Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
25S. THEEFEECTOF ZYTl\uN ONS~EDJ..Lm C. ft. Skogley2 nJkF GhilSSESI Spring seeded la\~s are often beset with problems, chief amongwhich may be competition with annual weed grasses. The elimination of this problem would solve an age old dilemma. Very recently several herbdcddes have been introduced that sho\1 promise of selectively controlling crabgrass when applied to established grasses prior to the germination of the crabgrass seed. Zytron, known chendcally as 0-(2,4-dichlorophenyl) O-methyl phosphoromidothioate, is one of these materials. Little is knO\Yn about the value or use of this chemical with seedling, grasses, however. This test was established in order to preliminarily observe the effects of Zytron on seedling grasses under field conditions. Materials and Methods The test area was prepared and seeded on April 26, 1960. Eight different grasses were included, and were seeded in adjacent strips each 6 x 60 feet in size. The soil in the test area is classed as Jridgehampton silt loam and the pH was adjusted to about 6.5. Twenty pounds of an 8-6-2 fertilizer was applied per 1000 square feet and raked into the surface inch of soil prior to seeding. The grasses included in the trial were Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis) and the }~rionvariety of Kentucky bluegrass, Creeping red and Chewingsfescue (Festuca rubra), Kentucky 31 tall fescue Festuca arUndinacea), ~erennial ryegrass (101ium perenne), Redtop (Agrostis !!2! ,and Astoria Colonia bentgrass (Agrostis tenuis). The seeding rate was 3 p6undsper 1000 square feet for the bluegrasses, 6 pounds for the red fescues, 10 pounds for tall fescue and the ryegrass and 2 pounds for the agrostis species. The Agrostis species were mowed at a height of one inch and all others \{ere cut at IJ.-inches. Twofornlulations of Zytron were applied in ~{o foot strips over each species of grass at 2, 4, 6, and 8 week intervals fron:the seeding date. Treatments were in triplicate and each interval lias randomized within blocks. hl1 emulsifiable concentrate (}~1329) containing 2 pounds active ingredient per gallon and a formulation on vermiculite (}~1662) containing 8%active material were employed at the rate of 20 pounds active per acre.' Periodic obser.vati~n~. ~d rea&ings ·w.er~ :.~&de to observe and record seedling and grass response to t~ 'treatments; Untreated ~ontrols were maintained as a standard for comparison. Plant counts were taken on one replication on July 5 ~iO weeks after the last chemical application. Estimates of turf coverage were made and root formation and penetration were studied in early November. 1 2Contribution No. 1015 of the Rhode Island Agricultural Experiment Station. Associate Professor of Agronomy.
Results and Discussion ;llien the first ~ytron treatments were made the bluegrasses had hardly commenced germination. The seedlings of the other species ranged in size up to about 2 inches with some seed still gernunating. The soil was moist and cool and the .grass growth was slow. . The emulsion sprayiapplied bvo weeks after planting severely damaged or actually killed the seedlings of most species within a few days. The application of the dry formulation had little visual effect on the seedlings until several "leeks after the application. ~jith each succeeding application the chemical treatment apneared less camaging to the grasses but at each interval the emulsion caused more rapid discoloration than the dry formulation. Table 1 gives the average number of grass plants present on July 5. These plant counts also indicate that the eJ:1ulsion in general was more damaging than the dry formulation and that the earlier the date of treatment the greater the grass n~rtality. The Lgrostis species