Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
148. WEEDCONrROLEXPERIMENl'S WITHNURSERYPLAlf.rS Arthur Bing* This report is on a continuation ot the wee,d control experiments being carried out at the Cornell Ornamentals Research Laboratory on Long Island and in commercial nurseries in the Nell'York metropoli tanar.ea. This work is being carried out' in collaboration with Dr • Pridham at Ithaca. There are several separate experiments being carried on and each will be discussed seParately. Tolerance of Nursery stock to Herbicic.les There is much interest in which herbicides at what strength. can be used on woody ornamentals grOWing in the nursery row or in a ~andscape planting. This experiment is concerned with the planting ot a variety of yoUDgwoody plants and treating them with various rates of herbicides. One set of Atrazine plots was raked in after treatment to see if it 'j" > improved or lowered the usefulness of the material. A similar trial was carried out with EPI'C. Four hundred foot roys containing 200 ~iners 2 feet apart were planted with 3 feet between rows. There were t-.o rows of Taxus cus:p1data Hicks1i (Hicks yew), and one each of Uex crenata convexa (Boxleafed Holly) , Juniperus hetzii (Hetz juniper), Ligustrum ovalitol1um (California privet), Rhododendron obtussum var. Hinocrimson (Hinocrimson azaJ.ea), and B;ydrangea macrophy'lla var. Stratford (Stratford hydrangea). PJ.antings were made on ~ 3 to ll, all rows were tractor cultivated on Mq 12, and herbicidal treatments made on Mq 13 and 17. Each treatment consisted of 1 concentration of: a"material across the rows to include 2 plants in each row. The granular treatments were appl.ied with a calibrated lawn spreader mounted on large wooden wheels. The liquids were applied with a 1 172 gallon hand sprqer equipped with a flat spr. nozzle. Liquid was applied at 1 quart per 100 square feet which is equivalent to ~OO gallons per acre. The treatments and rates used are shown in Table ~. One set ot Atrazine treatments was raked in (cult) the other was lett undisturbed. EPTCtreatments were also applied in duplicate and one set of treatments raked into the soil. Atrazine plus Zytron and Atrazine plus Dacthal were used to try to control crabgra.ss which usually comes up strong in otherwise clean Atrazine plots. The Dacthal, Zytron, CDEC,Amiben, and CIPC plots became weedy fa.irly early and were hand weeded. Weed ratings were made June 18 before the hand weeding and on August ~7-24 when all plots were cultivated and hand noed. Cultivation was continued weekly until fall treatments were made in ~" early November 1$)60. PJ.ant tolerance data were taken September 16. Table 2 shows the minimum rate ot &ny' herbicide used in the experiment that caused marked injury during the four month growing period. Atrazine did not serioualy affect Uex at erry of the rates used (see Table 1 for rates used) but at 8 pounds per acre was harmful to pr1 vet. Simazine and Atrazine were quite * Cornell OrnamentaJ.s Research Laboratory, Farmingdale, Long Island, NewYork.
- Table 1. Herbicides and Rates Used on Nursery Stock Applied 5/13-5/17/60 Material Formulation Rates Used Pounds Actual Per Acre
- Page 97 and 98: 97. Weed counts were made 3 weeks a
- Page 99 and 100: 99. Third applications were made on
- Page 101 and 102: 1t1. ~ata - Onion stand counts, wee
- Page 103 and 104: The data in table 2 gives the signi
- Page 105 and 106: The following effects were noted. 1
- Page 107 and 108: PRE-fREATINGSOILS, APOSSIBLE.TECfiN
- Page 109 and 110: · 109. Table 2. The influence of d
- Page 111 and 112: ..... 11 ... - Progress Report on W
- Page 113 and 114: 113. fndothal as a pre-planting inc
- Page 115 and 116: 115~ Table 3. Mean markebab l.e 9£
- Page 117 and 118: 1170 Chemical Weed Control Charles
- Page 119 and 120: 119. Table I .. Weed contrOl! plant
- Page 121 and 122: 121. '- The stand of plants of bo
- Page 123 and 124: 123. Table II. Weed control stand a
- Page 125 and 126: EFFECTOF SEVERALHERBICIDESONEARLYYI
- Page 127 and 128: Table 2. Calcula.ted ecre yields of
- Page 129 and 130: 129. - Treatment Average weight per
- Page 131 and 132: -- The herbicides were applied on J
- Page 133 and 134: 133. Table 2. Effect of pre-plant h
- Page 135 and 136: - 135. Dim tro for Weed Control in
- Page 137 and 138: PJ,OORESSREPORT:ON.:WEEJhCGNTROL IN
- Page 139 and 140: - Simazine 2 and 2 1/2 lb./A and at
- Page 141 and 142: 141. Results - .l2.22 Table 2 shows
- Page 143 and 144: - !!!! Applications 143. The plots
- Page 145 and 146: 145. Conclusions ADexperiment carri
- Page 147: 147. Residual herbicide activity wa
- Page 151 and 152: ~ __ ( ( ( Table 3. WeedControl on
- Page 153 and 154: 153. TreatiD§ Established Hemlock
- Page 155 and 156: 155. flowering and growth in the sp
- Page 157 and 158: 157. Table 2. Pansy Weed Control (P
- Page 159 and 160: 1590 Table 3. Herbicides Used on Tu
- Page 161 and 162: ------- -------------_._------ ..
- Page 163 and 164: '. 163. In .Table 3 Co.mpariS01'U$
- Page 165 and 166: 1.65. "'-" Ia.!!l.! ! __!ind_a!!,d_
- Page 167 and 168: 167. Maleic Hydrazide for Weed Cont
- Page 169 and 170: 169. 1. Dana, M. N. Sensitive Fern
- Page 171 and 172: 171. -' Table 1. Amino triazole res
- Page 173 and 174: 1730 Additiona! apple .,samples wer
- Page 175 and 176: more consistently effective than 5
- Page 177 and 178: 177. HUBICIDES roll YOUNGAPPLE TUES
- Page 179 and 180: --. Table I. Treatments No. Materia
- Page 181 and 182: Table 1 -Effect of Granular Formula
- Page 183 and 184: iss. BVAWATIONor rIVE HEIBICIDES 10
- Page 185 and 186: PROGRESSREPORT'ON WEEDCONTROL IN CA
- Page 187 and 188: "'- Table' 1. Herbicide,s Used inCa
- Page 189 and 190: 189. Tabl\7 5. Rating ot BroodIest
- Page 191 and 192: WEEDGONTROLIN SWBE:rCORNWITHDACTHAL
- Page 193 and 194: D. FlantinB A!Plication of Thiolcar
- Page 195 and 196: Table 2. Rainfall, Monmouth, Maine
- Page 197 and 198: 197. Table 4. rercent> Broadlear We
-<br />
Table 1. Herbicides and Rates Used on Nursery Stock<br />
Applied 5/13-5/17/60<br />
Material Formulation Rates Used Pounds Actual Per Acre