08.06.2015
•
Views
234. Table 2. Effoct of several herbicid&s on weed control and crop response with transplanted broccoli. Cropl Weed 2 Yield 11 Broccoli treatment Injury Control No. Heads Wt..-Lbs. ----------------------------------------~--~------~-~-~-~~--~-~~ Dacthal 4 Ibs/A. gran. 1 3.0 19 10.9 u 8 II II 13.018 12.5 "12 It n . . 1 4.0 25 16.8 Amibin 2 _ "" ft 4 11" 1 1 4.0 5.0 15 16 10.8 12.2 Dinoben 2" II 4 Q" II 1 1 4.0 4.0 16 21 . 10.4 12.6 Trietazine 1.5 II It 1 II 3 tI n 2 4.0 5.0 18 19 10.4 7.8 Simazine 1 II II II 2 II II 1 1 4.0 4.5 20 8 u.4 2.8 Atrazinel fl It 3 n 2 "It , 5.0 5.0 2 0 0.8 0 Monsanto 15336 _ 4 If liq. 1 2.0 12 8.6 It 8 1111 1 3,,0 18 12.0 Vegadex 4-" ,II 1 3.5 24 14 ..7 Dicryl 4 fI II 1 3~5 14 10~ 2 Stauffer 2061 4 II If 1 3.0 19 12.3 II II • II 1 4.0 20 Eptam It It 2 4.0 21 II 8 4. 12(>2 1309 19'10 It 4 It gran. 2 4.5 24 Check 1 1.0 19 13.2 LoS.D. 5% 9 4.9 1 2 1 D no injury 5-· severe 1 ==no control 5= complete control S~: Dicry1, Vegadex, Stauffer 2061, Trietazine, and Monsanto 15336 looked promsing for- weed control in direc:t seeded;' broccoli. Dactha1 did not injure thEr.crop but rates used were too low for satisfactory weed control. Amibin, dinobin, Dacthal, Ivonsanto ·15336, Stauffer 2061, Vegadex, and Diaryl pe:rf'ormed well, applied to well establishedr.ransplanted broccoli.
PRE-EMERGENCEWEEDCONTROLTN ceRN s, ,,~,.,':a,le1,ghl , .-.+! ''l- ~_ ' ,i'he,1960 pre-~mergl1ln~~, :weed control treat mant s were 13imi la r to tile plots es tab:lt s:h~d,ln the, lat e .f art 1 es and early ft f t i as b e ca use of the int,erest in granular 2, 4-D. i'he first 2i 4-D pre-emergence weed control in corn in the United states was done by J.C. Anderson and D.E. Yolf in New Jersey in 1946. ~he 2, 4-D was applied just before emergence. From 1947 to 195" many investigators in the northeast applied 2, 4-D at planting time and also just before emergence of the corn. Since 19',. very little work has been done with 2, 4-D at planting time because of the chances of more injury to the corn. The corn, in 1960 wasp'lanted with a four row planter. The center two rQ~S w~re treated and the edge rows left as checks. fhe results given fn Table I were obtained by counting weeds in the treated rows and adjacen. untreated rows to obtain the per cent control. There was a goad s'tend of broadleaf weeds in all areas, but grass population was scattered. The tr~atments marked:e~riy were~pplied the day of planting. All other treatments were applied just before Pcoma up" of the corn .. Granular 2, 4-D and liquid 2. 4-D reacted in a very similar manner.. The corn in these plots was slightly stunted when the plants were 4-, inches't"al1, later in the season you could see n o' injury. r r you 'did not have nontreated rows next to the treated area, you could not see the stunting. Atrazine and sim~zine were outstanding in controlling both broadleaf and: grassy weeds~ Granular s1mazine was somewhat poorer than simaz1ne 80W. 1. pr(}f~ssor at AgrCJn"my. Penn str:ite TJnivers1ty.
