Vol. 16â1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 16â1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 16â1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
86. !oa'.!?l!~._ ~2.h!.s;;.o!~g_f~r;..;7.:c.\!1!!og~,W!C!t!O~ 2.f ~! S.~!, Days following'· ;. Test 1 Te8t-2' Test 3. . __ t!:,e!t!,ni __ ....;,....;q;:;,__ ~u~e_7_ ~ __ ...;.__ :!U!l_l! Aug~sig,4_ ... ...- -- ~ 0 .00 .00 " 1.45 1 .65 Trace ·32 2 .01 .05 .00 3 .78 :.19 Trace ,::"li 4 1.08 '. .07, .03 5 .00 .15 .00 6 .50 ;00" .00 ~.- .1, -.: .Ol'·· .ce .. .02 ' ..-.-,.~; ----1- ----------~:...----------.~ __ 'to!.B!. ~ ~ :_l·Q.S__ .:..-;- ~.!i8-~ _' 1!,.Bg,_..:...,. It can be seen in Table 5t_,z)lphenamid was ucept10nally variable. l1n pe1'formance between the several te8't:s. It is thOupt; that the leaching 'QItiabJ.e may accolmlifortbese difference8ioiDacthBl gave UD1tormly gOod resuJ.ts. There is toxic to crucifers at . higher rates. Trifluralin was outstanding in weed·corxtrol. Except wbel'il..'leach,., ing wasprQbab~.severe it appears to be safe, even at 3 or 4 times the. d,c)sage, nMded 'for weed ooDt1'Ol. CIlEC..cDAA'performedwell ti'bb .:l1ttle crop.Cla1IItIPand generally good weed control. However) in the second test Wbere no heavy ri.1ne occutX'ed)' weed coetrol was only. mediocre. .:, ", Those compounds performing, unsatisfactorily, et1;be~ beCal»e of poor 1lIHd" control or because of crop inj1.li7. are listed in Ta~ 6. '" l. 'DacthBl:has a wid.eme.rg1nof safety on seeded or transplanted b:l'oCco11, aa~e,and cauJ.ttlower. :rt is effective on l11811Yannualweed species. .... ' weed~'6peeies tolerant of DacthBlare ragweed, S1II&1'tiJ8edand galinsoga • ..~.Zytronhasc.•pprOX1mat.ly the sameactiv11lyce,a DacthBl as tar 88 .«i . species ;is coneened. However" 1lbere seems to be Ii' 41stinctly narrover .~. of.crop. sat~ty.Tbe ,granular formulation IIlUStbe sUbstituted fortbe l1q11td if cruciterfol1ale ispreseDt. 3. Cabbage. .,.,ieties appear tc! react d11'fefeat1ally to-Zytron.Irl ODe tr1al two ;yeUows reeistant varte\ttee seemed to be'.eresu8ceptible than-'l1Dnresistant. However only 5 varieties were included in this study. More 1lCrk is needed on this aspect.
Table 5. Bai
- Page 35 and 36: This narrative of ineptitude must b
- Page 37 and 38: does Jo run a recreational facility
- Page 39 and 40: Another pote1U:ialuse for chemicals
- Page 41 and 42: Newapproaches in the use of herbici
- Page 43 and 44: 43 sentence would bear this out". T
- Page 45 and 46: More and more each year since the a
- Page 47 and 48: 11. Rice, E. J. The effects of cUlt
- Page 49 and 50: PFSI'ICIDESUSED - - - - - - - - - -
- Page 51 and 52: __..:I whether or not these apparen
- Page 53 and 54: Dosage. Ib./acre Dimethyl tetrachlo
- Page 55 and 56: ~ ~_~ __ L L Table 2. Weed Susceoti
- Page 57 and 58: - - - - - - - - ~, - - - - --- - -
- Page 59 and 60: Table 7.. Weed Control in :l:!c,Ql1
- Page 61 and 62: Table '1. Rat.1lISstI 'Of carrot an
- Page 63 and 64: H , 'ta~l!. g,._~e~_O!~ut~• .:.:.
- Page 65 and 66: 65 plant press and dried in a f~ced
- Page 67 and 68: 67 Tablet. 'lIi! EFFECT'or AN'INO'l
- Page 69 and 70: 69 THE INFLUENCE JIt P.I!ll'ROLEUM
- Page 71 and 72: 71 1 CDEC(Ee) 2 " " 3 4 " 5 " " 6 7
- Page 73 and 74: !a~l~ 1._ ~!:.c!: :!!1~hJl!:e.::m~d
- Page 75 and 76: 75 EFFECT;OFCOMPOSITIONANDVOLUMEOF
- Page 77 and 78: A LOGARITHMICSPRAlERFORSMALLPLCflSY
- Page 79 and 80: 79 Do~ Calculations The actual init
- Page 81 and 82: Selective Herbicides for Several Cr
- Page 83 and 84: 83 Susceptible weeds Tolerant weeds
- Page 85: 85 Marion Market 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Da
- Page 89 and 90: weeding of Lima Bean. With Chemical
- Page 91 and 92: EFFECTOF HERBICIDESONQUALITYANDYIEL
- Page 93 and 94: Results Date treated: 9/6/61 Soil m
- Page 95 and 96: 95 Date planted: 915/61 Date treate
- Page 97 and 98: Table 3. Yield Data on Hanover and
- Page 99 and 100: Weeding of Carrots With 'pre-lilanU
- Page 101 and 102: 101 WEEDCONTROLSTUDIESIN SEElED ONI
- Page 103 and 104: Weather conditions at the two locat
- Page 105 and 106: In contrast to the damage noted in
- Page 107 and 108: 107 Literature Cited 1. Althaus. R.
