Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

08.06.2015 Views

62 Du R)nt 326 caused slight early stunting of carrots on muck. However, at barvest no differences in yield could be noted. In tbe t'WOtests on coarse sand where only early records we~.btained, 326 caused marked stunting at three pounds. It was for this reasOn that rates were kept at 1.5 lbs. ma.x1mum in the sandy !oem test. Ragweed is a severe pest not controlled by Stoddard Solvent. Tbe t'WO tests abandoned early, were in fields chosen primarily because of bigh ragweed population. These tests yielded some data on ragweed control. The follow1nc materials failed to control tbis pest: Cbloro !PC, Dacthsl, Zytran, Dipropalin (post-emergence) and Trifiuralin. Du R)nt 326 gave excellent control of ragweed. Other compounds whicb performed well were J:.pazine and Solan. In the planting on the sandy loam soil annual grasses were a serious problem. Ipe.zine and Solan gave only fair control of tbese pests. Du R)nt 326, however, performed exceedingly well. Tbus for a wide range of weed species on widely different soils under either pre or post-emergent conditions this chemical was outstanding. Nutgrass Ex,per1ments The activity of Du Pont 326 and other chemicals was studied at two locations beavily infested witb nutgrass. The materials were applied pre-planting at botb locations. At one location they were also applied in the "spike" stage and wben tbe nutgrass averaged 6 - 8 inches tall. The results of the several tests are presented in table 2. Timing bad a pronounced effect on the response of nutgrass to Du R)nt 326. Pre-plant applications whether on the surface or incorporated gave unsatisfactory control. Disappointing results were also bad from the "spike" stage applications. At both of these timings the foliage turned somewhat yellow and early growtb was slightly retarded. However, after about three weeks tbe nutgrass foliage returned to a normal color and the plants developed vigorously. When treated at the taller stage, the foliage turned yellow and gradually became necrotic. No regrowtb occurred on any 326 plot treated at the 6 - 8 inch stage. Atrazine performed less satisfactorily at the spike stage than is normally expected. EPrC, however, was consistently excellent. Dalapon gave widely different results at tbe two pre-plant locations. Tbe authors do not have any explanation for the poor early results ~b Dalapon at King Ferry. Generally, early applications witb Dalapon have givfn results similar to tbose obtained at Binghamton. ReSponse of Additional Crops In addition to the results already reported Du R)nt 326 was used as an at -planting treatment in one test on muck, three tests on sandy loam, and in three tests on stony silt loam. R)tatoes appeared to be tolerant, however, no post -emergent tests have been conducted on this crop. Other crops including cucumbers, muskmelons, peas, snap and lima beans, tomatoes, beets and spinach were either severely damaged or killed at rates needed for weed control. Squasb were moderately damaged from pre-emergence applications but were killed by

H , 'ta~l!. g,._~e~_O!~ut~• .:.:.'tO_8i!V!,1'!.l..,Q~~~&!!&tl~!ti1!~'__ 6.:8_ 1!;!Ch!.s £h!.m!.c!l ~b!.... _ .. '!!!.-'R.l!!ii'2L;~ _ ............ "~!t!< ......... DeJ.apon Atrazine .~ , 7.00 . ~. .JC!!1Ib$Y',:KingTeeg, .!iDe Ii'erq ).0 3.5 10 8.50 2 5.75 5.5 4.5 4 7.50 1.0' 5.5 ,6;.,,· 8.75 8." EP1'C(Inc.) 2 6.5· 11;., 8.5 ' '; 8.5 8.0 ' Du Pont 326 1/2; • 1. 2.00" 2.95 5~0:'. 2 - 3 5.25 ~ i.50 ~ 6.5 Check ;,", 1.0,' -':,1",0 ,'1.0 ' '1.0" ;;-9:~~: :e:t:~ :f-t:P"'~~~~~."'c:.::Q~~~~; :f"'t~~~~."'''' 5.unsat1sfactory control W top growth. 1. heavy complete ground cover. Ratings made in early August. . 6.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 9.0 2/ All pre-plant treatments at King Ferriwere diS~•. ~Y the E}ltam W8lI incorporate4,at i1D&h&mton· .. ",", ,.; . .... , post-emergeneet~t.. ~" covet crops are'~ well whe~ .~·was applied in June OIlslWl:Y1OBlIl.. s~ and Conclusions • '" .• "")",C," , 1. In1.4Q1lel'1mant& on~.~ frOm~e'~ to IDUck,DI1.~~t 326 @IlVeexaelant 'eont1'ol ofaW1lit r6i1ge of azmUl4Weedsinc1.ud1ng:c~~s, Eragrostis !!E.', barn;yai'd' 'srast,~i lambsquarten J ;purslane, gal1Deo_, ragweed, senecio.,. and 1.ad;Y'8thUmb 8IDl\1'tveed.='SOU t)'pe hadl1ttle ,Qr no influence on res s.' , " ' ' , , 2. Northern il.utgaSllWU etljlec~. lIusceptlblA,:to ;post-em$rgenceappllcations of 326. bat; vas not coiJ.t1'01~ by' pre~;,pdlce t~ts. 3. C8IT0ts were tolerMt o~·~. irw. post~sence applications of 326 at rates adequate to control either annual weeds or m.ttgrass. Post-emerse~ appl1ce.tionswere very.ffei:lt1ve1litO~·5and 1.0 ~~'~'t¥ acre but abQ~:. twice this qU8lXtttywas Deeded pre~t:sence. ,~' ' ,'" 4. Potatoes tolerated pre-e'llBrgence applic&t1oZUl,l;>utit is not knovIl.if they will tolel'atepos-to.emergenO'e''trfttments. .. . . ' 5. IDng residual ai:ltivity j,s apparently not a PJ'l)blem on sandy loam. Information talao1dng tor ot~eoulS' . 63 _

