Proceedings of the Sixty-first Annual Meeting of the Northeastern ...

Proceedings of the Sixty-first Annual Meeting of the Northeastern ... Proceedings of the Sixty-first Annual Meeting of the Northeastern ...

08.06.2015 Views

188 $179 million, in contrast to a USDA proposal to eliminate half of this funding and shift the funds to a new $75 million competitive grants program. The National Research Initiative (NRI) of competitively awarded research grants increases slightly to $183 million. Earmarked special research grants, however, grow from $120 million to $128 million. The FY2006 appropriation for Forest Service Research and Development is $329 million, up $15 million from last year. Farm Bill Forums: The dates, locations and times of the forums will be announced as they are scheduled and be available on the USDA website http://www.usda.gov/farmbill. Six key topics will frame the forums, which the public is invited to comment on: 1. How should farm policy be designed to maximize US competitiveness and our country’s ability to effectively compete in global markets? 2. How should farm policy address any unintended consequences and ensure that such consequences do not discourage new farmers and the next generation of farmers from entering production agriculture? 3. How should farm policy be designed to effectively and fairly distribute assistance to producers? 4. How can farm policy best achieve conservation and environmental goals? 5. How can federal rural and farm programs provide effective assistance in rural areas? 6. How should agricultural product development, marketing, and research-related issues be addressed in the next farm bill? Respondents can submit their comments electronically on the USDA home page (http://www.usda.gov) by selecting “Farm Bill Forums.” Comments can also be emailed to FarmBill@usda.gov, or be sent by mail to: Secretary of Agriculture Mike Johanns, Farm Bill, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-3355. USDA will review the public comments received by December 30, 2005, including any analyses, reports, studies and other material submitted with the comments that address the six questions. Other legislative areas important to Weed Scientist in 2004 included WSSA’s comments in support of the joint Counterpart Regulations for Consultation under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (Counterpart Regulations). Rob Hedberg comment on behalf of WSSA that based on the use of science to improve the management of invasive species and to improve the pesticide regulatory process. Rob noted in his letter to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service that the ”EPA has the scientific expertise and an established process to adequately evaluate the human health and ecological risks of pesticides. Their process is efficient, productive and thorough. Moreover, the Agency has made substantial progress in the past decade to make the process transparent to all stakeholders so that it is clear how, when and why decisions will be made. We believe that giving the Agency authority to make the initial “Not Likely to Adversely Affect (NLAA)” determination will yield sound decisions in a timely and efficient manner that minimizes duplication, uncertainty and ambiguity.” The counter part regulations have been accepted and it is believed that this counter part regulation will resolve some (but not all) of the Double Jeopardy problems for pesticide registrations associated with Endangered Species Act. The Sixth Annual National Invasive Weeds Awareness Week (NIWAW VI) was held in Washington, DC the week of February 27 th to March 4, 2005. Constituents representing more than 50 percent of U.S. states gathered to advance efforts toward protecting native ecosystems through awareness, education and control of invasive plant species. More than 150 participants, including representatives of government agencies, non-profits, private industry and landowners, spent the week lobbying state legislators and attending briefings from federal agencies including 170

189 the United States Department of Agriculture, Department of the Interior and Army Corps of Engineers. Through a partnership between the Invasive Species Council and the National Geographic Society, NIWAW participants also enjoyed an early screening of the first in a new TV series titled Strange Days on Planet Earth. The first show appeared on PBS, on April 20 and investigated the ecological and economic damages triggered by invasive species infestations. The next NIWAW VII will be held February 26 to March 3 rd . Individuals and organizations interested in this issue are invited to participate in this event and help build on the success of NIWAW activities in previous years. The Invasive Weeds Awareness Coalition has been working hard to put together a jam-packed week of events designed to focus attention on the Federal government’s and Congress’s role in dealing invasive weed problems. More info will be posted on the NIWAW website. BioTech Crops in the EU are still having a tough go. According to a June 24, 2005 Reuters Report, titled "EU ministers uphold sovereign right to ban GMOs," which states in part that " ... EU environment ministers dealt a blow on Friday to efforts to get more GMO crops grown in Europe as they agreed to uphold eight national bans on genetically modified maize and rapeseed types. The vote was a sharp rebuff for the European Union's executive Commission, which had wanted the ministers to endorse an order to lift the bans within 20 days. EU law provides for national GMO bans if the government can justify the prohibition. It was also the EU's first agreement on GMO policy since 1998, when the bloc began its unofficial moratorium on approving new GMO foods and crops ... 'A very large majority, 22 member states, rejected proposals to lift these national bans ... Between 1997 and 2000, Austria, France, Germany, Greece and Luxembourg banned specific GMOs on their territory, focusing on three maize and two rapeseed types approved shortly before the start of the EU moratorium ... The EU executive now has several options, including returning to the ministers with the same proposals for lifting the bans, though at a later date, or changing them radically ... Green groups were ecstatic that the EU had finally agreed to slap down not just one of the national bans, but all eight. The re-registration Eligibility Decision was issued in August of this year for 2,4- Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D). As well EPA established Tolerances for Hop, Soybean and Wild Rice - EPA issues a Final Rule establishing tolerances for residues in or on hop, soybean, and wild rice which were requested by the Interregional Research Project Number 4 (IR-4) and the Industry Task Force II on 2,4-D Research Data (Task Force) - Effective July 27, 2005 with objections and hearing requests due to EPA by September 26, 2005 - EPA OPPTS OPP Contact: Joanne Miller, Registration Division at 703 305 6224; e-mail: Miller.Joanne@EPA.gov - EPA July 27 Federal Register: http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20051800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2005/ 05-14886.htm. Other products due for reregistration eligibility decisions in 2006 include: aAcetochlor, amitraz, ethephon, fomesafen, imazaquin, and propazine. . 171

