Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
?16. TABLEI. EFFECT OF HERBICIDESONWEEDGtlOWTH AT MID-JUNE CUTTINGPEllIOD Weed Controll l Predom. Species Rate I-Poor to . Ranked G • GrasB Active '-Excellent Weed Index!1 WeedControL!I B = Br~&dle8f !e!b~~d~ .}es.!l!:.-_,_6L916Q~_ _ -:-__ §/!/!O r: §/!3169.~ 6.(.9L69. _ Simatsine 5.00· ; 9.0, .02 l_So! 0 Atrasine 5.00 , ' 8 1lS ' .20 1.02 . B· .8!-l· Sima.ine 3.75 8.8 .00 0 Atrasine 3.75 8.0 .83 .28_J I G Monoron . 3.20 8.0 .28 .21 I C EPTC 6.00 7.0 1.56 .12 B "1 -, B Manuron 2.40 8.0 .61 .06 G . ,~~ . Atrasine 2.50 1.0 '3.28 - J .32 I l G .. ... '!'"'A q .. " I IPt'C " ,.It.:.(¥)' 6.S 3.71 .52. . .. .. ., , '''' - . ---_. .< . Monuron 1.60 6.3 ' ;'~. } " "... 5.43 .66, , G " EM'C ' 2.00 4.5 8.21 -1.12 IG ..~--- ......~ Check 1.0 18.75 -1.63 B';G I,,"' . , , ... - :~. 7. ~ .- - .......... "... - - - - ~ - - ... - - - - - - - ....- - - - ~. - - - -. ~..':--t:;" - !/'~':: n~rmal gro_hi 7 •. commercial cOiltrol; 9 = complete' kill.: ,-;1:/.Percent weed.coyer x heisht(~.):lOO =We.d Index. seed' Lit. Cit. (6) • ., ., : • y 4/ Means included in brackets are not significantly different at the 5% level (Dun.can·,t,.)", Mult1,ple. Range Test. See Lit. Clt~: (2h'" . t,' -.' ';~ . ~ :' '< ' , ' • t J.
-- ,,"I. ,'~; "... TABLEII. EFFECTOF HERBICIDESONWEEDGROWTH ANDYIELDOF ASPARAGUS AT ENDOF .:- HARVESTPERIOD . 217. Weed control!1 Predom. Species Rate I-Poor to G : Grass Yield Active 9-Excellent Weed Index~/ Weed Controll 1 B 8 Broadlea£ Market- Herbicide Lbe./A. 7/1/60 7/1/60 7/5/60 1/5/60 ab1e-Lbs. ------------------------------------------- Simazine 5,,00 8.3 1.34 1.6~l G 12.8 " Simaz1ne 3.75, 7.8 2.46 .89 G 14.0 "'-' Atrazine 5.00 7.3 9.49 .59 G 12.9 -I : Mon\l,ron 3.20 5.5 14.15 .31 i G 13.2 Ept8!D 6.00 3.5 37.59 .18 I/G 12.9 Atrazine 3.75, 4.5 18..85 .16 I I G 12.4 Eptam 4.00 3.5 41.35 I/G 13.5 '?!_J Monufon 2.40 5.0 19.83 -.11 G 11.9 - ·~·--I Eptam 2.00 2.0 50.14 - .71 !/G 11.6 AtraZine 2.50 2.8 37.82 G 10.4 Honuron 1.60 2.0 41.75 - .89 G 11.5 'I • Cheek 1 00 62.25 -1.63 ,-BIG 11.4 ------------------------------------------ --~-----------.~-.-~-~-------~~---~-~------- 1/ 1. = normal growth; 7 8:c011liner~iii control; 9 8 comple:e k~l1. ~/ Percent weed cover x height (cma.):lOO : Weed Indexe :See Lit. Cit. (6). 1/ Exp~essed as "Rsnk1ts". See Lit. Cit. (3,7). ~/ Means included in brackets are not significantly differ.n~ ~t the S~ level (Duncan's Multiple Range Test). See Lit. Cit. (2). . N.S•
- Page 165 and 166: 1.65. "'-" Ia.!!l.! ! __!ind_a!!,d_
- Page 167 and 168: 167. Maleic Hydrazide for Weed Cont
- Page 169 and 170: 169. 1. Dana, M. N. Sensitive Fern
- Page 171 and 172: 171. -' Table 1. Amino triazole res
- Page 173 and 174: 1730 Additiona! apple .,samples wer
- Page 175 and 176: more consistently effective than 5
- Page 177 and 178: 177. HUBICIDES roll YOUNGAPPLE TUES
- Page 179 and 180: --. Table I. Treatments No. Materia
- Page 181 and 182: Table 1 -Effect of Granular Formula
- Page 183 and 184: iss. BVAWATIONor rIVE HEIBICIDES 10
- Page 185 and 186: PROGRESSREPORT'ON WEEDCONTROL IN CA
- Page 187 and 188: "'- Table' 1. Herbicide,s Used inCa
- Page 189 and 190: 189. Tabl\7 5. Rating ot BroodIest
- Page 191 and 192: WEEDGONTROLIN SWBE:rCORNWITHDACTHAL
- Page 193 and 194: D. FlantinB A!Plication of Thiolcar
- Page 195 and 196: Table 2. Rainfall, Monmouth, Maine
- Page 197 and 198: 197. Table 4. rercent> Broadlear We
- Page 199 and 200: 1-. . " Table 6. Percent Broad1eaf
- Page 201 and 202: '\) 0' ,.... • ( ( ( Table 9. Y
- Page 203 and 204: ANNUALWEEDCONTROLIN POTATOESWITHDNB
- Page 205 and 206: ·205. Percen t Woad Can trol ·196
- Page 207 and 208: , r t"
- Page 209 and 210: Table 5. Annual Broadleaf Weed Cont
- Page 211 and 212: 211. Table 9. Effect of fast-Emerge
- Page 213 and 214: 2130 Conclusion There are quite a n
- Page 215: SOMERESEARCHANDWEEDCONTROL METHODS
- Page 219 and 220: ( ( ( - -~. , ~ ._w ~~ "PlOOl:tB21.
