Proceedings of the Sixty-first Annual Meeting of the Northeastern ...
Proceedings of the Sixty-first Annual Meeting of the Northeastern ... Proceedings of the Sixty-first Annual Meeting of the Northeastern ...
38 AMMONIUM PELARGONATE AS A BIOHERBICIDE FOR PEPPER ROW MIDDLES. B.A. Scott and M.J. VanGessel, Univ. of Delaware, Georgetown. ABSTRACT Weed control in the area between rows of plastic is critical for maximum yield of fruit and vegetables in plasticulture. A non-selective herbicide plus residual herbicides are often used to control existing vegetation in "row middles". Since bioherbicides are non-selective, their utility in plasticulture for this use needs to be investigated. A study was established to determine the efficacy of ammonium pelargonate for weed control in peppers grown with black plastic and to determine the necessity of residual herbicides. This study was arranged as a randomized complete block with four replications. Treatments consisted of ammonium pelargonate or pelargonic acid applied alone or with residual herbicides (halosulfuron and metolachlor) applied 3 weeks after pepper transplant (WAPT). Ammonium pelargonate plus clethodim was also applied at 3 WAPT. Also, ammonium pelargonate was applied alone at 2, 3, or 4-week intervals. A treatment of paraquat applied at 3-week intervals, a weed free, and an untreated check were included for comparisons. Treatments were applied at 327 l/ha. Weed heights were measured prior to individual treatment applications, and pepper injury was evaluated after each application. Weed control ratings were noted at 4, 8, and 10 WAPT. Pepper harvest was based on the maturation of the weed-free check, and treatments were harvested at 8 and 11 WAPT. Addition of residuals herbicides to a single application of ammonium pelargonate resulted in a significant improvement in weed control and increased yield as compared to a single application of ammonium pelargonate alone. Antagonism did not result from the addition of clethodim. Ammonium pelargonate applied at 2-week intervals resulted in increased broadleaf control and increased yield as compared to the 3 and 4-week interval treatments. Although overall weed control was greater with the 3-week interval paraquat treatment than the 2-week interval ammonium pelargonate treatment, yields did not differ. Applications of ammonium pelargonate applied at 2-week intervals or a single application of ammonium pelargonate with residual herbicides is needed in order to provide effective weed control and prevent yield loss. Grass control with the bioherbicides alone is minimal unless multiple applications are used. 20
39 BROCCOLI AND EDAMAME RESPONSES TO VINEGAR APPLICATION FOR WEED MANAGEMENT. C.B. Coffman, J. Radhakrishnan, and J.R. Teasdale, USDA-ARS, Beltsville, MD. ABSTRACT Cole crops and brassicas are commonly grown by small conventional and organic farmers in the U. S. Broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica) is popular at farmers' markets and subscribers to CSAs, thus it is an important source of farm income. In the mid-Atlantic region, broccoli is usually grown as a spring or fall crop, and weeds are usually abundant and competitive unless successful management systems have been utilized. Edamame (Glycine max L.) is a summer field crop often grown using organic methods for weed management. Vinegar application has been investigated as a method for weed management in edamame for several years on an organic farm in Buckeystown, MD. Fall broccoli response to vinegar applications was investigated at the Beltsville Agricultural research Center in 2006. The objective of this project was to evaluate crop responses to basal applications of 20% acetic acid vinegar for within-row weed control. Edamame (var. 'Mooncake’) was sown on 27 May 2006 at a rate of 170,000 seeds/A in 36-inch rows. Experimental plots consisted of three 20-foot rows with the center row being the treated portion of the plot. Treatments were (1) vinegar applications to withinrow weeds at the base of the crop plants, (2) unweeded control, and (3) hand-weeded control. Treatments were replicated 4 times and were randomly placed throughout the field. Vinegar applications were made on 31 July 2006 using a hand sprayer. Vinegar was applied to weeds to achieve complete coverage until runoff. Crop plants were 21-31 inches high when treatments were applied. Weeds between rows were controlled by cultivation. Weeds in the hand-weeded control were removed two times during the growing season. Treatments were visually rated and harvested 25 September 2006. There were no significant differences in visual ratings among treatments. Total biomass and grain yields will be determined. Broccoli (var. ‘Packman’) transplants were placed 18 inches apart in 5-foot rows in a clean, cultivated field on 8 August 2006. Experimental plots consisted of three 20-foot rows with the center row being the treated portion of the plot. Treatments were the same as those in the edamame investigation. Treatments were replicated 4 times and randomly arranged in the field. Vinegar applications were made on 31 August 2006 to the basal portion of the crop plants. Broccoli plants treated with vinegar showed diminished leaf turgor compared to the non-vinegar treated plants within 30 min of application. Weeds between rows were removed via cultivation. Visual rating and crop harvest occurred on 3 October 2006. Heads were cut to a length of 7 inches and fresh weights recorded. Plants treated with vinegar did not differ in size from plants in the controls, although the lower leaves were chlorotic. Broccoli head counts were 8% higher than the unweeded controls and equivalent to the hand weeded treatment. However, total head weights and mean individual head weights were 25 and 30% lower for the vinegar treatments than for the hand weeded and unweeded controls, respectively. 21
- Page 1 and 2: 1 Proceedings of the Sixty-first An
- Page 3 and 4: 3 NORTHEASTERN WEED SCIENCE SOCIETY
- Page 5 and 6: 5 SECTION CHAIRS Agronomy Chair: J.
