Vol. 16â1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 16â1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 16â1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
406 SUMIIARY or SBYlRALAQttATBOL ,'fUATllBBtS IN NEWJBRSEYWATER by R. L. LINDABERRY PENNSALT alBllICALS CORPORATION 'This disCus.ion deals with a summary of some results of cOIIlIIlercial appliCation. on .eveHJ. different lakes within potable . 'i· wetersbed areas in. Northern New Jersey. 1'I* Jrrol l.o\\t' ;DI · are the result.e, ob.ervations-:·. . I. COZy LAKE - CoDdlUons: ~ tetal lake area is 30 acres with a maximum depth td tt teet and .. j avera.e of 4 feet, with a total of 100 acre feet. The illejor .... d .pecies was Najas mlnor, wlth minor species ceratophyllum.6Jljo, Potamogeton criapu., Nuphar sp., Blcdea canadenai., green filamentous algae. Application: An application wa. lIIade on llay 22, 1961, by Roy Younger, Conaul t inc Biolccists Inc., Philadelphia, Penn.ylvania, on Cozy Lake. The lake waa drawn dOWll6 lnches. OI1e appllcation waa made of 227 ,allons of AQUATIOLfor a total concentration of 2 ppm. Resuit.r Excell.n~10Il11l0:l. of .U ·'.xcept Elodea and al,ae. In mid-Septe.ber Najas minor had commenced to regrOW il1 ... 11 patches.· Elodea canaden.~':"!!I!~"1Itar~.d.totake' .. over one end of the lake. other species were not present. An alr .. ·.~trol t".t_Dt:!~f,':9,,5 ppm euso wa... de to control 4 algae bloolll. II. Condi tiona: The total lake area is 18 acres with a D18ximumdepth,oflO:r.et .anIL_e-liverage depth of 7.5 feet. Tbs major weed speciea was Potamoreton cr1spus, with acattered Myriophyllum sp. and Blodea sp •• Application: Two treatments were applied as follows: OI1eon June 13, 1961, to the north dde of the lake and the other on June 23, 1961, to the aouth side of the lake by W. C. Hall, Chemtree Corporation, Rarriman, New York. The lake was drawn down 12 inches, and a total of 225 gallona waa applied in a aplit application of 112 gallons for a 1.5 ppm treatment (in treated area), with onehalf of the lake being treated each time.
407 , '.". '.·',',~'l~rL,i;'. "\" , ,', ,.'~;':P;1 Results: Effective •• d' 'cootrol. was obtlftbed for the season. Ob!,&~""#CJ.IIilI aD4 comiten~,!p:.~1lerqU811tY,~.~ .,.d&byf\1chard .' E., ·~:r)1 '~"',icVa11ey W~~,.COlllllli•• l0G ,l4il:td,•. Falls,. NEtwJers~y 'I t ' . as fo1~: o. [! ' . i" . :-~ ,.'i:.,.r-., ' " ,.... .~ , ,. ;,.l,." "An ef~ective ~Jt~p was obtat,~.~thout ,l" .pp~~nt iDcreasej,n;~, water odor,d.,. ,to, the use of AQUATROL.The increa.e in odor when ltct'id Occur \Vas due primarily todecayillg .vegetation. , I ~ , .,IiO~ ~ ",urther indic8;t~1f:!S were that mi~~~~plc organisms I,. , were Jl.4led initial~t'. ~ the use of ~, and this in ,t""D 1011~ed by an,~usincrease~ t~. water i bacteria. however, q~~tebahnce ap~ecl to have .been ,re"ained in about 1Q'J11J1~ to 2 we.les af~~r treatment." . . "&.w:tie,ns: Total l,~'.~ea is 140 aczij' "lth an 896 acre. f~i vo~" "i,th ~ average ~P~li.:pf 6.4 f.et •. ~ .. jor weed specie.,!' was fo.t~ton c~ispus ,with, aliae patches ~~entthrougho,u~ t~ I?' lake prior to treatment. . .' " " ','._" d," '. ,:-L.