Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Table 3. Yield of Carmel Oross Sweet Corn Following Flaating APP~lcation f?~ yarious Hel'bicides. Acre rate of herbicide AI 2# Simazine" wP!/'·-···pr)/ 3# Trietazine, WF PL' 2# Atrazine, WF rL 4' Trietazine, wr 1'L 2{1 TrietQzine, WF PL' . Iff Trietazine" Wf IL' ···.1".2# Diuron, WF IL . 0'.6# Di ron, WF IL 6,# PaLone , EM 6# Decthal, W1'PL 4# Dao t haL, WP PL 8# Dacthsl, WF 1'L 3# DNaI' + 2.22# Dalspon EM 3# DNBF+ 4.44# Da1apon EM Check 3# DNBP* 8.88# DalaponEM . Yield 1 2 :3 ~ 6 7 8 9 .10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Rank Wead control Broadleaf 2 3 1 .5 7 9 ~ 6 14 15 12 10 11 16 13 .!I WI = wettable gj Corn planted fL = applied L.S.D. 5~ 1% powder 6 June, 7 June, l! Means within brackets are not significantly level (Duncan's Multiple Range Test). 1960. 1960; EM applied at emergence 13 June, '60. different at the 5%
197. Table 4. rercent> Broadlear Weed Control Following }lanting hpplication of Various Herbicides. Means convorted Means Rank ~are rate of herbicide (AI) to angles % Y 2# atrazlne WI!! IL .88.16 1 2# Simazine WI rt 87.39 2 3# Trietazine W? ,IL 86.82 3 1.2# Diuron wr :FL 86.20 4 4# Trietazine WI IL 86.06 5 6# Falone EM . 8l~40 6 2# Trietazlne WI IL 80.01 7 0.6# Diuron WI rL 78.65 8 1# Trietazine wr IV 73.17 9 3# DNBr + 2.22# Da1aponEM 58.79 10 3# DNBr + 4.44# DalaponEM 55.13 11 8# Daetha1 wr fL 54.60 12 3# DNBP+ 8.88# Da1aponEM 48.88 13 6# Dactha1 wp rL 45.11 4# Daathal Wi IL 41.94 ~ L.S.D. 5% 10.03 1% 13.36 l/ WI = wettable powder g; Means included within brackets are not significantly different at the 5% level (Duncan's Multiple Range T~st).
- Page 145 and 146: 145. Conclusions ADexperiment carri
- Page 147 and 148: 147. Residual herbicide activity wa
- Page 149 and 150: - Table 1. Herbicides and Rates Use
- Page 151 and 152: ~ __ ( ( ( Table 3. WeedControl on
- Page 153 and 154: 153. TreatiD§ Established Hemlock
- Page 155 and 156: 155. flowering and growth in the sp
- Page 157 and 158: 157. Table 2. Pansy Weed Control (P
- Page 159 and 160: 1590 Table 3. Herbicides Used on Tu
- Page 161 and 162: ------- -------------_._------ ..
- Page 163 and 164: '. 163. In .Table 3 Co.mpariS01'U$
- Page 165 and 166: 1.65. "'-" Ia.!!l.! ! __!ind_a!!,d_
- Page 167 and 168: 167. Maleic Hydrazide for Weed Cont
- Page 169 and 170: 169. 1. Dana, M. N. Sensitive Fern
- Page 171 and 172: 171. -' Table 1. Amino triazole res
- Page 173 and 174: 1730 Additiona! apple .,samples wer
- Page 175 and 176: more consistently effective than 5
- Page 177 and 178: 177. HUBICIDES roll YOUNGAPPLE TUES
- Page 179 and 180: --. Table I. Treatments No. Materia
- Page 181 and 182: Table 1 -Effect of Granular Formula
- Page 183 and 184: iss. BVAWATIONor rIVE HEIBICIDES 10
- Page 185 and 186: PROGRESSREPORT'ON WEEDCONTROL IN CA
- Page 187 and 188: "'- Table' 1. Herbicide,s Used inCa
- Page 189 and 190: 189. Tabl\7 5. Rating ot BroodIest
- Page 191 and 192: WEEDGONTROLIN SWBE:rCORNWITHDACTHAL
- Page 193 and 194: D. FlantinB A!Plication of Thiolcar
- Page 195: Table 2. Rainfall, Monmouth, Maine
- Page 199 and 200: 1-. . " Table 6. Percent Broad1eaf
- Page 201 and 202: '\) 0' ,.... • ( ( ( Table 9. Y
- Page 203 and 204: ANNUALWEEDCONTROLIN POTATOESWITHDNB
- Page 205 and 206: ·205. Percen t Woad Can trol ·196
- Page 207 and 208: , r t"
- Page 209 and 210: Table 5. Annual Broadleaf Weed Cont
- Page 211 and 212: 211. Table 9. Effect of fast-Emerge
- Page 213 and 214: 2130 Conclusion There are quite a n
- Page 215 and 216: SOMERESEARCHANDWEEDCONTROL METHODS
- Page 217 and 218: -- ,,"I. ,'~; "... TABLEII. EFFECTO
- Page 219 and 220: ( ( ( - -~. , ~ ._w ~~ "PlOOl:tB21.
- Page 221 and 222: '-~ With respect to asparagus. howe
- Page 223 and 224: , 1 ,WEEDCONTROLIN ClaTAIN VlGBTABL
- Page 225 and 226: 225 • r '.,':' .TABU: ~~ ... ,WEE
- Page 227 and 228: 227 • . TABLEIV' -' WEED CONTROJ.
- Page 229 and 230: 2290 'of.' .'J • ~ : ~. ... :.' "
- Page 231 and 232: 231. Conclusions The results publis
- Page 233 and 234: possibility of too severe thinning
- Page 235 and 236: PRE-EMERGENCEWEEDCONTROLTN ceRN s,
- Page 237 and 238: INCORPORATED ANDUNINCORPORATED·LIQ
- Page 239 and 240: ( ( ( Table 1. Weed Control Ratings
- Page 241 and 242: at both weed rating dates at Newark
- Page 243 and 244: DNBP - Zytron Mixture for Weed Cont
- Page 245 and 246: ~ •• 245. ·Res~1~8 fr.o.George
197.<br />
Table 4. rercent> Broadlear <strong>Weed</strong> Control Following }lanting<br />
hpplication of Various Herbicides.<br />
Means convorted Means Rank<br />
~are rate of herbicide (AI) to angles %<br />
Y<br />
2# atrazlne WI!! IL .88.16 1<br />
2# Simazine WI rt 87.39 2<br />
3# Trietazine W? ,IL 86.82 3<br />
1.2# Diuron wr :FL 86.20 4<br />
4# Trietazine WI IL 86.06 5<br />
6# Falone EM . 8l~40 6<br />
2# Trietazlne WI IL 80.01 7<br />
0.6# Diuron WI rL 78.65 8<br />
1# Trietazine wr IV 73.17 9<br />
3# DNBr + 2.22# Da1aponEM 58.79 10<br />
3# DNBr + 4.44# DalaponEM 55.13 11<br />
8# Daetha1 wr fL 54.60 12<br />
3# DNBP+ 8.88# Da1aponEM 48.88 13<br />
6# Dactha1 wp rL 45.11<br />
4# Daathal Wi IL 41.94 ~<br />
L.S.D. 5% 10.03<br />
1% 13.36<br />
l/ WI = wettable powder<br />
g; Means included within brackets are not significantly different<br />
at the 5% level (Duncan's Multiple Range T~st).
Change language