Vol. 16â1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 16â1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 16â1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
TABLEI. HEEDCONTROLAIUlYIEIJ) IN EARLmING mlEET CORN ~ale__ Planted June 16, 1961 - (3 Re;lt"~ions) ; '1 ~: wee;'~ontrol Yield-Lb. 1/' T1me I-Poor to ~nttable • .'Applied 9-hceUent Ean ..,._Chemisa!.". _S!1.U£cJ.· ':;'.1.6Ll2,I§..l_ _ ';"V~f~l- SL2j.l§.1""'· ..,.__ Check-Cultivated,.O' 46• 4.0 Lb. Atratine Ge1gy . Pre-eaierg. :g.O 4.0 11 Sima:d!le 11 11 11 ;'.0 t." 2.0 11 Atrazine 11 11 It 8.0 ,':l' I 3.0 11 S1mazine I. 11.' 11 9,0; 1.0 " Urea 326 D1.IPont " 11
273 TABLEII. ~1EED CONTROLANDYIELD IN ASPARAGUJ (4 aeplications) _R,!t!! ___ ,£h.1ll'lc,al __ Heed Control Time 1-Poor to Yield-Lb. Applied 9-Excellent 5/11/61- §.o.!:!.X's.e;..' _ _5Ll1/&1_ _ _ _ 2/2/&1____ Y1/§.'C_ 1,6 Lb. C'TG DuPont: Pre-emerc· 5.3 7.2 2.4 " 3.2 II II 2.5 II 3.75 II 5.0 II II " " " " 7.3 7.7 Atre:~ins Geig'j " " II II G.O 3.3 II 7.0 7.0 11 II II II 0.3 7.6 9.0 II Zytron D~~~ " II " 9.0 7.4 II 11 2.3 3.2 15.0 II II II II II 5.8 9.1 2.5 II Simazine Geiey II II 8.8 0.4 3.7-5 II II II II II 9.0 9.0 5.0 II II II II II 8.8 6.5 Check 1.0 7.8 N.S.
- Page 221 and 222: Table 2. tilat' of pre-plantbftb.tc
- Page 223 and 224: l EVALUATIONOF THREEHERBICIDESONPnE
- Page 225 and 226: TABLE2. TIll HIGHESTlATEOFHERBICIDE
- Page 227 and 228: Because of the lush growth of quack
- Page 229 and 230: Table 2. Effects of Herbicides on Q
- Page 231 and 232: Table 3. Effects of Herbicides on A
- Page 233 and 234: 233 The inhibitory activity was ass
- Page 235 and 236: non-polar solvents. Table 5 shows t
- Page 237 and 238: 237 Figure I Bioassay of cbrOlll4to
- Page 239 and 240: 239 Weed Control and Residual Effec
- Page 241 and 242: Rototilling was done in June·' SO
- Page 243 and 244: 243 in the spring of 1961 preceedin
- Page 245 and 246: WEEDCONTROL.AR
- Page 247 and 248: Li£erature Cited 1. Chappell. W. E
- Page 249 and 250: Tl'eatments ghing un.811~!8facto%'y
- Page 251 and 252: Table 1. Designa t ion Am1l:)en .\
- Page 253 and 254: Table 3. Percent Broadleat Weed Con
- Page 255 and 256: ,255 CONTROLOF ANNUALWlmDSIN swDT C
- Page 257 and 258: of Casoron per acre was statistical
- Page 259 and 260: ~.-! _ 1.37 ~ Table 2. Sweet Corn Y
- Page 261 and 262: Table 4. Peroent Control ot Ann.ual
- Page 263 and 264: EVALUATIONOF FIVE _~p>I!:S FOR KILL
- Page 265 and 266: 265 STRAWBERRY HERBICIDEINVESTIGATI
- Page 267 and 268: 267 Table 2. Eftect Of'herbicidet~e
- Page 269 and 270: 'h ", 4. Tillam lOG at 5 lb/A a.i.
- Page 271: Asparagus The results of weed contr
- Page 275 and 276: ~ C'l TABLE tv. lIEE» OON1T..OLAND
- Page 277 and 278: WEEDCONTROLIN TRANSPLANT TOMATOES (
- Page 279 and 280: 279 ·QUACKGRASSCONTROL S.M. Raleig
- Page 281 and 282: 281 table II. The control of:'4oaek
- Page 283 and 284: no cultivation during the growing s
- Page 285 and 286: SummaryandConclu.1Qp' 1. A quackgra
- Page 287 and 288: If or where farmer acceptance of a
- Page 289 and 290: ,~, ~ Tab1.e II. Chemical. Treatmen
- Page 291 and 292: so11 per plot at each sampling date
- Page 293 and 294: 418' 293 Table III Main Eff,ects of
- Page 295 and 296: Table V, }nt ...... e..• ,fa~, I;
- Page 297 and 298: plots showed smaller decreases with
- Page 299 and 300: FURTHEREVALUmONor HERBICIDESFal· W
- Page 301 and 302: 301 In the SUIIIIIlf)1' seeding, th
- Page 303 and 304: The results were similar to those o
- Page 305 and 306: In another experiment, loam soil wa
- Page 307 and 308: apparently due to severe competitio
- Page 309 and 310: ab1e 2. Average dry weight of corn
- Page 311 and 312: 311 The most strllt~Mrr~ct. ~fiIIJI
- Page 313 and 314: 313 RE9lfm'$~lfI)DI3CtlSSION '1.",
- Page 315 and 316: 315 LrrERATURECITED 1. Fertig, Stan
- Page 317 and 318: .~ pattern following applications o
- Page 319 and 320: Ratings at the time of'gJ;Vllst; al
- Page 321 and 322: THERESPONSEOF NUTGRASS TO HERBIC~I)
273<br />
TABLEII. ~1EED CONTROLANDYIELD IN ASPARAGUJ<br />
(4 aeplications)<br />
_R,!t!! ___<br />
,£h.1ll'lc,al __<br />
Heed Control<br />
Time 1-Poor to Yield-Lb.<br />
Applied 9-Excellent 5/11/61-<br />
§.o.!:!.X's.e;..' _ _5Ll1/&1_ _ _ _ 2/2/&1____ Y1/§.'C_<br />
1,6 Lb. C'TG DuPont: Pre-emerc· 5.3 7.2<br />
2.4 "<br />
3.2<br />
II II<br />
2.5<br />
II<br />
3.75 II<br />
5.0<br />
II II<br />
"<br />
" " " 7.3 7.7<br />
Atre:~ins Geig'j "<br />
"<br />
II II<br />
G.O 3.3<br />
II<br />
7.0 7.0<br />
11 II II II<br />
0.3 7.6<br />
9.0<br />
II<br />
Zytron D~~~<br />
"<br />
II<br />
" 9.0 7.4<br />
II 11<br />
2.3 3.2<br />
15.0<br />
II II II II II<br />
5.8 9.1<br />
2.5<br />
II<br />
Simazine Geiey<br />
II II<br />
8.8 0.4<br />
3.7-5 II<br />
II II II II<br />
9.0 9.0<br />
5.0<br />
II II II II II<br />
8.8 6.5<br />
Check 1.0 7.8<br />
N.S.
Change language