Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
230. , Be.ts Oetroit Dark llec1beets were seedecl in the plQts on May 3 anel the herbicides were appUed a day later. lesults are presented in Table III. Here it appeareel that treatments l.nvol'riq 4 .4. 6 pOUl\4. of V"p.dex ~re .theOl'lly treatments which Blet our re.qu1r8IGtlits fora llemictcte in beets. Xt ·is 1-nterestlng to note that ~en applied at a differeDt ttme in tbe lettuce plots, .. described p~ious· 1y, Ve,ada: did not .. et the' requirement. i. coIit'rol1f.ng Weeds.·Thl. V4dabUity of performance has been characterl.tic otVegaclex in teets parfomed here previously; apparently .everal environmental factors markedly affect the action of this ch.lcal. .' £ ,. . , '·.Seede. Onions . . Seed of Biplight onion, an '1 h1brld~ va planted 0I'l April 26 and the plots were .prayed with tbepre-emergence weed killers ~ April 28. Postemergeftca spra'8 were applied on Kay 20. The weed control aod crop appearance' ratinae were not,ed on JUDe 3. Results are preaented in .Tab1e IV. Randox T a~ 9 poun.de ,'1'acre _d all of the othes: treatments which included! pounds of eIPe, 1 and 2 pounds of 9S4, 2 and 4 pounds of 8562, 8nd10 and 15 pounds of Zytron all cOJltroUed weeds well until June 3 without appreciable crop injury. Treatments which included 2 pounds of 984, 2 and 4 pounds of B562, ,8 pounds of CIPC and 15
231. Conclusions The results published here should not be interpreted as a final assess· mant of the chemicals involved in the tests since the balance of environmental influences are extremely important in dete~ning the value of many herbicides. Bither plus or minus minor to major variations might be expected from trials conducted under other conditions. Therefore, tests conducted over a period of years are necessary to eVAluate the potential of each product.
- Page 179 and 180: --. Table I. Treatments No. Materia
- Page 181 and 182: Table 1 -Effect of Granular Formula
- Page 183 and 184: iss. BVAWATIONor rIVE HEIBICIDES 10
- Page 185 and 186: PROGRESSREPORT'ON WEEDCONTROL IN CA
- Page 187 and 188: "'- Table' 1. Herbicide,s Used inCa
- Page 189 and 190: 189. Tabl\7 5. Rating ot BroodIest
- Page 191 and 192: WEEDGONTROLIN SWBE:rCORNWITHDACTHAL
- Page 193 and 194: D. FlantinB A!Plication of Thiolcar
- Page 195 and 196: Table 2. Rainfall, Monmouth, Maine
- Page 197 and 198: 197. Table 4. rercent> Broadlear We
- Page 199 and 200: 1-. . " Table 6. Percent Broad1eaf
- Page 201 and 202: '\) 0' ,.... • ( ( ( Table 9. Y
- Page 203 and 204: ANNUALWEEDCONTROLIN POTATOESWITHDNB
- Page 205 and 206: ·205. Percen t Woad Can trol ·196
- Page 207 and 208: , r t"
- Page 209 and 210: Table 5. Annual Broadleaf Weed Cont
- Page 211 and 212: 211. Table 9. Effect of fast-Emerge
- Page 213 and 214: 2130 Conclusion There are quite a n
- Page 215 and 216: SOMERESEARCHANDWEEDCONTROL METHODS
- Page 217 and 218: -- ,,"I. ,'~; "... TABLEII. EFFECTO
- Page 219 and 220: ( ( ( - -~. , ~ ._w ~~ "PlOOl:tB21.
- Page 221 and 222: '-~ With respect to asparagus. howe
- Page 223 and 224: , 1 ,WEEDCONTROLIN ClaTAIN VlGBTABL
- Page 225 and 226: 225 • r '.,':' .TABU: ~~ ... ,WEE
- Page 227 and 228: 227 • . TABLEIV' -' WEED CONTROJ.
- Page 229: 2290 'of.' .'J • ~ : ~. ... :.' "
- Page 233 and 234: possibility of too severe thinning
- Page 235 and 236: PRE-EMERGENCEWEEDCONTROLTN ceRN s,
- Page 237 and 238: INCORPORATED ANDUNINCORPORATED·LIQ
- Page 239 and 240: ( ( ( Table 1. Weed Control Ratings
- Page 241 and 242: at both weed rating dates at Newark
- Page 243 and 244: DNBP - Zytron Mixture for Weed Cont
- Page 245 and 246: ~ •• 245. ·Res~1~8 fr.o.George
- Page 247 and 248: 247. Weed Control in Soybeans with
- Page 249 and 250: 249, EFFECTOF HERBICIDESONSEEDPRODU
- Page 251 and 252: 251. TABLE3. EFFECTSOF APPLICATIONS
- Page 253 and 254: 253. almost a week, with treatment
- Page 255 and 256: ( ( ( , Table 1. Effects of Various
- Page 257 and 258: Table 3. anal.ysi.s of Soil l,esidu
- Page 259 and 260: Results and Discussion ;llien the f
- Page 261 and 262: 4. Immediate treattlent injury to t
- Page 263 and 264: ( ( ( Table n. :'.!:sti.Jl'ated.'er
- Page 265 and 266: have very littla real II'+eaningas
- Page 267 and 268: 267. Table 2. Pre-emergence crabgra
- Page 269 and 270: 269 • ..., : Table 1.. 1960, Rain
- Page 271 and 272: 271. Chlordane must be used at rate
- Page 273 and 274: u • 2 ( ( ( t Table 3. Effect of
- Page 275 and 276: 275. Table 5. Effect. of preemergen
- Page 277 and 278: 277. In one area, the old turf was
- Page 279 and 280: 279. following application. The hig
231.<br />
Conclusions<br />
The results published here should not be interpreted as a final assess·<br />
mant of the chemicals involved in the tests since the balance of environmental<br />
influences are extremely important in dete~ning the value of many herbicides.<br />
Bither plus or minus minor to major variations might be expected from trials<br />
conducted under other conditions. Therefore, tests conducted over a period of<br />
years are necessary to eVAluate the potential of each product.
Change language