Vol. 16â1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 16â1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 16â1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
418 EarlY 'Chemical Trea~':, . . .. .. ,:,;) Chemical control of weed trees began in 1957, mostly with a one :Per cent solution of 2,4,5-T in 011, applied by hand as a basal spray. Although this was effective, it was laborious. PrOlllllling 1958 trials with dry fenuron in a sawdust carrie:r;"irid later with the 25 per cent fenuron pelleted formulation, led to 'an~l!insive experiment in 1959. An 18-acre piece of Illi~ forest (the:2-Durgin field) was chosen for this experiment. Applications were made in May 1959. The fenuron pellets were applied in a heel depression at the base of each weed tree or clump. The rate was one-quarter ounce per tree or clump (a slightly heaping domestic teaspoon or 1.9 grams of the basic chemical). A few weed trees were chopped down, rather than treated', where they seemed too close to" desirable trees for sllote chemical use. '", Altbough the summerwu very dry, wide's~ad defoliation was o~erved after the fall rains began, jus't before frost .1Jul-:jJ:lg the winter and e~iy spring of 1960, neighboring conifers showed somebro'wning of the needle tips. However, they recovered during 1960, and grew with increased vigor. Seedlings more than doubled their top growtb. Most of the ~'d.trees showed ad~tional defoliatIon andtlnally died. Mantof tL.:Jse whichlu.d', not die continueddafoliating in 1961. A number otthe weed trees tha~'surVlved into 1961 we~e multi-stelll!lledbirch or stump sprouts of swampmaplflNl.,The explanation tor the birch survival seems to be eUherthat more chemiclil'should have been used per clump, or It should have been spread over more are!',., With the swampmaple stumps, apparently the' feeder roOts, were too far ~the point where tba chemical was applied. -, , '[f' A group of profession8.ltoresters who in:8;Pectedthis tract on July 25, 1961, considered it an adequate job of forest weeding. ,me}260 Experiments Beginning in July 1960, further chemical weeding was lmdertaken on about 35 acres of a 50-acre phce (the l-Proctor lot). On this land there , were many valuable hardwoods intermixed with small pines. Since the selecti v ity of the 1959fmmronapplicat1en.had not beenetlmp1etely established, ';the program started lIIIl1t1lywith 2,4, 5-'tapplied in fri~.; To redllce tranepgrtation and labor,jelliedsod1uma1"senite was shortl:f'!Used tor the weed 'tr,"e~ " close to desirable ones • ' ;j , " As continUedobservatlotFof the 1959 f~,a;pplicationslnai¢~ed: ," its safety to nearby untreated t1'eelt" more and, IIIOre't'.ehUron,was applied '4\lring , ~:~u:~:::so~P~~~d "~~ ~:~::eer:a:t::l'b~~h:~~hOd. ,Mo~t rJf tlie" - ....._~..'.~ ., Repeated inspections of this area in 196J..1n4.1catethat,,-tbe 2:'-4~~,lT, treatment wasettect1 "e 'without n6tleeable re-sprOttt1n~. Tr~es -tJ:"eated With _- sodium arsenitere-sprouted severely, even where the'stems w.ere,kiUedj liut J many of the larger trees did not ~e at all. ,8 - '
There are a number of reaso~ for unders{anding the mode fenuron in tree-killing and for,recognizing its effects at various of acHonor stages. 419 Observations during 1961 of the trees treated with fenuron in the fall of 1960 indicate that about' 80 per cent of t*irihave been surely Idlled. The same problema of inadequate dOsage or poor d1i1tr:l.bution for multi-stemmed and large trees appeared again in the 1960 fenuron program. However, no valuable trees were damaged with :f'entiron, except onelSat-ge wolf oak., Fenuron from four nearby treated trees ap~ntl;y was taken up 'by its perimeter roots on one side and the whole tree defoliated late in 196!L. ' (' Two general conclusiopswere made from the 1960 program. Fir&t~ fenuron could have been used more Y.!.dely in place"bt the 2,4,5-T and so4fum arsenite, with consequent redUction in laborarii'l. :I.lire-sprouting. Resti-l'tS