-
Page 1 and 2:
THE USE OF VEGETATIVECHARACTERISTIC
-
Page 3 and 4:
In a few grasses with smooth sheath
-
Page 5 and 6:
5. FACTORSINFLUEUCINGTHE PERFORFANC
-
Page 7 and 8:
7. The introduction of synthetic or
-
Page 9 and 10:
The com;onents the distribution of
-
Page 11 and 12:
grains. We early found that the oat
-
Page 13 and 14:
13. Atrazine Days following cpm/O.
-
Page 15 and 16:
15. not find an abundant production
-
Page 17 and 18:
Weed Control In Suburbia 1 Howard H
-
Page 19 and 20:
For establishing new lawns, I would
-
Page 21 and 22:
Any improvement that you can make i
-
Page 23 and 24:
PROMISINGNEWCHEMICALSFORWEEDCONTROL
-
Page 25 and 26:
25. Promis ins results have also be
-
Page 27 and 28:
27. (Lycbnis alba), cinquefoil (Pot
-
Page 29 and 30:
THE EFFECTS OF ADDED PENETRANT AIDS
-
Page 31 and 32:
... Surfactant Produced bz: . 31
-
Page 33 and 34:
33. 33. of scintillation solution,
-
Page 35 and 36:
Table 3. The Net Counts Per Minute
-
Page 37 and 38:
The comparisons for lower leaves, s
-
Page 39 and 40:
39. SUMMARY Tests using 2-C 14-1abe
-
Page 41 and 42:
41. RECENTDEVELOPMENTS IN THEUSE OF
-
Page 43 and 44:
second application be made not late
-
Page 45 and 46:
45. Combinations of vegadex-Randox
-
Page 47 and 48:
11/ Persistence of Soil-Incorporate
-
Page 49 and 50:
Plot size varied from 9 sq. ft. to
-
Page 51 and 52:
Lower rates of R-1856 were tested o
-
Page 53 and 54:
greenhouse tests are listed below.
-
Page 55 and 56:
PROGRESSREPORTON LAY-BYUEEDCONTROLI
-
Page 57 and 58:
57. Table 1. Effect of sodium silic
-
Page 59 and 60:
Sheets (1959) studied, under labora
-
Page 61 and 62:
M, ',. • • •• • " ' Treat
-
Page 63 and 64:
Figure 1. Relative performance trea
-
Page 65 and 66:
A duplicate test was started August
-
Page 67 and 68:
67. "he two tests which dealt with
-
Page 69 and 70:
69. CONTROLOF WEEDSIN VEGETABLECROP
-
Page 71 and 72:
71.' TABLE 3. RESPONSE OF VEGETABLE
-
Page 73 and 74:
73. COHBIltit.TloNS' OF cnu:'PITH C
-
Page 75 and 76:
75. Results The delay in applicatio
-
Page 77 and 78:
77. Summary Logarithmic, tank-mixed
-
Page 79 and 80:
(' ( ( Table 1 Rates and Dates of H
-
Page 81 and 82:
( ( ( Table 3 Effect of Post-Tran~l
-
Page 83 and 84:
( ( ( Table 5 Effect of Lay-By Herb
-
Page 85 and 86:
Chemical Weed Control Charles J. No
-
Page 87 and 88:
Table I. Weed control, plant stand,
-
Page 89 and 90:
Table 1 - Table Beets Pre-plant; Pr
-
Page 91 and 92:
91. Chemical Weed Control in Onions
-
Page 93 and 94:
93. Table I. l;ced control, plant s
-
Page 95 and 96:
95. Results Survey Table I of Hando
-
Page 97 and 98:
97. Weed counts were made 3 weeks a
-
Page 99 and 100:
99. Third applications were made on
-
Page 101 and 102:
1t1. ~ata - Onion stand counts, wee
-
Page 103 and 104:
The data in table 2 gives the signi
-
Page 105 and 106:
The following effects were noted. 1
-
Page 107 and 108:
PRE-fREATINGSOILS, APOSSIBLE.TECfiN
-
Page 109 and 110:
· 109. Table 2. The influence of d
-
Page 111 and 112:
..... 11 ... - Progress Report on W
-
Page 113 and 114:
113. fndothal as a pre-planting inc
-
Page 115 and 116:
115~ Table 3. Mean markebab l.e 9£
-
Page 117 and 118:
1170 Chemical Weed Control Charles
-
Page 119 and 120:
119. Table I .. Weed contrOl! plant
-
Page 121 and 122:
121. '- The stand of plants of bo
-
Page 123 and 124:
123. Table II. Weed control stand a
-
Page 125 and 126:
EFFECTOF SEVERALHERBICIDESONEARLYYI
-
Page 127 and 128:
Table 2. Calcula.ted ecre yields of
-
Page 129 and 130:
129. - Treatment Average weight per
-
Page 131 and 132:
-- The herbicides were applied on J
-
Page 133 and 134:
133. Table 2. Effect of pre-plant h
-
Page 135 and 136:
- 135. Dim tro for Weed Control in
-
Page 137 and 138:
PJ,OORESSREPORT:ON.:WEEJhCGNTROL IN
-
Page 139 and 140:
- Simazine 2 and 2 1/2 lb./A and at
-
Page 141 and 142:
141. Results - .l2.22 Table 2 shows
-
Page 143 and 144:
- !!!! Applications 143. The plots
-
Page 145 and 146:
145. Conclusions ADexperiment carri
-
Page 147 and 148:
147. Residual herbicide activity wa
-
Page 149 and 150:
- Table 1. Herbicides and Rates Use
-
Page 151 and 152:
~ __ ( ( ( Table 3. WeedControl on
-
Page 153 and 154:
153. TreatiD§ Established Hemlock
-
Page 155 and 156:
155. flowering and growth in the sp
-
Page 157 and 158:
157. Table 2. Pansy Weed Control (P
-
Page 159 and 160:
1590 Table 3. Herbicides Used on Tu
-
Page 161 and 162:
------- -------------_._------ ..
