Proceedings of the Sixty-first Annual Meeting of the Northeastern ...
Proceedings of the Sixty-first Annual Meeting of the Northeastern ... Proceedings of the Sixty-first Annual Meeting of the Northeastern ...
144 ALUMINUM TREATMENT FOR PHOSPHORUS AND ALGAE CONTROL: WHAT, WHY, WHERE AND WHEN. K.J. Wagner, ENSR, International. ABSTRACT The use of aluminum compounds as coagulants has long been practiced in the water and wastewater industries, so use of aluminum is neither novel nor new. Their use to bind up phosphorus in lakes dates back about 35 years, with many more treatments in the last decade or two and considerable lessons learned. Multiple factors must be evaluated when developing an aluminum dosing program, including the target location of phosphorus (incoming water, standing lake water, sediment reserves), the amount of phosphorus to be inactivated, existing water chemistry (especially pH and alkalinity), and potentially sensitive receptor populations in the aquatic environment. In general, the aluminum dose to effectively inactivate phosphorus in the target location will be 10 to 100 times the available phosphorus concentration, with several methods used to determine available phosphorus. Longevity of results depends upon the length of time it takes for inactivated phosphorus to be replaced. Where internal recycling is the primary source of phosphorus, reduced levels are expected for more than a decade and have lasted for over 20 years in real cases. Where external inputs are dominant, improvement can be expected for 3 to 5 times the detention time of the system, which may be as short as a season. While aluminum can be toxic to aquatic fauna in its reactive form, reactions occur quickly and result in non-toxic forms that bind phosphorus and some other contaminants in a largely permanent manner. Approaches for minimizing toxicity include keeping the pH between 6.0 and 8.0 SU, with a strong preference for pH levels between 6.5 to 7.5 SU, keeping the applied aluminum level
145 INTEGRATED AQUATIC WEED MANAGEMENT IN TURFGRASS AREAS. J. Whetstone, Clemson Univ., Clemson, South Carolina. ABSTRACT This presentation will focus on integrated aquatic weed control methods for ponds located in turfgrass areas, such as golf courses. Proper methods for controlling aquatic weeds when ponds are being used as irrigation sources will be detailed. Chemical and non-chemical control strategies will be discussed. ---------- Jack Whetstone is an Associate Professor in the Department of Forestry and Natural Resources at Clemson University. He is also affiliated with the South Carolina Sea Grant Extension Program and works in a cooperative program with the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources. Jack is a Past-President and Past Member of the Year of the South Carolina Aquatic Plant Management Society. He coordinates and develops continuing education programs for certified aquatic applicators in South Carolina and is the coauthor of “Applying Aquatic Herbicides in South Carolina: A Training Manual for Aquatic Applicators”. In 2004 Jack received the Distinguished Public Service Award from the Cooperative Extension Service in South Carolina and in 2005 he received the Superior Outreach Award for Sea Grant Extension Programs. 127
- Page 94 and 95: 94 EVALUATION OF HERBICIDES FOR CON
- Page 96 and 97: 96 HOT WATER SYSTEMS FOR VEGETATION
- Page 98 and 99: 98 SEEDHEAD SUPPRESSION OF ANNUAL B
- Page 100 and 101: 100 ROUGHSTALK BLUEGRASS CONTROL WI
- Page 102 and 103: 102 EFFECT OF DEW AND GRANULAR FORM
- Page 104 and 105: 104 USE OF TRICLOPYR TO REDUCE ANTI
- Page 106 and 107: 106 YELLOW NUTSEDGE CONTROL WITH SU
- Page 108 and 109: 108 PRE AND POST EMERGENT ANNUAL BL
- Page 110 and 111: 110 PUMPKIN RESPONSE TO HALOSUFSULF
- Page 112 and 113: 112 Figure 1. Grass cover following
- Page 114 and 115: 114 CHEMICAL CONTROL OF APPLE ROOT
- Page 116 and 117: 116 STRAWBERRY PLANTING YEAR WEED C
- Page 118 and 119: 118 WEED CONTROL IN NO-TILL PUMPKIN
- Page 120 and 121: 120 NATURAL PRODUCT POTENTIAL FOR W
- Page 122 and 123: 122 THE IR-4 PROJECT: UPDATE ON HER
- Page 124 and 125: 124 PEDIGREE OF A PESTICIDE. D.R. S
- Page 126 and 127: 126 SEEDHEAD SUPPRESSION OF ANNUAL
