Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
304. b) Seed tolerance trials Plots 6r x 20' (120 sq. ft.) were laid out in a newly fitted area. Dry and liquid materials were applied as in the preemergence trials. One foot wide rows of different grasses were seeded the following day and at intervals of one, two and four weeks. Half of each plot was raked lightly before and after seeding. No mulch was used, but irrigation was available and was used as needed to keep the soil surface damp. " c) Seedling tolerance trials Strips ,- x lOOt (500 sq. ft.) were seeded to pure stands of Seaside berrtgrass , Kentucky bluegrass, Chewings fescue, perennial ryegrass and smooth crabgrasses and \1Ihite Dutch c'lover , At two time intervals after sprouting, l8-inch bands of chemical were applied across these strips with a 6ftinch check strip left between each treated band. Dry' formulations were weighFd out in advance and applied by hand. Sprayed materials were mixed in the equivalent of 180 gpaof water and applied with a single nozzle backpack sp::ayer. No mulch was used, but irrigation was available and was used as needed to keep the soil surface damp. Observations a) Pre-emergence crabgrass trials On June 1" August 15 and Septeniber 30, visual estimates were made of the proportion of each plot infested with crabgrass. The nine check plots were averaged and taken as the standard. The three replications of each treatment were averaged and compared to the standard to determine the percent crabgrass . control produced by each treatment. These resu1ts are reported in Table I. b) Seed tolerance trials On July 8 and August 25, visual estimates were made of the stand of grasses in each plot. The stand of grasses in the check plots was rated as "10" and stands in treated plots were related to this. A rating of flO" indicates complete inhibition of seed growth. Resu1ts are reported in Table II. c) Seedling tolerance trials On June 6 and July 8" visual estimates were made of the injury and/or reduced stand of each species of seedling grass. The stand of grasses in the check rows was rated as "10" and stands in treated rows were related to this. A rating of flO" indicates complete post-emergence kill of seedling grasses. A rating of "7" or less indicates objectionable injury. Results are reported in Table III ..
Discussion 30; • a) Pre-emergence crabgrass control trials Theproductsand experimental materials reported in Table I are from a total of 27 field tested in 1960 (210 plots). The materials not reported were all eJq)erimental and did not provide satisfactory pre-emergence crabgrass control. Products: Of the materials tested, it is interesting to note the difference between the performance of the two trica1cium arsenate products. Variation in crabgrass control with chemicals from different sources has been reported elsewhere, and in this case can not be attributed to the 2,4-D/2,4,5-TP content alone. The two chlordane products (on vermiculite) were not effective at any time during the season. The dacthol product produced excellent pre-emergence crabgrass control that lasted throughout the season. Experimental materials: All rates of DAc-893, Zytron 1328 and ZYt/ron 1481used in this test produced satisfactory to excellent pre-emergence crabgrass control. The liquid Zytron appeared to be slightly superior to the vermiculite Zytron 1481. Of the A:i'mHEMexperimental formulations, XF-834 prOVided satisfactory control throughout the season. The three XF compounds reported here had been taken to the field after screening eight similar compounds in the greenhouse. b) Seed tolerance trials XF-832, 834, 833: . These chemicals produced no significant reduction in the stand of bent, blue, fescue or rye grasses at 3/4 or l! lb/1OOO sq. ft. The poorer stands of grasses seeded four weeks after treatment can be explained by the severe stand of foxtail that developed in the area before the fourth week and competed with the germinating grasses. (See the check plots.) Zytron 1328 and 1481: Except for a little rye grass, these materials inhioited the germination of grasses for the entire foUr-week period. This is similar to its long-term inhibition of crabgrass germination. Chlordane (product): This material produced reduction in the stand of bent, blue, fescue date of seeding. no or significant rye at any Dacthol (product): liU,Ie ryegrass to treatment. This sprout material allowed nothing except when seeded up to 4 weeks after a 'Jricalcium arsenate + 2,4-D/2,4's-TP (product): This material greatly reduced the germination of all grasses planted up to four weeks after treatment. Unexpectedly, t·cntgrass grew better than any of the other grasses.
