Inception Report - CDEMA
Inception Report - CDEMA Inception Report - CDEMA
disaster risk reduction and reduction or reversal of damage to and loss of natural resources. CANARI is increasingly adopting and training others in outcome mapping, which tracks the impact of project interventions on people’s behaviour and actions, and will therefore introduce this concept briefly in the M&E Section of the Module alongside the more traditional monitoring and evaluation of whether project outputs have been achieved. 3.2.2 Good practice in DRR Climate Change Training and Capacity Building Based on the review of selected community-based disaster management and climate change materials (tool kits, training manuals and videos) listed in Appendix 2, as well as CANARI’s own experience in delivering training and capacity-building workshops, the following elements of good practice in training and pedagogy have been identified as methods and practices that will be used to inform the development of the CDEMA climate change module. a) Use of a range of teaching/training methodologies Each person learns in a different way, and using a range of training methods in a workshop setting accommodates this. Additionally, the use of a various methodologies breaks up the monotony of a training course and engages participants in different ways (see, for example, Concern Universal 5 ; and Coburn et al./UN Disaster Management Training Programme). Each methodology used has its particular strength and utility in a workshop setting. Icebreakers and energisers encourage rapid relationship building and stimulate participants at points in the workshop where their energy has dropped. Lectures, presentations and background reading are useful for conveying knowledge. Whole group discussions allow for the development of a common understanding of certain topics and identify areas where there may be conflict within the group or community. Small group discussions stimulate greater participation from people who are not confident contributing to large group discussions; Questioning techniques promote participant engagement and help to identify participants’ relevant prior knowledge and experience. Brainstorming allows participants to generate several ideas about an issue in a short space of time without others criticising them. Small group work and practical exercises involve participants as actors and allow them to apply information and knowledge gained to their own situation for problem solving. b) Use of Participatory Learning Action (PLA) Tools Participatory learning and action (PLA) tools are particularly useful for community level engagement because they allow not only for information and idea generation but also create space within a training setting for analysis and learning by local people. PLA tools build participation and support communication and conflict resolution, all of which have usefulness outside the workshop setting. Several disaster preparedness manuals incorporate the use of PLA tools (see material by International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies; WWF; Daze et al./CARE International; Abarquez, et al./Asian Disaster Preparedness Center; Bread for All; for example). c) Inclusion of illustrations of tools: The use of illustrations (diagrams and photos) of tools described in training material provides an additional visual support for facilitators. This is particularly useful for facilitators who may not have used a particular tool before. 5 All materials referenced here are listed in more detail in Appendix 2. 6
d) Use of case studies Descriptive, narrative case studies allow for real-life illustration of issues or concepts (see material from IUCN et al. and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, for example). e) Sequential “how to guides” Step by step guides help facilitators and participants work through processes sequentially and when accompanied by illustrations, help users to “see” how a process might unfold (see, for example, material from Bread for All and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies). f) Engaging participants’ creativity Many of CANARI’s workshops have successfully built on the exceptional creativity that many Caribbean people possess by encouraging them to use painting or drawing, craft, singing, poetry, dramatisation, mapping and other forms of expression to present their ideas and findings (see, for example, the workshop report on the workshop Enhancing the role of civil society in raising awareness and building capacity for adaptation to climate change, at http://www.canari.org/ccddr2.asp. This approach works particularly well for strategic visioning (i.e. what would a resilient community look like); designing communications to influence other community members; institutional mapping; and strategic monitoring and evaluation (e.g. ‘body mapping’ of success). 3.3 Drawing on Regional Knowledge, Attitude and Practices studies The design of the Programme and its sub-components will draw on existing baseline studies of the knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) at community level in Caricom countries and other CDEMA participating states, such as the KAP studies undertaken under the Mainstreaming Adaptation to Climate Change (MACC) project; and the KAP study under the 2005 Jamaica Climate Change Enabling Activity project implemented by the local Meteorological Service. CANARI will also draw on its observations of people’s KAP at the workshops it has facilitated for similar target audiences, for example: facilitation of a regional workshop for Commonwealth Foundation entitled Enhancing the role of civil society in raising awareness and building capacity for adaptation to climate change, which brought together civil society organisations, media professionals and performance artists, and subsequently catalysed a whole range of spin-off activities at the national level in the participating countries (see http://www.canari.org/ccddr2.asp). facilitation of workshops in Jamaica, Haiti and Dominican Republic based on the toolkit produced for Christian Aid. 3.4 Specific approach to and activities under the sub-project 3.4.1 Scope of work CANARI has participated in a series of negotiations and a virtual inception meeting on 5 July 2010 with CDEMA and IFRC to review the Terms of Reference and to confirm the scope of work and timeframe for implementation. A second meeting was held on 30 July to further clarify CDEMA’s expectations, based on which the timeframe attached at Appendix 3 was produced, though at the time of writing this has not been agreed by CDEMA 3.4.2 Preparation of an inception report CANARI had agreed with CDEMA on a phased approach to the inception report, with an initial overview of the project and the consultants’ approach being submitted to the Project Steering Committee (PSC) meeting of 13 July 2010. The intention was that the full inception report would then be produced within one week of receipt of comments from the PSC for submission to the CSSSC. However, CDEMA submitted the overview to the CSSSC, with comments from both the PSC and the CSSSC being sent to CANARI on 27 July 2010. This 7
- Page 1 and 2: Inception Report for Development of
- Page 3 and 4: 1. Project background and descripti
- Page 5 and 6: 3. Methodology 3.1 Overall approach
- Page 7: project design and implementation.
