Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
.; THE USEOF SEVERALHERBICIDESoliPERENNIALS . Arthur :Bing* The use and appreciation of biennial and perennial ornamental plants is limited by the cost of controlling weeds. The growth habits of most of these plants and the long period they remain in one location make close clean cultivation very diff1cul t if not impossible. Ornamental plants occur in a wide variety' of families and genera and frequently are close re.1.ati ve to weeds that the 'WOotVplant nurseryman is trying·. to control. Herbicides with a long lasting effect that w1ll kill most weeds and still not adversely affect a particular crop are desirable. Certain perennial weeds have shown specific resistance to certain herbicides. For this reason an experiment was conducted 'W1th some of the more promising long lasting herbicides on some of the more important perennials and biennials. Daffodil, Dahlia, Da¥lily, Oriental. Poppy, Pansy ,P~ny, Phlox, and Tulip were included in this study. Daffodil (Narcissus pseudo narcissus) A grower was interested in weed control on field grown daffodils. The bulbs are planted in rows in the field for 2 years atter forcing in the greenhouse tor winter cut flowers. At:ter groWing in the field they are again planted in flats and forced in the greenhouse. On Mq 2, 1960 after the daffodils had flowered in the field the treatments shown in Table 1 vere made on 20 foot sections of row. Table 1. Herbicides Used on Daffodils (Friarts Head Farms 1960) Material Rates Used Iii
155. flowering and growth in the spring of 1961 Will be necessary to properly evaluate crop tolerance. ' Dahlia (Dahlia pinnata) Treatments on newly planted dal:111-.swith S1maZ1ne, cm, and Diuron in 1959 showed good crop tolerance and' good weed control. This limited test was repeated in 1960 with s1m11arresults. , A large scale series of treatments was made on June 10 on a dalIl1a planting at the U. S. Veterans Hospital"No~thport" L.I-"N.Y. dThe 'rows were 200 feet lons and 4 feet apart. 'Plants had not yet emerged from the sol1 a1ld the area was fairly free of 'Weeds. . Replicate treatments were made Oil half rowan th liquid Simazine 80~ lv.P. at 1" 2" '3, and 4 J>Ounds actual per 100 gallons of water per acre and Diuron' 80~ W. P. at )." 1 112 and 2 pounds actual per 100 gallons of water per acre. ' , None of the treatments injured the dahlias • Weed control was evaJ.uated on July 25. S1ma.zine at 1 and 2 pound rates gave good weed control except for a few crabgrass" barnyard grass" and purslane. S1ma.zine,at 4 po6.nds controlled all weeds except a few grasses. Diuron at 1 Jamau pound gave fairly goodi1'1itia1coz;1trol but by July 25'afew ,grasses, purslane" and red root were com:1ngin.D:L~on at l 1/2: pouDds gave better controlbutsim1lar weeds:'to those in the 1 pound plots' were coming up. At the 2 pound rat,e of Diuron only, a few purslane were emerging. l?t&lily (Hemerocallis sp.) ~lilies are very desirable perennials that are left in the same 10ca.tion for many years. In the fell of 1959 and the sPring of 1960" herbicidal treatments with Sima.zine 4}&G·at 4,6,8, and lO' EPI'C 6% G at 3 and 6, and Amiben 10% G at 4 and 8 pounds actual per acre were apPlied to established dqlUies. During the 1960 growing season there were nO signs of injury from any of the treatments. Fall applications of Simazine resulted in the best weed, control. Larger scaJ.e treatments with Si.m$Zine at 4·6 pounds per acr,e were made d'ltring.'early November 1960. German Iris (Iris sp.) , Trea.tments made on iris .several years ago showed CIPC to be fairly safe on iris and to gi ve fair, weed control. Quackgiass is the most troubJ.esome weed in iris plantings and it is not controlled by CIPO. S1maz1,hecontrols quackgrass in peonies. 'In the fall of 1959 iris plants at the Martin Viette Nursery were treated With Sima.zine 4~ G at 4,6,8, and 10 pounds actual per acre , EPro 6% G at 3 and 6 pounds actual per acre, and with Amiben 10~ G at 4 and 8 'ppun4s actual per acre. 'The treatments were repeated on adjacent rows in the early sPring of 1960. None of the herbicidaJ. treatments produced any signs of injury during the growing season. Simazine applied during the faJ.l gave the best weed control. Six pounds of S1mazine per acre gave gOOdweed control.