- Page 128 and 129: 128 APPLICATIONS FOR SULFENTRAZONE
- Page 130 and 131: 130 HORSEWEED: FROM OBSCURITY TO TH
- Page 132 and 133: 132 RECENT FINDINGS ON THE FIELD BE
- Page 134 and 135: 134 HORSEWEED RESPONSE TO NO-TILL P
- Page 136 and 137: 136 THE MASSACHUSETTS EXAMPLE: ONE
- Page 138 and 139: 138 Supplemental NEWSS Abstracts (p
- Page 140 and 141: 140 ABSTRACTS AND BIOGRAPHIES FOR P
- Page 142 and 143: 142 EVALUATION OF AN HERBICIDE APPL
- Page 146 and 147: 146 BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF AQUATIC W
- Page 148 and 149: 148 THE 2002 FARM BILL AND ITS EFFE
- Page 150 and 151: 150 LAND USE PRACTICE IMPACTS ON NO
- Page 152 and 153: 152 A NEW STANDARD FOR DEFINING AQU
- Page 154 and 155: 154 PORTRAIT OF THE HEALTH STATUS O
- Page 156 and 157: 156 TEN YEARS OF VARIABLE WATER MIL
- Page 158 and 159: 158 Northeastern Weed Science Socie
- Page 160 and 161: 160 meeting attendance numbers have
- Page 162 and 163: 162 members or to members of the Ex
- Page 164 and 165: 164 primary areas that had increase
- Page 166 and 167: 166 1 st place: Evaluation of Kentu
- Page 168 and 169: 168 d) Resolutions Committee Appoin
- Page 170 and 171: 170 2005, Hilary Sandler and Brent
- Page 172 and 173: 172 (Ornamentals), Rakesh Chandran
- Page 174 and 175: 174 Total Expenses $38,227.24 Total
- Page 176 and 177: 176 PUBLIC RELATIONS Brent Lackey A
- Page 178 and 179: 178 • 2 nd place team: Guelph tea
- Page 180 and 181: 180 WSSA REPRESENTATIVE Jeffrey Der
- Page 182 and 183: 182 b. Legislative Visits training
- Page 184 and 185: 184 b. Selection of a WSSA Member f
- Page 186 and 187: 186 WSSA Provides Comments to the C
- Page 188 and 189: 188 $179 million, in contrast to a
- Page 190 and 191: 190 NEWSS PAST PRESIDENTS Gilbert H
- Page 192 and 193: 192 1986 John R. Havis University o
144<br />
ALUMINUM TREATMENT FOR PHOSPHORUS AND ALGAE CONTROL: WHAT,<br />
WHY, WHERE AND WHEN. K.J. Wagner, ENSR, International.<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> aluminum compounds as coagulants has long been practiced in <strong>the</strong><br />
water and wastewater industries, so use <strong>of</strong> aluminum is nei<strong>the</strong>r novel nor new. Their use<br />
to bind up phosphorus in lakes dates back about 35 years, with many more treatments in<br />
<strong>the</strong> last decade or two and considerable lessons learned. Multiple factors must be<br />
evaluated when developing an aluminum dosing program, including <strong>the</strong> target location <strong>of</strong><br />
phosphorus (incoming water, standing lake water, sediment reserves), <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong><br />
phosphorus to be inactivated, existing water chemistry (especially pH and alkalinity), and<br />
potentially sensitive receptor populations in <strong>the</strong> aquatic environment. In general, <strong>the</strong><br />
aluminum dose to effectively inactivate phosphorus in <strong>the</strong> target location will be 10 to 100<br />
times <strong>the</strong> available phosphorus concentration, with several methods used to determine<br />
available phosphorus. Longevity <strong>of</strong> results depends upon <strong>the</strong> length <strong>of</strong> time it takes for<br />
inactivated phosphorus to be replaced. Where internal recycling is <strong>the</strong> primary source <strong>of</strong><br />
phosphorus, reduced levels are expected for more than a decade and have lasted for<br />
over 20 years in real cases. Where external inputs are dominant, improvement can be<br />
expected for 3 to 5 times <strong>the</strong> detention time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> system, which may be as short as a<br />
season. While aluminum can be toxic to aquatic fauna in its reactive form, reactions occur<br />
quickly and result in non-toxic forms that bind phosphorus and some o<strong>the</strong>r contaminants<br />
in a largely permanent manner. Approaches for minimizing toxicity include keeping <strong>the</strong> pH<br />
between 6.0 and 8.0 SU, with a strong preference for pH levels between 6.5 to 7.5 SU,<br />
keeping <strong>the</strong> applied aluminum level