Proceedings of the Sixty-first Annual Meeting of the Northeastern ...
Proceedings of the Sixty-first Annual Meeting of the Northeastern ... Proceedings of the Sixty-first Annual Meeting of the Northeastern ...
188 $179 million, in contrast to a USDA proposal to eliminate half of this funding and shift the funds to a new $75 million competitive grants program. The National Research Initiative (NRI) of competitively awarded research grants increases slightly to $183 million. Earmarked special research grants, however, grow from $120 million to $128 million. The FY2006 appropriation for Forest Service Research and Development is $329 million, up $15 million from last year. Farm Bill Forums: The dates, locations and times of the forums will be announced as they are scheduled and be available on the USDA website http://www.usda.gov/farmbill. Six key topics will frame the forums, which the public is invited to comment on: 1. How should farm policy be designed to maximize US competitiveness and our country’s ability to effectively compete in global markets? 2. How should farm policy address any unintended consequences and ensure that such consequences do not discourage new farmers and the next generation of farmers from entering production agriculture? 3. How should farm policy be designed to effectively and fairly distribute assistance to producers? 4. How can farm policy best achieve conservation and environmental goals? 5. How can federal rural and farm programs provide effective assistance in rural areas? 6. How should agricultural product development, marketing, and research-related issues be addressed in the next farm bill? Respondents can submit their comments electronically on the USDA home page (http://www.usda.gov) by selecting “Farm Bill Forums.” Comments can also be emailed to FarmBill@usda.gov, or be sent by mail to: Secretary of Agriculture Mike Johanns, Farm Bill, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-3355. USDA will review the public comments received by December 30, 2005, including any analyses, reports, studies and other material submitted with the comments that address the six questions. Other legislative areas important to Weed Scientist in 2004 included WSSA’s comments in support of the joint Counterpart Regulations for Consultation under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (Counterpart Regulations). Rob Hedberg comment on behalf of WSSA that based on the use of science to improve the management of invasive species and to improve the pesticide regulatory process. Rob noted in his letter to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service that the ”EPA has the scientific expertise and an established process to adequately evaluate the human health and ecological risks of pesticides. Their process is efficient, productive and thorough. Moreover, the Agency has made substantial progress in the past decade to make the process transparent to all stakeholders so that it is clear how, when and why decisions will be made. We believe that giving the Agency authority to make the initial “Not Likely to Adversely Affect (NLAA)” determination will yield sound decisions in a timely and efficient manner that minimizes duplication, uncertainty and ambiguity.” The counter part regulations have been accepted and it is believed that this counter part regulation will resolve some (but not all) of the Double Jeopardy problems for pesticide registrations associated with Endangered Species Act. The Sixth Annual National Invasive Weeds Awareness Week (NIWAW VI) was held in Washington, DC the week of February 27 th to March 4, 2005. Constituents representing more than 50 percent of U.S. states gathered to advance efforts toward protecting native ecosystems through awareness, education and control of invasive plant species. More than 150 participants, including representatives of government agencies, non-profits, private industry and landowners, spent the week lobbying state legislators and attending briefings from federal agencies including 170
