Vol. 16â1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 16â1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 16â1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
118 the pepperantl tollato expel'1men~"'s :3 rows 36 teet :l.ong. Pepper row. were 4 teef. apart, .While the ~rows wen Slept apart. Treatments were replioated tour tiines in ranllblliized' blocks.,. Herb~cide treatmentS used:l.n'the l$l6Oexpedments are'pi'esented in rsbleJ ,2"antl 3. Sprays were applied
a- Table 2_"COIIlpartsonof' Several" Herbi\)1dEta tor Weed contrP.1~ .-f .-f Transplanted Peppers in 1.960, Georgetown, Delaware • Herbici3: Weed Control on 8/1.9 2, percent Marketable Crop injury and rate Yield, on 7/20, Annual Tons/A percent BroadJ.eats GrasSes Nutgrass TUl8J11 spray3" 4-1.b/k 58 33 85 4.0 0 rar. 61b/A 60 71 89 3.9 0 " , fi.1laa-$p Eptam gramilarJ, 2 1b/A 55 40 83 4.2 0 Eptam granular3 , 4 1.b/A 70 68 95 3.7 28 Amiben granu1ar, 5 1.b/A 85 81. 64 4.9 0 Dacthal. spray, 8 1.b/A 71. 58 38 4.7 0 Dacthal granular, 8 1.b/A 25 53 53 3.7 0 Cultivated check 100 1.00 1.00 3.3 0 Unhoed check 0 0 0 3.8 0 LSD 5% 22.8 27 NS NS 8 1.. Herbicides were applied 6 weeks after plants were set in field. 2. '!his was 7~ weeks after herbicides were applied. 3. These herbicides were incorporated by two cultivations. ) )
- Page 67 and 68: 67 Tablet. 'lIi! EFFECT'or AN'INO'l
- Page 69 and 70: 69 THE INFLUENCE JIt P.I!ll'ROLEUM
- Page 71 and 72: 71 1 CDEC(Ee) 2 " " 3 4 " 5 " " 6 7
- Page 73 and 74: !a~l~ 1._ ~!:.c!: :!!1~hJl!:e.::m~d
- Page 75 and 76: 75 EFFECT;OFCOMPOSITIONANDVOLUMEOF
- Page 77 and 78: A LOGARITHMICSPRAlERFORSMALLPLCflSY
- Page 79 and 80: 79 Do~ Calculations The actual init
- Page 81 and 82: Selective Herbicides for Several Cr
- Page 83 and 84: 83 Susceptible weeds Tolerant weeds
- Page 85 and 86: 85 Marion Market 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Da
- Page 87 and 88: Table 5. Bai
- Page 89 and 90: weeding of Lima Bean. With Chemical
- Page 91 and 92: EFFECTOF HERBICIDESONQUALITYANDYIEL
- Page 93 and 94: Results Date treated: 9/6/61 Soil m
- Page 95 and 96: 95 Date planted: 915/61 Date treate
- Page 97 and 98: Table 3. Yield Data on Hanover and
- Page 99 and 100: Weeding of Carrots With 'pre-lilanU
- Page 101 and 102: 101 WEEDCONTROLSTUDIESIN SEElED ONI
- Page 103 and 104: Weather conditions at the two locat
- Page 105 and 106: In contrast to the damage noted in
- Page 107 and 108: 107 Literature Cited 1. Althaus. R.
- Page 109 and 110: Table 1. Weed control: stand of pla
- Page 111 and 112: Results and Discussion. The data, p
- Page 113 and 114: CIPO, Vegadex, and Randox Singly or
- Page 115 and 116: Table 1•. Wa. control, stand of p
- Page 117: 'Ihree experiments were conducted i
- Page 121 and 122: fJ Table 3. CcBparison of Several.
- Page 123 and 124: c
- Page 125 and 126: Table 1. Seeding and Weed Counts on
- Page 127 and 128: WEEDCONTROLANDTHE IMPROVEMENT OF SE
- Page 129 and 130: Following emergence of the tomato s
- Page 131 and 132: indicates that several of the treat
- Page 133 and 134: DISCUSSIONOF RESULTS Transplant Tom
- Page 135 and 136: harvest was covered with weeds, and
- Page 137 and 138: An additional 2 years of tests on f
- Page 139 and 140: ~ Table 2 .--l Average Number and P
- Page 141 and 142: ~ Table 4 Total Yields in Number an
- Page 143 and 144: "" ~ Table 6 Bvalu~t1.on of S&l~nto
- Page 145 and 146: of weed eoneee I without inj ury 't
- Page 147 and 148: 1. Associate Research Specialist in
- Page 149 and 150: Stulllll&ry A study was lh1tlatedto
- Page 151 and 152: Table 2. The residual effects of se
- Page 153 and 154: FURTHEROBSERVATIONS ONCONTROL OF TH
- Page 155 and 156: Table 3 - Mean per cent brake contr
- Page 157 and 158: lAssociate Research Spec1alist in W
- Page 159 and 160: PRE-E~mRGENCE WEEDCONTROLTEST IN RE
- Page 161 and 162: 161 Table 2. Tolerance of Beets and
- Page 163 and 164: 163 Results generally were good wee
- Page 165 and 166: USE OF GRANULAR CHl!H[CALAPPLICATOR
- Page 167 and 168: u.s. #1 potatoes and weed control e
a- Table 2_"COIIlpartsonof' Several" Herbi\)1dEta tor <strong>Weed</strong> contrP.1~<br />
.-f<br />
.-f<br />
Transplanted Peppers in 1.960, Georgetown, Delaware •<br />
Herbici3: <strong>Weed</strong> Control on 8/1.9 2, percent Marketable Crop injury<br />
and rate Yield, on 7/20,<br />
Annual Tons/A percent<br />
BroadJ.eats GrasSes Nutgrass<br />
TUl8J11 spray3" 4-1.b/k 58 33 85 4.0 0<br />
rar. 61b/A 60 71 89 3.9 0<br />
" ,<br />
fi.1laa-$p<br />
Eptam gramilarJ,<br />
2 1b/A 55 40 83 4.2 0<br />
Eptam granular3 , 4 1.b/A 70 68 95 3.7 28<br />
Amiben granu1ar,<br />
5 1.b/A 85 81. 64 4.9 0<br />
Dacthal. spray, 8 1.b/A 71. 58 38 4.7 0<br />
Dacthal<br />
granular,<br />
8 1.b/A 25 53 53 3.7 0<br />
Cultivated check 100 1.00 1.00 3.3 0<br />
Unhoed check 0 0 0 3.8 0<br />
LSD 5% 22.8 27 NS NS 8<br />
1.. Herbicides were applied 6 weeks after plants were set in field.<br />
2. '!his was 7~ weeks after herbicides were applied.<br />
3. These herbicides were incorporated by two cultivations.<br />
) )
Change language