Proceedings of the Sixty-first Annual Meeting of the Northeastern ...
Proceedings of the Sixty-first Annual Meeting of the Northeastern ... Proceedings of the Sixty-first Annual Meeting of the Northeastern ...
46 ROTARY HOE EFFICACY IN CORN: INFLUENCE OF SOIL TYPE AND MOISTURE. M.G. Burton, C. Reberg-Horton, G.T. Place, and S.T. Hoyle, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh. ABSTRACT Early season in-row (within 10 cm of crop row) weed control in corn was evaluated at two locations in 2006. Factors in the study included the different soil types (sand vs. loam) at the Sandhills (Jackson Springs, NC) and Cunningham (Kinston, NC) Research Stations, and moisture. The experiment was established in a stripped-plot design with irrigation level (none, 1.25 cm and 2.5 cm rainfall equivalent) in stripped plots and rotary hoe frequency in subplots. Rotary hoe frequency treatments included: None, 5, 5+12, 12+19, and 5+12+19 DAP. Three weeks after the conclusion of the 19 DAP rotary hoe treatment, counts of surviving weeds within 10 cm of the crop row were counted and identified by species (these weeds were considered likely to escape cultivator sweeps in subsequent cultivation passes with different equipment. The HADSS computer program was used to calculate potential yield loss using this species and density data. No interaction was observed between soil moisture and rotary hoe treatments at either location. Soil moisture level did not affect corn stand at either location. Corn stand was reduced (5%) by multiple rotary hoe passes only at the Cunningham farm. Weed density was affected by soil moisture only at the Sandhills location, where dry conditions resulted in lower weed emergence in the low moisture treatment (p=0.02). Weed density was reduced at both locations by multiple passes of the rotary hoe, and at the Sandhills location by a single pass (5 DAP) (p
47 EFFECTIVENESS OF A ROLLER/CRIMPER FOR CONTROL OF WINTER ANNUAL COVER CROPS. W. Curran, S. Mirsky, and M. Ryan, The Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park. ABSTRACT Cover crop roller/crimpers are increasing in popularity. In 2005, Penn State University constructed a roller/crimper designed after a Rodale Institute prototype. Over the last two years, several experiments have investigated the effectiveness of the roller/crimper for control of winter annual cover crops. Most of the efforts at Penn State have focused on cereal rye control as influenced by planting date in the fall and termination date in the spring. In 2006, additional trials examined reduced rates of herbicide in combination with the roller/crimper for control of both cereal rye (Secale cereale) and hairy vetch (Vicia villosa). Glyphosate was examined in cereal rye and 2,4-D was used in the hairy vetch trial. A third experiment in 2006 examined the effectiveness of the roller/crimper for control of winter rape (Brassica napus) alone and in combination with glyphosate. In the rape experiment, two application timings based on cover crop growth stage were examined. In all experiments, either Roundup Ready corn or soybean was no-till planted shortly after rolling the cover crops and glyphosate was used for in-season weed control. The results of the cereal rye experiment showed that the roller treatment alone only provided about 50% control of the cover crop. The rye was just beginning to head and not yet susceptible to control with rolling alone. The combination of glyphosate applied at either 0.093 lb ae/A (1/8X) or 0.1875 lb/A (1/4X) with rolling provided 85% and 94% rye control, respectively 14 days after application. The reduced rates of glyphosate alone provided 67 and 89% control. In the hairy vetch trial, rolling alone provided about 75% control of the hairy vetch and the addition of 2,4-D LVE increased control to over 90%. Again, the hairy vetch was just beginning to flower and not completely susceptible to control from rolling alone. Hairy vetch is very susceptible to 2,4-D and application of 0.25 lb ae/A provided effective control regardless of the roller treatment. Finally, rolling winter rape alone at either the early or mid flowering stages of growth was not very effective for control and a full rate of glyphosate (0.75 lb/A) was necessary to achieve greater than 85% control. Glyphosate applied at 0.375 lb/A provided about 80% winter rape control. The results of this research show that reduced rate herbicide programs combined with roller/crimper technology can be more effective for control of certain cover crops such as cereal rye than either tactic alone. For other cover crops such as hairy vetch and winter rape, the roller/crimper is less effective for control and will require alternative tactics or strategies for effective control prior to establishing a cash crop. 29
- Page 1 and 2: 1 Proceedings of the Sixty-first An
- Page 3 and 4: 3 NORTHEASTERN WEED SCIENCE SOCIETY
- Page 5 and 6: 5 SECTION CHAIRS Agronomy Chair: J.
