08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

114<br />

weediOl of Sweec Corn With Chemical Band-cid ..<br />

CharLe.'J. Noll 1<br />

More than half, ot Jiaenll8y1vaD1a'. 24,000 acr .. of .wet corn are weeded<br />

with chemicala. Mo.t 1arg. growr. lrowing for freah _rket us. ch.. ical '.<br />

h.rbicides. A. th.r. i. no lack of good herbicides to weed corn, this experi·<br />

lII8nt wa. deaipe4· to COIIIp8rethe bett.r known ch.. ica1. with tha newch.... &1.<br />

thought to b. promi.inl for the weedinl of thi. crop.<br />

The s•• dbed W8. prepared May 1.5. The pr.·p1anting tr.at1Mnta W8r.<br />

applied just ahead ofs •• dingonMay 17 and incorpo ... ted in the .0U witb .•<br />

rototUler .et.hallow. The vari.ty seeded was. 1tt.The pre· ... ra••• ··<br />

tr.atments w.r. appli.d 2 days aft.r ••• ding. Th. "'1'1.nce tr.atm.nts ....<br />

appU.d 17 day. aft.r seeding wh.n corn was in the .pik. stag.. Individual.<br />

plots were 36 feet long and 3 feet wide. Treatment. were randomized in •• db,<br />

of 6 block ••<br />

The chemicala were applied with a small spra~l'ov.r the row for a width<br />

of 12 inch... Cultivation controlled the weeds betw.nth. rows. An .stWet.<br />

of we.d contro1wa. made July 24 on a bali. of 1 to.O, 1 being most d.sir~l.<br />

and 10 being l .. at d.sirab1e. Corn vas harve.ted Aqu.t 23.<br />

USULTS<br />

Th. results ar. pr.sented in tab1. 1. All ch.. ica1s significant1y1Dcr.""9d<br />

weed control a. compar.d to the untreated chacko Th. best weedCOlKro1<br />

treatments were Atraz1ne, Herb. 326, Diruon .and Pa10D~ The .tand of p1anta w••<br />

unaffected by ,the treatments. Only ~he Atra.tn. and: tPa 2,4·D treated. plot.<br />

had dgn1ficantlymoremark.tabb 88;1 than the unt,...ted' ch.ck.,p10t. A<br />

h:l.gblY·."pUle.at tacna •• in .. iglac o.f mazltetab1e ear., as cc.par.d to _<br />

un,tr.ated check plot was 'ound wh.r. Atraz1ne, 2,4-1> &IMltha lower rate of·<br />

Herb. 326 weI" appu'edat time of Co1'11elll8rpnc. and wh..... DNBPat 6 1ba•.<br />

per acr. and RaD40xat 10 1bs. per acr. w.re appli.d priOr to corn emerpnc ••<br />

Many other chemical. had .ignificant increaaea in welsht of marketab1 •• ar.<br />

at the S%1ev.1 a. compar.d to the untreated check plot.<br />

COHpLUSIQN<br />

Many ch.. icala wh.n applied to corn gave good weed control, no Itand<br />

reduction. and incr.a ••• in yi.ld~. compared to th.untr.ated. ch.ck plots.<br />

Th. outstanding ch.. ical in thi,experiment va. Atraaina.<br />

1 . . .,. , . .<br />

A' sociate Prof.s.or of' 01erlcu1 ture, ~'Department of BoFticu1 ture, Coll.g.<br />

of Agriculture and Bxperiment Sta.tioD, P8IlIlaylvanuoJtat.Univer.lty, Uni.,.reity<br />

Park, Pennsylvanu. ..'<br />

'I'

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!