08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

'j 437<br />

petioles, now elongated,f'ortoed miruature arches above the'L·'.<br />

water; the ,pads overturned and theentire,jplot presented a4"8ddiSh<br />

oast oompared to the surrounding untreated green area.UBy<br />

the end of the first week, the surface supported a tangled mass<br />

of stems, leaves ,and bloa'8dms, whioh stlon:began to deoompoee.<br />

From this point on, deoomposition proceeded slowly, more al",,1y<br />

than in previous years. Whereas the surfaoe of treated a~••<br />

usually had been free of pad. by late JUll,' they were not.tjoee<br />

of pads until August or earl~ September i~ 1961.<br />

In oaves or little bays of area I II" where the waterw&s<br />

qUiet, the 111y pads disappeared more qUickly, as well as mQre<br />

oompletely. In the region of the ohanneL~exposed to win~<br />

and probably a small ourrent, the treatment was not as effe~t~<br />

1ve, and even in september oonsiderable ngmbers of lily pad$;<br />

dotted the surfaoe. Submersed weeds (Utrloularia) responde~<br />

in muoh the same way. They.were reduoe! cr nearly eliminated<br />

in qUiet waters, but not in the deeper and more exposed ohannel<br />

area.!<br />

.-: J t) I<br />

Areas I and II oan be oommented upon'·together. Exoept',ltor<br />

a narrow band olose to shore •. these areas responded suooesst.lly<br />

to tr~atment. By early september the surtace was well olea~edof<br />

111y pads,and the submerged weeds (mostlJ: Utrioularia) had·IQeen<br />

ei tbel" eliminated Qr muoh re(1uced •. Along~:the west shore, a cmos-s,<br />

hornwort, and some water 1111es form an:exoeedingl~ dense b~r.d&r<br />

of 8 feet in wldth. These plants were not eliminated or substantially<br />

reduoed. As fo.r the Potamoge~. it is very diffioult<br />

to judge. InsparElel-y populatedare",s. it seems to di~<br />

appear With treatment, b"t in densely popQtated areas, ther$c<br />

a,ppears to be no reduction lP number of pl&;nts. l<br />

, , j'<br />

One halr of area I r!&j:utlved a seoond.pp110a tion of K~sal<br />

G on July 5, three weeks. afUr the first¥pllcation. Thisn<br />

treatment was made ~in order ,.to test the v1:80Zlof a large pa1i~<br />

of NUpp!r advena whioh had not. beenaffeo'ed by the first appli<br />

ca tion.. By the end at . twoweeks, thepA,ants were dying. ~d<br />

by early September they w8l"'e.-declmated, bu:1l.not oompletely<br />

eliminated.<br />

.I 'r::- i '<br />

It may be oonol1uded that, ln genera1., ~~haea, BrasenM,<br />

and Utr!1oul~rla res,ponded l1uooessfully tOfJLIlithree weedio1i$8<br />

when applied at a oonoentra1iion of 2 ppm. ".No one of the thl"IH<br />

weedloides proved more effeotive than the,-other two. I<br />

The summer of 1961 3,n P:utohesEl Countl:W8,:S hot and humid<br />

With all" temperatures oft.enj,n high 80'.S~; low 90's. FrPm.i:<br />

May 31 - September 20, bottom, tempe;ra tur~-ttd):r- the pond variei1.<br />

with the usual seasonal ~enQ.. Op May 31iot.ne temperature "Joil<br />

a 0001 60 0F, whioh rose sharply during a hot period in early<br />

June to 78 0F. During the AA~terohalfo:r. ~nei .and early JU::LY,<br />

the pond oooled to a conatan t, 74 F, but %?qse",galn by mld.... Ju.iLf<br />

to 80°F. Although no sample~ were taken 1~ AUgust, it is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!