were most seriously injured lvith the earlier treatments. Of the bluegrasses the her ion variety ap,eared less tolerant of the chemical as did Chewings fescue when compared with creeping red fescue. It was interesting to note that in most instances there were more pl~ts present on those plots receiving treatment on the eighth week than on the untreated plots. Perhaps the treatment at the eighth week weakened the plants sufficiently to eliminate mortality usually occuring as a result of natural competition in dense turf stands. The test area received only natural precipitation during the treatment period and at the 6 and 8 week intervals the soil was dry and the seedlings were making very slow growth. It is possible-that this factor had an influence on the results indicated. ~uring i~gust the test area was fertilized with an 8-6-2 fertilizer and water was supplied to insure an amount adequate for good grass growth. The recovery of the grass on many of the plots, even on many severely injured.by.early treatments, was of interest. The estimates of percentage turf cover taken on November 3rd would indicate this. Certain plots with no plants present on July 5 had as much as a 75 percent coverage in early November. It is probable that a few seeds germinated after the nl.ant; counts wer-e taken in July but most of the coverage was due to the spread of a few plants remaining in all plots even though the stand was so thin as to show a zero reading when quadrat counts were made. \fuen the stands wer-e thinned by chemical treatment the remaining plants became large and aggressive. This characteristic of the grasses appeared to eliminate much of the earlier differences attributed to formulation and apnl.Lcat.Lon interval. .1ith very few exceptions, however, all treatments reduced the stands of grasses. In some instances the dry formulation ~ave lower coverage readings
- Page 207 and 208: , r t"
- Page 209 and 210: Table 5. Annual Broadleaf Weed Cont
- Page 211 and 212: 211. Table 9. Effect of fast-Emerge
- Page 213 and 214: 2130 Conclusion There are quite a n
- Page 215 and 216: SOMERESEARCHANDWEEDCONTROL METHODS
- Page 217 and 218: -- ,,"I. ,'~; "... TABLEII. EFFECTO
- Page 219 and 220: ( ( ( - -~. , ~ ._w ~~ "PlOOl:tB21.
- Page 221 and 222: '-~ With respect to asparagus. howe
- Page 223 and 224: , 1 ,WEEDCONTROLIN ClaTAIN VlGBTABL
- Page 225 and 226: 225 • r '.,':' .TABU: ~~ ... ,WEE
- Page 227 and 228: 227 • . TABLEIV' -' WEED CONTROJ.
- Page 229 and 230: 2290 'of.' .'J • ~ : ~. ... :.' "
- Page 231 and 232: 231. Conclusions The results publis
- Page 233 and 234: possibility of too severe thinning
- Page 235 and 236: PRE-EMERGENCEWEEDCONTROLTN ceRN s,
- Page 237 and 238: INCORPORATED ANDUNINCORPORATED·LIQ
- Page 239 and 240: ( ( ( Table 1. Weed Control Ratings
- Page 241 and 242: at both weed rating dates at Newark
- Page 243 and 244: DNBP - Zytron Mixture for Weed Cont
- Page 245 and 246: ~ •• 245. ·Res~1~8 fr.o.George
- Page 247 and 248: 247. Weed Control in Soybeans with
- Page 249 and 250: 249, EFFECTOF HERBICIDESONSEEDPRODU
- Page 251 and 252: 251. TABLE3. EFFECTSOF APPLICATIONS
- Page 253 and 254: 253. almost a week, with treatment
- Page 255 and 256: ( ( ( , Table 1. Effects of Various
- Page 257: Table 3. anal.ysi.s of Soil l,esidu
- Page 261 and 262: 4. Immediate treattlent injury to t
- Page 263 and 264: ( ( ( Table n. :'.!:sti.Jl'ated.'er
- Page 265 and 266: have very littla real II'+eaningas
- Page 267 and 268: 267. Table 2. Pre-emergence crabgra
- Page 269 and 270: 269 • ..., : Table 1.. 1960, Rain
- Page 271 and 272: 271. Chlordane must be used at rate
- Page 273 and 274: u • 2 ( ( ( t Table 3. Effect of
- Page 275 and 276: 275. Table 5. Effect. of preemergen
- Page 277 and 278: 277. In one area, the old turf was
