Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Resulta All treated plota were clean of aDDUalweede in April and remained 80 UDtil about the fir8t of June when weeda began to appear In the p10ta treated with propaaiu 2 lb. and 81mazine 2 lb. About the lliddle of June, BuOIlJlll!UI tbat'eeceived 'atraal. at 4 Ib./A began to .bow injur,. Table 1 ahowl the weed control aad plant injur, observed at the end of June ancJ early July. B, tbis tiM, w.eds bad bacun to Brow in the plotl treated. witb propazi. 2 lb. ancJlf.maalne2 lb. Plota tbat received atrazine 2 lb. or 4 lb. ancJ 11mazine 4 lb. were stUl relativoly clean. Baaed on the aUlllber of planta dead or injured. Rhododendron could not tolerate atraal~e.at 4 10,. Dut other' treat1Hnt1 were .afe. Simaaine at 2 lb. wal the oa1, 'treat _t that did not' injure Iuonymua. ' . . . ......•........•.....•.••.•••...•.........••...•.. , . - ~ TABLE1. WEEDCONTROLANDPLANTINJURYJUNE 27. 1960 '. . PROM.APPLICATIONMADE' OCTOBER23.' 1960. CRBMlCAt RATE AVERAGB RHODODBtmRON. EUONYMUS• .... (lb./A) WOD CONTROL (No.out of 12 planta) DJURY . BATING* DJW) INJURED (Ju1, 8,1960) Check 1 0 1 .None Propazine .. 2 5 0 0 Slight Atraz1_ ,2 8.3 I I Moderate Atraz1ne 4 8.7 4 3 Severe Simazine 2 4.3 1 0 Rone stmaairae 4 9 0 0 Sligbt ... - - *Weed Control , Retinas: 1 : no control; " 9 : clean ; ~;~,. This and other trials baveshown that a fall application of ·.tmazia. at 2 lb./A gave practical control of annual weede untn about the firat of JuDe. when crabgrass was u8ual1, the firat weed to appear. FJ:.'OIIl this teat, ··it 'appeared that EuOU'!!8 radicans ve,etus va. quite sensitive, to the triaz1nes. Atraztne was more injurious than limadaa. The symptom of injur, to Buonymus was chlorotic leaves Dear: the ends of the br4DCbes. In severe cases the _plants were atUDted.. _ \ . .' , ' . ~ '"~ ~ , QU'ACKGllASS IN BsTABLISHBDNURSEllY STOCK All teat. were conducted at a coaaercial aurler, onaandy 10.. soU. l!.!! Applieation-!!! Tr1a~inel. ' • . ,-, t s All applicatiOUs iie~e 'aprays of wettable powder fOl'1llUlatious in about 50 gall0DS of water per acre. St.. a1ne 5 Ib./A and atrazine S Ib./A were applied September 23, 1959 to quackgra88 in established Globe Arborvitae. Hemlock, and Taxus. Quack sprouted and began to grow in April, yellowed and began dyiag back ta May. and did not re-.proutafter cultivation. }alots appeared to be clean of quack in .June and for the remainder of the aealon. The nursery pluts did DOt abow anJ lymptofDSof injury.
- Simazine 2 and 2 1/2 lb./A and atrazine 2 and 2 1/2 tb./A were appl~ed September 23 or October 14, 1959, to quack in established Globe Arborvitae, Hemloek, Taxus, and Carolina Rhododendron.' Quack sprou~ed~n April but showed evidence or having been weakened in May. Cultivation tmproved control, 'an~' by June the"population and vigor of quack was markedly les8 than untre£ed'('l".':; areas. Crabgrass grew vigorously in the treated area, but quack did not:·. ;~L~'ti'~ return. The nursery plants did not show injury. . !S; "',,; Propazine at 2 1/2 Ib./A was applied September 23, 1959 to quack in Glohe Arborvitae. The results were about equal to,bUt not better than, simazine and atrazine at the same rate. ,~., '~, :j t~ A combination of dalapon 6 Ib./A with atrazine 2 lb./A applied October 14, 1959 gave no better control than the saenerate of atradne alone'. Conclusion ' ,J Fall applications of stmazine or atra~i~e at 5 Ib./A gave excellent control. Simazine, atrazine, or propazine at 2 and ,2 112 lb./A resulted in marked' " reduction of