Vol. 16â1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 16â1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 16â1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
240 immediately. The weights are given in 'rf!.ble 1 anq.',liIhowno consistent trend nor statistic~ valid difference even at the 5~ level. under these circumstances the plots ~ be regarded as having a tria:tS.ne content lower than that plVtotox1c to nursery crops tested. 'rable 1. Green weight in grams of 10 red kidney belln,.plants at first flower stage following' June planting in, con'jlrol plots and in treated plots. 5>.11 Type cat ion S011 tl'eatment No. of 'plots ,Rotot1lled Control Eptam Simazine Atrazine Mean weight SNt'ace, 16 888 214.25 246.13 233.75 215·00 224.69. 204.56 220.12 248.75 206.50 216.95 . S1mazine and ll.trazine, have. given .good,control ,9f established stands of Agropyrbn repens. Reinfestat10n, howeVer, fol;l.ows unless sCllleadditional control measures are maintained. Spot spra;ying,aultivation, plowing or weeding ma;y be sel.ected but pro3.0nged residueJ.ac4onis not adeqUate to prevent re-estab1ishment of some weeds and release of' others from a minor to a dominant position. Hedge bindweed, Convolvulus a.i'd' was present in. mi~ilmOUntsp1n"1959 but eJ.1 plots showed some '6, :wee in autumn 1961 - 7~ of eJ.l the plots rated 5 or,more on a sceJ.e oto through 9. Grass stand was eJ.so rated on stand density. Agr'?PY3'0nrepens, was present to 50~ or more in rototilled plots. ' 'rab1e 2. Stand of perennieJ. grasses present at the close of the third seasonatter a s.1ngle &?plication O,f atrazine, and sima.zine based on rating 0-6to1:&1 for 3 repl1ca:tes' and duplicate ratings (hence 6 x 3 x 2 = 36maximum). ' Rate Not .rotot1lled 1959 04 ~ototilled ." Herbicide lbs. AlA 1959-61 ,960only 1959 & !§O0 Control 0 27 18 18 17 Atrazine 5 26 22 23 17 10 30 24 22 13 EPtalll 5 30 20 21 20 l~ 28 23 17 18 S1ms.zine 5 20 15 20 13 1:0 2; 11 19 12 ,-~, '
Rototilling was done in June·' SO that the 1959 and 1960 data represents re-establishment over the period June 1960 to November 1961. In the fall of 1959 three months after treatnumt little Agropyron repens was present in the plots receiving simazine or atrazine. This was true also in November 1961 following June 1961 rototilling. Summary In a Dunkirk' silty c1B¥ 101$ simazine and atraZine applied on the SUI" face at 5 poundS or at 10 pounds' of active ingredient per acre are effective in controlling Agr0J2.:'Lr.cnr~pens'antt'seedling wceds'ror one and possibly 'biro growing seasons. Ro'';;otiJling 2- 3 times at the closE! of the second aeason largely reduces any herbicidal value and permits nomal growth of red kidney beans during the sensi.tive juvdhileleaf' stage on through to flowering stage. Normal growth of all indicator plants tested is taken to indicate that the soil is free of herbicidal leveis Of the herbicide applied. Incorporation of simazine or atrazine at the tfm~ of application increases the initial efficiency of the herbicidala.ctibh.It is ljJ~ely that incorporation assures placement within the soil. and minimizes loss through run off or ' spreading to adjacent plots. ao~dtilling once a year in present tests appears to be as effective as herbicidal appEcatj,on used once in a three y'ear period. Weed control value is lost and phytotoxic effect to indicator plants was not evident after the second year following application. :References Pridhem, A. M. S. Crop, voed !Uld.~oi1 aspects of sil'nazine, atrazine and' other herbicides in greenhouse and field tests. Proc. 14th Almual Meeting N.E. Weed Control conr , 142-147. 1960. • -----a~:t~r~a~z~i·ne Weed control. and residual effects applied to. sod prior to planting of simazine and of nursery stock. Proc. 15th Annual MeetiDg R.E. Weed Control Conf. 174-176. 1961.