-
Page 163 and 164:
'. 163. In .Table 3 Co.mpariS01'U$
-
Page 165 and 166:
1.65. "'-" Ia.!!l.! ! __!ind_a!!,d_
-
Page 167 and 168:
167. Maleic Hydrazide for Weed Cont
-
Page 169 and 170:
169. 1. Dana, M. N. Sensitive Fern
-
Page 171 and 172:
171. -' Table 1. Amino triazole res
-
Page 173 and 174:
1730 Additiona! apple .,samples wer
-
Page 175 and 176:
more consistently effective than 5
-
Page 177 and 178:
177. HUBICIDES roll YOUNGAPPLE TUES
-
Page 179 and 180:
--. Table I. Treatments No. Materia
-
Page 181 and 182:
Table 1 -Effect of Granular Formula
-
Page 183 and 184:
iss. BVAWATIONor rIVE HEIBICIDES 10
-
Page 185 and 186:
PROGRESSREPORT'ON WEEDCONTROL IN CA
-
Page 187 and 188:
"'- Table' 1. Herbicide,s Used inCa
-
Page 189 and 190:
189. Tabl\7 5. Rating ot BroodIest
-
Page 191 and 192:
WEEDGONTROLIN SWBE:rCORNWITHDACTHAL
-
Page 193 and 194:
D. FlantinB A!Plication of Thiolcar
-
Page 195 and 196:
Table 2. Rainfall, Monmouth, Maine
-
Page 197 and 198:
197. Table 4. rercent> Broadlear We
-
Page 199 and 200:
1-. . " Table 6. Percent Broad1eaf
-
Page 201 and 202:
'\) 0' ,.... • ( ( ( Table 9. Y
-
Page 203 and 204:
ANNUALWEEDCONTROLIN POTATOESWITHDNB
-
Page 205 and 206:
·205. Percen t Woad Can trol ·196
-
Page 207 and 208:
, r t"
-
Page 209 and 210:
Table 5. Annual Broadleaf Weed Cont
-
Page 211 and 212:
211. Table 9. Effect of fast-Emerge
-
Page 213 and 214:
2130 Conclusion There are quite a n
-
Page 215 and 216:
SOMERESEARCHANDWEEDCONTROL METHODS
-
Page 217 and 218:
-- ,,"I. ,'~; "... TABLEII. EFFECTO
-
Page 219 and 220:
( ( ( - -~. , ~ ._w ~~ "PlOOl:tB21.
-
Page 221 and 222:
'-~ With respect to asparagus. howe
-
Page 223 and 224:
, 1 ,WEEDCONTROLIN ClaTAIN VlGBTABL
-
Page 225 and 226:
225 • r '.,':' .TABU: ~~ ... ,WEE
-
Page 227 and 228:
227 • . TABLEIV' -' WEED CONTROJ.