- Page 279 and 280: 279. following application. The hig
- Page 281 and 282: 2$1. The standard date of applicati
- Page 283 and 284: Table 2. Effect of season of applyi
- Page 285 and 286: L 1-l34B9 ,Jiphenyllactelonitrile o
- Page 287 and 288: 287. Halts F-24, Halts F-26, Halts
- Page 289 and 290: POST-.EJ.iEhGENCE CONThOLOF CIiABGI
- Page 291 and 292: ,veedone at 4 pounds of tL.cl per a
- Page 293 and 294: ( ( ( Table I. Post-Emergence Contr
- Page 295 and 296: • •• ., .. • •• ',' •
- Page 297 and 298: 297. compatible with grub-proofing
- Page 299 and 300: 299, Diphenatrile Results During th
- Page 301 and 302: 301. tentative generic name triflur
- Page 303 and 304: - 1 PRE-ENERGENCE CRABGRASS CONTROL
- Page 305 and 306: Discussion 30; • a) Pre-emergence
- Page 307 and 308: 307. TABLEI -- Comparison of Produc
25S.<br />
THEEFEECTOF ZYTl\uN ONS~EDJ..Lm<br />
C. ft. Skogley2<br />
nJkF GhilSSESI<br />
Spring seeded la\~s are often beset with problems, chief amongwhich may<br />
be competition with annual weed grasses. The elimination of this problem would<br />
solve an age old dilemma. Very recently several herbdcddes have been introduced<br />
that sho\1 promise of selectively controlling crabgrass when applied to established<br />
grasses prior to the germination of the crabgrass seed. Zytron, known<br />
chendcally as 0-(2,4-dichlorophenyl) O-methyl phosphoromidothioate, is one of<br />
these materials. Little is knO\Yn about the value or use of this chemical with<br />
seedling, grasses, however.<br />
This test was established in order to preliminarily observe the effects of<br />
Zytron on seedling grasses under field conditions.<br />
Materials<br />
and Methods<br />
The test area was prepared and seeded on April 26, 1960. Eight different<br />
grasses were included, and were seeded in adjacent strips each 6 x 60 feet in<br />
size. The soil in the test area is classed as Jridgehampton silt loam and the<br />
pH was adjusted to about 6.5. Twenty pounds of an 8-6-2 fertilizer was applied<br />
per 1000 square feet and raked into the surface inch of soil prior to seeding.<br />
The grasses included in the trial were Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis) and<br />
the }~rionvariety of Kentucky bluegrass, Creeping red and Chewingsfescue<br />
(Festuca rubra), Kentucky 31 tall fescue Festuca arUndinacea), ~erennial ryegrass<br />
(101ium perenne), Redtop (Agrostis !!2! ,and Astoria Colonia bentgrass<br />
(Agrostis tenuis). The seeding rate was 3 p6undsper 1000 square feet for the<br />
bluegrasses, 6 pounds for the red fescues, 10 pounds for tall fescue and the<br />
ryegrass and 2 pounds for the agrostis species. The Agrostis species were mowed<br />
at a height of one inch and all others \{ere cut at IJ.-inches.<br />
Twofornlulations of Zytron were applied in ~{o foot strips over each species<br />
of grass at 2, 4, 6, and 8 week intervals fron:the seeding date. Treatments were<br />
in triplicate and each interval lias randomized within blocks. hl1 emulsifiable<br />
concentrate (}~1329) containing 2 pounds active ingredient per gallon and a formulation<br />
on vermiculite (}~1662) containing 8%active material were employed at<br />
the rate of 20 pounds active per acre.'<br />
Periodic obser.vati~n~. ~d rea&ings ·w.er~ :.~&de to observe and record seedling<br />
and grass response to t~ 'treatments; Untreated ~ontrols were maintained as a<br />
standard for comparison. Plant counts were taken on one replication on July 5 <br />
~iO weeks after the last chemical application. Estimates of turf coverage were<br />
made and root formation and penetration were studied in early November.<br />
1 2Contribution No. 1015 of the Rhode Island Agricultural Experiment Station.<br />
Associate Professor of Agronomy.