Vol. 16â1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 16â1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 16â1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
360 Ta~leS. ,Tb.:~,,~hlnl ot'tl!Uhral1n atl'ilb/AbOJll the So!l' 8uZ'~..o••. ,Expr •••• 4 ..s Pero •• t, •• 4uot1on in Growtll: l ot C:ra_.ratp' ~I h"," , ,~ , - ..-- - -.;'. .'p!r!l~t_R!d~C?1:~~n",~! ,£r!bsr!s! ~r2~_ • ... ~,!~ IDQhlS .;.t',:,.olJ }fajilt .Sii;L tne ••• _ ••• 0••••• 2•• ~":: .6 •• § .12 Princll"tOn 'tine sand "99 97 '96 i,T ,,96 84 ,90 Brooke.tonsiit)-' :ell'a,., l.oamiOi'):100 10O-:J.do 2 100 100100 Houghton muck . " :9':1£.:90 8S, :19".'80 '74 74 ------~-- ..~~--------- ---- The results arp,presented in,\Table S. In the fine sand there was a slight reduction in the .. ~t of herbicide present after tbe addition of 8 ,incbes of wa~lt- Tritluralin did not leacb from tbe aurface of tbl'H .. ~lty clay~. The 2 pounds p-er aore rate ot tritlural1n ln, H.oughton mucJt';JI:.a not suffioient to capletel)' kill all the orab,ra.s, thus ineW-oat-ing ada$)rpt1
In Princeton fine sand, tritlupalin leached ,tic a. depth of 8 inches, reducing subsequent cr~bgrass growth 29 percent at this depth (Table 6). In the silty'o!Lay loam; little activity was found below the 1 inch level. These results confirm the results from the previous experiment which indicated trifluralin did not leach from the surtace in th!. soil. 361 Surface sprays of triflural~ngave excellent,~re-emergent weed, control at 4-6 pounds per acre with no damag. to soybeans, snapbeans, lim. beans, green pelU!, peanuts, and~;otton. Soil in .. ' corporation increased activit7Jl ..6 times ovel' surtace sprays. , Rotovationprovedsuperior to o:t;her incorpor~tion methods.. . Tritluralin leached very slowly trom the surtace of sandy, silty claY' loam, and muck soils. The compound leached to a greater depth in sand than in siltY' claY' loam.
- Page 309 and 310: ab1e 2. Average dry weight of corn
- Page 311 and 312: 311 The most strllt~Mrr~ct. ~fiIIJI
- Page 313 and 314: 313 RE9lfm'$~lfI)DI3CtlSSION '1.",
- Page 315 and 316: 315 LrrERATURECITED 1. Fertig, Stan
- Page 317 and 318: .~ pattern following applications o
- Page 319 and 320: Ratings at the time of'gJ;Vllst; al
- Page 321 and 322: THERESPONSEOF NUTGRASS TO HERBIC~I)
- Page 323 and 324: '\.......- TABLE2. Ratings of Nutgr
- Page 325 and 326: All treatments produced si~1f~c~tly
- Page 327 and 328: A 327 WEBDe
- Page 329 and 330: . Eli'FECTSali' WEEDSON YIELD AND"G
- Page 331 and 332: Pollen Maturity: ",l. ,. Broadleaf
- Page 333 and 334: '--' The applicators were tested un
- Page 335 and 336: 335 Figure 1. The effeetof partic1e
- Page 337 and 338: 337 SRFeader 1 On this spreader onl
- Page 339 and 340: Table 4. The effect of speed, p~~cl
- Page 341 and 342: Table 1: Herbicidal treatments used
- Page 343 and 344: ·000 .000, I II ! WEEDCONTROLRATIN
- Page 345 and 346: 2.5000 CORNINJURY EXPRESSEDAS SQUAR
- Page 347 and 348: 347 1. 2. Danielson. l , ;4. L. Ef~
- Page 349 and 350: ',-- 34~ 3-(3 ..4-Dichlorophenyl)-1
- Page 351 and 352: weed control with adequate safety t
- Page 353 and 354: Untreated Table 2. Directed Post-E"
- Page 355 and 356: .s .... __ Table 7. Pre-Emel'ae~eWe
- Page 357 and 358: experiment is reported herE!. Trifl
- Page 359: Results are given. in Table 4~J'Rot
- Page 363 and 364: Included in the lima. bean test wer
- Page 365 and 366: Table 1. The Effects ofS8veral form
- Page 367 and 368: Table 3. The effects of several for
- Page 369 and 370: 369 Table 5. The effects of sev~ral
- Page 371 and 372: • ~ : .• \ • ' -' ..,,:- ',-"
- Page 373 and 374: Heights of barley were significantl
- Page 375 and 376: Table 2. The effe,cts of s~\I'~ral
- Page 377 and 378: Table 4. 377 The effects of aevel8.
- Page 379 and 380: ,:' A PROGRESSREPORTONCOMIo!ERCIAL
- Page 381 and 382: 4. Undesirable dead stem.,lio not r
- Page 383 and 384: areas under service conditionsa~ va
- Page 385 and 386: We ,prpbablyhave no speeie of g~owt
- Page 387 and 388: control. At the end of the third ye
- Page 389 and 390: initial defoliation was evident lat
- Page 391 and 392: OBJECTIVE In 1958 an experiment was
- Page 393 and 394: Replicates DlO 810 I 2.0 0.5 II 1.5
- Page 395 and 396: DISCUSSION One Year After Applicati
- Page 397 and 398: 1. Button, E.F. Bndwrfg'h~';J .L. ,
- Page 399 and 400: 399 The treatment consisted of appl
- Page 401 and 402: 401 FIELD PROCEDURES Although. the
- Page 403 and 404: 403 In the light of these data it a
- Page 405 and 406: 405 ...·1!MLE I SAMPLECHARACTERIST
- Page 407 and 408: 407 , '.". '.·',',~'l~rL,i;'. "\"
- Page 409 and 410: dltterent l"atespacaoreand"~"at thr
In Princeton fine sand, tritlupalin leached ,tic a. depth of 8<br />
inches, reducing subsequent cr~bgrass growth 29 percent at this<br />
depth (Table 6). In the silty'o!Lay loam; little activity was<br />
found below the 1 inch level. These results confirm the results<br />
from the previous experiment which indicated trifluralin did not<br />
leach from the surtace in th!. soil.<br />
361<br />
Surface sprays of triflural~ngave excellent,~re-emergent weed,<br />
control at 4-6 pounds per acre with no damag. to soybeans, snapbeans,<br />
lim. beans, green pelU!, peanuts, and~;otton. Soil in .. '<br />
corporation increased activit7Jl ..6 times ovel' surtace sprays. ,<br />
Rotovationprovedsuperior to o:t;her incorpor~tion methods.. .<br />
Tritluralin leached very slowly trom the surtace of sandy, silty<br />
claY' loam, and muck soils. The compound leached to a greater<br />
depth in sand than in siltY' claY' loam.
Change language