08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2. Assistant Professor. Department of Agronomy, University of Massachusettt,<br />

Amherst. Massachusetts.<br />

282<br />

CHEMICALQUACICGWSCONTROL 1 ,<br />

Jona.<br />

Ve~gri82<br />

Atrazine (2-chloro-4-ethylamine-6-i80prop,lamino-s-triazine) and<br />

other herbic,ide.areavailable wh~~Il,,,ppear to provida reliable mean8 of<br />

controlling quackgral8 (Agropyron repen8). Atradne:'.uppresses this weed<br />

significantly ~utoften recollllend_" t.j;e. fail.to e.radicate it completely.,<br />

The persi8tence of this weed i8 related to its primary mode of reproduction.<br />

i.e. itl rhizomes which usually ate distributed in the l'low layer. Rhizomes<br />

vary in length and depth and thist·a. our tests indicate (2). i8 at leatt<br />

part of the explanation for failure. in controlling quackgrass with chemicals.<br />

Atrazine sholi14 be applied c.•• clole as pouible to the rhizomes .It<br />

is re.sonable to conclude that mi.i~g the herbicide with the soil should<br />

be advantageous. The ch4llllical will be closer to the rhizomes and under dry<br />

surface .oil conditions mixing ma, provide better moisture conditions for<br />

atrazine to be tAken up by rhizomes and kill them.<br />

The main objective of ou~ trials in 1960/1961 was to investigate<br />

the importance of mixing atrazine ",ith the soil by rototUling versus leavtag<br />

the material on the surface. Comparisons were al.e .. de between fall and<br />

spring applications. In addition'to'atrazine. other promising herbicides<br />

or their combination. were included.<br />

Procedure<br />

Trials were conducted on a well drained gravelly sandy loam. The<br />

area had a good unif.,. stand of quackgrass. Plots wlere 12 ft. by 28 ft.<br />

Three replicates were used. Time :0'£'application and ~ates are given in<br />

Table II. Fall applications were made on October 10. 1960 and spring applications<br />

on April 27, 1961. The quaclgrass was from 5 to 7 inches tall.<br />

On May 19 the exper1lilental area w". "lowed. disked, fertilized and prepared<br />

for field corn planting. On May 22 after seedbed preparation, atrazine and<br />

EPTCwere applied as shown in Table-iII. Treatments 10, 11, 12 and 20 were<br />

rototillad about 4-~ in. deep immedtately following application of the<br />

material. The next day on May 23, Ohio M-1S silage field corn was planted.<br />

Thus treatments appUed on May 22 aMybe considered lUI being made at planting.<br />

Atrazine is only slightly soluble ·in'water (70 ppm i1l':water) and moisture<br />

conditions in the soil at the time of application and for the first ten days<br />

after application are critical fo~tbe effectiveness of treatment. In<br />

Table I. rainfall and temperature data are shown for the various treatment<br />

dates. With each date.of application, the moisture conditions were favorable<br />

for the action of atrazine. On June 5 the whole experimental area was sprayed<br />

with 6 pounds per acre· of dinitro' (DNB') for annull'lW4eedcontrol. There wa•<br />

._-----------_.._----------------_.- .. _._----._---_.--_._------------<br />

1. ContributiCn No. 1336 of the University of Massachusetts, College of<br />

Agriculture, Experiment Station, Amherst, Massachusetts.<br />

..--- .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!