Vol. 16â1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 16â1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 16â1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
"'1 ) Table 1. Pre-Plant and ~rgence Weed Control on Tab1e Beets Rating* I Yield Per Acre Chemical Beets Weeds (Tons) T' Tillam , Tillam " + 3 + ~. :Pre. SDraY' 2.0 2.1) 21).1..0 : 2..6 2~".1.. J.2 ..I) TL'71Q.'7-' Randox Solubor ** 10 Pre. St>raY 0 2.~ 2l.~? 2.8 28.L.. 1l.2 lA.? Q.L.. Solubor 20 " Spra.T 0.2 2.8 22.80 2.0 39.5 44.6 9.6 L..."I I Solubor -m " 8" Band 1.0 ~·l 2'L so 1.A 28.8 L..I).8 1s,n i R.7 I Solubor l..O " St' Band 1."1 L...2 2"1.'70 2.L.. "I1.Q I 1.1)."1I 1'7.'\1 ?Q Zvtron f, " Snl":lV 1:;_0 ~_A z.vtron 12 n Snrav '\.0 s,n Veedex i: Snr.a.v O.R ~.f, ?l..Q~ 2_1. ':10_1. l;(LO n di-,.o j " Vep;adex 6 Spra.v 0.8 "1.7 " I 2'i.7~ I 1.2122.2 I L..'i.7 I H , 1,£ ., ACP 61-81 A Sn,."v 0.'7 ':1.1. " ACP 61-62 2 " SPrav 5.0 s,o I i i Check - - - O. o l zs.so J 1.h I"", e: 1"\ o 1""£' "c ! * ** Visual rating system: o - No weed control - no crop injury. 5_- Complete weed control -cClDJlll~t:.e c~p destru.cUon. The rates given for Solubor are based on elemental Boron and not manufactured product. The 30 and 40 lb. rate of Boron is that for the area in the 8 inch band. The rate per planted acre would be 1/3 of that reported in Table 1 since i-owwidth is 24 inches. s ri
161 Table 2. Tolerance of Beets and Weed Control Obtained with Tillam E. C. and Granular : Lhs. Rating *** Active Chemical Per Acre Timing * Beets Weeds - Tillam E.C. .3 0 2.8** 3.0 Tillam E.C. 5 0 1.3 4.5 'N 1 1~... n~~~. ':l o o_~ ':1.7 Tillam Gran. 5 0 2.7 4.3 Check - 0 0 0 Tillam E.C. 3 .3 0.4 2•.3 Tillam E.C. 5 .3 0.7 .3.7 Tillam Gran. 3 .3 0, 3.5 Tillam Gran. 5 .3 l.e .3.8 Check - ':I 0: 0 * 0 - Applied and incorporated into the soil 5/25/61 - Beets planted'5/25/6l .3 - Applied and incorporated into the soil 5/25/6'). - Beets planted 5/28/61 ** This average reading influenced by one high reading from a questionable replicate. ' *** Visual rating system: o - No weed control - no crop injury~ 5 - Complete weed kill - complete cr6pdestruction.
- Page 109 and 110: Table 1. Weed control: stand of pla
- Page 111 and 112: Results and Discussion. The data, p
- Page 113 and 114: CIPO, Vegadex, and Randox Singly or
- Page 115 and 116: Table 1•. Wa. control, stand of p
- Page 117 and 118: 'Ihree experiments were conducted i
- Page 119 and 120: a- Table 2_"COIIlpartsonof' Several
- Page 121 and 122: fJ Table 3. CcBparison of Several.