- Page 7 and 8: 7 CARFENTRAZONE AND QUINCLORAC FOR
- Page 9 and 10: 9 THE EFFICACY AND CROP TOLERANCE O
- Page 11 and 12: 11 EVALUATION OF HERBICIDES FOR CON
- Page 13 and 14: 13 BEING HEARD BY THE IR-4 PROJECT.
- Page 15 and 16: 15 ABSTRACTS FROM THE 7 TH CONFEREN
- Page 17: 17 HERBICIDE NAMES: COMMON, TRADE,
- Page 20 and 21: 20 INTEGRATING WEED CONTROL STRATEG
- Page 22 and 23: 22 GIANT HOGWEED ERADICATION IN PEN
- Page 24 and 25: 24 EFFECTS OF EMERGENCE PERIODICITY
- Page 26 and 27: 26 PRODUCER AND PRODUCTION IMPACTS
- Page 28 and 29: 28 A SIMPLE METHOD FOR CLEANING TUF
- Page 30 and 31: 30 EMERGENCE AND PERFORMANCE OF TWO
- Page 32 and 33: 32 CARFENTRAZONE AND QUINCLORAC FOR
- Page 34 and 35: 34 2006 NEWSS SUMMER WEED CONTEST R
- Page 36 and 37: 36 INVASIVE AQUATIC WEEDS IN NORTH
- Page 38 and 39: 38 AMMONIUM PELARGONATE AS A BIOHER
- Page 40 and 41: 40 TRINEXAPAC-ETHYL INFLUENCES EFFI
- Page 42 and 43: 42 Table 1. Insect feeding damage,
- Page 44 and 45: 44 WEED CONTROL WITH TOPRAMEZONE PR
- Page 48 and 49: 48 ALFALFA/GRASS FORAGE MIXTURES US
- Page 50 and 51: 50 CONTROL OF NEW WEED SPECIES IN T
- Page 52 and 53: 52 Table 1. Results of 2006 contain
- Page 54 and 55: 54 TOLERANCES OF ORNAMENTAL SHRUBS
- Page 56 and 57: 56 2006 WEED MANAGEMENT TRIALS IN C
- Page 58 and 59: 58 THE RESPONSE OF FIELD AND CONTAI
- Page 60 and 61: 60 THE EFFICACY AND CROP TOLERANCE
- Page 62 and 63: 62 Table 2. Plant quality ratings o
- Page 64 and 65: 64 EVALUATION OF PROLINE-LINKED PEN
- Page 66 and 67: 66 ANNUAL BLUEGRASS AND DOLLAR SPOT
- Page 68 and 69: 68 Table 1. Autumn 2005 versus spri
- Page 70 and 71: 70 A PRELIMINARY STUDY OF THE NON-N
- Page 72 and 73: 72 native species, covering and smo
- Page 74 and 75: 74 EFFECTS OF BUCKWHEAT RESIDUE ON
- Page 76 and 77: 76 Japanese knotweed control 28 DAT
- Page 78 and 79: 78 ENHANCED TOLERANCE TO WEED COMPE
- Page 80 and 81: 80 EFFECTS OF PLANTING AND TERMINAT
- Page 82 and 83: 82 A UNIFYING FRAMEWORK FOR SPECIES
- Page 84 and 85: 84 BIOLOGY OF MULTIFLORA ROSE: AN I
- Page 86 and 87: 86 AN OUNCE OF PREVENTION. M.J. Van
- Page 88 and 89: 88 HERBICIDE COMPARISON IN WET BLAD
- Page 90 and 91: 90 Table 1. Morrow's honeysuckle (L
- Page 92 and 93: 92 EVALUATION OF HERBICIDES FOR CON
- Page 94 and 95: 94 EVALUATION OF HERBICIDES FOR CON
47<br />
EFFECTIVENESS OF A ROLLER/CRIMPER FOR CONTROL OF WINTER ANNUAL<br />
COVER CROPS. W. Curran, S. Mirsky, and M. Ryan, The Pennsylvania State Univ.,<br />
University Park.<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Cover crop roller/crimpers are increasing in popularity. In 2005, Penn State<br />
University constructed a roller/crimper designed after a Rodale Institute prototype. Over<br />
<strong>the</strong> last two years, several experiments have investigated <strong>the</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
roller/crimper for control <strong>of</strong> winter annual cover crops. Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> efforts at Penn State<br />
have focused on cereal rye control as influenced by planting date in <strong>the</strong> fall and<br />