-
Page 229 and 230:
2290 'of.' .'J • ~ : ~. ... :.' "
-
Page 231 and 232:
231. Conclusions The results publis
-
Page 233:
possibility of too severe thinning
-
Page 237 and 238:
INCORPORATED ANDUNINCORPORATED·LIQ
-
Page 239 and 240:
( ( ( Table 1. Weed Control Ratings
-
Page 241 and 242:
at both weed rating dates at Newark
-
Page 243 and 244:
DNBP - Zytron Mixture for Weed Cont
-
Page 245 and 246:
~ •• 245. ·Res~1~8 fr.o.George
-
Page 247 and 248:
247. Weed Control in Soybeans with
-
Page 249 and 250:
249, EFFECTOF HERBICIDESONSEEDPRODU
-
Page 251 and 252:
251. TABLE3. EFFECTSOF APPLICATIONS
-
Page 253 and 254:
253. almost a week, with treatment
-
Page 255 and 256:
( ( ( , Table 1. Effects of Various
-
Page 257 and 258:
Table 3. anal.ysi.s of Soil l,esidu
-
Page 259 and 260:
Results and Discussion ;llien the f
-
Page 261 and 262:
4. Immediate treattlent injury to t
-
Page 263 and 264:
( ( ( Table n. :'.!:sti.Jl'ated.'er
-
Page 265 and 266:
have very littla real II'+eaningas
-
Page 267 and 268:
267. Table 2. Pre-emergence crabgra
-
Page 269 and 270:
269 • ..., : Table 1.. 1960, Rain
-
Page 271 and 272:
271. Chlordane must be used at rate
-
Page 273 and 274:
u • 2 ( ( ( t Table 3. Effect of
-
Page 275 and 276:
275. Table 5. Effect. of preemergen
-
Page 277 and 278:
277. In one area, the old turf was
-
Page 279 and 280:
279. following application. The hig
-
Page 281 and 282:
2$1. The standard date of applicati
-
Page 283 and 284:
Table 2. Effect of season of applyi
-
Page 285 and 286:
L 1-l34B9 ,Jiphenyllactelonitrile o
-
Page 287 and 288:
287. Halts F-24, Halts F-26, Halts
-
Page 289 and 290:
POST-.EJ.iEhGENCE CONThOLOF CIiABGI
-
Page 291 and 292:
,veedone at 4 pounds of tL.cl per a
-
Page 293 and 294:
( ( ( Table I. Post-Emergence Contr
-
Page 295 and 296:
• •• ., .. • •• ',' •
-
Page 297 and 298:
297. compatible with grub-proofing
-
Page 299 and 300:
299, Diphenatrile Results During th
-
Page 301 and 302:
301. tentative generic name triflur
-
Page 303 and 304:
- 1 PRE-ENERGENCE CRABGRASS CONTROL
-
Page 305 and 306:
Discussion 30; • a) Pre-emergence
-
Page 307 and 308:
307. TABLEI -- Comparison of Produc
-
Page 309 and 310:
-' Table II (can't) 309. Stand of S
-
Page 312 and 313:
312. THEEFFECTIVENESSOF COMBINATION
-
Page 314 and 315:
314. Table 2. Stand Counts and Sile
-
Page 316 and 317:
316. planted control before these h
-
Page 318 and 319:
Table II. The control of quackgrass
-
Page 320 and 321:
320. growing season in the 1957-59
-
Page 322 and 323:
322. Table I Main Effects of Cultur
-
Page 324 and 325:
324. Atrazine by September 10 when
-
Page 326 and 327:
326. Another effect of Atrazine tha
-
Page 328 and 329:
32S. Amitrol-T was intermediate in
-
Page 330 and 331:
Qolumn Separation: Cellulose. A 24
-
Page 332 and 333:
332, Figure -I. Chromatogram of qua
-
Page 334 and 335:
334. PRELIMINARYRESULTSONTHE USE OF
-
Page 336 and 337:
336. DATEOF BERRYHARVESTAS IT AFFEC
-
Page 338 and 339:
within three inches of the soIl sur
-
Page 340 and 341:
340 .. The growth ra.te of Horse ne
-
Page 342 and 343:
342. dish containing ten seeds bet\
-
Page 344 and 345:
344. is not a factor in in It is
-
Page 346 and 347:
346 • .Absornt:j.Qn Qn Exchange R