- Page 123 and 124: c
- Page 125 and 126: Table 1. Seeding and Weed Counts on
- Page 127 and 128: WEEDCONTROLANDTHE IMPROVEMENT OF SE
- Page 129 and 130: Following emergence of the tomato s
- Page 131 and 132: indicates that several of the treat
- Page 133 and 134: DISCUSSIONOF RESULTS Transplant Tom
- Page 135 and 136: harvest was covered with weeds, and
- Page 137 and 138: An additional 2 years of tests on f
- Page 139 and 140: ~ Table 2 .--l Average Number and P
- Page 141 and 142: ~ Table 4 Total Yields in Number an
- Page 143 and 144: "" ~ Table 6 Bvalu~t1.on of S&l~nto
- Page 145 and 146: of weed eoneee I without inj ury 't
- Page 147 and 148: 1. Associate Research Specialist in
- Page 149 and 150: Stulllll&ry A study was lh1tlatedto
- Page 151 and 152: Table 2. The residual effects of se
- Page 153 and 154: FURTHEROBSERVATIONS ONCONTROL OF TH
- Page 155 and 156: Table 3 - Mean per cent brake contr
- Page 157 and 158: lAssociate Research Spec1alist in W
- Page 159: PRE-E~mRGENCE WEEDCONTROLTEST IN RE
- Page 163 and 164: 163 Results generally were good wee
- Page 165 and 166: USE OF GRANULAR CHl!H[CALAPPLICATOR
- Page 167 and 168: u.s. #1 potatoes and weed control e
- Page 169 and 170: 0' ~ Table 2. Pre-emergent weed con
- Page 171 and 172: Table 3. Post-hilling weed control
- Page 173 and 174: ~/Pe.nt>:r lITn. h.7(L T1o:oTl.,:r+
- Page 175 and 176: In table 2 are presettted weed a*1'
- Page 177 and 178: Since rec1root is only one of the I
- Page 179 and 180: w.l.th 3 and 4 Ibs. ot Randox per a
- Page 181 and 182: 181 CONTROLOF ANNUALWEEDSIN pOTATOE
- Page 183 and 184: The following comments on the vario
- Page 185 and 186: 185 S\:U!U!1fryand ConclWtlon No he
- Page 187 and 188: 187 Table 2. Potato YIelds Followin
- Page 189 and 190: Residue analysis of potatoes treate
- Page 191 and 192: soil temperatures at the time the m
- Page 193 and 194: ( ( ~able 2. Effect of Several Che~
- Page 195 and 196: 195 PROBLEMSIN THEAPPLICATIONOF HER
- Page 197 and 198: 197 scale tests on 2 cOlJllllercial
- Page 199 and 200: l!!!! Experiment A factorial experi
- Page 201 and 202: frOlll plot. at .horter i*nalt (~ t
- Page 203 and 204: 6.50 Table 1. Effe,ct of p"e- an
- Page 205 and 206: 205 EVALUATION0It' DACTHAL * HERBIC
- Page 207 and 208: The 1959 and 1960 replicated field
- Page 209 and 210: 209 TABLEII Average Weed Cont~l Exh
161<br />
Table 2. Tolerance of Beets and <strong>Weed</strong> Control Obtained with<br />
Tillam E. C. and Granular<br />
:<br />
Lhs. Rating ***<br />
Active<br />
Chemical Per Acre Timing * Beets <strong>Weed</strong>s<br />
-<br />
Tillam E.C. .3 0 2.8** 3.0<br />
Tillam E.C. 5 0 1.3 4.5<br />
'N 1 1~... n~~~. ':l o o_~ ':1.7<br />
Tillam Gran. 5 0 2.7 4.3<br />
Check - 0 0 0<br />
Tillam E.C. 3 .3 0.4 2•.3<br />
Tillam E.C. 5 .3 0.7 .3.7<br />
Tillam Gran. 3 .3 0, 3.5<br />
Tillam Gran. 5 .3 l.e .3.8<br />
Check -<br />
':I 0: 0<br />
* 0 - Applied and incorporated into the soil 5/25/61 - Beets planted'5/25/6l<br />
.3 - Applied and incorporated into the soil 5/25/6'). - Beets planted 5/28/61<br />
** This average reading influenced by one high reading from a questionable<br />
replicate.<br />
'<br />
*** Visual rating system:<br />
o - No weed control<br />
- no crop injury~<br />
5 - Complete weed kill - complete cr6pdestruction.
Change language