- Page 189 and 190: Residue analysis of potatoes treate
- Page 191 and 192: soil temperatures at the time the m
- Page 193 and 194: ( ( ~able 2. Effect of Several Che~
- Page 195 and 196: 195 PROBLEMSIN THEAPPLICATIONOF HER
- Page 197 and 198: 197 scale tests on 2 cOlJllllercial
- Page 199 and 200: l!!!! Experiment A factorial experi
- Page 201 and 202: frOlll plot. at .horter i*nalt (~ t
- Page 203 and 204: 6.50 Table 1. Effe,ct of p"e- an
- Page 205 and 206: 205 EVALUATION0It' DACTHAL * HERBIC
- Page 207 and 208: The 1959 and 1960 replicated field
- Page 209 and 210: 209 TABLEII Average Weed Cont~l Exh
- Page 211 and 212: Where the weed eompleJl;conststs of
- Page 213 and 214: ...... 1.67, 213 Table 1. Effect of
- Page 215 and 216: 215 Table 2. Bffect of pre-plant he
- Page 217 and 218: .217 Pive pre-plant herbicide. were
- Page 219 and 220: 219 Table 1. Effect of pre-p1anthel
- Page 221 and 222: Table 2. tilat' of pre-plantbftb.tc
- Page 223 and 224: l EVALUATIONOF THREEHERBICIDESONPnE
- Page 225 and 226: TABLE2. TIll HIGHESTlATEOFHERBICIDE
- Page 227 and 228: Because of the lush growth of quack
- Page 229 and 230: Table 2. Effects of Herbicides on Q
- Page 231 and 232: Table 3. Effects of Herbicides on A
- Page 233 and 234: 233 The inhibitory activity was ass
- Page 235 and 236: non-polar solvents. Table 5 shows t
- Page 237 and 238: 237 Figure I Bioassay of cbrOlll4to
- Page 239: 239 Weed Control and Residual Effec
- Page 243 and 244: 243 in the spring of 1961 preceedin
- Page 245 and 246: WEEDCONTROL.AR
- Page 247 and 248: Li£erature Cited 1. Chappell. W. E
- Page 249 and 250: Tl'eatments ghing un.811~!8facto%'y
- Page 251 and 252: Table 1. Designa t ion Am1l:)en .\
- Page 253 and 254: Table 3. Percent Broadleat Weed Con
- Page 255 and 256: ,255 CONTROLOF ANNUALWlmDSIN swDT C
- Page 257 and 258: of Casoron per acre was statistical
- Page 259 and 260: ~.-! _ 1.37 ~ Table 2. Sweet Corn Y
- Page 261 and 262: Table 4. Peroent Control ot Ann.ual
- Page 263 and 264: EVALUATIONOF FIVE _~p>I!:S FOR KILL
- Page 265 and 266: 265 STRAWBERRY HERBICIDEINVESTIGATI
- Page 267 and 268: 267 Table 2. Eftect Of'herbicidet~e
- Page 269 and 270: 'h ", 4. Tillam lOG at 5 lb/A a.i.
- Page 271 and 272: Asparagus The results of weed contr
- Page 273 and 274: 273 TABLEII. ~1EED CONTROLANDYIELD
- Page 275 and 276: ~ C'l TABLE tv. lIEE» OON1T..OLAND
- Page 277 and 278: WEEDCONTROLIN TRANSPLANT TOMATOES (
- Page 279 and 280: 279 ·QUACKGRASSCONTROL S.M. Raleig
- Page 281 and 282: 281 table II. The control of:'4oaek
- Page 283 and 284: no cultivation during the growing s
- Page 285 and 286: SummaryandConclu.1Qp' 1. A quackgra
- Page 287 and 288: If or where farmer acceptance of a
- Page 289 and 290: ,~, ~ Tab1.e II. Chemical. Treatmen
240<br />
immediately. The weights are given in 'rf!.ble 1 anq.',liIhowno consistent trend<br />
nor statistic~ valid difference even at the 5~ level. under these circumstances<br />
the plots ~ be regarded as having a tria:tS.ne content lower than<br />
that plVtotox1c to nursery crops tested.<br />
'rable 1. Green weight in grams of 10 red kidney belln,.plants at first<br />
flower stage following' June planting in, con'jlrol plots and in<br />
treated plots.<br />
5>.11<br />
Type cat ion<br />
S011 tl'eatment No. of 'plots<br />
,Rotot1lled<br />
Control<br />
Eptam<br />
Simazine<br />
Atrazine<br />
Mean weight<br />
SNt'ace,<br />
16<br />
888<br />
214.25<br />
246.13<br />
233.75<br />
215·00<br />
224.69.<br />
204.56<br />
220.12<br />
248.75<br />
206.50<br />
216.95<br />
. S1mazine and ll.trazine, have. given .good,control ,9f established stands of<br />
Agropyrbn repens. Reinfestat10n, howeVer, fol;l.ows unless sCllleadditional<br />
control measures are maintained. Spot spra;ying,aultivation, plowing or<br />
weeding ma;y be sel.ected but pro3.0nged residueJ.ac4onis not adeqUate to<br />
prevent re-estab1ishment of some weeds and release of' others from a minor to<br />
a dominant position. Hedge bindweed, Convolvulus a.i'd' was present in.<br />
mi~ilmOUntsp1n"1959 but eJ.1 plots showed some '6, :wee in autumn 1961 -<br />
7~ of eJ.l the plots rated 5 or,more on a sceJ.e oto through 9. Grass stand<br />
was eJ.so rated on stand density. Agr'?PY3'0nrepens, was present to 50~ or<br />
more in rototilled plots. '<br />
'rab1e 2. Stand of perennieJ. grasses present at the close of the third<br />
seasonatter a s.1ngle &?plication O,f atrazine, and sima.zine<br />
based on rating 0-6to1:&1 for 3 repl1ca:tes' and duplicate<br />
ratings (hence 6 x 3 x 2 = 36maximum). '<br />
Rate<br />
Not .rotot1lled<br />
1959 04<br />
~ototilled ."<br />
Herbicide lbs. AlA 1959-61 ,960only 1959 & !§O0<br />
Control 0 27 18 18 17<br />
Atrazine 5 26 22 23 17<br />
10 30 24 22 13<br />
EPtalll 5 30 20 21 20<br />
l~ 28 23 17 18<br />
S1ms.zine 5 20 15 20 13<br />
1:0 2; 11 19 12<br />
,-~, '