Vol. 16â1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 16â1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 16â1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
') ) .;/ u " . y~ ~ca1 I ,; ,~ CheDdCl,' . ~~: EeI··1 ~ I I 1* Atraz1ne ~ 0 11+_8_ : .. n" . . ' .' i8"'~i'" ~ NO- - - 2It 3* 4* 5 6 1 8* 10 II 9* Atrazine S1mad.ne G-34696 G-34361 2.0 Jan~-~J re.Q, "~, ." ~. F2.0 "::( .~. 0. ,- ..r Pro~ne:. G-34360 Atratone ~.o 2.0 2.0 ::!~:t~~: . , G-34696 G-3436l. Atratoue 2.0 2.0 Atraz1De.::: '2'.0 ~:'"~ . ~ ~ e.~ Propazine 3·0 G-34360, 2.0 I a.e -~.... - Bone ,,,,'WQ.; 12 "",~_.;i._ 1280 -----~. 13 4.0 16..6 340 14 " Atraz1JJe I 2.0 16.3 15.5 310 15 00 1------- r---- '1-------- l18osL!0. I..;--- I Atraz1De IU r ..~ .I .255 re16 p!Jeck .---- -:::==:1 --~-_L=:---- ------~ 9.1" 4.~-~-~~ . *S~ chemical, ra1;e per acre and methOd of treatJl!etlt used in lYbQ. . .all.otller trea'tmeDts the cheln1~a1 vas changed .q ~ ;·1.30 1367 l.26O 61.5 495 ~
,~, ~ Tab1.e II. Chemical. Treatments Used on Sod Area and Yiel.ds of Corn Silage ('0/ andQuackgrass Foliage. 1.961. I - c Tons of silage corn Ib~(A of" quacltgrass P1ow~wn ChSn:LCaJ. - Pre.;me;;~ce lloat-emerge,i;lce at 751imisture rollage at 2i:1f,moist\ ~at~ ChemieaJ.'BB£e/A Chemical. Rate/A Chemical. Rate/A. Not Not No. 1bs.a.e. P.bs.a.e. _ bs a.e. Cul1;1vated ~ul:tivated Cultivated Cultivate ,I Atrazine 1.0 Atrazine 1.0 ------ .... ---. 21.5 1.9·9 60 70 2 Atrazine 1.0 Atrazine 2.0 ------ ----- 21.3 21.1 331 0 3 Atrazine 2.0 Atrazine 1.0 ------ .._--- 22.1 21.1 --- 20 4 Atrazine 2.0 AtraziDe 2.0 ----- : ----- 21.2 20.5 15 5 5 Atrazine 3.0 Atraz1ne ' 1.0 ---_._- ----- 23·9 22.8 None 15 6 Amitro1-T 1.0 Atrazine 1..0 -...---- ----- 1.9.4 20.9 455. 400 7 c Amitrol-T lO ~ ~, J¢raz1rW" ~1...0- -."-~-- ; ----- ~c'.3, .~ 20,5 ~:c.'J .: 40 8',;0' Mntrol-7 ." ~ "At1".8.z1Jie ':, '~:
- Page 237 and 238: 237 Figure I Bioassay of cbrOlll4to
- Page 239 and 240: 239 Weed Control and Residual Effec
- Page 241 and 242: Rototilling was done in June·' SO
- Page 243 and 244: 243 in the spring of 1961 preceedin
- Page 245 and 246: WEEDCONTROL.AR
- Page 247 and 248: Li£erature Cited 1. Chappell. W. E
- Page 249 and 250: Tl'eatments ghing un.811~!8facto%'y
- Page 251 and 252: Table 1. Designa t ion Am1l:)en .\
- Page 253 and 254: Table 3. Percent Broadleat Weed Con
- Page 255 and 256: ,255 CONTROLOF ANNUALWlmDSIN swDT C
- Page 257 and 258: of Casoron per acre was statistical
- Page 259 and 260: ~.-! _ 1.37 ~ Table 2. Sweet Corn Y
- Page 261 and 262: Table 4. Peroent Control ot Ann.ual
- Page 263 and 264: EVALUATIONOF FIVE _~p>I!:S FOR KILL
- Page 265 and 266: 265 STRAWBERRY HERBICIDEINVESTIGATI
- Page 267 and 268: 267 Table 2. Eftect Of'herbicidet~e
- Page 269 and 270: 'h ", 4. Tillam lOG at 5 lb/A a.i.
