08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 16—1962 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

101<br />

WEEDCONTROLSTUDIESIN SEElED ONIONSV<br />

J. C. Cialone, G. Bayer and R.D. Sweet.<br />

Introduction<br />

New York with about 15,000 acres ranks all one of the leading onion p:L'0­<br />

ducing sta1ies, with the majority of the production centered in the muck soil<br />

areas where '<strong>Weed</strong>s are a serious problem. Growers have shown great interest in<br />

herbicides as an aid in reducing weeding costs.<br />

Most of the acreage in NewYork this year was treated with cbloro-N-Ndiallyl-acetamide,<br />

CDAA,sold as Randox. This prosram consists of a 6 lb/acre<br />

rate of the liquid formulation of CDAAin the crook stage of onion development<br />

and subsequent applications of the granular formul~ion as they are needed<br />

throughout the remainder of the season. CIPC (cbloro-isopropyl-phenyl carbamate)<br />

is used in combination with the CDAA,primarily in situations were purslane<br />

(Portulaca sp.) has not been controlled by the CDAA. In general, the above two<br />

chemicals have given .very satisfactory results over a wide range of environmental<br />

conditions on muck soils. CDAAdoes have the limitation that it will not control<br />

purslane other·than in the seedling stage of development and does not have a<br />

very long period of residual activity in the soil.<br />

Since CDAAoften gives injury when applied immediately after planting, if this<br />

application is followed by rain, and since liquid formulations may give Uljury<br />

when the onion has reached the nag stage of development, the early period of<br />

safe use is a short and crucial one. l't can readily be seen that with the great<br />

variations in spring weather conditions this period of safe use may not alw.ys<br />

coincide with the stage of weed growth at which CDAAwill be most effective. Any<br />

chemical which could eliminate this crucial timing with respect to the crOp and<br />

still be an effective herbicide would be very valuable. Tests conducted on muck<br />

soil in 1960 by Althaus, Langlois and Gleason (1) indicate that a combination ef<br />

CDAAand TCBC(Tricblorobenzylcbloride) sold as R8l'1doxT, was effective e.ge.1nSt<br />

purslane, gave generally good weed control and g8velittle stand reduction wbOn<br />

used at 6 and 9 qt/acre rates. Romanowski in 1960 (4) indicated that this e

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!