- Page 7 and 8: 7 CARFENTRAZONE AND QUINCLORAC FOR
- Page 9 and 10: 9 THE EFFICACY AND CROP TOLERANCE O
- Page 11 and 12: 11 EVALUATION OF HERBICIDES FOR CON
- Page 13 and 14: 13 BEING HEARD BY THE IR-4 PROJECT.
- Page 15 and 16: 15 ABSTRACTS FROM THE 7 TH CONFEREN
- Page 17: 17 HERBICIDE NAMES: COMMON, TRADE,
- Page 20 and 21: 20 INTEGRATING WEED CONTROL STRATEG
- Page 22 and 23: 22 GIANT HOGWEED ERADICATION IN PEN
- Page 24 and 25: 24 EFFECTS OF EMERGENCE PERIODICITY
- Page 26 and 27: 26 PRODUCER AND PRODUCTION IMPACTS
- Page 28 and 29: 28 A SIMPLE METHOD FOR CLEANING TUF
- Page 30 and 31: 30 EMERGENCE AND PERFORMANCE OF TWO
- Page 32 and 33: 32 CARFENTRAZONE AND QUINCLORAC FOR
- Page 34 and 35: 34 2006 NEWSS SUMMER WEED CONTEST R
- Page 36 and 37: 36 INVASIVE AQUATIC WEEDS IN NORTH
- Page 40 and 41: 40 TRINEXAPAC-ETHYL INFLUENCES EFFI
- Page 42 and 43: 42 Table 1. Insect feeding damage,
- Page 44 and 45: 44 WEED CONTROL WITH TOPRAMEZONE PR
- Page 46 and 47: 46 ROTARY HOE EFFICACY IN CORN: INF
- Page 48 and 49: 48 ALFALFA/GRASS FORAGE MIXTURES US
- Page 50 and 51: 50 CONTROL OF NEW WEED SPECIES IN T
- Page 52 and 53: 52 Table 1. Results of 2006 contain
- Page 54 and 55: 54 TOLERANCES OF ORNAMENTAL SHRUBS
- Page 56 and 57: 56 2006 WEED MANAGEMENT TRIALS IN C
- Page 58 and 59: 58 THE RESPONSE OF FIELD AND CONTAI
- Page 60 and 61: 60 THE EFFICACY AND CROP TOLERANCE
- Page 62 and 63: 62 Table 2. Plant quality ratings o
- Page 64 and 65: 64 EVALUATION OF PROLINE-LINKED PEN
- Page 66 and 67: 66 ANNUAL BLUEGRASS AND DOLLAR SPOT
- Page 68 and 69: 68 Table 1. Autumn 2005 versus spri
- Page 70 and 71: 70 A PRELIMINARY STUDY OF THE NON-N
- Page 72 and 73: 72 native species, covering and smo
- Page 74 and 75: 74 EFFECTS OF BUCKWHEAT RESIDUE ON
- Page 76 and 77: 76 Japanese knotweed control 28 DAT
- Page 78 and 79: 78 ENHANCED TOLERANCE TO WEED COMPE
- Page 80 and 81: 80 EFFECTS OF PLANTING AND TERMINAT
- Page 82 and 83: 82 A UNIFYING FRAMEWORK FOR SPECIES
- Page 84 and 85: 84 BIOLOGY OF MULTIFLORA ROSE: AN I
- Page 86 and 87: 86 AN OUNCE OF PREVENTION. M.J. Van
39<br />
BROCCOLI AND EDAMAME RESPONSES TO VINEGAR APPLICATION FOR WEED<br />
MANAGEMENT. C.B. C<strong>of</strong>fman, J. Radhakrishnan, and J.R. Teasdale, USDA-ARS,<br />
Beltsville, MD.<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Cole crops and brassicas are commonly grown by small conventional and organic<br />
farmers in <strong>the</strong> U. S. Broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica) is popular at farmers'<br />
markets and subscribers to CSAs, thus it is an important source <strong>of</strong> farm income. In <strong>the</strong><br />
mid-Atlantic region, broccoli is usually grown as a spring or fall crop, and weeds are<br />
usually abundant and competitive unless successful management systems have been<br />
utilized. Edamame (Glycine max L.) is a summer field crop <strong>of</strong>ten grown using organic<br />
methods for weed management. Vinegar application has been investigated as a method<br />
for weed management in edamame for several years on an organic farm in Buckeystown,<br />