- Page 271 and 272: Asparagus The results of weed contr
- Page 273 and 274: 273 TABLEII. ~1EED CONTROLANDYIELD
- Page 275 and 276: ~ C'l TABLE tv. lIEE» OON1T..OLAND
- Page 277 and 278: WEEDCONTROLIN TRANSPLANT TOMATOES (
- Page 279 and 280: 279 ·QUACKGRASSCONTROL S.M. Raleig
- Page 281 and 282: 281 table II. The control of:'4oaek
- Page 283 and 284: no cultivation during the growing s
- Page 285 and 286: SummaryandConclu.1Qp' 1. A quackgra
- Page 287: If or where farmer acceptance of a
- Page 291 and 292: so11 per plot at each sampling date
- Page 293 and 294: 418' 293 Table III Main Eff,ects of
- Page 295 and 296: Table V, }nt ...... e..• ,fa~, I;
- Page 297 and 298: plots showed smaller decreases with
- Page 299 and 300: FURTHEREVALUmONor HERBICIDESFal· W
- Page 301 and 302: 301 In the SUIIIIIlf)1' seeding, th
- Page 303 and 304: The results were similar to those o
- Page 305 and 306: In another experiment, loam soil wa
- Page 307 and 308: apparently due to severe competitio
- Page 309 and 310: ab1e 2. Average dry weight of corn
- Page 311 and 312: 311 The most strllt~Mrr~ct. ~fiIIJI
- Page 313 and 314: 313 RE9lfm'$~lfI)DI3CtlSSION '1.",
- Page 315 and 316: 315 LrrERATURECITED 1. Fertig, Stan
- Page 317 and 318: .~ pattern following applications o
- Page 319 and 320: Ratings at the time of'gJ;Vllst; al
- Page 321 and 322: THERESPONSEOF NUTGRASS TO HERBIC~I)
- Page 323 and 324: '\.......- TABLE2. Ratings of Nutgr
- Page 325 and 326: All treatments produced si~1f~c~tly
- Page 327 and 328: A 327 WEBDe
- Page 329 and 330: . Eli'FECTSali' WEEDSON YIELD AND"G
- Page 331 and 332: Pollen Maturity: ",l. ,. Broadleaf
- Page 333 and 334: '--' The applicators were tested un
- Page 335 and 336: 335 Figure 1. The effeetof partic1e
- Page 337 and 338: 337 SRFeader 1 On this spreader onl
') )<br />
.;/ u<br />
" .<br />
y~ ~ca1 I ,; ,~ CheDdCl,' . ~~: EeI··1 ~ I I<br />
1* Atraz1ne ~ 0 11+_8_ : .. n" . . ' .' i8"'~i'" ~ NO- - -<br />
2It<br />
3*<br />
4*<br />
5<br />
6<br />
1<br />
8*<br />
10<br />
II<br />
9*<br />
Atrazine<br />
S1mad.ne<br />
G-34696<br />
G-34361<br />
2.0<br />
Jan~-~J re.Q, "~, ."<br />
~. F2.0 "::(<br />
.~. 0. ,- ..r<br />
Pro~ne:.<br />
G-34360<br />
Atratone<br />
~.o<br />
2.0<br />
2.0<br />
::!~:t~~:<br />
. ,<br />
G-34696<br />
G-3436l.<br />
Atratoue<br />
2.0<br />
2.0<br />
Atraz1De.::: '2'.0<br />
~:'"~ . ~<br />
~ e.~<br />
Propazine 3·0<br />
G-34360, 2.0<br />
I a.e<br />
-~.... -<br />
Bone<br />
,,,,'WQ.;<br />
12<br />
"",~_.;i._<br />
1280<br />
-----~.<br />
13<br />
4.0<br />
16..6<br />
340<br />
14<br />
" Atraz1JJe I 2.0 16.3 15.5<br />
310<br />
15<br />
00 1------- r---- '1-------- l18osL!0.<br />
I..;--- I Atraz1De IU<br />
r ..~ .I .255<br />
re16 p!Jeck .---- -:::==:1 --~-_L=:---- ------~ 9.1" 4.~-~-~~<br />
. *S~ chemical, ra1;e per acre and methOd of treatJl!etlt used in lYbQ. . .all.otller trea'tmeDts the cheln1~a1 vas changed<br />
.q ~<br />
;·1.30<br />
1367<br />
l.26O<br />
61.5<br />
495<br />
~
Change language