with fenuron would have been be'1;ter on larger and :Jz1Ulti-stemmed.trees w:Il1lh higher dosage and wider scattering over the root tone. !!.he 1961 Experiment~"' On the basis of 1960 success, fenuron w~used in 1961 for weeding 10 different forest areas, ranging in size from slightly under an acre up to 25 acres. The total was 61 acres, requiring 318, pounda of fenuron pellets or only ab?ut five pounds per acre. The first ap:plic,tion was made in Mar~h, on snow, ~d the work continued throuP Sept ember 20,r'" During the summer a 'few modifications in application were adopted. Fenuroo'Wll.s applied in the dbttventional manner on' the ground, and, for close work~" tn various homemade jellies or pastes in hatchet cuts. Dosage for so11 applieation was differentia-bed for various size trees, up to a full ounce of pellets, for a 30-inch swamp maple. The, spoon was abandoned for hand applicll-tion. Ex~pt for close work, the pellets were slightly scattered at tree bases, in~ead of being concentrated in a heel print. In most areas, the duff was scuttedaway so the :pelle1;SWe1'e put on bare soil, and then a duff covering was kicked over them. (A tabu}.ation of these 10 "commercial-sc~e" treatments is, ,available from the authOr.) In the first nine, and. a first :pll.rtof tIle tenth, of the fieldis, injury symptoms from "Dybar" fenuron, weed and brush'killer were quite evident before the seasonal changes of foliage by the ,mid.dle of October. In each case all the smaller weed trees (up to six inches d.b.1i}') with few ~cept1ans., were defoliated. ' . , " ~ On the majority of these weed trees, a s:econd crop of lee:vee ~ started~ as occurs in the spring When,a late frost 'freezes early leaves,' In most cases, the second crop of,1eaves also showed chlorosis. That is, the chemical, either remaining in the ground, or, w4at:)s more likely, rema.1n1ng in the tree systems, was interfering with the proclliction of the second crop of leaves. The inner wood of the trees was still cle~, White, and seemed alive. Although definite results will not be evident until 1962, the I preliminary shm.>:ingwas excellent ~ ~ of Action"'! I,
- Page 367 and 368: Table 3. The effects of several for
- Page 369 and 370: 369 Table 5. The effects of sev~ral
- Page 371 and 372: • ~ : .• \ • ' -' ..,,:- ',-"
- Page 373 and 374: Heights of barley were significantl
- Page 375 and 376: Table 2. The effe,cts of s~\I'~ral
- Page 377 and 378: Table 4. 377 The effects of aevel8.
- Page 379 and 380: ,:' A PROGRESSREPORTONCOMIo!ERCIAL
- Page 381 and 382: 4. Undesirable dead stem.,lio not r
- Page 383 and 384: areas under service conditionsa~ va
- Page 385 and 386: We ,prpbablyhave no speeie of g~owt
- Page 387 and 388: control. At the end of the third ye
- Page 389 and 390: initial defoliation was evident lat
- Page 391 and 392: OBJECTIVE In 1958 an experiment was
- Page 393 and 394: Replicates DlO 810 I 2.0 0.5 II 1.5
- Page 395 and 396: DISCUSSION One Year After Applicati
- Page 397 and 398: 1. Button, E.F. Bndwrfg'h~';J .L. ,
- Page 399 and 400: 399 The treatment consisted of appl
- Page 401 and 402: 401 FIELD PROCEDURES Although. the
- Page 403 and 404: 403 In the light of these data it a
- Page 405 and 406: 405 ...·1!MLE I SAMPLECHARACTERIST
- Page 407 and 408: 407 , '.". '.·',',~'l~rL,i;'. "\"
- Page 409 and 410: dltterent l"atespacaoreand"~"at thr
- Page 411 and 412: 411 RESULTS ireatmentettect was det
- Page 413 and 414: , 413 ;. ' "1 ' "':j " • made wit
- Page 415 and 416: ( ( . Table 3. Effectiveness on Spe
- Page 417: 417 FENURQlt,A PROMISINGNEWTOOL FOR
- Page 421 and 422: .n_ots, "'hhin a few months after:
- Page 423 and 424: sater method ot tree-killing close
- Page 425 and 426: Material ~izone is a,mixedf~g.. t w
- Page 427 and 428: 427 On November 16, 1961, at the en
- Page 429 and 430: CHBMI-THINNINGWITH,AIrlINES IN THED
- Page 431 and 432: These tests show once aaaiJithe nee
- Page 433 and 434: Th:Ls ch!~ca1. tx'eatme:n1!_1IhClJ.
