Proceedings of the Sixty-first Annual Meeting of the Northeastern ...
Proceedings of the Sixty-first Annual Meeting of the Northeastern ... Proceedings of the Sixty-first Annual Meeting of the Northeastern ...
116 STRAWBERRY PLANTING YEAR WEED CONTROL: THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL HERBICIDES. C.A. Benedict and R.R. Bellinder, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY. ABSTRACT Weed control in the year of planting is a major issue facing strawberry growers. In a recent survey, growers placed weeds as the highest of their concerns during the establishment year. Planting year weed control is essential to both minimize weed competition and to maximize yield in the fruiting years. With few herbicides registered for strawberries in the planting year, reliance on costly hand-weeding can become a serious economic drain. Field and greenhouse studies were initiated to determine compatibility of new herbicides. In the greenhouse, herbicides were applied using an Allen Track Sprayer (Midland, MI) at 25 GPA. In these trials, over 15 herbicides were evaluated postemergence (POST), pretransplant (PRETP), or for impact on runner development/rooting. Injury was observed PRETP with fomesafen (0.626 lb ai/A) and s- metolachlor (1.3, 2.6 lb). Injury PSTTP was observed with oxyfluorfen (2XL 0.5, 4F 0.5 lb), flumioxazin (0.03, 0.06 lb), halosulfuron (0.092 lb), and in combinations of s- metolachlor (0.094 lb) + flumioxazin (0.03 lb) and KIH-485 (0.113 lb) + oxyfluorfen (4F 0.375 lb). Runner injury, root development, and dry wt reduction were observed with s- metolachlor (1.3 lb) and KIH-485 (0.226 lb). In a field trial, 'Earliglow' and ‘Jewel’ were utilized to evaluate ten products either PRETP or PSTTP. All applications were made using a CO 2 backpack sprayer set to deliver 34 GPA. Oxyfluorfen (4F 0.375 lb) caused initial injury on ‘Earliglow’. Other notable injury occurred in KIH-485 (0.226 lb PSTTP) and flumioxazin (0.03 lb PRETP). Runner production decreased with flumioxazin (0.03 lb PRETP), penoxsulam (0.026 lb PSTTP), and V-10142 (0.1 lb PSTTP) treatments. 98
117 BEING HEARD BY THE IR-4 PROJECT. E. Lurvey, Northeast Region IR-4 Project, Cornell NYSAES, Geneva, NY. ABSTRACT The mission of IR-4 is to support the registration of pest management tools for specialty crops such as fruits, vegetables and ornamental horticulture. Pest management tools include conventional pesticides as well as biological control agents (biopesticides). The IR-4 research process is dependent on the active participation of growers, researchers, extension personnel, and other client groups. First, only clients without vested interests can submit a Project Clearance Request Form (PCR), either through the IR-4 Northeast Region Field Coordinator (RFC), Edith Lurvey, the IR-4 website (http://ir4.rutgers.edu/) or the appropriate IR-4 State Liaison Representative. The PCR is the first step in the process to get the pest management use on the IR-4 agenda for consideration. Only Par's that have been agreed to by the product registrant will be eligible for consideration at the IR-4 Priority Setting Workshops in September and October. Prior to either workshop, the IR-4 Northeast Region Field Coordinator solicits input on the important needs from growers and researchers in the region. No project is given a high priority without a regional champion. Priorities are as follows: A priorities will have research started in the following growing season: B priorities may be researched as funds allow; C priorities are kept on the researchable project list for future consideration. Food Use prioritization: An additional step was added to the Food Use process this year. All projects to be discussed in a given year must now be nominated prior to the workshop in September. This entails going to the IR-4 website a few weeks prior to the workshop and selecting chemical/crop uses from the researchable projects list. Any project not nominated for three years in a row will be dropped from the IR-4 active list, and would need a new PCR to be reactivated. Growers, researchers, extension workers, etc., need to contact the RFC directly for any project needing a high priority (A or B Priority). Ornamental Horticulture prioritization: A, B and C priorities are established focusing on a specific pest or production need. These priorities are arrived at by consensus among the participants from the four IR-4 regions, with some attention is paid to projects of regional importance. For example, the 2007 national weed science priority is phytotoxicity of several herbicides in perennial nursery plants, with a regional priority (southern and western) for efficacy in the control of sedges in nursery production. Please note that the Northeast region solicits input via email on regional priorities prior to the workshop. Final selection of regional A priorities is made via a teleconference, if needed. If you would like to be added to the list serve for these calls for input, please contact the RFC, Edith Lurvey (ell10@cornell.edu). Biopesticide projects continue to be selected as competitive grants for proposals. 99