~I ')'7" .'C . "" " ,,,:' < .4.,L ;:,: ;,:Ape11eeti,oJl,:" A sincle~l:LcaUon wu 948 ~onJuly 10, l.~l",:t~l..; -by;.Ro,VoQlllrer,COnsul t~).1~~Oiists Inc. ,. ,~~de1Phia, PeIlJ1~~~""1 n, vaDU!Gp~ylD8 3:45 ga110&\8 '~, AQUATHOL to ¥~.cres at a CODCjJJl-.'· . 1;ratiPn',of .~ ppm in the;t~a;~~ area. ,':} ..' . ·-V·',, '. v.. ,~.~; " .,', -)21:.1'3 .: 1,~.~1t.r ,~..CODtrO; #l"bieved was90l ~h,.a limited alllo~t ~~.t-~-l'-p"th, b7,:-:id-Septe~Ft, .: The en:tirela~ .was .treated with to: control~bloODl.. 't, ,O.5pP1D,CuSo.. y;: .IV..,MIg!:'@OI1S- .~ Various other lakes In New Jersey OUt81~oi watershed areas , -relt~a~cI:: "loth very ~cl,~.ults when "l'PM-Jca~10Ds were me,de alfa1~>t~, ~ds speciUe4;:oo the label ancl*recommended ratea., This,c~IDci.desvery well.~the results ob~d in the rest of . the l1n-ited state. and cana~..; ~'.; .:'
- Page 355 and 356: .s .... __ Table 7. Pre-Emel'ae~eWe
- Page 357 and 358: experiment is reported herE!. Trifl
- Page 359 and 360: Results are given. in Table 4~J'Rot
- Page 361 and 362: In Princeton fine sand, tritlupalin
- Page 363 and 364: Included in the lima. bean test wer
- Page 365 and 366: Table 1. The Effects ofS8veral form
- Page 367 and 368: Table 3. The effects of several for
- Page 369 and 370: 369 Table 5. The effects of sev~ral
- Page 371 and 372: • ~ : .• \ • ' -' ..,,:- ',-"
- Page 373 and 374: Heights of barley were significantl
- Page 375 and 376: Table 2. The effe,cts of s~\I'~ral
- Page 377 and 378: Table 4. 377 The effects of aevel8.
- Page 379 and 380: ,:' A PROGRESSREPORTONCOMIo!ERCIAL
- Page 381 and 382: 4. Undesirable dead stem.,lio not r
- Page 383 and 384: areas under service conditionsa~ va
- Page 385 and 386: We ,prpbablyhave no speeie of g~owt
- Page 387 and 388: control. At the end of the third ye
- Page 389 and 390: initial defoliation was evident lat
- Page 391 and 392: OBJECTIVE In 1958 an experiment was
- Page 393 and 394: Replicates DlO 810 I 2.0 0.5 II 1.5
- Page 395 and 396: DISCUSSION One Year After Applicati
- Page 397 and 398: 1. Button, E.F. Bndwrfg'h~';J .L. ,
- Page 399 and 400: 399 The treatment consisted of appl
- Page 401 and 402: 401 FIELD PROCEDURES Although. the
- Page 403 and 404: 403 In the light of these data it a
- Page 405: 405 ...·1!MLE I SAMPLECHARACTERIST
- Page 409 and 410: dltterent l"atespacaoreand"~"at thr
- Page 411 and 412: 411 RESULTS ireatmentettect was det
- Page 413 and 414: , 413 ;. ' "1 ' "':j " • made wit
- Page 415 and 416: ( ( . Table 3. Effectiveness on Spe
- Page 417 and 418: 417 FENURQlt,A PROMISINGNEWTOOL FOR
- Page 419 and 420: There are a number of reaso~ for un
- Page 421 and 422: .n_ots, "'hhin a few months after:
- Page 423 and 424: sater method ot tree-killing close
- Page 425 and 426: Material ~izone is a,mixedf~g.. t w
- Page 427 and 428: 427 On November 16, 1961, at the en
- Page 429 and 430: CHBMI-THINNINGWITH,AIrlINES IN THED
- Page 431 and 432: These tests show once aaaiJithe nee
- Page 433 and 434: Th:Ls ch!~ca1. tx'eatme:n1!_1IhClJ.
