Vol. 16â1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 16â1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 16â1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
170 Yie.s of U.S. #1 Delus potatoes ranged from3~a, bushels to 491 bushels per acre; and those of Kennebec',fran 508 to 646bu~helS per acre. The variability of the individual yields was such that no statistically significant differences between treatments ~' ,found. Th, sPCIP'11:1c gravity of the Kennebec potatoes averaged 1.078 and,the,Delus 1.083~:' Procedure Post-hilling and layby herbicide applications, 1961 These tests were randomized in blocks which alternated with the pre-emergent blocks. They were planted ,at the same time ancf:Ileaeived the same fertilization and managementexcept that they were CUltivated on May31, June 6, 16, and 20, with preliminary hilling on June 26 and final hilling on June 30. Ladysthumband ragweed were eliminated from the tops of the hills by the cultivating process. The field was overseeded with millets but the heavy fOliage cover and dry weather minimized the stand. The post-hilling herbicide sprays were applied June 26 with a calibrated sprayer at 'the rate of 40 gallons to the acre. The granular materials were weighed out individually and mixed with sand befo" spreading by hand. A few plots received vine-down applications on August 15. The vines were green and leafy but had opened up enough so herbicides COuldreach the soil. Trietazine spray prod~ced a little yellowing on the older leaves but this effect disappeared within two week$. Results The materials used, stands of weeds and yields of U.S. #1 Kennebecand Delus potatoes are shown in table 3. The yieldS of Kennebecs ranged from 500 bushels per acre where the double application of t1'ietazine was used to 631 on the falone plots. The controls averaged 590 bushels. The maximumand minimum yields of Oelu6 potatoes were 481 and 341 bushels per acre for these same two treatments, respectively. The check plots of Delus produced 438 bushels per acre. Unfortunately, the variation within blocks was such that significance could not be established at the 5%level. It is suspected, however, that the lowest average yields obtained from the combined application of trietazine at layby and vine-down is in part due to the heavy application of this herbicide. Whentubers of the, Kennebecvariety were dug in ~9ust for trietazine analysi~, smaller potatoes than in the check plots were found. ~ext season it is planned to' harvest potatoes at several periods to see whether the post-hilling spray retards tuber development. The weed stand was rather light. Proper CUltivation in June produced a nearly weedfree area. Ladysthumb(Polygonvmgersicaria) and some of the annual millets were present. '" The data in table 3 show that granular falone, alanap, zytron, eptam, dalapon, and amiben were effective in reducing the stand of annual grasses. Falone spray and trietazine spray were also effective. Repeating'the application of falone or trietazine at vine-down was no more effective than the post-h~lling treatment alone. The repeat application of
Table 3. Post-hilling weed control experiments with Kennebec and Delus potatoes (R.I. 1961). Active toxicant Ib/A U.S. #1 Weedrating* Vines BulA Ladys- Annual Material Layby down Kennebec Delus thumb 9/26/61 grasses Falone 4 631 481 7.2 9.3 Falone 4 4 629 440 8.1 9.5 Falone (gran. ) 4 554 421 7.7 :9.0 Falone (gran.) 4 4 514 406 7.4 9.1 Alanap (gran.) 4 458 391 6.0 9.0 Dalapon (gran.) 5 505 428 5.8 8.5 Zytron 5 598 445 5.0 8.6 Zytron 8 589 416 5.3 8.6 Zytron (gran.) 8 621 461 5.6 9.1 Eptam (gran.) 5 571 445 6.6 8.7 Eptam (gran.) 5 4 550 428 9.0 9.6 Trietazine 3 506 405 9.0 9.2 Trietazine 