-
Page 348 and 349:
348. The' chrona tog ram."WaS first
-
Page 350 and 351:
350. PROGRESSREPORTON A STUDYOF THE
-
Page 352 and 353:
352. 7. Fluctuating warm and cold w
-
Page 354 and 355:
354. A clos.e correlation was found
-
Page 356 and 357:
356. 1 THE ANATOMICAL NATUREO:BTHE
-
Page 358 and 359:
358. The 2,4,5-TP was most effectiv
-
Page 360 and 361:
Table I. Effect. of Pre-emergence T
-
Page 362 and 363:
INTRODUCIIOB: THEEFFECTOF WEEDCOMPE
-
Page 364 and 365:
1";. 1958 JFab1e I (cont ' d) Treat
-
Page 366 and 367:
366. fiE USE OF FENACFOR QUACKGRASS
-
Page 368 and 369:
36$. SUMMARY: Based on a I).umber o
-
Page 370 and 371:
- Table 1. Chemicals and Rates Used
-
Page 372 and 373:
372. On spring plowed plots I where
-
Page 374 and 375:
Table 1. Treat.ments Used and Stand
-
Page 376 and 377:
37t. PRELIMINARYRESULTSONTHE CONTRO
-
Page 378 and 379:
378. CHEMICAL TREATMENTS FORTHECONT
-
Page 380 and 381:
Table ;. Visual RatiDgs and Stand C
-
Page 382 and 383:
ANN11AL WEEDCONTROL IN SILAGECORN1
-
Page 384 and 385:
TABLEI. field Corn tiead Control an
-
Page 386 and 387:
Sunderiand,' Mass..Experiment: In t
-
Page 388 and 389:
) ) BBLB I. QuackgT88S Control in F
-
Page 390 and 391:
TABLEIII. Quackgr888 Control in Fie
-
Page 392 and 393:
392. herbicides. In senerel."we.had
-
Page 394 and 395:
394. RESULTS§e PISCUSSION In Augus
-
Page 396 and 397:
396. WHATHAPPENS TO PHENOXYHERBICID
-
Page 398 and 399:
D. TASTEAND ODORSTUDIES Taste and o
-
Page 400 and 401:
herbicides produces aquantit.at.ive
-
Page 402 and 403:
4('2. • A DECADEOF BRUSHCONl'ROL
-
Page 404 and 405:
areas, fre1.uently the crews l'UIrL
-
Page 406 and 407:
406. During June and July 1959 a pr
-
Page 408 and 409:
408. Numerous chemicals have been u
-
Page 410 and 411:
" A Progress Report on Urab * Brush
-
Page 412 and 413:
412.
-
Page 414 and 415:
414. Urab is an effective chemical
-
Page 416 and 417:
416. application. Atrazine has a wa
-
Page 418 and 419:
418. COMPARISONOF TECHNIQUESANDSPEC
-
Page 420 and 421:
Table I - Results of chemicals appl
-
Page 422 and 423:
422. Results and Discussion Data fr
-
Page 424 and 425:
424. THE CONNECTICUT ARBORETUM RIGH
-
Page 426 and 427:
426. (Kalmia angustifolia) ,huckleb
-
Page 428 and 429:
42$. TABLEI (cont'd.) Technique For
-
Page 430 and 431:
43". by Leonard and Crafts (15) mos
-
Page 432 and 433:
432. awareness of the need for good
-
Page 434 and 435:
434. RECOMMENDAT:I"'NS FOR THE USE
-
Page 436 and 437:
436. The recommended materials for
-
Page 438 and 439:
438. NATURALANDSCAJ:'ING WITHHERBIC
-
Page 440 and 441:
440. STATEHIGHWAYHERBICIDE POLICIES
-
Page 442 and 443:
442. There is a matter of judgment
-
Page 444 and 445:
444. DATAON STATEHIGHWAYHERBICIDE P
-
Page 446 and 447:
446. ROADSIDEBRUSHCONTROLWIM PHENOX
-
Page 448 and 449:
446. Spraying begins in Connecticut
-
Page 450 and 451:
Basal applications can be applied e
-
Page 452 and 453:
452. UMASSACHUSETTS PROGRESSREPORTO
-
Page 454 and 455:
45,4. Again, since the solution is
-
Page 456 and 457:
456. Statistics In 1959, the low bi
-
Page 458 and 459:
458. formation of seed heads. It wa
-
Page 460 and 461:
460. In our northern division, we c
-
Page 462 and 463:
