08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 15—1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 15—1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 15—1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

232.<br />

l<br />

Chemical <strong>Weed</strong> Control In Direct Seeded And Transplanted Brof!lcoli<br />

S. L. Dallyn and R. L. Sawyer<br />

Cornell University - Long'Island Vegetable Research Farm<br />

The cole crops - cauliflower" broccoli, brussels' sprouts" and cabbage<br />

have long been of major, importance in the agriculturiu. economy of .Long Island.<br />

Tradi tiona:).ly they have. been grown primarily in the fall and with the trapsp1al,1t<br />

system of culture. Both. these factors have favored· reasonably satisfacto~ weed<br />

control with mechanical equipment plus, perhaps, one or two hand hoeings. in tb:e .<br />

more weedy fields. Recently there has been a marked increase in production of<br />

spring and sunmer cabbage and with it an increased weed problem. Also, interest<br />

has risen in the possibilities of direct seeding as a method of reducing production<br />

costs and labor requirement. This praotice would be effective only with<br />

aVailability of an efficient herbicide.<br />

This station has had a projeot on oole crop herbicides for approximately<br />

15 years. Progress during the first ten was lind ted primarily to the conclusion<br />

that these crops were alOOngthe most sensitive to herbicides then available. The<br />

two materials CIFC and CD~ produced. the first encouraging results and more<br />

recently a number of others have shown some promise - amDg them Eptam" Daothol,<br />

and Amibin. As part of a pro ject on broocoli production the performance of a<br />

number of herbicides on this crop was studied in 1960.<br />

Methods: The experiments were conducted. on Sassafras loam with the variety<br />

Waltham 29 used in both a direct seeded and a transplanted trial.<br />

Plant spacing 'Was12 inohes in the row, 34 inches between rows. Plots of single,<br />

20-foot rows were replicated three times. Principal weeds in the area were<br />

annual grasses and pusley.<br />

The direct seeded trial was planted June 22, treated immediately and<br />

watered in with one-half inch of irrigation. The transplant trial was set in<br />

the field August 1 and the Eptam applied and incorporated into fairly dry soil<br />

on August 9. Rain, 0.6 inches, fell during the night of August 10 and the<br />

remainder of the treatments were applied to moist soil the next day. On onehalf<br />

of each plot receiving ~tauffer 2061 the material was incorporated into the<br />

soil. Granulars were applied directly over the plants; the spr~s directed from<br />

each side to overlap about one inch up the stem. Observations on weed control<br />

and crop response were made at intervals ~uring the growing season. Both plantings<br />

suffered some damage from the hurric~e on September 12. Harvest data were<br />

taken on the center heads only. Harvest period for the direct seeded trial was<br />

September 9 to October 25, for the transplanted Septenber 20 to October 31.<br />

Results and Discussion: The data for the direct seeded trial are summarized in<br />

table 1. Several of the treatments reduced crop stand.<br />

A certain amount of chemical thinning might actually be an advantage if it<br />

could be reliably controlled. Ar\Ythingwith a rating of .3.0 or over in this<br />

catagory would be considered questionable, however, as there would always be the<br />

1<br />

Paper Ho. 445, Department of Vegetable Crops, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!