189<br />

<strong>the</strong> United States Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Interior and Army Corps <strong>of</strong><br />

Engineers. Through a partnership between <strong>the</strong> Invasive Species Council and <strong>the</strong> National<br />

Geographic Society, NIWAW participants also enjoyed an early screening <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>first</strong> in a new<br />

TV series titled Strange Days on Planet Earth. The <strong>first</strong> show appeared on PBS, on April 20 and<br />

investigated <strong>the</strong> ecological and economic damages triggered by invasive species infestations.<br />

The next NIWAW VII will be held February 26 to March 3 rd . Individuals and organizations<br />

interested in this issue are invited to participate in this event and help build on <strong>the</strong> success <strong>of</strong><br />

NIWAW activities in previous years. The Invasive Weeds Awareness Coalition has been<br />

working hard to put toge<strong>the</strong>r a jam-packed week <strong>of</strong> events designed to focus attention on <strong>the</strong><br />

Federal government’s and Congress’s role in dealing invasive weed problems. More info will be<br />

posted on <strong>the</strong> NIWAW website.<br />

BioTech Crops in <strong>the</strong> EU are still having a tough go.<br />

According to a June 24, 2005 Reuters Report, titled "EU ministers uphold sovereign right to ban<br />

GMOs," which states in part that " ... EU environment ministers dealt a blow on Friday to efforts<br />

to get more GMO crops grown in Europe as <strong>the</strong>y agreed to uphold eight national bans on<br />

genetically modified maize and rapeseed types. The vote was a sharp rebuff for <strong>the</strong> European<br />

Union's executive Commission, which had wanted <strong>the</strong> ministers to endorse an order to lift <strong>the</strong><br />

bans within 20 days. EU law provides for national GMO bans if <strong>the</strong> government can justify <strong>the</strong><br />

prohibition. It was also <strong>the</strong> EU's <strong>first</strong> agreement on GMO policy since 1998, when <strong>the</strong> bloc<br />

began its un<strong>of</strong>ficial moratorium on approving new GMO foods and crops ... 'A very large<br />

majority, 22 member states, rejected proposals to lift <strong>the</strong>se national bans ... Between 1997 and<br />

2000, Austria, France, Germany, Greece and Luxembourg banned specific GMOs on <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

territory, focusing on three maize and two rapeseed types approved shortly before <strong>the</strong> start <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> EU moratorium ... The EU executive now has several options, including returning to <strong>the</strong><br />

ministers with <strong>the</strong> same proposals for lifting <strong>the</strong> bans, though at a later date, or changing <strong>the</strong>m<br />

radically ... Green groups were ecstatic that <strong>the</strong> EU had finally agreed to slap down not just one<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> national bans, but all eight.<br />

The re-registration Eligibility Decision was issued in August <strong>of</strong> this year for 2,4-<br />

Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D). As well EPA established Tolerances for Hop, Soybean and<br />

Wild Rice - EPA issues a Final Rule establishing tolerances for residues in or on hop, soybean,<br />

and wild rice which were requested by <strong>the</strong> Interregional Research Project Number 4 (IR-4) and<br />

<strong>the</strong> Industry Task Force II on 2,4-D Research Data (Task Force) - Effective July 27, 2005 with<br />

objections and hearing requests due to EPA by September 26, 2005 - EPA OPPTS OPP<br />

Contact: Joanne Miller, Registration Division at 703 305 6224; e-mail:<br />

Miller.Joanne@EPA.gov - EPA July 27 Federal Register:<br />

http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20051800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2005/<br />

05-14886.htm. O<strong>the</strong>r products due for reregistration eligibility decisions in 2006 include:<br />

aAcetochlor, amitraz, e<strong>the</strong>phon, fomesafen, imazaquin, and propazine.<br />

.<br />

171

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!