control in Soybeans with
Page 249 and 250:
249, EFFECTOF HERBICIDESONSEEDPRODU
Page 251 and 252:
251. TABLE3. EFFECTSOF APPLICATIONS
Page 253 and 254:
253. almost a week, with treatment
Page 255 and 256:
( ( ( , Table 1. Effects of Various
Page 257 and 258:
Table 3. anal.ysi.s of Soil l,esidu
Page 259 and 260: Results and Discussion ;llien the f
Page 261 and 262: 4. Immediate treattlent injury to t
Page 263 and 264: ( ( ( Table n. :'.!:sti.Jl'ated.'er
Page 265 and 266: have very littla real II'+eaningas
Page 267 and 268: 267. Table 2. Pre-emergence crabgra
Page 269 and 270: 269 • ..., : Table 1.. 1960, Rain
Page 271 and 272: 271. Chlordane must be used at rate
Page 273 and 274: u • 2 ( ( ( t Table 3. Effect of
Page 275 and 276: 275. Table 5. Effect. of preemergen
Page 277 and 278: 277. In one area, the old turf was
Page 279 and 280: 279. following application. The hig
Page 281 and 282: 2$1. The standard date of applicati
Page 283 and 284: Table 2. Effect of season of applyi
Page 285 and 286: L 1-l34B9 ,Jiphenyllactelonitrile o
Page 287 and 288: 287. Halts F-24, Halts F-26, Halts
Page 289 and 290: POST-.EJ.iEhGENCE CONThOLOF CIiABGI
Page 291 and 292: ,veedone at 4 pounds of tL.cl per a
Page 293 and 294: ( ( ( Table I. Post-Emergence Contr
Page 295 and 296: • •• ., .. • •• ',' •
Page 297 and 298: 297. compatible with grub-proofing
Page 299 and 300: 299, Diphenatrile Results During th
Page 301 and 302: 301. tentative generic name triflur
Page 303 and 304: - 1 PRE-ENERGENCE CRABGRASS CONTROL
Page 305 and 306: Discussion 30; • a) Pre-emergence
Page 307 and 308: 307. TABLEI -- Comparison of Produc
Page 309: -' Table II (can't) 309. Stand of S
Page 313 and 314: ~~~~ ( ( ( Table 1. Chemicals and C
Page 315 and 316: 315. ~UACKGRASS S. M. Raleigh CONTR
Page 317 and 318: ( ( ( Table I Fall and Spring app1i
Page 319 and 320: 319. THE EFFECTS OF CHEMICALAND CUL
Page 321 and 322: On the basis of the rhizomes obtain
Page 323 and 324: -- Table II Main Effects -of Herbic
Page 325 and 326: -- 325. . 'r Table III Interaction
Page 327 and 328: 3:!7. remained, and then mote rapid
Page 329 and 330: 329. Further studies on a growth in
Page 331 and 332: 331. Two solvent systems (No. 1 and
Page 333 and 334: 333. Literature Cited 1. LeFevre, C
Page 335 and 336: Table 1. Chemicals Used as SOU lnco
Page 337 and 338: 337" THO YEAR SUMMARYOF LIFE HISTOR
Page 339 and 340: 339. Summaryof Root, Stem, and Flo~
Page 341 and 342: PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIONSaP' A GEm
Page 343 and 344: and top.extractions gave the result
Page 345 and 346: - Soxhlm< Extractions: Extractions
Page 347 and 348: extraction was applied along the pe
Page 349 and 350: was found to exist. An attempt to c
Page 351 and 352: 351. were made during 1958 both of
Page 353 and 354: 3) Another nitrate compound , MgN03
Page 355 and 356: operations are still able to produc
Page 357 and 358: 357. THEEFFECTOF HERBICIDESONTHEYIE
Page 359 and 360: 359. THEEFFE0TIVENESSOF PRE-E.II4EB
Page 361 and 362:
361. The most e.ffective chemicals
Page 363 and 364:
( ( ( Treatment Interval in Weeks a
Page 365 and 366:
RESULTSANDDISCUSSION: The results o
Page 367 and 368:
- - Table 1. Yield of Silage Corn
Page 369 and 370:
'!HE EFFECTIVENESS OF FALLANDSPRING
Page 371 and 372:
: i I Table 2. Stand Counts of Quac
Page 373 and 374:
373. - THE CONTROLOF BEDSTRAW(GALIU
Page 375 and 376:
375. control ot: additional weed sp
Page 377 and 378:
3770 - Table I, Chemicals Used and
Page 379 and 380:
379. '- Table 1, Chemical Treatme
Page 381 and 382:
Based on the visual ratings and sta
Page 383 and 384:
effective a8'1n1959 (1). This could
Page 385 and 386:
1 CHEMICAL QVACKGRASS CONTROL Jonas
Page 387 and 388:
DNBP. Quackgrass stand estimate§ w
Page 389 and 390:
( ( ( TABLEII. Quaekgrus Control in
Page 391 and 392:
391. RUTGRASSCONTROLWlTR ATaAZINEAN
Page 393 and 394:
393. Pre-emergence Crabgrass Contro
Page 395 and 396:
395. SUMMARY Herbicides were applie
Page 397 and 398:
- 397. B. PROCEDURE Laboratory appa
Page 399 and 400:
-- have aromatic 011s in them; More
Page 401 and 402:
-.... 401. LITERATURECITED 1. AlduS
Page 403 and 404:
"- 403. the stumps flush with the
Page 405 and 406:
percentage of o~r trAnsmission line
Page 407 and 408:
With the ra~id constru~tion of new
Page 409 and 410:
Mora pr~gress has been made in brus
Page 411 and 412:
411. Some of the earlier work with
Page 413 and 414:
413. -- - - gallA of Urab Liquid Co