462. '. 1. A. 200 ga'l Lons of' wat
-
Page 464 and 465:
METHODSOF SMIJPLING RAG.hfEED POLLS
-
Page 466 and 467:
counted. ThJ grqins m~y ba st~inad
-
Page 468 and 469:
468. slide moved across the orifi~e
-
Page 470 and 471:
470. INTERIMREPORTONAQUATICWEEDCONT
-
Page 472 and 473:
,.' f'inal retJuJ.t was that the us
-
Page 474 and 475:
474. taste and odor problems. The a
-
Page 476 and 477:
476. AQUATIC'J1ElID.CONTJ3.,OL '65~
-
Page 478 and 479:
478. For example: Imagine, if you:
-
Page 480 and 481:
enefit of those both us1ng the wate
-
Page 482 and 483:
• • of ,-, "",jqc. '\:':' ',:,;
-
Page 484 and 485:
~ '. r; I ' ':'.' ~, ',;' '.'. 1·"
-
Page 486 and 487:
486. weeds increased the food 4.3 t
-
Page 488 and 489:
..; . " .," .. ,', oontro..lbe ·oo
-
Page 490 and 491:
490. Idee1ly these woUld coVer' foo
-
Page 492 and 493:
4')2. Literatm-o Cit~: Biolog:$,cal
-
Page 494 and 495:
494. SYSt.:Clil ..:ne sp:aying cont
-
Page 496 and 497:
496. 0ll'l;ljing, &hluL ..l V,~l"Y
-
Page 498 and 499:
etween our sprayine=. operatdons an
-
Page 500 and 501:
500. loblolly pine existed iii quat
-
Page 502 and 503:
502. 'j' " Using results for all ou
-
Page 504 and 505:
cut over several year. ,b.elozoe.·
-
Page 506 and 507:
506. HARJJ.rlOOD CONTROL WITHMIST B
-
Page 508 and 509:
508. distance was achieved. All sub
-
Page 510 and 511:
510. Hardwood oontrol within the li
-
Page 512 and 513:
• J ". 512. ~ ., and the weather
-
Page 514 and 515:
) ) ) '.. . . hble). EffectbeneBB o
-
Page 516 and 517:
516. HERBICIDf;TECHNIQUE.:> ,FORTn-
-
Page 518 and 519:
518. The possibility o:rusing contr
-
Page 520 and 521:
520 • . However, the capacity of
-
Page 522 and 523:
522. This is followed by planting i
-
Page 524 and 525:
524. AQJJATICWEEDCONTROLANDRELATEDP
-
Page 526 and 527:
526. findings we increased the amou
-
Page 528 and 529:
52e. There is a constant reinfectio
-
Page 530 and 531:
530. in 1960 the Potamogeton re-app
-
Page 532 and 533:
532. PROGRESSREPORT ON THE FIELD TE
-
Page 534 and 535:
534. It· was tht.;n necessary to d
-
Page 536 and 537:
536. l.qunlin Hcrbici(.l(; pr-ove-d
-
Page 538 and 539:
;538. P.EFEP..ENCES 1. ijOSCIlETTI,
-
Page 540 and 541:
540. The oontrol plot was ohosen so
-
Page 542 and 543:
542. The dissolved oxygen content r
-
Page 544 and 545:
544. Summary 1. Six experimental pl
-
Page 546 and 547:
546. A PRELIMINARYREPORTON THE EFFE
-
Page 548 and 549:
that either slow chemical hydrolysi
-
Page 550 and 551:
550. In July of 1959 funds were mad
-
Page 552 and 553:
552. The barge was run at ~ speed o
-
Page 554 and 555:
554. areas successfully treated in
-
Page 556 and 557:
556. pick~rel spawning suacess but
-
Page 558 and 559:
Control of the Pondweed. Potamogeto
-
Page 560 and 561:
560. THE ABSORPTIONANDMETABOLISMOF
-
Page 562 and 563:
562. in controlling weeds in ponds
-
Page 564 and 565:
CommonName WEEDSCONTROLLED ANDAQUAT
-
Page 566 and 567:
566. PROGRESS-R!PORT·ON CONTltOLOF
-
Page 568 and 569:
568. Herbicides used for these stud
-
Page 570 and 571:
570. StHtARy Invasion of Eurasian v
-
Page 572 and 573:
AUTHORINDEX(continued) ~ King, -Ken
-
Page 574 and 575:
S/I/pg.2 Dinitro (DNOSBP) •• 11
-
Page 576:
S/I/4 SUBJECTINDEX{corrt Lnued ) S/
Change language