08.06.2015 Views

Proceedings of the Sixty-first Annual Meeting of the Northeastern ...

Proceedings of the Sixty-first Annual Meeting of the Northeastern ...

Proceedings of the Sixty-first Annual Meeting of the Northeastern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

87<br />

RESPONSE OF PALE SWALLOW-WORT TO TRICLOPYR APPLICATION AND<br />

CLIPPING. K.M. Averill, A. DiTommaso, and S.H. Morris, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY.<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Pale swallow-wort (Vincetoxicum rossicum (Kleopow) Barbar.) is an invasive<br />

alien vine in natural areas in many Nor<strong>the</strong>astern U.S. States and Provinces <strong>of</strong> Ontario<br />

and Quebec. Since effective control <strong>of</strong> this herbaceous perennial has been previously<br />

difficult, we conducted a two-year (2005-2006) triclopyr and clipping field study in<br />

Chaumont, NY. We compared <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> a single season (mid-June 2005) foliar<br />

application <strong>of</strong> triclopyr at <strong>the</strong> labeled rate <strong>of</strong> 1.9 kg a.e. ha -1 , alone and in combination<br />

with clipping <strong>of</strong> aboveground tissue (mid-July), and <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> clipping once (mid-<br />

June) and twice (mid-June and mid-July) during <strong>the</strong> <strong>first</strong> and second seasons on pale<br />

swallow-wort stem and seedling density and percentage cover. By <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong><br />

September 2005, pale swallow-wort stem densities were significantly lower in triclopyrtreated<br />

plots (0.43 to 13 stems m -2 ) than in clipped-only (181 to 206 stems m -2 ) and<br />

unmanaged control (167 stems m -2 ) plots. Similarly, <strong>the</strong> percentage cover <strong>of</strong> pale<br />

swallow-wort was significantly lower in plots treated with triclopyr (6 to 13%) compared<br />

with plots subjected to clipping only treatments (76-85%) or unmanaged control plots<br />

(78%). By <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> September 2005, <strong>the</strong> percentage cover <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r plant species was<br />

significantly higher in triclopyr treatments (66 to 67%) than in <strong>the</strong> clipping only<br />

treatments (11-16%) and in <strong>the</strong> unmanaged control (11%). The same differences in<br />

stem density and percentage cover were observed through August 2006. Seedling<br />

densities <strong>of</strong> pale swallow-wort varied by year and treatment. Densities were significantly<br />

greater in <strong>the</strong> clipping only and control treatments in 2005 (964 to 1207 seedlings m -2 )<br />

than <strong>the</strong> same treatments in 2006 (414 to 493 seedlings m -2 ), but <strong>the</strong>y were not<br />

significantly different in <strong>the</strong> triclopyr treatments between 2005 (114 to 207 seedlings m -<br />

2 ) and 2006 (111 to 254 seedlings m -2 ). By <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> both <strong>the</strong> 2005 and 2006 growing<br />

seasons, in clipping only plots mature follicles were produced, however in triclopyrtreated<br />

plots no follicles were produced. Thus, <strong>the</strong> clipping only treatments, regardless<br />

<strong>of</strong> frequency, were not effective in reducing pale swallow-wort aboveground biomass,<br />

cover, or follicle production. The timing <strong>of</strong> clipping may be critical in reducing follicle<br />

production and, although fur<strong>the</strong>r assessments are necessary, a later-season (August)<br />

clipping may be more effective. Although in this study a single application <strong>of</strong> triclopyr<br />

provided considerable control <strong>of</strong> pale swallow-wort even after two growing seasons, it is<br />

likely that repeat applications <strong>of</strong> triclopyr during multiple years would be required to<br />

achieve effective control, especially in heavily infested areas.<br />

69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!