quack in most of the plots. Quackgrass sprouted in early, spring: (following the fall application) but was obviously weakened. Spring and summer cultivation appeared to aid in destroying the remaining quackgrass. Globe Arborvitae, Hemlock, and Taxus appeared eo tolerate ..fall application of simazine and atrazine as high as 5 lb./A. Carolina Rhododendron appeared to, tolerate simazine and atrazine at 2 lb./A., Sprins ApplIcation of Dalapon ~ Amitrol Crop: Pyramidal Arborvitae (Thuja occidentalle) 4 '.5' high in quackgrass sod. Date of Treatment: April 29, 1960, when quack was:4" high; repeat sprays , applied May 12, 1960., , , Method: Sprays were directed to quack around ,bastl~ofplants at 100 gal./A. Area Treated: Twofeet of row, 100 feet long. The remaining middle, about 3 feet, was cultivated with tototiller. ',,' , ,.;,: T~e~~~nts applied: , ., :t (1) dalapon 8 1b./A (repeated) (2) dalapon 6 lb./A (repeated) " ,;() .da1apon 6 Ib./A + "Plyae" sticke,t: (l'epeated··w.tthout sticker) J:L"}.; :(4h dalapon 6 1b./A + simazine 2 1/2, Ib.iA ,(repeated wit.hout: .Jimaz-lnft), .{~).,. da,lapon 6 lb./A + atrazine 2 1/2 Ib~/A (r"eated;witl\out ,e.t:r:azine) '':lr.i.!{~''.daJ-~p,01'\ 6 Ib./A + Karsil 4 lb./A ,(repeated) >', '1~d7r) ,pal~p'o'Pt)6 lb. + amitrol"T 1/2~-1b.JA{notlrepeated) . (").111 (8) "W"'~l'ol"T 2 Ib./A (not repeated) C)b' (9) ,am,-trol"T 1 lb./A (not repea,te4l ", (10) :a~il;rol-T 1 lb./A + "Plyac" sticker (not rep...-ted) , " (11) ~~troJ·T 1 Ib.tA + simazine·2 1/2.lb./A,.(not,repeated)
- Page 87 and 88: Table I. Weed control, plant stand,
- Page 89 and 90: Table 1 - Table Beets Pre-plant; Pr
- Page 91 and 92: 91. Chemical Weed Control in Onions
- Page 93 and 94: 93. Table I. l;ced control, plant s
- Page 95 and 96: 95. Results Survey Table I of Hando
- Page 97 and 98: 97. Weed counts were made 3 weeks a
- Page 99 and 100: 99. Third applications were made on
- Page 101 and 102: 1t1. ~ata - Onion stand counts, wee
- Page 103 and 104: The data in table 2 gives the signi
- Page 105 and 106: The following effects were noted. 1
- Page 107 and 108: PRE-fREATINGSOILS, APOSSIBLE.TECfiN
- Page 109 and 110: · 109. Table 2. The influence of d
- Page 111 and 112: ..... 11 ... - Progress Report on W
- Page 113 and 114: 113. fndothal as a pre-planting inc
- Page 115 and 116: 115~ Table 3. Mean markebab l.e 9£
- Page 117 and 118: 1170 Chemical Weed Control Charles
- Page 119 and 120: 119. Table I .. Weed contrOl! plant
- Page 121 and 122: 121. '- The stand of plants of bo
- Page 123 and 124: 123. Table II. Weed control stand a
- Page 125 and 126: EFFECTOF SEVERALHERBICIDESONEARLYYI
- Page 127 and 128: Table 2. Calcula.ted ecre yields of
- Page 129 and 130: 129. - Treatment Average weight per
- Page 131 and 132: -- The herbicides were applied on J
- Page 133 and 134: 133. Table 2. Effect of pre-plant h
- Page 135 and 136: - 135. Dim tro for Weed Control in
- Page 137: PJ,OORESSREPORT:ON.:WEEJhCGNTROL IN
- Page 141 and 142: 141. Results - .l2.22 Table 2 shows
- Page 143 and 144: - !!!! Applications 143. The plots
- Page 145 and 146: 145. Conclusions ADexperiment carri
- Page 147 and 148: 147. Residual herbicide activity wa
- Page 149 and 150: - Table 1. Herbicides and Rates Use
- Page 151 and 152: ~ __ ( ( ( Table 3. WeedControl on
- Page 153 and 154: 153. TreatiD§ Established Hemlock
- Page 155 and 156: 155. flowering and growth in the sp
- Page 157 and 158: 157. Table 2. Pansy Weed Control (P
- Page 159 and 160: 1590 Table 3. Herbicides Used on Tu
- Page 161 and 162: ------- -------------_._------ ..
