08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

69<br />

THE INFLUENCE JIt P.I!ll'ROLEUM Ml:fLOi"'O. N 'Jl}JE<br />

PERFORMANCE OF SEVERALHERBICII:lBSY<br />

George Bayer ,Bodgerdfsrgsn and Joseph Cialone Y<br />

For .the past several yearsplutic sheets. Poth, black and clear and V!lU'Ying<br />

in width have. been .used commerc1ally as a methodotCClntrollingweeds,<br />

stimulating plant· growth and 1m,proVing small fruit $:Id vegetable quality •<br />

. ':his report is c01lQerned with,the applicat1()n~ a liquid petrole1,llllmuJ.ch in<br />

cOllbinat ion with herbicides Which IIl!ght serve some of the same purposes 8l$. the<br />

black plastic sheets. but to be 'PPLied as a~~pr~ alter seeding or prio~·to<br />

transplanting. Work done by Kaye&:Wiggans21 ind:1cated that the effectiv.ess<br />

of certain herbicides ' was enhanced when used in coaPinetion with aspha1t~ch.<br />

Experimental<br />

Four tests were carried out duriIig the 1961 growing season at Ithaca. The<br />

sandy loam soil was ploved, diskedand harrowed with a meeker to prOVide a uniformly<br />

f:Lne s~ bed. The randomized plots were eaeh 3 x 15 feet and rep.l.:lcated<br />

two to four t1meso.epending on the nature of theJt.,1t. The herbicides were<br />

applied with a ~ proessure-operated Small-~l,ot spraye. 1' •. For. ease of operat. ion<br />

in the latter two tests the petrole1,llll mulc~ wa, oppUed.; using a hand o.. rateo.<br />

1.5 gall.oJl;garden~type sprayer connected to a standard spray boom equi~w1th<br />

two 8004 TeeJet ~~type noZZles.<br />

In total; seyendifferent~heJilJ,cals were exam1Jledin three categories relating<br />

to the mulch: under the mulch, ~ with mulch an4:;no mulch. A fourth.C)~check<br />

category was that of no mulch and no herbicide. Application of herbic;l.de':fllI.d<br />

mulch was on an overall basi.s. In the first test two rates of mulch were tested.<br />

Since no differences were observed" only one rate wasused m subsequept -tests.<br />

Crops were varied according to chemical. SQlIlfl:werechosen on the be,sie. of<br />

present herbic:Ldal practices but. several sensitive grops were selected as ,indicators<br />

of chemical. toXicity or &et1v;l:ty.<br />

The foUl'. tests were started respectively on JU~ 16, July 7-10, Augl1$;tl 7,<br />

and September 1.<br />

!JPaper No• 469of the~partmentof Vegetable Crops, Cornell University,-tthaca,<br />

gj~;~duate Assistants, Department of Vegetable Crops, Cornell University .'<br />

YKays , W.R.aDd S. C. WiggaM,Oklahoma State, S~water, Oklahoma. Soil<br />

stabilizers and herbi~ide combinations for weed. ~trol with horticultural<br />

4 jcrops • Oral presentation ASBS.. August 1961.<br />

:::tFormulation E.A.P. 2000 except as noted.<br />

Part of this research was made possible by a grant in aid from Esso Re8ear~h<br />

and Engineering, Linden, New,J~sey.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!