- Page 103 and 104: The data in table 2 gives the signi
- Page 105 and 106: The following effects were noted. 1
- Page 107 and 108: PRE-fREATINGSOILS, APOSSIBLE.TECfiN
- Page 109 and 110: · 109. Table 2. The influence of d
- Page 111 and 112: ..... 11 ... - Progress Report on W
- Page 113 and 114: 113. fndothal as a pre-planting inc
- Page 115 and 116: 115~ Table 3. Mean markebab l.e 9£
- Page 117 and 118: 1170 Chemical Weed Control Charles
- Page 119 and 120: 119. Table I .. Weed contrOl! plant
- Page 121 and 122: 121. '- The stand of plants of bo
- Page 123 and 124: 123. Table II. Weed control stand a
- Page 125 and 126: EFFECTOF SEVERALHERBICIDESONEARLYYI
- Page 127 and 128: Table 2. Calcula.ted ecre yields of
- Page 129 and 130: 129. - Treatment Average weight per
- Page 131 and 132: -- The herbicides were applied on J
- Page 133 and 134: 133. Table 2. Effect of pre-plant h
- Page 135 and 136: - 135. Dim tro for Weed Control in
- Page 137 and 138: PJ,OORESSREPORT:ON.:WEEJhCGNTROL IN
- Page 139 and 140: - Simazine 2 and 2 1/2 lb./A and at
- Page 141 and 142: 141. Results - .l2.22 Table 2 shows
- Page 143 and 144: - !!!! Applications 143. The plots
- Page 145 and 146: 145. Conclusions ADexperiment carri
- Page 147 and 148: 147. Residual herbicide activity wa
- Page 149 and 150: - Table 1. Herbicides and Rates Use
- Page 151 and 152: ~ __ ( ( ( Table 3. WeedControl on
- Page 153: 153. TreatiD§ Established Hemlock
- Page 157 and 158: 157. Table 2. Pansy Weed Control (P
- Page 159 and 160: 1590 Table 3. Herbicides Used on Tu
- Page 161 and 162: ------- -------------_._------ ..
- Page 163 and 164: '. 163. In .Table 3 Co.mpariS01'U$
- Page 165 and 166: 1.65. "'-" Ia.!!l.! ! __!ind_a!!,d_
- Page 167 and 168: 167. Maleic Hydrazide for Weed Cont
- Page 169 and 170: 169. 1. Dana, M. N. Sensitive Fern
- Page 171 and 172: 171. -' Table 1. Amino triazole res
- Page 173 and 174: 1730 Additiona! apple .,samples wer
- Page 175 and 176: more consistently effective than 5
- Page 177 and 178: 177. HUBICIDES roll YOUNGAPPLE TUES
- Page 179 and 180: --. Table I. Treatments No. Materia
- Page 181 and 182: Table 1 -Effect of Granular Formula
- Page 183 and 184: iss. BVAWATIONor rIVE HEIBICIDES 10
- Page 185 and 186: PROGRESSREPORT'ON WEEDCONTROL IN CA
- Page 187 and 188: "'- Table' 1. Herbicide,s Used inCa
- Page 189 and 190: 189. Tabl\7 5. Rating ot BroodIest
- Page 191 and 192: WEEDGONTROLIN SWBE:rCORNWITHDACTHAL
- Page 193 and 194: D. FlantinB A!Plication of Thiolcar
- Page 195 and 196: Table 2. Rainfall, Monmouth, Maine
- Page 197 and 198: 197. Table 4. rercent> Broadlear We
- Page 199 and 200: 1-. . " Table 6. Percent Broad1eaf
- Page 201 and 202: '\) 0' ,.... • ( ( ( Table 9. Y
- Page 203 and 204: ANNUALWEEDCONTROLIN POTATOESWITHDNB
155.<br />
flowering and growth in the spring of 1961 Will be necessary to properly<br />
evaluate crop tolerance. '<br />
Dahlia<br />
(Dahlia pinnata)<br />