- Page 221 and 222: '-~ With respect to asparagus. howe
- Page 223 and 224: , 1 ,WEEDCONTROLIN ClaTAIN VlGBTABL
- Page 225 and 226: 225 • r '.,':' .TABU: ~~ ... ,WEE
- Page 227 and 228: 227 • . TABLEIV' -' WEED CONTROJ.
- Page 229 and 230: 2290 'of.' .'J • ~ : ~. ... :.' "
- Page 231 and 232: 231. Conclusions The results publis
- Page 233 and 234: possibility of too severe thinning
- Page 235 and 236: PRE-EMERGENCEWEEDCONTROLTN ceRN s,
- Page 237 and 238: INCORPORATED ANDUNINCORPORATED·LIQ
- Page 239 and 240: ( ( ( Table 1. Weed Control Ratings
- Page 241 and 242: at both weed rating dates at Newark
- Page 243 and 244: DNBP - Zytron Mixture for Weed Cont
- Page 245 and 246: ~ •• 245. ·Res~1~8 fr.o.George
- Page 247 and 248: 247. Weed Control in Soybeans with
- Page 249 and 250: 249, EFFECTOF HERBICIDESONSEEDPRODU
- Page 251 and 252: 251. TABLE3. EFFECTSOF APPLICATIONS
- Page 253 and 254: 253. almost a week, with treatment
- Page 255 and 256: ( ( ( , Table 1. Effects of Various
- Page 257 and 258: Table 3. anal.ysi.s of Soil l,esidu
- Page 259 and 260: Results and Discussion ;llien the f
- Page 261 and 262: 4. Immediate treattlent injury to t
- Page 263 and 264: ( ( ( Table n. :'.!:sti.Jl'ated.'er
- Page 265 and 266: have very littla real II'+eaningas
?16.<br />
TABLEI.<br />
EFFECT OF HERBICIDESONWEEDGtlOWTH<br />
AT MID-JUNE CUTTINGPEllIOD<br />
<strong>Weed</strong> Controll l<br />
Predom. Species<br />
Rate I-Poor to . Ranked G • GrasB<br />
Active '-Excellent <strong>Weed</strong> Index!1 <strong>Weed</strong>ControL!I B = Br~&dle8f<br />
!e!b~~d~ .}es.!l!:.-_,_6L916Q~_ _ -:-__ §/!/!O r: §/!3169.~ 6.(.9L69. _<br />
Simatsine 5.00· ; 9.0, .02 l_So! 0<br />
Atrasine 5.00<br />
,<br />
' 8 1lS ' .20 1.02 . B·<br />
.8!-l·<br />
Sima.ine 3.75 8.8 .00 0<br />
Atrasine 3.75 8.0 .83 .28_J I G<br />
Monoron . 3.20 8.0 .28 .21<br />
I<br />
C<br />
EPTC 6.00 7.0 1.56 .12 B<br />
"1<br />
-,<br />
B<br />
Manuron 2.40 8.0 .61 .06 G<br />
. ,~~ .<br />
Atrasine 2.50 1.0 '3.28 -<br />
J<br />
.32 I l G<br />
..<br />
... '!'"'A q ..<br />
" I<br />
IPt'C " ,.It.:.(¥)' 6.S 3.71 .52. . ..<br />
.. .,<br />
, '''' - .<br />
---_.<br />
.< .<br />
Monuron 1.60 6.3<br />
'<br />
;'~. }<br />
" "... 5.43 .66, , G<br />
"<br />
EM'C ' 2.00 4.5 8.21 -1.12 IG<br />
..~--- ......~<br />
Check 1.0 18.75 -1.63 B';G<br />
I,,"' . , ,<br />
... - :~. 7. ~ .- - .......... "... - - - - ~ - - ... - - - - - - - ....- - - - ~. - - - -. ~..':--t:;" - <br />
!/'~':: n~rmal gro_hi 7 •. commercial cOiltrol; 9 = complete' kill.:<br />
,-;1:/.Percent weed.coyer x heisht(~.):lOO =We.d Index. seed' Lit. Cit. (6) •<br />
.,<br />
.,<br />
: • y<br />
4/ Means included in brackets are not significantly different at the 5% level<br />
(Dun.can·,t,.)", Mult1,ple. Range Test. See Lit. Clt~: (2h'"<br />
. t,' -.' ';~ .<br />
~ :'<br />
'< '<br />
, '<br />
• t J.
Change language