62<br />

Du R)nt 326 caused slight early stunting of carrots on muck. However, at<br />

barvest no differences in yield could be noted. In tbe t'WOtests on coarse<br />

sand where only early records we~.btained, 326 caused marked stunting at<br />

three pounds. It was for this reasOn that rates were kept at 1.5 lbs. ma.x1mum<br />

in the sandy !oem test.<br />

Ragweed is a severe pest not controlled by Stoddard Solvent. Tbe t'WO<br />

tests abandoned early, were in fields chosen primarily because of bigh ragweed<br />

population. These tests yielded some data on ragweed control. The follow1nc<br />

materials failed to control tbis pest: Cbloro !PC, Dacthsl, Zytran, Dipropalin<br />

(post-emergence) and Trifiuralin. Du R)nt 326 gave excellent control of<br />

ragweed. Other compounds whicb performed well were J:.pazine and Solan.<br />

In the planting on the sandy loam soil annual grasses were a serious problem.<br />

Ipe.zine and Solan gave only fair control of tbese pests. Du R)nt 326, however,<br />

performed exceedingly well. Tbus for a wide range of weed species on widely<br />

different soils under either pre or post-emergent conditions this chemical was<br />

outstanding.<br />

Nutgrass<br />

Ex,per1ments<br />

The activity of Du Pont 326 and other chemicals was studied at two locations<br />

beavily infested witb nutgrass. The materials were applied pre-planting at botb<br />

locations. At one location they were also applied in the "spike" stage and wben<br />

tbe nutgrass averaged 6 - 8 inches tall. The results of the several tests are<br />

presented in table 2.<br />

Timing bad a pronounced effect on the response of nutgrass to Du R)nt 326.<br />

Pre-plant applications whether on the surface or incorporated gave unsatisfactory<br />

control. Disappointing results were also bad from the "spike" stage applications.<br />

At both of these timings the foliage turned somewhat yellow and early<br />

growtb was slightly retarded. However, after about three weeks tbe nutgrass<br />

foliage returned to a normal color and the plants developed vigorously. When<br />

treated at the taller stage, the foliage turned yellow and gradually became<br />

necrotic. No regrowtb occurred on any 326 plot treated at the 6 - 8 inch stage.<br />

Atrazine performed less satisfactorily at the spike stage than is normally<br />

expected. EPrC, however, was consistently excellent. Dalapon gave widely<br />

different results at tbe two pre-plant locations. Tbe authors do not have any<br />

explanation for the poor early results ~b Dalapon at King Ferry. Generally,<br />

early applications witb Dalapon have givfn results similar to tbose obtained<br />

at Binghamton.<br />

ReSponse of Additional<br />

Crops<br />

In addition to the results already reported Du R)nt 326 was used as an<br />

at -planting treatment in one test on muck, three tests on sandy loam, and in<br />

three tests on stony silt loam. R)tatoes appeared to be tolerant, however, no<br />

post -emergent tests have been conducted on this crop. Other crops including<br />

cucumbers, muskmelons, peas, snap and lima beans, tomatoes, beets and spinach<br />

were either severely damaged or killed at rates needed for weed control. Squasb<br />

were moderately damaged from pre-emergence applications but were killed by

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!