189 the United States Department of Agriculture, Department of the Interior and Army Corps of Engineers. Through a partnership between the Invasive Species Council and the National Geographic Society, NIWAW participants also enjoyed an early screening of the first in a new TV series titled Strange Days on Planet Earth. The first show appeared on PBS, on April 20 and investigated the ecological and economic damages triggered by invasive species infestations. The next NIWAW VII will be held February 26 to March 3 rd . Individuals and organizations interested in this issue are invited to participate in this event and help build on the success of NIWAW activities in previous years. The Invasive Weeds Awareness Coalition has been working hard to put together a jam-packed week of events designed to focus attention on the Federal government’s and Congress’s role in dealing invasive weed problems. More info will be posted on the NIWAW website. BioTech Crops in the EU are still having a tough go. According to a June 24, 2005 Reuters Report, titled "EU ministers uphold sovereign right to ban GMOs," which states in part that " ... EU environment ministers dealt a blow on Friday to efforts to get more GMO crops grown in Europe as they agreed to uphold eight national bans on genetically modified maize and rapeseed types. The vote was a sharp rebuff for the European Union's executive Commission, which had wanted the ministers to endorse an order to lift the bans within 20 days. EU law provides for national GMO bans if the government can justify the prohibition. It was also the EU's first agreement on GMO policy since 1998, when the bloc began its unofficial moratorium on approving new GMO foods and crops ... 'A very large majority, 22 member states, rejected proposals to lift these national bans ... Between 1997 and 2000, Austria, France, Germany, Greece and Luxembourg banned specific GMOs on their territory, focusing on three maize and two rapeseed types approved shortly before the start of the EU moratorium ... The EU executive now has several options, including returning to the ministers with the same proposals for lifting the bans, though at a later date, or changing them radically ... Green groups were ecstatic that the EU had finally agreed to slap down not just one of the national bans, but all eight. The re-registration Eligibility Decision was issued in August of this year for 2,4- Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D). As well EPA established Tolerances for Hop, Soybean and Wild Rice - EPA issues a Final Rule establishing tolerances for residues in or on hop, soybean, and wild rice which were requested by the Interregional Research Project Number 4 (IR-4) and the Industry Task Force II on 2,4-D Research Data (Task Force) - Effective July 27, 2005 with objections and hearing requests due to EPA by September 26, 2005 - EPA OPPTS OPP Contact: Joanne Miller, Registration Division at 703 305 6224; e-mail: Miller.Joanne@EPA.gov - EPA July 27 Federal Register: http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20051800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2005/ 05-14886.htm. Other products due for reregistration eligibility decisions in 2006 include: aAcetochlor, amitraz, ethephon, fomesafen, imazaquin, and propazine. . 171
- Page 138 and 139: 138 Supplemental NEWSS Abstracts (p
- Page 140 and 141: 140 ABSTRACTS AND BIOGRAPHIES FOR P
- Page 142 and 143: 142 EVALUATION OF AN HERBICIDE APPL
- Page 144 and 145: 144 ALUMINUM TREATMENT FOR PHOSPHOR
- Page 146 and 147: 146 BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF AQUATIC W
- Page 148 and 149: 148 THE 2002 FARM BILL AND ITS EFFE
- Page 150 and 151: 150 LAND USE PRACTICE IMPACTS ON NO
- Page 152 and 153: 152 A NEW STANDARD FOR DEFINING AQU
- Page 154 and 155: 154 PORTRAIT OF THE HEALTH STATUS O
- Page 156 and 157: 156 TEN YEARS OF VARIABLE WATER MIL
- Page 158 and 159: 158 Northeastern Weed Science Socie
- Page 160 and 161: 160 meeting attendance numbers have
- Page 162 and 163: 162 members or to members of the Ex
- Page 164 and 165: 164 primary areas that had increase
- Page 166 and 167: 166 1 st place: Evaluation of Kentu
- Page 168 and 169: 168 d) Resolutions Committee Appoin
- Page 170 and 171: 170 2005, Hilary Sandler and Brent
- Page 172 and 173: 172 (Ornamentals), Rakesh Chandran
- Page 174 and 175: 174 Total Expenses $38,227.24 Total
- Page 176 and 177: 176 PUBLIC RELATIONS Brent Lackey A
- Page 178 and 179: 178 • 2 nd place team: Guelph tea
- Page 180 and 181: 180 WSSA REPRESENTATIVE Jeffrey Der
- Page 182 and 183: 182 b. Legislative Visits training
- Page 184 and 185: 184 b. Selection of a WSSA Member f
- Page 186 and 187: 186 WSSA Provides Comments to the C
- Page 190 and 191: 190 NEWSS PAST PRESIDENTS Gilbert H
- Page 192 and 193: 192 1986 John R. Havis University o
- Page 194 and 195: 194 DISTINGUISHED MEMBERS 2002 Brad
- Page 196 and 197: 196 1991 1 Elizabeth Maynard Cornel
- Page 198 and 199: 198 COLLEGIATE WEED CONTEST WINNERS
- Page 200 and 201: 200 1996 - Penn State Agronomy Farm
- Page 202 and 203: 202 RESEARCH POSTER AWARDS 1983 1.
