Vol. 16â1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 16â1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 16â1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
3~ own,.root.g~p~ ~f'!f.•. tl1e:p~_,p•..j. completaly-killedand.· ina matter of fQur or fiy. ~.r!lJ ~Qi. new ~,,*._rnande athlUi-. Other .pecie'i1&J'e . genera,Uy '.lower ia their neeet~o par.tilcola1fty thole that de'VIe'" fro!P:· ••• c:l.1.~l'~.II" .... ,i~colN,ts,;~'.pro.bl cm.Ob prop.rly. We CQaItmt o~r bru.h ~9#tl'ol.prmi ..,ily JO'~""'P.1telUl. area"'wedonotpaymllC~at. tentlon to~ru.b ,~•• whe,r•• ~tn."".J'••1lrlct.vl.iOlll_tlae vicinity of .i •• b or &;t r o!,d cr.oa,.,iQa.. qr ~~'II,\i'H,.uIQ 1:l:outlitut4," ~a~ d to etructurq_. bulldJDSIl. I w.nl;dl.,f,c:~••. boWcwtl""'d~the•• ,.:it"'i ..... a biMatet'.: ii" • " • l :-:!{~,;:..:, ',:~i~-< ..1",: t~:·r ·:-;:::lP.L Shortly af~r we tl'8J.ttUU.r,_ with .c;beznLi:.at,we ,made,our flrat.lWforts to control weed. and. gr~.'" 'f'\~A8~9~rnendedt.zftica1.~ ..Our first· :bleatment consisted of two balic ch.mica11. One wa. an average of four poundl of 78folfl~Di.ch1~o.propioni(); ~w..~ums.u.. .. tt.Jgal1011 of coocenttate solution. T~ot~r .wa. on.an."..~.,tbie.quWJd•• t._four. pounda'O( H.:' Dl&clUoroptut~oxyac.t~ac:.id peJ'l._~n. The •• ee .... l'ate mix .. we're '~.' 1utedin.~a~er: at~. I'aw, of lt~k~ ~d Ito 100 r•• ,.ctiv.ly:. and applie-cl1doag theri&ht.o~.waY;AAd·U1 ~rdS,\ .nr., , . . ·1iY'
control. At the end of the third year we omitted tr.atment between the ralls in one yard and regrowth becameve~y evident. wti thereby assume that Ithe sterllent prOpertysbollld be continlied each year htorder to maintain cOdtrol and, to date. we are following that practice. 1 do not want to imply that the material that we use is the only o~ that will produ~ip ~~sults - 1 only report what we have obtained. '.' 'C:'> ..u 387 .' ,. ..' .;'., . ,,' c·' T The'good ruultsthat we qbtained from use Of drY chemicals in yards led to furth~'r.,a~Pt.te..atlotl.,s •... · We' d., ~s,~.i:.l.bute,thll, marte .•. :r.;".ia,~. around signals", ,,~o.ne booths, relay-boxes a~d power ,wif~,~,macJ1ine •• b~ndlpgs. fuel tanks, ~~ beneathsor:ne bJi'idge structures.':!., also have distributed material ben8!~th, pole lines that are not a~ceUlbfe,flom track. 111" tli\s ease a small handf~; of material placed tna pn~at the 'ba•• of larger gro~~ will shortly remov,\tl\at problem; You are aware that sol1..,.terilent type n\&~er,ials are rather ~on~ selective and that' care ~ust be:exe~cised in their,~:~~o as not, to dama~: growth adjoining your properties,., However. we hare l.iand applled matel1ials without harming apple and peacli'trees that were leeil than fifty feet away. We have shared in:payi,~ claims af,ter~sing liquid ~.r~~h k~llers. but we l1ave had no claims resulting'tre>m dry chemicals. 1 mlghq~ention one intere!lt~.complaint that has resulted from our us.e; of dry chemic"ls and this was in the vicinity of our grl..in elevator in~~lt.tmore. Weed growth was rather lux\l: riant in thi* area and ra~sfoUl1,dBo~dharbor. The~o,wth was ellminateji. the rat population substantlally:?{creaeed, and thF,lI'mQVed further away for harbor, many of them off our property. I' . 1 have diverted from my,t'i.rfJ menUonof we:fld and grass control within thebeI'm s.ctlonalol1,g our lineol r;oad. Our initifJrm.thod of control w~s repeated the secondyea~ and ouroyerall results ~e still spotty, generia~ly good, 'but with discouraging effect lolponseveral a~~s. The following ye~r we added a thir~ cheJPic::al to our prev:iplol8 mix, namely,. Baron. 