- Page 66 and 67: 66 ANNUAL BLUEGRASS AND DOLLAR SPOT
- Page 68 and 69: 68 Table 1. Autumn 2005 versus spri
- Page 70 and 71: 70 A PRELIMINARY STUDY OF THE NON-N
- Page 72 and 73: 72 native species, covering and smo
- Page 74 and 75: 74 EFFECTS OF BUCKWHEAT RESIDUE ON
- Page 76 and 77: 76 Japanese knotweed control 28 DAT
- Page 78 and 79: 78 ENHANCED TOLERANCE TO WEED COMPE
- Page 80 and 81: 80 EFFECTS OF PLANTING AND TERMINAT
- Page 82 and 83: 82 A UNIFYING FRAMEWORK FOR SPECIES
- Page 84 and 85: 84 BIOLOGY OF MULTIFLORA ROSE: AN I
- Page 86 and 87: 86 AN OUNCE OF PREVENTION. M.J. Van
- Page 88 and 89: 88 HERBICIDE COMPARISON IN WET BLAD
- Page 90 and 91: 90 Table 1. Morrow's honeysuckle (L
- Page 92 and 93: 92 EVALUATION OF HERBICIDES FOR CON
- Page 94 and 95: 94 EVALUATION OF HERBICIDES FOR CON
- Page 96 and 97: 96 HOT WATER SYSTEMS FOR VEGETATION
- Page 98 and 99: 98 SEEDHEAD SUPPRESSION OF ANNUAL B
- Page 100 and 101: 100 ROUGHSTALK BLUEGRASS CONTROL WI
- Page 102 and 103: 102 EFFECT OF DEW AND GRANULAR FORM
- Page 104 and 105: 104 USE OF TRICLOPYR TO REDUCE ANTI
- Page 106 and 107: 106 YELLOW NUTSEDGE CONTROL WITH SU
- Page 108 and 109: 108 PRE AND POST EMERGENT ANNUAL BL
- Page 110 and 111: 110 PUMPKIN RESPONSE TO HALOSUFSULF
- Page 112 and 113: 112 Figure 1. Grass cover following
- Page 114 and 115: 114 CHEMICAL CONTROL OF APPLE ROOT
- Page 118 and 119: 118 WEED CONTROL IN NO-TILL PUMPKIN
- Page 120 and 121: 120 NATURAL PRODUCT POTENTIAL FOR W
- Page 122 and 123: 122 THE IR-4 PROJECT: UPDATE ON HER
- Page 124 and 125: 124 PEDIGREE OF A PESTICIDE. D.R. S
- Page 126 and 127: 126 SEEDHEAD SUPPRESSION OF ANNUAL
- Page 128 and 129: 128 APPLICATIONS FOR SULFENTRAZONE
- Page 130 and 131: 130 HORSEWEED: FROM OBSCURITY TO TH
- Page 132 and 133: 132 RECENT FINDINGS ON THE FIELD BE
- Page 134 and 135: 134 HORSEWEED RESPONSE TO NO-TILL P
- Page 136 and 137: 136 THE MASSACHUSETTS EXAMPLE: ONE
- Page 138 and 139: 138 Supplemental NEWSS Abstracts (p
- Page 140 and 141: 140 ABSTRACTS AND BIOGRAPHIES FOR P
- Page 142 and 143: 142 EVALUATION OF AN HERBICIDE APPL
- Page 144 and 145: 144 ALUMINUM TREATMENT FOR PHOSPHOR
- Page 146 and 147: 146 BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF AQUATIC W
- Page 148 and 149: 148 THE 2002 FARM BILL AND ITS EFFE
- Page 150 and 151: 150 LAND USE PRACTICE IMPACTS ON NO
- Page 152 and 153: 152 A NEW STANDARD FOR DEFINING AQU
- Page 154 and 155: 154 PORTRAIT OF THE HEALTH STATUS O
- Page 156 and 157: 156 TEN YEARS OF VARIABLE WATER MIL
- Page 158 and 159: 158 Northeastern Weed Science Socie
- Page 160 and 161: 160 meeting attendance numbers have
- Page 162 and 163: 162 members or to members of the Ex
- Page 164 and 165: 164 primary areas that had increase
116<br />
STRAWBERRY PLANTING YEAR WEED CONTROL: THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL<br />
HERBICIDES. C.A. Benedict and R.R. Bellinder, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY.<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Weed control in <strong>the</strong> year <strong>of</strong> planting is a major issue facing strawberry growers.<br />
In a recent survey, growers placed weeds as <strong>the</strong> highest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir concerns during <strong>the</strong><br />
establishment year. Planting year weed control is essential to both minimize weed<br />
competition and to maximize yield in <strong>the</strong> fruiting years. With few herbicides registered<br />
for strawberries in <strong>the</strong> planting year, reliance on costly hand-weeding can become a<br />
serious economic drain. Field and greenhouse studies were initiated to determine<br />
compatibility <strong>of</strong> new herbicides. In <strong>the</strong> greenhouse, herbicides were applied using an<br />
Allen Track Sprayer (Midland, MI) at 25 GPA. In <strong>the</strong>se trials, over 15 herbicides were<br />
evaluated postemergence (POST), pretransplant (PRETP), or for impact on runner<br />
development/rooting. Injury was observed PRETP with fomesafen (0.626 lb ai/A) and s-<br />
metolachlor (1.3, 2.6 lb). Injury PSTTP was observed with oxyfluorfen (2XL 0.5, 4F 0.5<br />
lb), flumioxazin (0.03, 0.06 lb), halosulfuron (0.092 lb), and in combinations <strong>of</strong> s-<br />
metolachlor (0.094 lb) + flumioxazin (0.03 lb) and KIH-485 (0.113 lb) + oxyfluorfen (4F<br />
0.375 lb). Runner injury, root development, and dry wt reduction were observed with s-<br />
metolachlor (1.3 lb) and KIH-485 (0.226 lb). In a field trial, 'Earliglow' and ‘Jewel’ were<br />
utilized to evaluate ten products ei<strong>the</strong>r PRETP or PSTTP. All applications were made<br />
using a CO 2 backpack sprayer set to deliver 34 GPA. Oxyfluorfen (4F 0.375 lb) caused<br />
initial injury on ‘Earliglow’. O<strong>the</strong>r notable injury occurred in KIH-485 (0.226 lb PSTTP)<br />
and flumioxazin (0.03 lb PRETP). Runner production decreased with flumioxazin (0.03<br />
lb PRETP), penoxsulam (0.026 lb PSTTP), and V-10142 (0.1 lb PSTTP) treatments.<br />
98