- Page 109 and 110: Table 1. Weed control: stand of pla
- Page 111 and 112: Results and Discussion. The data, p
- Page 113 and 114: CIPO, Vegadex, and Randox Singly or
- Page 115 and 116: Table 1•. Wa. control, stand of p
- Page 117 and 118: 'Ihree experiments were conducted i
- Page 119 and 120: a- Table 2_"COIIlpartsonof' Several
- Page 121 and 122: fJ Table 3. CcBparison of Several.
- Page 123 and 124: c
- Page 125 and 126: Table 1. Seeding and Weed Counts on
- Page 127 and 128: WEEDCONTROLANDTHE IMPROVEMENT OF SE
- Page 129 and 130: Following emergence of the tomato s
- Page 131 and 132: indicates that several of the treat
- Page 133 and 134: DISCUSSIONOF RESULTS Transplant Tom
- Page 135 and 136: harvest was covered with weeds, and
86.<br />
!oa'.!?l!~._ ~2.h!.s;;.o!~g_f~r;..;7.:c.\!1!!og~,W!C!t!O~ 2.f ~! S.~!,<br />
Days following'· ;. Test 1 Te8t-2' Test 3. .<br />
__ t!:,e!t!,ni __ ....;,....;q;:;,__ ~u~e_7_ ~ __ ...;.__ :!U!l_l! Aug~sig,4_ ... ...-<br />
-- ~<br />
0 .00 .00<br />
"<br />
1.45<br />
1 .65 Trace ·32<br />
2 .01 .05 .00<br />
3 .78 :.19 Trace<br />
,::"li<br />
4 1.08 '. .07, .03<br />
5 .00 .15 .00<br />
6 .50 ;00" .00<br />
~.-<br />
.1, -.: .Ol'·· .ce .. .02 '<br />
..-.-,.~; ----1- ----------~:...----------.~<br />
__ 'to!.B!.<br />
~<br />
~ :_l·Q.S__ .:..-;- ~.!i8-~ _' 1!,.Bg,_..:...,.<br />
It can be seen in Table 5t_,z)lphenamid was ucept10nally variable. l1n<br />
pe1'formance between the several te8't:s. It is thOupt; that the leaching 'QItiabJ.e<br />
may accolmlifortbese difference8ioiDacthBl gave UD1tormly gOod resuJ.ts. There<br />
is toxic to crucifers at .<br />
higher rates. Trifluralin was outstanding in weed·corxtrol. Except wbel'il..'leach,.,<br />
ing wasprQbab~.severe it appears to be safe, even at 3 or 4 times the. d,c)sage,<br />
nMded 'for weed ooDt1'Ol. CIlEC..cDAA'performedwell ti'bb .:l1ttle crop.Cla1IItIPand<br />
generally good weed control. However) in the second test Wbere no heavy ri.1ne<br />
occutX'ed)' weed coetrol was only. mediocre. .:, ",<br />
Those compounds performing, unsatisfactorily, et1;be~ beCal»e of poor 1lIHd"<br />
control or because of crop inj1.li7. are listed in Ta~ 6. '"<br />
l. 'DacthBl:has a wid.eme.rg1nof safety on seeded or transplanted b:l'oCco11,<br />
aa~e,and cauJ.ttlower. :rt is effective on l11811Yannualweed species. .... '<br />
weed~'6peeies tolerant of DacthBlare ragweed, S1II&1'tiJ8edand galinsoga •<br />
..~.Zytronhasc.•pprOX1mat.ly the sameactiv11lyce,a DacthBl as tar 88 .«i .<br />
species ;is coneened. However" 1lbere seems to be Ii' 41stinctly narrover .~.<br />
of.crop. sat~ty.Tbe ,granular formulation IIlUStbe sUbstituted fortbe l1q11td if<br />
cruciterfol1ale ispreseDt.<br />
3. Cabbage. .,.,ieties appear tc! react d11'fefeat1ally to-Zytron.Irl ODe<br />
tr1al two ;yeUows reeistant varte\ttee seemed to be'.eresu8ceptible than-'l1Dnresistant.<br />
However only 5 varieties were included in this study. More 1lCrk<br />
is needed on this aspect.
Change language