- Page 11 and 12: Although the Programme is being des
- Page 13 and 14: produce outputs, such as pictures,
- Page 15 and 16: a) first drafts submitted for revie
- Page 17 and 18: o o o o o o use of participatory vi
- Page 19 and 20: 3.3.10.2 Plan components It is anti
- Page 21 and 22: Jud Clarke, Climate Change and Disa
- Page 23 and 24: 7. Risks The major risk attached to
- Page 25 and 26: Activity title Caribbean Disaster M
- Page 27 and 28: Activity title Disaster Preparednes
- Page 29 and 30: Appendix 2: Review of Selected Comm
- Page 31 and 32: Title Dazé, A., Ambrose K. and C.
- Page 33 and 34: Title Format Target Audience (Prima
- Page 35 and 36: Title Format Target Audience (Prima
- Page 37 and 38: Title No Strings. Tales of Disaster
- Page 39 and 40: Title Pomonis. 1994. Vulnerability
- Page 41 and 42: Title Format Target Audience (Prima
- Page 43 and 44: Week number (w/c date) 1 2 3 4 5 6
- Page 45 and 46: Week number (w/c date) 1 2 3 4 5 6
- Page 47 and 48: Week number (w/c date) 1 2 3 4 5 6
- Page 49 and 50: Week number (w/c date) 1 2 3 4 5 6
- Page 51 and 52: The Caribbean Disaster Emergency Ma
- Page 53 and 54: particularly the community disaster
- Page 55 and 56: c) Inclusion of illustrations of to
- Page 57 and 58: o proposal development and project
disaster risk reduction and reduction or reversal of damage to and loss of natural resources. CANARI is<br />
increasingly adopting and training others in outcome mapping, which tracks the impact of project interventions<br />
on people’s behaviour and actions, and will therefore introduce this concept briefly in the M&E Section of the<br />
Module alongside the more traditional monitoring and evaluation of whether project outputs have been<br />
achieved.<br />
3.2.2 Good practice in DRR Climate Change Training and Capacity Building<br />
Based on the review of selected community-based disaster management and climate change materials (tool<br />
kits, training manuals and videos) listed in Appendix 2, as well as CANARI’s own experience in delivering<br />
training and capacity-building workshops, the following elements of good practice in training and pedagogy<br />
have been identified as methods and practices that will be used to inform the development of the <strong>CDEMA</strong><br />
climate change module.<br />
a) Use of a range of teaching/training methodologies<br />
Each person learns in a different way, and using a range of training methods in a workshop setting<br />
accommodates this. Additionally, the use of a various methodologies breaks up the monotony of a training<br />
course and engages participants in different ways (see, for example, Concern Universal 5 ; and Coburn et al./UN<br />
Disaster Management Training Programme). Each methodology used has its particular strength and utility in a<br />
workshop setting.<br />
Icebreakers and energisers encourage rapid relationship building and stimulate participants at points in<br />
the workshop where their energy has dropped.<br />
Lectures, presentations and background reading are useful for conveying knowledge.<br />
Whole group discussions allow for the development of a common understanding of certain topics and<br />
identify areas where there may be conflict within the group or community.<br />
Small group discussions stimulate greater participation from people who are not confident contributing<br />
to large group discussions;<br />
Questioning techniques promote participant engagement and help to identify participants’ relevant prior<br />
knowledge and experience.<br />
Brainstorming allows participants to generate several ideas about an issue in a short space of time<br />
without others criticising them.<br />
Small group work and practical exercises involve participants as actors and allow them to apply<br />
information and knowledge gained to their own situation for problem solving.<br />
b) Use of Participatory Learning Action (PLA) Tools<br />
Participatory learning and action (PLA) tools are particularly useful for community level engagement because<br />
they allow not only for information and idea generation but also create space within a training setting for<br />
analysis and learning by local people. PLA tools build participation and support communication and conflict<br />
resolution, all of which have usefulness outside the workshop setting.<br />
Several disaster preparedness manuals incorporate the use of PLA tools (see material by International<br />
Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies; WWF; Daze et al./CARE International; Abarquez, et<br />
al./Asian Disaster Preparedness Center; Bread for All;<br />
for example).<br />
c) Inclusion of illustrations of tools:<br />
The use of illustrations (diagrams and photos) of tools described in training material provides an additional<br />
visual support for facilitators. This is particularly useful for facilitators who may not have used a particular tool<br />
before.<br />
5 All materials referenced here are listed in more detail in Appendix 2.<br />
6