08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 15—1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 15—1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 15—1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

144.<br />

Results<br />

Table 5 shows the herbicides used and the weed control rgtinga<br />

each month prior to cleaning the plots of existing weeds•<br />

......................., ,.<br />

TABLE5. HERBICIDES APPLIEDK>NTHLY OURIm THE1960 SEASON<br />

AND WEEDRATINGSJUSTPRIORTO EACHAPPLICATION<br />

The first application was made Hay 16.<br />

Plot Numbers correspond to same plots<br />

a8 in Tables 2, 3, and 4.<br />

PLOT RATE WEEDCONTROL RATINGS<br />

2<br />

NO. HEIUlICIDE(lb./A) l<br />

JUNE16 JULY15 AUG.12 NOV.3 AVERAGE<br />

4 EPTC 4 5.1 5.3 6.3 , 5. 1 5.8<br />

6 CDIC (spray) 8 7.3 3.0 6.7 5.7 5.7<br />

7 CDIC 8 7.7 6.0 7.3 7.0 7.0<br />

12 CIPC 8 5.0 5.3 6.0 4.7 5.2<br />

I Atrazlne 1 9.0 8.3 8.7 9.0 8.8<br />

3 Simazine 1 8.0 6.1 8.0 8.3 7.8<br />

(Treatments below were applied July 1 and August 12 only)<br />

2 Atrazine 2 7.0 8.7 1.0 9.0 7.9<br />

11 Simazine 2 7.7 1.7 6.7 9.0 7.8<br />

1 All herbicides were applied as granular except as indicated.<br />

2<strong>Weed</strong>Control Ratinas: 1 • no control; 9. clean<br />

A rating of 7 meant that only a very few small weeds<br />

were present an~ plotl could be' cleaned" quickly.<br />

........,......................" "..<br />

Of the treatuents applied monthly. the beet weed control resulted<br />

from simazine 1 tb.tA andatrazine i lb../A. Second best, but satisfactory<br />

weed control; was CDEC8 lb./A granul~r. Consistently poorer ratings<br />

resulted fromCDEC8 Ib./A as spray, ~PTC 4 lb./A, and CIPC 8 lb./A.<br />

The plots receiving atrazine 2 Ib./A and simazine 2 lb./A "wben<br />

needed" reqUired two weedings and two appUcations for the seasOIl. Check<br />

plots were weeded five times.<br />

--<br />

Stand counts and height measurementa of the plants ware taken<br />

November8, 1960 to evaluate tbe~njury fro. herbicidal treatments. The<br />

results showed that (1) TaXU8and Juniperus apparently were not affected<br />

by the treatments. (2) stand of ericaceous planta was not affected by<br />

the treatments, (3) height measuremeuts gave significant differences for<br />

Azaleas only. The measur$ments showe4 ~nbibited growth of Azaleas fro.<br />

two years appllcatioll8 of EPTC'(S lb. first year and 4 lb. second year);<br />

CDEC(10 lb. first year and 8 lb. second year); S1mazine (2 lb. both years).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!