1 wanted to avoid use of any trade names, butthech.mical terms loriAis product are too "pauch. This was adde,1i at the rate of fOl.lf po,unds acid equly~1ent per gallon of concel1, trate and diluted at the rate of? 5,.,.,1l0ns of water~f This total combinatiqn produced milch be~ter results b4!t ~ appropriatiol1,~,..a. not sufficient to,4over the entire railr,oad a1)d we lost,onse. of 01&1' previo~ cQlltrol in these un~~.ated locations. ,The following year 1lVeJ;'~verted to our i,l:tial program but 1&8814 an aromatic 0\1 in ,s,o,me of pur le~JII. b;'o\lblesome are~,,, This oll was fortif~p with rather small quantities of pe~chorophenola1l4 of Z,4-D. We were able to hold the degree of control that we had developed but there was real room .for improvement .• ,Early in thi'p'~r we had an in~fl ..ting e~perience. I' .,., . ,,', " "j, ,'l ,- , One, of, the ~anufacturer. ,o!l;Iasic IlhemicaJ.f.;koew of our attempt~o maintain a planned contr,ol program." We were askefl.to set aside 80me ail'"a. of our most severe problems an,djc'ooperate with~~r research depart~nt in test appl~atioDofvarious produ
- Page 335 and 336: 335 Figure 1. The effeetof partic1e
- Page 337 and 338: 337 SRFeader 1 On this spreader onl
- Page 339 and 340: Table 4. The effect of speed, p~~cl
- Page 341 and 342: Table 1: Herbicidal treatments used
- Page 343 and 344: ·000 .000, I II ! WEEDCONTROLRATIN
- Page 345 and 346: 2.5000 CORNINJURY EXPRESSEDAS SQUAR
- Page 347 and 348: 347 1. 2. Danielson. l , ;4. L. Ef~
- Page 349 and 350: ',-- 34~ 3-(3 ..4-Dichlorophenyl)-1
- Page 351 and 352: weed control with adequate safety t
- Page 353 and 354: Untreated Table 2. Directed Post-E"
- Page 355 and 356: .s .... __ Table 7. Pre-Emel'ae~eWe
- Page 357 and 358: experiment is reported herE!. Trifl
- Page 359 and 360: Results are given. in Table 4~J'Rot
- Page 361 and 362: In Princeton fine sand, tritlupalin
- Page 363 and 364: Included in the lima. bean test wer
- Page 365 and 366: Table 1. The Effects ofS8veral form
- Page 367 and 368: Table 3. The effects of several for
- Page 369 and 370: 369 Table 5. The effects of sev~ral
- Page 371 and 372: • ~ : .• \ • ' -' ..,,:- ',-"
- Page 373 and 374: Heights of barley were significantl
- Page 375 and 376: Table 2. The effe,cts of s~\I'~ral
- Page 377 and 378: Table 4. 377 The effects of aevel8.
- Page 379 and 380: ,:' A PROGRESSREPORTONCOMIo!ERCIAL
- Page 381 and 382: 4. Undesirable dead stem.,lio not r
- Page 383 and 384: areas under service conditionsa~ va
- Page 385: We ,prpbablyhave no speeie of g~owt
- Page 389 and 390: initial defoliation was evident lat
- Page 391 and 392: OBJECTIVE In 1958 an experiment was
- Page 393 and 394: Replicates DlO 810 I 2.0 0.5 II 1.5
- Page 395 and 396: DISCUSSION One Year After Applicati
- Page 397 and 398: 1. Button, E.F. Bndwrfg'h~';J .L. ,
- Page 399 and 400: 399 The treatment consisted of appl
- Page 401 and 402: 401 FIELD PROCEDURES Although. the
- Page 403 and 404: 403 In the light of these data it a
- Page 405 and 406: 405 ...·1!MLE I SAMPLECHARACTERIST
- Page 407 and 408: 407 , '.". '.·',',~'l~rL,i;'. "\"
- Page 409 and 410: dltterent l"atespacaoreand"~"at thr
- Page 411 and 412: 411 RESULTS ireatmentettect was det
- Page 413 and 414: , 413 ;. ' "1 ' "':j " • made wit
- Page 415 and 416: ( ( . Table 3. Effectiveness on Spe
- Page 417 and 418: 417 FENURQlt,A PROMISINGNEWTOOL FOR
- Page 419 and 420: There are a number of reaso~ for un
- Page 421 and 422: .n_ots, "'hhin a few months after:
- Page 423 and 424: sater method ot tree-killing close
- Page 425 and 426: Material ~izone is a,mixedf~g.. t w
- Page 427 and 428: 427 On November 16, 1961, at the en
- Page 429 and 430: CHBMI-THINNINGWITH,AIrlINES IN THED
- Page 431 and 432: These tests show once aaaiJithe nee
- Page 433 and 434: Th:Ls ch!~ca1. tx'eatme:n1!_1IhClJ.