- Page 435 and 436: : if.. . ' A Comparative Study of t
- Page 437 and 438: 'j 437 petioles, now elongated,f'or
- Page 439 and 440: Helisoma, Menetus, fhYSa andValvata
- Page 441 and 442: i s. The benth1c populat1Q~ W¥", O
- Page 443 and 444: 443 Eurasian. wa~lfoil a W8t.f~~ ap
- Page 445 and 446: Empb4sis was on testing DOD-volatil
- Page 447 and 448: 447 . , , -. I':'V'est~a.ti
- Page 449 and 450: FIELDOBSERVATIONS UPONESTUARINE ANI
- Page 451 and 452: more than 2 feet. ExceptionalUdes s
- Page 453 and 454: TABLE1. Responseof oysters t~ diffe
- Page 455 and 456: In the'Dundee Creek series. ,one of
407<br />
, '.". '.·',',~'l~rL,i;'. "\" , ,', ,.'~;':P;1<br />
Results: Effective •• d' 'cootrol. was obtlftbed for the season.<br />
Ob!,&~""#CJ.IIilI aD4 comiten~,!p:.~1lerqU811tY,~.~ .,.d&byf\1chard .'<br />
E., ·~:r)1 '~"',icVa11ey W~~,.COlllllli•• l0G ,l4il:td,•. Falls,. NEtwJers~y 'I t '<br />
. as fo1~: o. [! ' . i"<br />
. :-~ ,.'i:.,.r-., ' " ,....<br />
.~ , ,. ;,.l,."<br />
"An ef~ective ~Jt~p was obtat,~.~thout ,l"<br />
.pp~~nt iDcreasej,n;~, water odor,d.,. ,to, the use of<br />
AQUATROL.The increa.e in odor when ltct'id Occur \Vas<br />
due primarily todecayillg .vegetation.<br />
, I ~ , .,IiO~ ~<br />
",urther indic8;t~1f:!S were that mi~~~~plc organisms I,.<br />
, were Jl.4led initial~t'. ~ the use of ~, and this in<br />
,t""D 1011~ed by an,~usincrease~ t~. water<br />
i bacteria. however, q~~tebahnce ap~ecl to have .been<br />
,re"ained in about 1Q'J11J1~ to 2 we.les af~~r treatment." .<br />
. "&.w:tie,ns: Total l,~'.~ea is 140 aczij' "lth an 896 acre. f~i<br />
vo~" "i,th ~ average ~P~li.:pf 6.4 f.et •. ~ .. jor weed specie.,!'<br />
was fo.t~ton c~ispus ,with, aliae patches ~~entthrougho,u~ t~ I?'<br />
lake prior to treatment. .<br />
.' " " ','._" d," '. ,:-L.~I ')'7" .'C . "" " ,,,:' < .4.,L<br />
;:,: ;,:Ape11eeti,oJl,:" A sincle~l:LcaUon wu 948 ~onJuly 10, l.~l",:t~l..;<br />
-by;.Ro,VoQlllrer,COnsul t~).1~~Oiists Inc. ,. ,~~de1Phia, PeIlJ1~~~""1 n,<br />
vaDU!Gp~ylD8 3:45 ga110&\8 '~, AQUATHOL to ¥~.cres at a CODCjJJl-.'· .<br />
1;ratiPn',of .~ ppm in the;t~a;~~ area. ,':} ..'<br />
. ·-V·',, '. v.. ,~.~; " .,', -)21:.1'3<br />
.: 1,~.~1t.r ,~..CODtrO; #l"bieved was90l ~h,.a limited alllo~t<br />
~~.t-~-l'-p"th, b7,:-:id-Septe~Ft, .: The en:tirela~ .was .treated with<br />
to: control~bloODl.. 't,<br />
,O.5pP1D,CuSo..<br />
y;:<br />
.IV..,MIg!:'@OI1S- .~<br />
Various other lakes In New Jersey OUt81~oi watershed areas<br />
, -relt~a~cI:: "loth very ~cl,~.ults when "l'PM-Jca~10Ds were me,de<br />
alfa1~>t~, ~ds speciUe4;:oo the label ancl*recommended ratea.,<br />
This,c~IDci.desvery well.~the results ob~d in the rest of .<br />
the l1n-ited state. and cana~..;<br />
~'.;<br />
.:'