Proceedings of the Sixty-first Annual Meeting of the Northeastern ...
Proceedings of the Sixty-first Annual Meeting of the Northeastern ...
Proceedings of the Sixty-first Annual Meeting of the Northeastern ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
45<br />
THE IMPACT OF CULTIVATION TIMING AND INCREASED PLANT POPULATION<br />
DENSITY ON WEED CONTROL IN ORGANIC SOYBEANS. S.C. Reberg-Horton,<br />
North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh.<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Weed management remains one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most challenging aspects <strong>of</strong> organic crop<br />
production. This study was undertaken with <strong>the</strong> help <strong>of</strong> organic soybean farmers to<br />
examine <strong>the</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most common weed management tools on <strong>the</strong>ir farms:<br />
stale seed bedding, blind cultivation and increased seeding rates. In one experiment,<br />
soybean seeding rates <strong>of</strong> 187,500, 312,500, 437,500, and 562,500 were planted under<br />
organic and conventional weed management. Plots were arranged in a split-plot<br />
design with weed management systems serving as <strong>the</strong> main plot factor and seeding<br />
rate as <strong>the</strong> subplot factor with six replications. The largely grass weed community in<br />
Plymouth, North Carolina, did not show a significant response to soybean seeding rate<br />
in <strong>the</strong> organically managed plots. The pigweed dominated community in Goldsboro,<br />
North Carolina, however, showed a marked response. Pigweed densities decreased<br />
linearly with increased seeding rate from a high <strong>of</strong> 4.0 end-<strong>of</strong>-season plants m -2 to a low<br />
<strong>of</strong> 1.3 plants m -2 .<br />
A second experiment combined stale seed bedding, accomplished with pre-plant<br />
passes <strong>of</strong> a rotary hoe, with post-plant use <strong>of</strong> a rotary hoe. The plots were arranged in<br />
a split-block design with six replications. Three levels <strong>of</strong> stale seed beds were<br />
implemented: four weeks, two weeks and zero weeks <strong>of</strong> pre-plant cultivation. Five<br />
levels <strong>of</strong> blind cultivation were used: zero, one, two, three and four passes with a rotary<br />
hoe after planting. In all treatments, rotary hoe frequency was approximately once<br />
every 5 days. Post-plant rotary hoe use was far more effective in reducing weed<br />
populations at both locations than pre-plant passes. No detectable differences among<br />
pre-plant treatments were present at Goldsboro. Post-plant cultivation frequency was<br />
inversely related to percent weed cover, ranging from a high <strong>of</strong> 30% to a low <strong>of</strong> 13%. In<br />
Plymouth, <strong>the</strong> pattern was similar with a high <strong>of</strong> 53% cover to a low <strong>of</strong> 2.9% cover. Preplant<br />
cultivations had an appreciable impact in Plymouth when no post-plant cultivations<br />
were used, but were considerably less effective than a single pass <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rotary hoe<br />
after planting. While increasing <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> cultivation passes resulted in better weed<br />
control, returns on investment decreased rapidly. Overall, increased seeding rates and<br />
multiple passes with a rotary hoe after planting exhibited <strong>the</strong> highest returns to farmers.<br />
27