08.06.2015 Views

Proceedings of the Sixty-first Annual Meeting of the Northeastern ...

Proceedings of the Sixty-first Annual Meeting of the Northeastern ...

Proceedings of the Sixty-first Annual Meeting of the Northeastern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

121<br />

WEED CONTROL IN NO-TILL SWEET CORN. D.D. Lingenfelter, The Pennsylvania<br />

State Univ., University Park and D.H. Johnson, The Pennsylvania State Univ.,<br />

Manheim.<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Field studies were conducted in 2006 at two locations in PA to evaluate annual<br />

and perennial weed control in no-till sweet corn (Zea mays L., succharata var.<br />

'Attribute'). Atrazine (1.24 lb ai/A) and s-metolachlor (0.96 lb ai/A) were applied PRE to<br />

most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> treatments followed by a POST application <strong>of</strong> one or a combination <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

following herbicides: 2,4-D (0.25 to 0.5 lb ai/A), atrazine (0.25 to 0.5 lb ai/A), bentazon<br />

(0.52 lb ai/A), mesotrione (0.094 lb ai/A), topramezone (0.0164 lb ai/A), tembotrione<br />

(0.12 lb ai/A), carfentrazone (0.012 lb ai/A), clopyralid (0.19 lb ai/A), halosulfuron (0.032<br />

lb ai/A), foramsulfuron (0.033 lb ai/A), glufosinate (0.4 lb ai/A), and KIH-485 (0.18 lb<br />

ai/A). Adjuvants were included in <strong>the</strong> POST spray mixtures.<br />

In general, herbicide treatments provided >90% control <strong>of</strong> annual weeds<br />

including, giant foxtail (Setaria faberi), fall panicum (Panicum dichotomiflorum), common<br />

lambsquarters (Chenopodium album), and velvetleaf (Abutilon <strong>the</strong>ophrasti). Canada<br />

thistle (Cirsium arvense) was <strong>the</strong> only perennial weed species that was common at both<br />

locations. Clopyralid, mesotrione plus atrazine, and glufosinate plus atrazine provided<br />

80 to 85% control <strong>of</strong> Canada thistle. O<strong>the</strong>r treatments that provided >80% control <strong>of</strong><br />

Canada thistle included, tembotrione plus atrazine (92%) at Rock Springs and<br />

topramezone plus atrazine (83%) at Landisville. At Landisville, field bindweed<br />

(Convolvulus arvensis) control ranged from 82 to 92% control with treatments<br />

containing 2,4-D, clopyralid, and glufosinate plus atrazine, while <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r treatments<br />

only provided 45 to 77% control. At Rock Springs, tembotrione plus atrazine,<br />

halosulfuron plus 2,4-D, and foramsulfuron provided between 70 and 81% control <strong>of</strong><br />

hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum) and common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca).<br />

Glufosinate plus atrazine also provided adequate suppression (80%) <strong>of</strong> hemp dogbane.<br />

Aside from carfentrazone, clopyralid, and KIH-485, most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r POST treatments<br />

provided 77 to 95% control <strong>of</strong> common pokeweed (Phytolacca americana).<br />

No crop injury occurred from any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> treatments at Landisville. At Rock<br />

Springs, negligible crop injury was noted on most treatments except for halosulfuron<br />

plus 2,4-D and foramsulfuron which ranged from 15 to 20%. Sweet corn yields at Rock<br />

Springs were generally better than at Landisville. At Rock Springs, sweet corn in <strong>the</strong><br />

untreated check yielded about 5,300 lb/A compared to <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r treatments which<br />

ranged from 9,100 to 13,000 lb/A. The one exception was <strong>the</strong> halosulfuron plus 2,4-D<br />

treatment which reduced <strong>the</strong> yield to about 5,800 lb/A. At Landisville, sweet corn yields<br />

also benefited from better weed control in <strong>the</strong> herbicide treated plots and ranged from<br />

about 5,800 to 9,000 lb/A compared to <strong>the</strong> untreated check (2,700 lb/A).<br />

In summary, production <strong>of</strong> no-till sweet corn can be enhanced by newer herbicide<br />

options. Compared to a decade ago, PRE and POST annual weed control in sweet<br />

corn has greatly improved. Perennial weed control can still be challenging for sweet<br />

corn producers, especially in no-till settings. However, with <strong>the</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> some<br />

newer herbicide chemistries, <strong>the</strong>se can complement o<strong>the</strong>r product choices to provide<br />

better weed management.<br />

103

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!