- Page 163 and 164: '. 163. In .Table 3 Co.mpariS01'U$
- Page 165 and 166: 1.65. "'-" Ia.!!l.! ! __!ind_a!!,d_
- Page 167 and 168: 167. Maleic Hydrazide for Weed Cont
- Page 169 and 170: 169. 1. Dana, M. N. Sensitive Fern
- Page 171 and 172: 171. -' Table 1. Amino triazole res
- Page 173 and 174: 1730 Additiona! apple .,samples wer
- Page 175 and 176: more consistently effective than 5
- Page 177 and 178: 177. HUBICIDES roll YOUNGAPPLE TUES
- Page 179 and 180: --. Table I. Treatments No. Materia
- Page 181 and 182: Table 1 -Effect of Granular Formula
- Page 183 and 184: iss. BVAWATIONor rIVE HEIBICIDES 10
- Page 185 and 186: PROGRESSREPORT'ON WEEDCONTROL IN CA
- Page 187 and 188: "'- Table' 1. Herbicide,s Used inCa
-<br />
Simazine 2 and 2 1/2 lb./A and atrazine 2 and 2 1/2 tb./A were appl~ed<br />
September 23 or October 14, 1959, to quack in established Globe Arborvitae,<br />
Hemloek, Taxus, and Carolina Rhododendron.' Quack sprou~ed~n April but showed<br />
evidence or having been weakened in May. Cultivation tmproved control, 'an~'<br />
by June the"population and vigor of quack was markedly les8 than untre£ed'('l".':;<br />
areas. Crabgrass grew vigorously in the treated area, but quack did not:·. ;~L~'ti'~<br />
return. The nursery plants did not show injury. . !S; "',,;<br />
Propazine at 2 1/2 Ib./A was applied September 23, 1959 to quack in<br />
Glohe Arborvitae. The results were about equal to,bUt not better than,<br />
simazine and atrazine at the same rate.<br />
,~., '~, :j t~<br />
A combination of dalapon 6 Ib./A with atrazine 2 lb./A applied<br />
October 14, 1959 gave no better control than the saenerate of atradne alone'.<br />
Conclusion ' ,J<br />
Fall applications of stmazine or atra~i~e at 5 Ib./A gave excellent control.<br />
Simazine, atrazine, or propazine at 2 and ,2 112 lb./A resulted in marked' "<br />
reduction of quack in most of the plots. Quackgrass sprouted in early, spring:<br />
(following the fall application) but was obviously weakened. Spring and summer<br />
cultivation appeared to aid in destroying the remaining quackgrass. Globe<br />
Arborvitae, Hemlock, and Taxus appeared eo tolerate ..fall application of<br />
simazine and atrazine as high as 5 lb./A. Carolina Rhododendron appeared<br />
to, tolerate simazine and atrazine at 2 lb./A.,<br />
Sprins ApplIcation of Dalapon ~ Amitrol<br />
Crop: Pyramidal Arborvitae (Thuja occidentalle) 4 '.5'<br />
high in quackgrass sod.<br />
Date of Treatment: April 29, 1960, when quack was:4" high; repeat sprays<br />
, applied May 12, 1960., , ,<br />
Method: Sprays were directed to quack around ,bastl~ofplants at 100 gal./A.<br />
Area Treated: Twofeet of row, 100 feet long. The remaining middle, about<br />
3 feet, was cultivated with tototiller. ',,' , ,.;,:<br />
T~e~~~nts applied: , ., :t<br />
(1) dalapon 8 1b./A (repeated)<br />
(2) dalapon 6 lb./A (repeated)<br />
" ,;() .da1apon 6 Ib./A + "Plyae" sticke,t: (l'epeated··w.tthout sticker)<br />
J:L"}.; :(4h dalapon 6 1b./A + simazine 2 1/2, Ib.iA ,(repeated wit.hout: .Jimaz-lnft),<br />
.{~).,. da,lapon 6 lb./A + atrazine 2 1/2 Ib~/A (r"eated;witl\out ,e.t:r:azine)<br />
'':lr.i.!{~''.daJ-~p,01'\ 6 Ib./A + Karsil 4 lb./A ,(repeated) >',<br />
'1~d7r) ,pal~p'o'Pt)6 lb. + amitrol"T 1/2~-1b.JA{notlrepeated) .<br />
(").111 (8) "W"'~l'ol"T 2 Ib./A (not repeated)<br />
C)b' (9) ,am,-trol"T 1 lb./A (not repea,te4l ",<br />
(10) :a~il;rol-T 1 lb./A + "Plyac" sticker (not rep...-ted) , "<br />
(11) ~~troJ·T 1 Ib.tA + simazine·2 1/2.lb./A,.(not,repeated)