08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

500<br />

Da1;ejJ01 e~uations<br />

~,a.;t'ollClW&I.,<br />

, . " l r I<br />

,.AMCHEJ{ Research ~t June 20, JulT 24, August 24 "<br />

: "September 29<br />

, 08k., Twrace CCt r·",,· June 20, Ju4r 27, August 24<br />

September 29<br />

~.<br />

',i1~e Valley GCs June 27, JulT 22, ,Ootober 11<br />

./ '"j '.<br />

( r', .i<br />

iThe sp,~.~~f·" ~961 ~,.t~'~:Old and~:~1l)kt\,~he PhUadelphia.',; sr:<br />

area,as. it wasin many other parts of the North... , crabgrass emergence<br />

was two weeks to a month later than usual, and growth after emergence was<br />

very slow until around the middle of June. Muchot the emerged crabgrass<br />

was still in the 2 to 4 leaf ,s'tap,on June let.' _ ,<br />

, ' . Ra:lntallwas constant ,\brR'I,1ghouthe SUJMr· and temperatures were<br />

high enough to t,Cl(Drcontinuous ,prmaxim'lllll emergence of crabgrass. There<br />

..ere no distinct. ~.ods of crabgrNs emergence and growth as is 'lSSualin<br />

our &r84.0.. ,~<br />

\'r<br />

Hhile no n'lllllerical counts of the actual stand of crabgrass per<br />

unit areaw.ereT~to compare~.rstand to previoUs seasons, visual<br />

~uatione .:1ndica:ted.,that the nat'Ol'alcrabgrass iDtestation was much more<br />

uaUom andseV~than in prev:1oul years. Thus, it is possible that in<br />

the past seaso~.;8Il.ef:fective c~cal producing 9Sto 98 per cent control<br />

may have left 10 to 15 crabgrass plants in a 50 to .100 square foot area.<br />

In 1961, on the ,other hand, 95 to9S per cent control of amuoh larger<br />

number ofsp%'out~gC1!E!bgrass seedS!imayhave allowed 50 to 75plants to<br />

develop.in the881lle plot area.' J:<br />

Whentransformed into the visual estimates used in our eva+.ua~ions,<br />

the larger n'lllllberof plants present would greatly reduce apparent contfo.l.i<br />

Thus, a chemical ~ have controlled 50 per cent of the crabgrass plants<br />

actualJ.¥· emerging,bU.t those ~g plants wou14:'beenough to completely<br />

intestthe plots ,and wew~ld8ft;].lIa'te this as' n(j,i,~aren't control.' .,:' ,,'<br />

This probably accounts for the reduced, etleotiveness 'of material's<br />

such as dacthal, zytron and tricalci'lllll arsenate, wh1ch have been consistently<br />

effect~ve :in our, 'tUttt.1t1- previau.::years. Theon1.:j liUlt.erialsproviding _<br />

more than 80 p.. oent· control t~th$., season ·1fMtritluraJ.in at 4,"~ ,<br />

and 8 lb/A and d1lll'opalin at 8 lb/A.<br />

In 1960, salcium propyl arsonate showed IIltcellent tolerance to<br />

established turf and new turf planted before or after application, good<br />

post-emergence activity on crabgrass, and aat:lsfactory seasonal pre-emeraence<br />

crabgrass control.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!