- Page 435 and 436: : if.. . ' A Comparative Study of t
- Page 437 and 438: 'j 437 petioles, now elongated,f'or
- Page 439 and 440: Helisoma, Menetus, fhYSa andValvata
- Page 441 and 442: i s. The benth1c populat1Q~ W¥", O
- Page 443 and 444: 443 Eurasian. wa~lfoil a W8t.f~~ ap
- Page 445 and 446: Empb4sis was on testing DOD-volatil
- Page 447 and 448: 447 . , , -. I':'V'est~a.ti
- Page 449 and 450: FIELDOBSERVATIONS UPONESTUARINE ANI
- Page 451 and 452: more than 2 feet. ExceptionalUdes s
- Page 453 and 454: TABLE1. Responseof oysters t~ diffe
- Page 455 and 456: In the'Dundee Creek series. ,one of
- Page 457 and 458: workers. springer (1961) cite8& num
- Page 459 and 460: OBSERVATIONSONTHE OCCURRENCE' ANDPE
- Page 461 and 462: 461 TABLE! Chemical Water QuaU1?::r
- Page 463 and 464: TABLEIII Threshold Taste and Odor C
- Page 465 and 466: (1.1-) Burttschell, R.H. , et al.,
- Page 467 and 468: Code A - seeded June 29 B - seeded
418<br />
EarlY 'Chemical Trea~':,<br />
. . .. .. ,:,;)<br />
Chemical control of weed trees began in 1957, mostly with a one<br />
:Per cent solution of 2,4,5-T in 011, applied by hand as a basal spray. Although<br />
this was effective, it was laborious. PrOlllllling 1958 trials with<br />
dry fenuron in a sawdust carrie:r;"irid later with the 25 per cent fenuron<br />
pelleted formulation, led to 'an~l!insive experiment in 1959.<br />
An 18-acre piece of Illi~ forest (the:2-Durgin field) was chosen<br />
for this experiment. Applications were made in May 1959. The fenuron pellets<br />
were applied in a heel depression at the base of each weed tree or clump. The<br />
rate was one-quarter ounce per tree or clump (a slightly heaping domestic teaspoon<br />
or 1.9 grams of the basic chemical). A few weed trees were chopped down,<br />
rather than treated', where they seemed too close to" desirable trees for sllote<br />
chemical use.<br />
'",<br />
Altbough the summerwu very dry, wide's~ad defoliation was o~erved<br />
after the fall rains began, jus't before frost .1Jul-:jJ:lg the winter and e~iy<br />
spring of 1960, neighboring conifers showed somebro'wning of the needle tips.<br />
However, they recovered during 1960, and grew with increased vigor. Seedlings<br />
more than doubled their top growtb. Most of the ~'d.trees showed ad~tional<br />
defoliatIon andtlnally died. Mantof tL.:Jse whichlu.d', not die continueddafoliating<br />
in 1961. A number otthe weed trees tha~'surVlved into 1961 we~e<br />
multi-stelll!lledbirch or stump sprouts of swampmaplflNl.,The explanation tor the<br />
birch survival seems to be eUherthat more chemiclil'should have been used per<br />
clump, or It should have been spread over more are!',., With the swampmaple<br />
stumps, apparently the' feeder roOts, were too far ~the point where tba<br />
chemical was applied. -, ,<br />
'[f'<br />
A group of profession8.ltoresters who in:8;Pectedthis tract on July<br />
25, 1961, considered it an adequate job of forest weeding.<br />
,me}260<br />
Experiments<br />
Beginning in July 1960, further chemical weeding was lmdertaken on<br />
about 35 acres of a 50-acre phce (the l-Proctor lot). On this land there ,<br />
were many valuable hardwoods intermixed with small pines. Since the selecti v<br />
ity of the 1959fmmronapplicat1en.had not beenetlmp1etely established, ';the<br />
program started lIIIl1t1lywith 2,4, 5-'tapplied in fri~.; To redllce tranepgrtation<br />
and labor,jelliedsod1uma1"senite was shortl:f'!Used tor the weed 'tr,"e~ "<br />
close to desirable ones • ' ;j , "<br />
As continUedobservatlotFof the 1959 f~,a;pplicationslnai¢~ed: ,"<br />
its safety to nearby untreated t1'eelt" more and, IIIOre't'.ehUron,was applied '4\lring ,<br />
~:~u:~:::so~P~~~d "~~ ~:~::eer:a:t::l'b~~h:~~hOd. ,Mo~t rJf tlie" -<br />
....._~..'.~ .,<br />
Repeated inspections of this area in 196J..1n4.1catethat,,-tbe 2:'-4~~,lT,<br />
treatment wasettect1 "e 'without n6tleeable re-sprOttt1n~. Tr~es -tJ:"eated With _-<br />
sodium arsenitere-sprouted severely, even where the'stems w.ere,kiUedj liut J<br />
many of the larger trees did not ~e at all. ,8 - '