termination date in <strong>the</strong> spring. In 2006, additional trials examined reduced rates <strong>of</strong><br />
herbicide in combination with <strong>the</strong> roller/crimper for control <strong>of</strong> both cereal rye (Secale<br />
cereale) and hairy vetch (Vicia villosa). Glyphosate was examined in cereal rye and<br />
2,4-D was used in <strong>the</strong> hairy vetch trial. A third experiment in 2006 examined <strong>the</strong><br />
effectiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> roller/crimper for control <strong>of</strong> winter rape (Brassica napus) alone and<br />
in combination with glyphosate. In <strong>the</strong> rape experiment, two application timings based<br />
on cover crop growth stage were examined. In all experiments, ei<strong>the</strong>r Roundup Ready<br />
corn or soybean was no-till planted shortly after rolling <strong>the</strong> cover crops and glyphosate<br />
was used for in-season weed control.<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cereal rye experiment showed that <strong>the</strong> roller treatment alone<br />
only provided about 50% control <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cover crop. The rye was just beginning to head<br />
and not yet susceptible to control with rolling alone. The combination <strong>of</strong> glyphosate<br />
applied at ei<strong>the</strong>r 0.093 lb ae/A (1/8X) or 0.1875 lb/A (1/4X) with rolling provided 85%<br />
and 94% rye control, respectively 14 days after application. The reduced rates <strong>of</strong><br />
glyphosate alone provided 67 and 89% control. In <strong>the</strong> hairy vetch trial, rolling alone<br />
provided about 75% control <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> hairy vetch and <strong>the</strong> addition <strong>of</strong> 2,4-D LVE increased<br />
control to over 90%. Again, <strong>the</strong> hairy vetch was just beginning to flower and not<br />
completely susceptible to control from rolling alone. Hairy vetch is very susceptible to<br />
2,4-D and application <strong>of</strong> 0.25 lb ae/A provided effective control regardless <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> roller<br />
treatment. Finally, rolling winter rape alone at ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> early or mid flowering stages <strong>of</strong><br />
growth was not very effective for control and a full rate <strong>of</strong> glyphosate (0.75 lb/A) was<br />
necessary to achieve greater than 85% control. Glyphosate applied at 0.375 lb/A<br />
provided about 80% winter rape control.<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> this research show that reduced rate herbicide programs combined<br />
with roller/crimper technology can be more effective for control <strong>of</strong> certain cover crops<br />
such as cereal rye than ei<strong>the</strong>r tactic alone. For o<strong>the</strong>r cover crops such as hairy vetch<br />
and winter rape, <strong>the</strong> roller/crimper is less effective for control and will require alternative<br />
tactics or strategies for effective control prior to establishing a cash crop.<br />
29