- Page 204 and 205: 204 1998 1. Weed Control Studies wi
- Page 206 and 207: 206 INNOVATOR OF THE YEAR 1986 Nath
- Page 208 and 209: 208 1960 The Influence of Cultivati
- Page 210 and 211: 210 1975 1. Control of Jimsonweed a
- Page 212 and 213: 212 1985 1. Peach Response to Sever
- Page 214 and 215: 214 Chris Benedict Cornell Universi
- Page 216 and 217: 216 Robert A. DeWaine Monsanto 505
- Page 218 and 219: 218 Robert Hedberg USDA/CSREES Scie
- Page 220 and 221: 220 Brian G Lackey Weeds Inc. 250 B
- Page 222 and 223: 222 Thomas Molloy University of Mai
- Page 224 and 225: 224 John Roy RWC, Inc. PO Box 876 2
- Page 226 and 227: 226 John R. Teasdale USDA-ARS Build
- Page 228 and 229: 228 HERBICIDE NAMES: COMMON, TRADE,
- Page 230 and 231: 230 Common Name Trade Name Chemical
- Page 232 and 233: 232 Common Name Trade Name Chemical
- Page 234 and 235: 234 Common Name Trade Name Chemical
- Page 236 and 237: 236 Common Name Trade Name Chemical
189<br />
<strong>the</strong> United States Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Interior and Army Corps <strong>of</strong><br />
Engineers. Through a partnership between <strong>the</strong> Invasive Species Council and <strong>the</strong> National<br />
Geographic Society, NIWAW participants also enjoyed an early screening <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>first</strong> in a new<br />
TV series titled Strange Days on Planet Earth. The <strong>first</strong> show appeared on PBS, on April 20 and<br />
investigated <strong>the</strong> ecological and economic damages triggered by invasive species infestations.<br />
The next NIWAW VII will be held February 26 to March 3 rd . Individuals and organizations<br />
interested in this issue are invited to participate in this event and help build on <strong>the</strong> success <strong>of</strong><br />
NIWAW activities in previous years. The Invasive Weeds Awareness Coalition has been<br />
working hard to put toge<strong>the</strong>r a jam-packed week <strong>of</strong> events designed to focus attention on <strong>the</strong><br />
Federal government’s and Congress’s role in dealing invasive weed problems. More info will be<br />
posted on <strong>the</strong> NIWAW website.<br />
BioTech Crops in <strong>the</strong> EU are still having a tough go.<br />
According to a June 24, 2005 Reuters Report, titled "EU ministers uphold sovereign right to ban<br />
GMOs," which states in part that " ... EU environment ministers dealt a blow on Friday to efforts<br />
to get more GMO crops grown in Europe as <strong>the</strong>y agreed to uphold eight national bans on<br />
genetically modified maize and rapeseed types. The vote was a sharp rebuff for <strong>the</strong> European<br />
Union's executive Commission, which had wanted <strong>the</strong> ministers to endorse an order to lift <strong>the</strong><br />
bans within 20 days. EU law provides for national GMO bans if <strong>the</strong> government can justify <strong>the</strong><br />
prohibition. It was also <strong>the</strong> EU's <strong>first</strong> agreement on GMO policy since 1998, when <strong>the</strong> bloc<br />
began its un<strong>of</strong>ficial moratorium on approving new GMO foods and crops ... 'A very large<br />
majority, 22 member states, rejected proposals to lift <strong>the</strong>se national bans ... Between 1997 and<br />
2000, Austria, France, Germany, Greece and Luxembourg banned specific GMOs on <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
territory, focusing on three maize and two rapeseed types approved shortly before <strong>the</strong> start <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> EU moratorium ... The EU executive now has several options, including returning to <strong>the</strong><br />
ministers with <strong>the</strong> same proposals for lifting <strong>the</strong> bans, though at a later date, or changing <strong>the</strong>m<br />
radically ... Green groups were ecstatic that <strong>the</strong> EU had finally agreed to slap down not just one<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> national bans, but all eight.<br />
The re-registration Eligibility Decision was issued in August <strong>of</strong> this year for 2,4-<br />
Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D). As well EPA established Tolerances for Hop, Soybean and<br />
Wild Rice - EPA issues a Final Rule establishing tolerances for residues in or on hop, soybean,<br />
and wild rice which were requested by <strong>the</strong> Interregional Research Project Number 4 (IR-4) and<br />
<strong>the</strong> Industry Task Force II on 2,4-D Research Data (Task Force) - Effective July 27, 2005 with<br />
objections and hearing requests due to EPA by September 26, 2005 - EPA OPPTS OPP<br />
Contact: Joanne Miller, Registration Division at 703 305 6224; e-mail:<br />
Miller.Joanne@EPA.gov - EPA July 27 Federal Register:<br />
http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20051800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2005/<br />
05-14886.htm. O<strong>the</strong>r products due for reregistration eligibility decisions in 2006 include:<br />
aAcetochlor, amitraz, e<strong>the</strong>phon, fomesafen, imazaquin, and propazine.<br />
.<br />
171