- Page 435 and 436: : if.. . ' A Comparative Study of t
control. At the end of the third year we omitted tr.atment between the ralls<br />
in one yard and regrowth becameve~y evident. wti thereby assume that Ithe<br />
sterllent prOpertysbollld be continlied each year htorder to maintain cOdtrol<br />
and, to date. we are following that practice. 1 do not want to imply that the<br />
material that we use is the only o~ that will produ~ip ~~sults - 1 only report<br />
what we have obtained.<br />
'.'<br />
'C:'><br />
..u<br />
387<br />
.' ,. ..' .;'., . ,,' c·' T<br />
The'good ruultsthat we qbtained from use Of drY chemicals in yards<br />
led to furth~'r.,a~Pt.te..atlotl.,s •... · We' d., ~s,~.i:.l.bute,thll, marte .•. :r.;".ia,~. around signals", ,,~o.ne<br />
booths, relay-boxes a~d power ,wif~,~,macJ1ine •• b~ndlpgs. fuel tanks, ~~<br />
beneathsor:ne bJi'idge structures.':!., also have distributed material ben8!~th,<br />
pole lines that are not a~ceUlbfe,flom track. 111" tli\s ease a small handf~; of<br />
material placed tna pn~at the 'ba•• of larger gro~~ will shortly remov,\tl\at<br />
problem; You are aware that sol1..,.terilent type n\&~er,ials are rather ~on~<br />
selective and that' care ~ust be:exe~cised in their,~:~~o as not, to dama~:<br />
growth adjoining your properties,., However. we hare l.iand applled matel1ials<br />
without harming apple and peacli'trees that were leeil than fifty feet away. We<br />
have shared in:payi,~ claims af,ter~sing liquid ~.r~~h k~llers. but we l1ave had<br />
no claims resulting'tre>m dry chemicals. 1 mlghq~ention one intere!lt~.complaint<br />
that has resulted from our us.e; of dry chemic"ls and this was in the<br />
vicinity of our grl..in elevator in~~lt.tmore. <strong>Weed</strong> growth was rather lux\l:<br />
riant in thi* area and ra~sfoUl1,dBo~dharbor. The~o,wth was ellminateji.<br />
the rat population substantlally:?{creaeed, and thF,lI'mQVed further away for<br />
harbor, many of them off our property. I'<br />
. 1 have diverted from my,t'i.rfJ menUonof we:fld and grass control within<br />
thebeI'm s.ctlonalol1,g our lineol r;oad. Our initifJrm.thod of control w~s<br />
repeated the secondyea~ and ouroyerall results ~e still spotty, generia~ly<br />
good, 'but with discouraging effect lolponseveral a~~s. The following ye~r we<br />
added a thir~ cheJPic::al to our prev:iplol8 mix, namely,. Baron. 1 wanted to avoid<br />
use of any trade names, butthech.mical terms loriAis product are too "pauch.<br />
This was adde,1i at the rate of fOl.lf po,unds acid equly~1ent per gallon of concel1,<br />
trate and diluted at the rate of? 5,.,.,1l0ns of water~f This total combinatiqn<br />
produced milch be~ter results b4!t ~ appropriatiol1,~,..a. not sufficient to,4over<br />
the entire railr,oad a1)d we lost,onse. of 01&1' previo~ cQlltrol in these un~~.ated<br />
locations. ,The following year 1lVeJ;'~verted to our i,l:tial program but 1&8814 an<br />
aromatic 0\1 in ,s,o,me of pur le~JII. b;'o\lblesome are~,,, This oll was fortif~p<br />
with rather small quantities of pe~chorophenola1l4 of Z,4-D. We were able<br />
to hold the degree of control that we had developed but there was real room<br />
.for improvement .• ,Early in thi'p'~r we had an in~fl ..ting e~perience.<br />
I' .,., . ,,', " "j, ,'l ,- ,<br />
One, of, the ~anufacturer. ,o!l;Iasic IlhemicaJ.f.;koew of our attempt~o<br />
maintain a planned contr,ol program." We were askefl.to set aside 80me ail'"a.<br />
of our most severe problems an,djc'ooperate with~~r research depart~nt in<br />
test appl~atioDofvarious produ