Treatments on newly planted dal:111-.swith S1maZ1ne, cm, and Diuron<br />
in 1959 showed good crop tolerance and' good weed control. This limited<br />
test was repeated in 1960 with s1m11arresults. , A large scale series of<br />
treatments was made on June 10 on a dalIl1a planting at the U. S. Veterans<br />
Hospital"No~thport" L.I-"N.Y. dThe 'rows were 200 feet lons and 4 feet<br />
apart. 'Plants had not yet emerged from the sol1 a1ld the area was fairly<br />
free of '<strong>Weed</strong>s. . Replicate treatments were made Oil half rowan th liquid<br />
Simazine 80~ lv.P. at 1" 2" '3, and 4 J>Ounds actual per 100 gallons of water per<br />
acre and Diuron' 80~ W. P. at )." 1 112 and 2 pounds actual per 100 gallons of<br />
water per acre. ' ,<br />
None of the treatments injured the dahlias • <strong>Weed</strong> control was<br />
evaJ.uated on July 25. S1ma.zine at 1 and 2 pound rates gave good weed<br />
control except for a few crabgrass" barnyard grass" and purslane.<br />
S1ma.zine,at 4 po6.nds controlled all weeds except a few grasses. Diuron at 1<br />
Jamau<br />
pound gave fairly goodi1'1itia1coz;1trol but by July 25'afew ,grasses,<br />
purslane" and red root were com:1ngin.D:L~on at l 1/2: pouDds gave better<br />
controlbutsim1lar weeds:'to those in the 1 pound plots' were coming up. At<br />
the 2 pound rat,e of Diuron only, a few purslane were emerging.<br />
l?t&lily (Hemerocallis sp.)<br />
~lilies are very desirable perennials that are left in the same<br />
10ca.tion for many years. In the fell of 1959 and the sPring of 1960"<br />
herbicidal treatments with Sima.zine 4}&G·at 4,6,8, and lO' EPI'C 6% G at 3<br />
and 6, and Amiben 10% G at 4 and 8 pounds actual per acre were apPlied to<br />
established dqlUies. During the 1960 growing season there were nO signs of<br />
injury from any of the treatments. Fall applications of Simazine resulted<br />
in the best weed, control. Larger scaJ.e treatments with Si.m$Zine at 4·6 pounds<br />
per acr,e were made d'ltring.'early November 1960.<br />
German Iris (Iris sp.) ,<br />
Trea.tments made on iris .several years ago showed CIPC to be fairly safe<br />
on iris and to gi ve fair, weed control. Quackgiass is the most troubJ.esome<br />
weed in iris plantings and it is not controlled by CIPO. S1maz1,hecontrols<br />
quackgrass in peonies. 'In the fall of 1959 iris plants at the Martin<br />
Viette Nursery were treated With Sima.zine 4~ G at 4,6,8, and 10 pounds<br />
actual<br />
per acre , EPro 6% G at 3 and 6 pounds actual per acre, and with<br />
Amiben 10~ G at 4 and 8 'ppun4s actual per acre. 'The treatments were<br />
repeated on adjacent rows in the early sPring of 1960.<br />
None of the herbicidaJ. treatments produced any signs of injury during<br />
the growing season. Simazine applied during the faJ.l gave the best weed control.<br />
Six pounds of S1mazine per acre gave gOOdweed control.