Vol. 16â1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 16â1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 16â1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Pollar appl:l.cati.4mso. '~no tr1uole .~~·¥ate ,o~ .two, four, and eight poqcd.ller "Cl'er~l~ed in a .....
69 THE INFLUENCE JIt P.I!ll'ROLEUM Ml:fLOi"'O. N 'Jl}JE PERFORMANCE OF SEVERALHERBICII:lBSY George Bayer ,Bodgerdfsrgsn and Joseph Cialone Y For .the past several yearsplutic sheets. Poth, black and clear and V!lU'Ying in width have. been .used commerc1ally as a methodotCClntrollingweeds, stimulating plant· growth and 1m,proVing small fruit $:Id vegetable quality • . ':his report is c01lQerned with,the applicat1()n~ a liquid petrole1,llllmuJ.ch in cOllbinat ion with herbicides Which IIl!ght serve some of the same purposes 8l$. the black plastic sheets. but to be 'PPLied as a~~pr~ alter seeding or prio~·to transplanting. Work done by Kaye&:Wiggans21 ind:1cated that the effectiv.ess of certain herbicides ' was enhanced when used in coaPinetion with aspha1t~ch. Experimental Four tests were carried out duriIig the 1961 growing season at Ithaca. The sandy loam soil was ploved, diskedand harrowed with a meeker to prOVide a uniformly f:Lne s~ bed. The randomized plots were eaeh 3 x 15 feet and rep.l.:lcated two to four t1meso.epending on the nature of theJt.,1t. The herbicides were applied with a ~ proessure-operated Small-~l,ot spraye. 1' •. For. ease of operat. ion in the latter two tests the petrole1,llll mulc~ wa, oppUed.; using a hand o.. rateo. 1.5 gall.oJl;garden~type sprayer connected to a standard spray boom equi~w1th two 8004 TeeJet ~~type noZZles. In total; seyendifferent~heJilJ,cals were exam1Jledin three categories relating to the mulch: under the mulch, ~ with mulch an4:;no mulch. A fourth.C)~check category was that of no mulch and no herbicide. Application of herbic;l.de':fllI.d mulch was on an overall basi.s. In the first test two rates of mulch were tested. Since no differences were observed" only one rate wasused m subsequept -tests. Crops were varied according to chemical. SQlIlfl:werechosen on the be,sie. of present herbic:Ldal practices but. several sensitive grops were selected as ,indicators of chemical. toXicity or &et1v;l:ty. The foUl'. tests were started respectively on JU~ 16, July 7-10, Augl1$;tl 7, and September 1. !JPaper No• 469of the~partmentof Vegetable Crops, Cornell University,-tthaca, gj~;~duate Assistants, Department of Vegetable Crops, Cornell University .' YKays , W.R.aDd S. C. WiggaM,Oklahoma State, S~water, Oklahoma. Soil stabilizers and herbi~ide combinations for weed. ~trol with horticultural 4 jcrops • Oral presentation ASBS.. August 1961. :::tFormulation E.A.P. 2000 except as noted. Part of this research was made possible by a grant in aid from Esso Re8ear~h and Engineering, Linden, New,J~sey.
- Page 17 and 18: The vigorous regrowth of quackgrass
- Page 19 and 20: during t,he sUllllller.is l,ower ll
- Page 21 and 22: 5. llslapon and other chlorine,ted
- Page 23 and 24: 23 • ·i INTRODUCTION: !!'he Bear
- Page 25 and 26: Some damage to runners rssul ted fr
- Page 27 and 28: 27 CELLSTRUCTUREANDPLANTGROWTHCRMON
- Page 29 and 30: pel'fQ.,..d,-.ear17M1932. that the
- Page 31 and 32: a copious precipitate deposits afte
- Page 33 and 34: B) A general review of the subject
- Page 35 and 36: This narrative of ineptitude must b
- Page 37 and 38: does Jo run a recreational facility
- Page 39 and 40: Another pote1U:ialuse for chemicals
- Page 41 and 42: Newapproaches in the use of herbici
- Page 43 and 44: 43 sentence would bear this out". T
- Page 45 and 46: More and more each year since the a
- Page 47 and 48: 11. Rice, E. J. The effects of cUlt
- Page 49 and 50: PFSI'ICIDESUSED - - - - - - - - - -
- Page 51 and 52: __..:I whether or not these apparen
- Page 53 and 54: Dosage. Ib./acre Dimethyl tetrachlo
- Page 55 and 56: ~ ~_~ __ L L Table 2. Weed Susceoti
- Page 57 and 58: - - - - - - - - ~, - - - - --- - -
- Page 59 and 60: Table 7.. Weed Control in :l:!c,Ql1
- Page 61 and 62: Table '1. Rat.1lISstI 'Of carrot an
- Page 63 and 64: H , 'ta~l!. g,._~e~_O!~ut~• .:.:.
- Page 65 and 66: 65 plant press and dried in a f~ced
- Page 67: 67 Tablet. 'lIi! EFFECT'or AN'INO'l
- Page 71 and 72: 71 1 CDEC(Ee) 2 " " 3 4 " 5 " " 6 7
- Page 73 and 74: !a~l~ 1._ ~!:.c!: :!!1~hJl!:e.::m~d
- Page 75 and 76: 75 EFFECT;OFCOMPOSITIONANDVOLUMEOF
- Page 77 and 78: A LOGARITHMICSPRAlERFORSMALLPLCflSY
- Page 79 and 80: 79 Do~ Calculations The actual init
- Page 81 and 82: Selective Herbicides for Several Cr
- Page 83 and 84: 83 Susceptible weeds Tolerant weeds
- Page 85 and 86: 85 Marion Market 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Da
- Page 87 and 88: Table 5. Bai
- Page 89 and 90: weeding of Lima Bean. With Chemical
- Page 91 and 92: EFFECTOF HERBICIDESONQUALITYANDYIEL
- Page 93 and 94: Results Date treated: 9/6/61 Soil m
- Page 95 and 96: 95 Date planted: 915/61 Date treate
- Page 97 and 98: Table 3. Yield Data on Hanover and
- Page 99 and 100: Weeding of Carrots With 'pre-lilanU
- Page 101 and 102: 101 WEEDCONTROLSTUDIESIN SEElED ONI
- Page 103 and 104: Weather conditions at the two locat
- Page 105 and 106: In contrast to the damage noted in
- Page 107 and 108: 107 Literature Cited 1. Althaus. R.
- Page 109 and 110: Table 1. Weed control: stand of pla
- Page 111 and 112: Results and Discussion. The data, p
- Page 113 and 114: CIPO, Vegadex, and Randox Singly or
- Page 115 and 116: Table 1•. Wa. control, stand of p
- Page 117 and 118: 'Ihree experiments were conducted i
Pollar appl:l.cati.4mso. '~no tr1uole .~~·¥ate ,o~ .two, four,<br />
and eight poqcd.ller "Cl'er~l~ed in a .....
Change language