3 2 500 341 9.4 9.5 Amiben (gran.) 5 593 465 8.6 9.5 No chemical** 590 438 6.3 7.8 *low numbers = poor control, 10 = no weeds **regular cultivation eptam seemed somewhat more effective in reducing the stand of ladysthumb. Where eptam was used at post-hilling and vine-down the plots were nearly free of this pest. Falone retarded the growth of ladysthumb while the other "grass" herbicides did not materially effect it. Trietazine prevents the development of this weed rather well. Summary The grass herbicides, such as falone or alanap at 4 Ib/A, eptam, dalapon or alanap at 5 Ib/A and zytron at 8 Ib/A reduced the stands of grasses without altering the yields of U.S. #1 potatoes. Dalapon and zytron at 5 Ib/A did not appear quite as effective as the others during 1961. Repeat applications of falone or trietazine at vine-down did not increase the effectiveness this year. A repeat application of granular eptam was more effective than one application. Trietazine is an effective herbicide for annual weeds. Its effect on the rate of development of potato tubers needs further· investigation. Literature Cited 1. Bell, R. S. and Erling Larssen. 1960. Pre-emergent and post-hilling weed control tests with Katahdin potatoes, 1958-59. NEWCC, pp. 201-206. 2. Ilnicki, R. D., J. C. Campbell, T. T. Tisdell and H. A. Collins. 1961. Progress report on lay-by weed control in potatoes. NEWCC, p. 55. 3. Trevett, M. F., H. J. Murphyand Wm.Gardner. 1960. NEWCC, pp. 207-213. 171
- Page 119 and 120: a- Table 2_"COIIlpartsonof' Several
- Page 121 and 122: fJ Table 3. CcBparison of Several.
- Page 123 and 124: c
- Page 125 and 126: Table 1. Seeding and Weed Counts on
- Page 127 and 128: WEEDCONTROLANDTHE IMPROVEMENT OF SE
- Page 129 and 130: Following emergence of the tomato s
- Page 131 and 132: indicates that several of the treat
- Page 133 and 134: DISCUSSIONOF RESULTS Transplant Tom
- Page 135 and 136: harvest was covered with weeds, and
- Page 137 and 138: An additional 2 years of tests on f
- Page 139 and 140: ~ Table 2 .--l Average Number and P
- Page 141 and 142: ~ Table 4 Total Yields in Number an
- Page 143 and 144: "" ~ Table 6 Bvalu~t1.on of S&l~nto
- Page 145 and 146: of weed eoneee I without inj ury 't
- Page 147 and 148: 1. Associate Research Specialist in
- Page 149 and 150: Stulllll&ry A study was lh1tlatedto
- Page 151 and 152: Table 2. The residual effects of se
- Page 153 and 154: FURTHEROBSERVATIONS ONCONTROL OF TH
- Page 155 and 156: Table 3 - Mean per cent brake contr
- Page 157 and 158: lAssociate Research Spec1alist in W
- Page 159 and 160: PRE-E~mRGENCE WEEDCONTROLTEST IN RE
- Page 161 and 162: 161 Table 2. Tolerance of Beets and
- Page 163 and 164: 163 Results generally were good wee
- Page 165 and 166: USE OF GRANULAR CHl!H[CALAPPLICATOR
- Page 167 and 168: u.s. #1 potatoes and weed control e
- Page 169: 0' ~ Table 2. Pre-emergent weed con
- Page 173 and 174: ~/Pe.nt>:r lITn. h.7(L T1o:oTl.,:r+
- Page 175 and 176: In table 2 are presettted weed a*1'
- Page 177 and 178: Since rec1root is only one of the I
- Page 179 and 180: w.l.th 3 and 4 Ibs. ot Randox per a
- Page 181 and 182: 181 CONTROLOF ANNUALWEEDSIN pOTATOE
- Page 183 and 184: The following comments on the vario
- Page 185 and 186: 185 S\:U!U!1fryand ConclWtlon No he
- Page 187 and 188: 187 Table 2. Potato YIelds Followin
- Page 189 and 190: Residue analysis of potatoes treate
- Page 191 and 192: soil temperatures at the time the m
- Page 193 and 194: ( ( ~able 2. Effect of Several Che~
- Page 195 and 196: 195 PROBLEMSIN THEAPPLICATIONOF HER
- Page 197 and 198: 197 scale tests on 2 cOlJllllercial
- Page 199 and 200: l!!!! Experiment A factorial experi
- Page 201 and 202: frOlll plot. at .horter i*nalt (~ t