MD. Fall broccoli response to vinegar applications was investigated at <strong>the</strong> Beltsville<br />
Agricultural research Center in 2006. The objective <strong>of</strong> this project was to evaluate crop<br />
responses to basal applications <strong>of</strong> 20% acetic acid vinegar for within-row weed control.<br />
Edamame (var. 'Mooncake’) was sown on 27 May 2006 at a rate <strong>of</strong> 170,000 seeds/A in<br />
36-inch rows. Experimental plots consisted <strong>of</strong> three 20-foot rows with <strong>the</strong> center row<br />
being <strong>the</strong> treated portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plot. Treatments were (1) vinegar applications to withinrow<br />
weeds at <strong>the</strong> base <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> crop plants, (2) unweeded control, and (3) hand-weeded<br />
control. Treatments were replicated 4 times and were randomly placed throughout <strong>the</strong><br />
field. Vinegar applications were made on 31 July 2006 using a hand sprayer. Vinegar<br />
was applied to weeds to achieve complete coverage until run<strong>of</strong>f. Crop plants were 21-31<br />
inches high when treatments were applied. Weeds between rows were controlled by<br />
cultivation. Weeds in <strong>the</strong> hand-weeded control were removed two times during <strong>the</strong><br />
growing season. Treatments were visually rated and harvested 25 September 2006.<br />
There were no significant differences in visual ratings among treatments. Total biomass<br />
and grain yields will be determined. Broccoli (var. ‘Packman’) transplants were placed 18<br />
inches apart in 5-foot rows in a clean, cultivated field on 8 August 2006. Experimental<br />
plots consisted <strong>of</strong> three 20-foot rows with <strong>the</strong> center row being <strong>the</strong> treated portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
plot. Treatments were <strong>the</strong> same as those in <strong>the</strong> edamame investigation. Treatments<br />
were replicated 4 times and randomly arranged in <strong>the</strong> field. Vinegar applications were<br />
made on 31 August 2006 to <strong>the</strong> basal portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> crop plants. Broccoli plants treated<br />
with vinegar showed diminished leaf turgor compared to <strong>the</strong> non-vinegar treated plants<br />
within 30 min <strong>of</strong> application. Weeds between rows were removed via cultivation. Visual<br />
rating and crop harvest occurred on 3 October 2006. Heads were cut to a length <strong>of</strong> 7<br />
inches and fresh weights recorded. Plants treated with vinegar did not differ in size from<br />
plants in <strong>the</strong> controls, although <strong>the</strong> lower leaves were chlorotic. Broccoli head counts<br />
were 8% higher than <strong>the</strong> unweeded controls and equivalent to <strong>the</strong> hand weeded<br />
treatment. However, total head weights and mean individual head weights were 25 and<br />
30% lower for <strong>the</strong> vinegar treatments than for <strong>the</strong> hand weeded and unweeded controls,<br />
respectively.<br />
21