- Page 253 and 254: 253. almost a week, with treatment
- Page 255 and 256: ( ( ( , Table 1. Effects of Various
- Page 257 and 258: Table 3. anal.ysi.s of Soil l,esidu
- Page 259 and 260: Results and Discussion ;llien the f
- Page 261 and 262: 4. Immediate treattlent injury to t
- Page 263 and 264: ( ( ( Table n. :'.!:sti.Jl'ated.'er
- Page 265 and 266: have very littla real II'+eaningas
- Page 267 and 268: 267. Table 2. Pre-emergence crabgra
- Page 269 and 270: 269 • ..., : Table 1.. 1960, Rain
- Page 271 and 272: 271. Chlordane must be used at rate
- Page 273 and 274: u • 2 ( ( ( t Table 3. Effect of
- Page 275 and 276: 275. Table 5. Effect. of preemergen
- Page 277 and 278: 277. In one area, the old turf was
- Page 279 and 280: 279. following application. The hig
- Page 281 and 282: 2$1. The standard date of applicati
- Page 283 and 284: Table 2. Effect of season of applyi
- Page 285 and 286: L 1-l34B9 ,Jiphenyllactelonitrile o
- Page 287 and 288: 287. Halts F-24, Halts F-26, Halts
- Page 289 and 290: POST-.EJ.iEhGENCE CONThOLOF CIiABGI
- Page 291 and 292: ,veedone at 4 pounds of tL.cl per a
- Page 293 and 294: ( ( ( Table I. Post-Emergence Contr
- Page 295 and 296: • •• ., .. • •• ',' •
- Page 297 and 298: 297. compatible with grub-proofing
- Page 299 and 300: 299, Diphenatrile Results During th
- Page 301 and 302: 301. tentative generic name triflur
- Page 303: - 1 PRE-ENERGENCE CRABGRASS CONTROL
- Page 307 and 308: 307. TABLEI -- Comparison of Produc
- Page 309 and 310: -' Table II (can't) 309. Stand of S
- Page 312 and 313: 312. THEEFFECTIVENESSOF COMBINATION
- Page 314 and 315: 314. Table 2. Stand Counts and Sile
- Page 316 and 317: 316. planted control before these h
- Page 318 and 319: Table II. The control of quackgrass
- Page 320 and 321: 320. growing season in the 1957-59
- Page 322 and 323: 322. Table I Main Effects of Cultur
- Page 324 and 325: 324. Atrazine by September 10 when
- Page 326 and 327: 326. Another effect of Atrazine tha
- Page 328 and 329: 32S. Amitrol-T was intermediate in
- Page 330 and 331: Qolumn Separation: Cellulose. A 24
- Page 332 and 333: 332, Figure -I. Chromatogram of qua
- Page 334 and 335: 334. PRELIMINARYRESULTSONTHE USE OF
- Page 336 and 337: 336. DATEOF BERRYHARVESTAS IT AFFEC
- Page 338 and 339: within three inches of the soIl sur
- Page 340 and 341: 340 .. The growth ra.te of Horse ne
- Page 342 and 343: 342. dish containing ten seeds bet\
- Page 344 and 345: 344. is not a factor in in It is
- Page 346 and 347: 346 • .Absornt:j.Qn Qn Exchange R
- Page 348 and 349: 348. The' chrona tog ram."WaS first
- Page 350 and 351: 350. PROGRESSREPORTON A STUDYOF THE
- Page 352 and 353: 352. 7. Fluctuating warm and cold w
304.<br />
b) Seed tolerance trials<br />
Plots 6r x 20' (120 sq. ft.) were laid out in a newly fitted<br />
area. Dry and liquid materials were applied as in the preemergence<br />
trials. One foot wide rows of different grasses<br />
were seeded the following day and at intervals of one, two<br />
and four weeks. Half of each plot was raked lightly before<br />
and after seeding. No mulch was used, but irrigation was<br />
available and was used as needed to keep the soil surface damp.<br />
"<br />
c) Seedling tolerance trials<br />
Strips ,- x lOOt (500 sq. ft.) were seeded to pure stands of<br />
Seaside berrtgrass , Kentucky bluegrass, Chewings fescue, perennial<br />
ryegrass and smooth crabgrasses and \1Ihite Dutch c'lover , At two<br />
time intervals after sprouting, l8-inch bands of chemical were<br />
applied across these strips with a 6ftinch check strip left<br />
between each treated band. Dry' formulations were weighFd out<br />
in advance and applied by hand. Sprayed materials were mixed<br />
in the equivalent of 180 gpaof water and applied with a single<br />
nozzle backpack sp::ayer. No mulch was used, but irrigation was<br />
available and was used as needed to keep the soil surface damp.<br />
Observations<br />
a) Pre-emergence crabgrass trials<br />
On June 1" August 15 and Septeniber 30, visual estimates were<br />
made of the proportion of each plot infested with crabgrass.<br />
The nine check plots were averaged and taken as the standard.<br />
The three replications of each treatment were averaged and<br />
compared to the standard to determine the percent crabgrass .<br />
control produced by each treatment. These resu1ts are reported<br />
in Table I.<br />
b) Seed tolerance trials<br />
On July 8 and August 25, visual estimates were made of the stand<br />
of grasses in each plot. The stand of grasses in the check plots<br />
was rated as "10" and stands in treated plots were related to<br />
this. A rating of flO" indicates complete inhibition of seed<br />
growth. Resu1ts are reported in Table II.<br />
c) Seedling tolerance trials<br />
On June 6 and July 8" visual estimates were made of the injury<br />
and/or reduced stand of each species of seedling grass. The<br />
stand of grasses in the check rows was rated as "10" and stands<br />
in treated rows were related to this. A rating of flO" indicates<br />
complete post-emergence kill of seedling grasses. A rating of<br />
"7" or less indicates objectionable injury. Results are reported<br />
in Table III ..