- Page 203 and 204: 6.50 Table 1. Effe,ct of p"e- an
- Page 205 and 206: 205 EVALUATION0It' DACTHAL * HERBIC
- Page 207 and 208: The 1959 and 1960 replicated field
- Page 209 and 210: 209 TABLEII Average Weed Cont~l Exh
- Page 211 and 212: Where the weed eompleJl;conststs of
- Page 213 and 214: ...... 1.67, 213 Table 1. Effect of
- Page 215 and 216: 215 Table 2. Bffect of pre-plant he
- Page 217 and 218: .217 Pive pre-plant herbicide. were
- Page 219 and 220: 219 Table 1. Effect of pre-p1anthel
170<br />
Yie.s of U.S. #1 Delus potatoes ranged from3~a, bushels to 491 bushels<br />
per acre; and those of Kennebec',fran 508 to 646bu~helS per acre. The variability<br />
of the individual yields was such that no statistically significant<br />
differences between treatments ~' ,found. Th, sPCIP'11:1c gravity of the Kennebec<br />
potatoes averaged 1.078 and,the,Delus 1.083~:'<br />
Procedure<br />
Post-hilling and layby herbicide applications, 1961<br />
These tests were randomized in blocks which alternated with the pre-emergent<br />
blocks. They were planted ,at the same time ancf:Ileaeived the same fertilization<br />
and managementexcept that they were CUltivated on May31, June 6, 16,<br />
and 20, with preliminary hilling on June 26 and final hilling on June 30.<br />
Ladysthumband ragweed were eliminated from the tops of the hills by the cultivating<br />
process. The field was overseeded with millets but the heavy fOliage<br />
cover and dry weather minimized the stand.<br />
The post-hilling herbicide sprays were applied June 26 with a calibrated<br />
sprayer at 'the rate of 40 gallons to the acre. The granular materials were<br />
weighed out individually and mixed with sand befo" spreading by hand. A few<br />
plots received vine-down applications on August 15. The vines were green and<br />
leafy but had opened up enough so herbicides COuldreach the soil. Trietazine<br />
spray prod~ced a little yellowing on the older leaves but this effect disappeared<br />
within two week$.<br />
Results<br />
The materials used, stands of weeds and yields of U.S. #1 Kennebecand<br />
Delus potatoes are shown in table 3. The yieldS of Kennebecs ranged from 500<br />
bushels per acre where the double application of t1'ietazine was used to 631 on<br />
the falone plots. The controls averaged 590 bushels. The maximumand minimum<br />
yields of Oelu6 potatoes were 481 and 341 bushels per acre for these same two<br />
treatments, respectively. The check plots of Delus produced 438 bushels per<br />
acre. Unfortunately, the variation within blocks was such that significance<br />
could not be established at the 5%level. It is suspected, however, that the<br />
lowest average yields obtained from the combined application of trietazine at<br />
layby and vine-down is in part due to the heavy application of this herbicide.<br />
Whentubers of the, Kennebecvariety were dug in ~9ust for trietazine analysi~,<br />
smaller potatoes than in the check plots were found. ~ext season it is<br />
planned to' harvest potatoes at several periods to see whether the post-hilling<br />
spray retards tuber development.<br />
The weed stand was rather light. Proper CUltivation in June produced a<br />
nearly weedfree area. Ladysthumb(Polygonvmgersicaria) and some of the<br />
annual millets were present. '"<br />
The data in table 3 show that granular falone, alanap, zytron, eptam,<br />
dalapon, and amiben were effective in reducing the stand of annual grasses.<br />
Falone spray and trietazine spray were also effective.<br />
Repeating'the application of falone or trietazine at vine-down was no more<br />
effective than the post-h~lling treatment alone. The repeat application of