Page 415 and 416:
415. THEAPPLICATIONOF THETRIAZINEHE
Page 417 and 418:
417. The dosage rate of the systemi
Page 419 and 420:
The following methods of applicatio
Page 421 and 422:
( ( ( Table 2 - Results of chemicai
Page 423 and 424:
423. However, there was a much lowe
Page 425 and 426:
- The managementprooedures reco~nde
Page 427 and 428:
TABLEI :Basal I I I !Root ,collar
Page 429 and 430:
429 where dense B-l'owths, such a
Page 431 and 432:
such as low bush blueberry, sweet f
Page 433 and 434:
5. r-ound, C. E. and F. E. Egler. 1
Page 435 and 436:
435. three days although this is no
Page 437 and 438:
HERBICIDESAS A LANDSCAPETOOLFORROAD
Page 439 and 440:
-- 2,4-D -- 2,4,5-T, 1 part of chem
Page 441 and 442:
441. We are looking forward to the
Page 443 and 444:
443. 0~TA ON STATEHIGHWAYHERBICIDEP
Page 445 and 446:
A \JINDVELOCITYANDDIRECTIONINDICATO
Page 447 and 448:
447. -. SCREENING Screening tests
Page 449 and 450:
449. The cost of this is approximat
Page 451 and 452:
-- mixtures and treating the base o
Page 453 and 454:
-- Currently, the number of cuts pe
Page 455 and 456:
455. -- In 19~, the advent of MH-30
Page 457 and 458:
457. 1:1ETHODSOF APPLYINGMALEICHYDR
Page 459 and 460:
- 459. slopes, in general, are 80 f
Page 461 and 462:
- 461. The next unit we used in our
Page 463 and 464:
-- treated with herbicides for the
Page 465 and 466:
Modified Durham Sample: An altern
Page 467 and 468:
467. equipped ~~ch of our saopl~rs
Page 469 and 470:
OI."'lt-bouad be f'or-e t.r-anap.La
Page 471 and 472:
471. his house. He can't pull a fis
Page 473 and 474:
473. time prior to the water's ulti
Page 475 and 476:
heavier weed growth the physical pr
Page 477 and 478:
477. We are facing tcday a competit
Page 479 and 480:
479. interest t hat papers are bein
Page 481 and 482:
CONSIDERATIONS REG.4RDIl\"G THEUSEO
Page 483 and 484:
changes in populations of various s
Page 485 and 486:
. CHEMICALCONTROLOF AQUATICVEGETATI
Page 487 and 488:
e readily inferred. .Waterfowl are
Page 489 and 490:
slow in ;the only waters, studied i
Page 491 and 492:
- 491. living on or in these bodies
Page 493 and 494:
493. SVI,E OBSEHv'A110N~ oi, J1.i~;
Page 495 and 496:
495. 'lilne M:..J.Eflication In our
Page 497 and 498:
497. ·.l ':1.·-.;
Page 499 and 500:
499. FOLIAR APPLICATIONOF 2.4.5-T F
Page 501 and 502:
factory artificial regeneration by
Page 503 and 504:
503. Summaryof Recent Work in Virgi
Page 505 and 506:
Current Work and General Conclusion
Page 507 and 508:
- Two ground methods of herbicide a
Page 509 and 510:
( ( ( 'lIable 1. ~ffect1veness of T
Page 511 and 512:
511. St.rips were run at 2o-.foot i
Page 513 and 514:
( ( ( Table 2. Effectiveness of :Ba
Page 515 and 516:
515. -- - Pine, hemlock, and epruce
Page 517 and 518:
517. The presence of both hardwood
Page 519 and 520:
519. First is timing. Whenwe apply
Page 521 and 522:
· 521. HOt'l1ever"where more than
Page 523 and 524:
523. LITERATUI.ECrIED 1. U.S.D.A. .
Page 525 and 526:
growing in wa.ter twelve feet deep.
Page 527 and 528:
527. , , 3. Lake Bottom, La.keMohaw
Page 529 and 530:
529. As an algicide we have been us
Page 531 and 532:
531. It would be beneficial to remo
Page 533 and 534:
533. prWCEDUltB Thu chcn Lc aLa tvs
Page 535 and 536:
535. On AUVlst 15, 1960, tht first
Page 537 and 538:
537. 1. Aqualin hcrbicicb was found
Page 539 and 540:
539. A Study of the Effect of the W
Page 541 and 542:
541. By the end of three weeks, the
Page 543 and 544:
543. during these first few days af
Page 545 and 546:
5450 Progress Report on the Effect
Page 547 and 548:
The 15 minute, 0.1 mg/l residual ch
Page 549 and 550:
549. - CONTROLOF EURASIANMILFOIL, M
Page 551 and 552:
551. recei vcd from Messrs. John Ga
Page 553 and 554:
553. radios; one was given to the b
Page 555 and 556:
phenols. While the possibility of L
Page 557 and 558:
557. 4. Checks to evaluate any chnn
Page 559 and 560:
559. - treated at the 5.0 p~a. rate
Page 561 and 562:
561. Potential Uses of Calcium Clan
Page 563 and 564:
-- SUMMARY OF 1960 AQUAmOLtEST RESU
Page 565 and 566:
- 4. The results obtained in compar
Page 567 and 568:
567. (such as, boating and water sk
Page 569 and 570:
-- treatments ~re broadcast by hand
Page 571 and 572:
AUTHORINDEX Ahrens, John F•••
Page 573 and 574:
SUBJE~ PAGE Acetamides ••••
Page 575 and 576:
Niagara - Casarone {N5996)•• 23
show all

Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?

Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society