08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WEEDCONTROL IN.STRAWBERRIES WI'DIEITAH,<br />

NEBURON, TRIEWINE ANDZY~<br />

Jolin S.<br />

8&11ey2<br />

In the northeast strawberry fi.1ds are cu.tomari1y fruited only onc.. One<br />

of the chief reasons for this i. the failure of growers to keep weeds under<br />

control. The use of Sesone haa helped but under 'CllII8condition. results. bave<br />

been d1sappointing. Several other chemicals have been tried but none bas been<br />

widely used (1,2,3,5,6). Therefore, the search for a better weed control<br />

chemical for use in strawberry fields continues.<br />

Materials<br />

and Method.<br />

In mid-April, 1960, virus~frea plants of the variety Surecrop were s.t in<br />

plots 5 feet by 12 f.et. The mother plants were s.t2 feet apart, 5 to a plot<br />

and allowed to form matted rows. The materials t ..... d and rates per acre w.re<br />

as follows: Eptam 51 granular at 2 and 4 pounds; NeburoD 18.5~ W.P. at: 1 and<br />

2 pounds; Trietadne 50%W.P. at 2 and 4 pounds and Zytron 25%on clay at 10<br />

and 20 pound.. Each treatment was replicated four time.. .<br />

The plot. were hoed and cultivated until June 10 so that the plants would<br />

be thoroughly established before any treatments were applied. On June 10,<br />

after thorough cultivation and hoeing the Trietaaine and Neburon were sprayed<br />

over the plots using one pint of wat.r per plot. On June 13 the Eptam and<br />

Zytron for each plot was mixed with a double handful of dry •• nd and broadcast<br />

by band. The•• two material. were then cultivated in lightly with an<br />

iron rake.<br />

By mid-July some of the plots were getting very weedy, especially the<br />

untreated plots. Therefore, all the weeds on each,lotwere counted. S1Dce.<br />

very little gra.s appeared in any of the plots at t~s time or later, all the<br />

data will cover broadleaf weeds Oh1y. Those present were mostly purslan.,<br />

Portulaca 01er~5~; red root pigweed, Amarant~~lt retroflexusj 1ambsquarters,<br />

~~~ ~j and smartweed, Po1ygonumhydropiper.<br />

After the weed counts were made all plots were thoroughly cultivated,<br />

hoed and on July 26 and 27 all plots were re-treated.<br />

By September 23 some plots had become very weedy again. Therefore, the<br />

plot. in each block were ranked for weed population so that the results could<br />

be tested statistically by the rankit method (4). The most abundant weed at<br />

this t~e was commonchickweed, Stellaria media. After the ranking all plots<br />

were cultivated and hoed and no more chemi~applied either in the fall or<br />

lContribution No. 1328 of the Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station.<br />

University of Ma.sacbusetts, Amherst. Mals.<br />

2Associate Professor of Pomology. Department of Horticulture, University of<br />

Ma.. achu.etts.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!